Moral Dilemma

Right now we have a choice and we have to make that choice now. There are millions of people fleeing war and famine from many middle eastern countries who are in urgent need of refuge. Western nations have the land and resources to shelter these people, and under normal conditions these people would be accepted into our societies. However, many working class people in the West don't want to let these people in. Why? Many will say that they don't want refugees because of the economy or because of unemployment and some genuinely feel this way. Others have more prejudice reasons. Racism and Islamophobia to name a few. As much as my heart goes out to the working class of developed nations, they are not in need. The refugees are in need. The way I see it we have a serious moral dilemma here. If we listen to the public: millions will die. The other option is to ignore the public, suspend our constitutions and force the people to let the refugees in. As much as it pains me to say this. We need to suspend democracy in order to save the people it exists for!

Other urls found in this thread:

cream-migration.org/files/FiscalEJ.pdf
theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/apr/01/immigrationpolicy.immigrationandpublicservices
data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?locations=DE-FR-PL-US-JP
iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country
theconversation.com/election-factcheck-are-many-refugees-illiterate-and-innumerate-59584
youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

they put themselves in that situation. they decided to overthrow their functional governments and tear their own countries apart.

let them sit and suffer in their own mess.

maybe it'll discourage other countries from making the same mistakes.

Let them die. Why do they deserve the fruit of our labor? They can build they're own nations

>Right now we have a choice and we have to make that choice now.

Nope. This is a human catastrophe made of US/Israel foreign policy.

Send them to africa or china or Israel! Those countries desperately need to be diversified.

Many of them would love to! But because of socio economic reasons they can't! The vast majority of them come here for work. They want a safe country to raise their children in. They're not much different than you and I.

>They
Sociol-economic reasons? You're going to have to shill better than that you god damn kike. They have no one to blame but themselves, they shall reap what they sow

Because the grandparents of the people in the west whitnessed the greatest war in human history and managed to rebuild their country with iron will and the dedication to bring a happy and prosperous life to their children.
Now they and their children see how all that they worked for is being given away for free to people who, for the most part, can't even read. They get dolmetchers for the bearucratic part, they get 70m^2 flats where native college students have to live with 3 people. Many of them, despite coming from shitholes, are so shameless and cry to media about how inhumane it is in their camps in order to get a flat quicker.
Do you think they will go back when the war has ended?
Never.

The worst part though is that the political left weaponized the grandchildren of the war generation against them and call them out for being nazis and racist, while they are only defending their life's work.

Just listen to yourself! It's no wonder people hate our country. Fuck you and fuck your victim blaming!

>socio economic reasons they can't!
>come here for work.
>want a safe country to raise their children in.

Even more reason to stay where they are at, building their own nation and investing in their blood and sweat in their country. They want a secure country? Be a cop or a soldier. IN THEIR OWN NATION.

I'd imagine there were tremendous hardship when the colonies were being established. Hardship crossing the plains to the West.

This country has literally spent billions of dollars and thousands of lives for Europe to keep out the Russians.
And the EU is in the process of welcoming in an invasion force of military aged males into their countries. 3/4 of the refugees.

Are you one of those college students that's a part of that community betterment workshop or whatever?
This dilemma will get an obvious answer here.
Gas the kikes, behead the Muslims, race war now.

In the civil war I will enjoy watching you hang Scum

lol! I should of known you were a confederate red neck!

The day is coming, your days are numbered friend

You could save 10x as many people by setting up safe zones within the middle east.

You're literally condemning 9/10 refugees by bringing them here.

You don't care about refugees. You care about the pussy you can get by pretending to care about the refugees.

/thread

...

...

>europe, 2022
>automation rails job market, sends millions into unemployment pool already saturated with useless muslims
>resources become scarce, fight for survival starts
>welfare systems start to collapse
>massive ethnic conflicts start to break out
>balkans on a much larger scale, with ethnic genocide on both sides
>hyper-altruistic white europeans get purged thinking they're helping the poor muslims


>mfw this WILL happen and europeans are too cucked to realize its coming

refugees can get fucked, shits about to hit the fan with or without them

Send all of them to Israel. It's time the jews receive the joy of diversity.

send them to isreal. We're currently at capacity for third world charity cases

>Moral Dilemma
no. kill all niggers, and kill all the kikes that enable them.

These foreign people overbreed & did not set up stable societies.
Why are their fuckups our problem?

...

Are you one of the college students trying to brigade Sup Forums?

Anyway I'll bite. My duty as an American is towards Americans. I don't care about what happens to refugees. Refugees can come in if they have something beneficial to offer our society.

If you want to serve refugees you should invite one to your home and house and clothe them.

Listening to cucks like you is why America will cease to be a country in 20 years.

Them being muslim is a legitimate reason not to let them in. Islam is incompatible with western society, get that through your head.

>We need to suspend democracy in order to save the people it exists for!

TIL American democracy existed for Middle Eastern Islamists. What a shithead cuck!!

Thankfully he's probably in loads of debt and wont be able to reproduce.

Allow them in.

Select designated are for them.

Send your huge military to crush isis

Focus on rebuilding syria

Send them back with gift baskets.

This would be done if the world was fair and israel didnt control the us government and the truth was spoken.

Cool, so have you set up tent space in your yard or offered your couch?

What of the point that for every 1 refugee we can help by relocating them to Europe, we can help 10 refugees by providing shelter and food in the Middle East?

4 BILLION africans by 2060.
What the fuck are 4 BILLION of them going to contribute towards?
I suppose pure European Cacasions will number around 100 million then, yep Mars habitats are a certainty.

If they were "fleeing from war" they would go to the nearest country and start from there , they have a plan to go to the most welcoming places for them and just take over the country

Why should we care?

Human brains, like monkey brains, are hardwired to care about people in our immediate tribe. The average first-worlder can hear about refugees drowning or Syrians getting gassed, and they'll say "this is a travesty, what a shame!", but then forget about it after an hour to tend to their own lives and worries. They likely spend more on frivolities Netflix and Starbucks than they do on humanitarian aid and charities simply because the human capacity for giving a fuck is limited

>Western nations have the land and resources to shelter these people
Wrong

> under normal conditions these people would be accepted into our societies
Wrong, normal conditions imply no kikery.

>don't want refugees because of the economy or because of unemployment
>cream-migration.org/files/FiscalEJ.pdf
>theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/apr/01/immigrationpolicy.immigrationandpublicservices
Because immigration has zero net benefit for the economy. It does however have a heavy social cost.

>Others have more prejudice reasons. Racism and Islamophobia to name a few.
Racism is a commie term to divide and conquer swaths of populations and has no bearing. It's islamomisia and not phobia. Don't fear islam, I know what it is, and I hate it. Use proper terms.

> As much as my heart goes out to the working class of developed nations, they are not in need. The refugees are in need.
So, you don't care about the working class of developed nations, yet want to increase it with "refugees". In other words, you're only looking for brownie points.

> The way I see it we have a serious moral dilemma here. If we listen to the public: millions will die.
Not a moral dilemma. Do you believe in evolution? If so, then their deaths are necessary for the advancement of the human species.

>The other option is to ignore the public, suspend our constitutions and force the people to let the refugees in.
So be dictatorial, and get rid of democracy to protect democracy. Makes a lot of sense.

>We need to suspend democracy in order to save the people it exists for!
So not the "refugees" then.

You don't make any sense.

> and under normal conditions these people would be accepted into our societies
No, stop right there. Under 'normal conditions', these people would absolutely not be accepted into our societies. The idea that the West is the dumping ground for all of the world's unwanted people is a modern invention, created by leftists to destroy Western identity and co-opted by globalists to drive down wages. Under 'normal conditions', we would tell these people to fuck off and find their own land instead of bending over and offering our ass to them. There is no moral dilemma here, the only dilemma you face is whether you stand with your people, or with the foreign hordes of Afghanistan, Syria, Somalia, etc.

Pretty much. Most people don't even realize that europe has one destination: hell.

They are our enemy, declared from their own mouths. We are beating them terribly and have made them a nice rubble pile to sleep on. I would have no moral problem ordering our forces to finish the job then to move into Germany and, France and kill the enemy there.

People like yourself are the problem. They started this war and i want to finish it for good. Their technique of hiding in their families house poses No problem to me. Kill them all. Islam is a Theocracy. It cannot exist in a democracy or even coward socialist society. Let us finish the job and just stay the fuck out of the way.

Islam is doomed. I would be glad to give the order to finish the job on the whole planet including Indonesia.

Be glad I'm not in command because sympathizers are even worst than the Islamic enemy.

Have a great day!

They arent citizens so arent afforded the same protections as X country

Cant handle it? Neck yourself, you faggot.

Quite simply, Westerners, at least those who subscribe to the ideologies present in Sup Forums, wish to see the continuation of their culture.

Of the horde of immigrants flooding into Europe, 2/3rds (correct me if I'm wrong) are illiterate in their own language, are generally uneducated, and on average have a fairly low IQ (~82 on average in the ME).

If this wasn't enough, studies and surveys demonstrate that their offspring, paradoxically, are in fact more radicalised and fundamentalist than their parents. This is to say, to OP and more sheltered readers, that they are more likely to respond that, say, it is moral to execute homosexuals, that terrorism in the interest of Islam is justified, that those who criticise Allah or his prophet should be met with punitive measures, etc.

Next, it must also be understood that these populations will within a relatively short period of time begin to supplant the native populations in terms of numerical superiority - relative to the existence of Western Civilisation, that is. The reason for this is severalfold: Current trends in the West discourage high fertility amongst natives, from my understanding, Islam promotes high fertility, and thirdly, the welfare state and government privileges granted to minorities allow for the raising of many children.

Although it pains me to do so, with these premises in mind, there can be only one conclusion:

If the Islamic population increases, and
the Islamic population becomes more fundamentalist, and
Europe continues to be a democratic, representative system, then
Europe will become fundamentally Islamic.

As I watched a speech of Stefan Molyneux (most 4channers should be familiar w/ him) he captured this existential crisis perfectly (do be cautious and please do not take my words verbatim as I am paraphrasing): From one fire may light spread from torch to torch, but if that one light is put out, then forever there will be darkness, and only darkness, ad infinitum.

Not even sure if you're a troll.

What's wrong with Making Africa Great? Do that, every people should make the their nation and culture great, period. Don't take anyone in.

>they put themselves in that situation

>they put themselves in that situation.

Fuck em. I know it's not the moral decision and I'm OK with that because it's the correct one, we shouldn't even have allowed this many in and are already doomed to war and internal conflict because of it.
The Arab spring and the collapse of the governments in that region is analogous to the collapse of many great empires throughout history and you can see the same cycles play out over an over, the evidence supports keeping them out to be in our collective best interests. In times like these feelings must take a back seat to self preservation and the survival of your nation and people, we will not allow the left to throw us all under the bus in order simply in order to satiate their compulsive desire to feel like good people and pat themselves on the back.

>they put themselves in that situation...

they're all niggers...

>they put themselves in that situation.

Sources:
data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?locations=DE-FR-PL-US-JP

iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country

theconversation.com/election-factcheck-are-many-refugees-illiterate-and-innumerate-59584 (This source, specifically of refugees to Australia from my understanding (it's implied but not certain) places illiteracy closer to 1/3)

I was unable to substantiate all claims, so please do your own research where I cannot.

take the children, the women and the elders. Fuck men of fighting age, fuck those cowards and send back the already migrated cowards aka 72% of the immigrants in europe alone.

If you could 100% guarantee they'd be deported when the war ended, maybe.

As it is, I'm suspicious when they're nearly *all* single males my age.....that's a fucking invasion you imbecile.

They are just going to bring their problems with them if they migrate to richer countries. Let them solve their own problems.

youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE

Deportation of refugees at war's end?

Better chance of fitting all the toothpaste back into the tube.

I think OP took a "Safe Break"

i get the referance

I'm not against helping people in desperate need, but we should help them where they live.

The cost of helping on person in a western country is 10 times that of helping them where they live.

Other benefits include:

* easier reintegration into their home countries when the conflicts is over

* a cultural and climatical environment they're more used to

* avoidance of conflicts with basis in religion or culture

* the fact that the most desperate people who can't make the journey from The Middle East to Germany or Sweden are left behind and who helps them when all resources are spent on those people who can afford the trip economically and health wise?

Mass migration isn't sustainable and I think you present a false dichotomy. The question isn't if we should help or not it's how.