How exactly is this possible? How can you want to redistribute everyone's income ,and control the economy...

How exactly is this possible? How can you want to redistribute everyone's income ,and control the economy, and still be considered "libertarian"?

People say it is impossible, but to find a left-libertarian society just look into any black city in the US. Hate for police, education, etc. but gibs me dats and redistribution

Think about native American tribes. They shared everything, and everyone was okay with it because they were an ethnically homogeneous group. You didn't have to force this lifestyle on anyone. There wasn't much of an economy. You just hunted for food, danced around fires, and smoked tobacco all day.

It isn't accurate. That test put me and everyone I know who took it in the same green spot

fuckin best lols
its so true.
I hate guvmunt
i hate police
sheet my brudda been shot police where yall at?
whah my welfur layt?
dah fuck guvment
dis wah we hayt yuuu

This is another good example

but the gibs come from theft (taxation) so it's still authoritarian

Does it require abundance? Like are bonobos with their abundant food a left libertarian society? Everyone is free, all is distributed, because no one has to make anything and nothing runs out. ??

So left libertarian, if that's it, would be Eden.

Anarchists are "libertarian" in that they reject the existence of the state but everyone else in the green square (the socially liberal left-wing type) is authoritarian

black markets

>being this stupid

based 0,-0.5 here. former -0.5,-0.5. it's about ideals, not practical governance. most people in the green square would quickly move either right, right+up, or up (copter ride time) if they were given any governmental responsibility

same is true of purples to a lesser extent. it wouldn't change their ideals, just their pragmatic intermediates

>inb4 USSR was intermediate to fullcommunism

It's a contradiction, sure, but you'll still find plenty of fucking retards that believe in both premises.

why don't we just defund police in black areas? it's what they want.

I'm kind of this: when I do the test, I believe I get anarcho-socialist. It may seem paradoxical, but my official stance is that everyone should be allowed to do what they want, but first everyone should work together to make sure we all have standard basic necessities, such as a tiny concrete house, root vegetables beans and rich, and basic non-labeled clothing.

Basically, my utopia is that everyone agrees to build a fuck-ton of tiny houses and have a farming reserve. You can have that, but then after that condition is met, everything else is deregulated and free market. You can do any drugs you want, sleep with prostitutes, own guns or even military grade equipment. There is no taxation other than the labor you agree to for the first 5 years of your adult life (you have to build a house for you self and maybe two others, until it's no longer practical to build houses). It might not actually be possible, but it makes sense in my head.

...

It's only possible in smallish communities where their members can keep checks on each other and punish or banish a member. Capitalism thrives on exploiting the faceless and the rule enforcers are commonly not held accountable, hence the huge disparities.

Bottom left wants infinite genders. Top left wants no genders Bottom left wants money for everyone, top left wants to destroy money as a concept. It's bleeding heart liberalism vs communism.

Everyone else is sane. Comprende?

>socialist economic views
>liberal social views

This is what "the state" looks like in Ancapistan.

Turn back now; you look to soft for freedom.

>redistribute everyone's income
When you're in the lower income brackets and dont have much to redistribute. It looks like a good idea, i mean, it cant get any worse.