Choose wisely

Well, Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=eoTSo1uB22c
armouredmedia.com/blog/where-are-skeptics
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Who is 1?

The Jewish ones

>7
You can't cuck the Tuck

>no shapiro

what's the point

3 7 9

Good point. I will need to remake this.

Lauren, Tucker and Molymeme. But seriously, Shapiro should be on there.

Tuck
Hannity
Molymeme

Alternatively if it's just a screaming match
Jones
Michael Savage
Molymeme

1,5,9

9, 1, and 6.

inb4 "where is shapiro??" x100

Molymeme, Tucker, and Shapiro

Jones, wilson, molymeme

Milo, Tucker, Lauren

666

Hannity, Tucker & Milo

After I chose them, I became so proud of myself for realizing that a year ago, I couldn't tell you who any of those people were, nor did I care. What a degenerate loser I was, sheesh...

4 7 9

milo

literally all of them are pants on head retarded, but at least tomi is hot

5,6 for that brittish sarcasm.
7 for Tucks cuckbuster missiles as a finisher.

alex jones and a few bottles of super male vitality

shapiro is on it, hes just too short to show up in the pic

Choose 4 and 8
Debate topic: muh dick
leftie gets to watch

watson tucker and stefan hands down

Paul front and center, Tucker as backup, Alex is the muscle

1, Shapiro, and Alex jones for the bantz

If you pick 4 5 or 6 you are a certified fag

Anyone who doesn't take Rees-Mogg is a fucking retard.

2 4 8
alex for lulz and hot bitches so I can smell them

/thread

Molymeme to tell liberals they are not presenting an argument.

Tucker to laugh at them

And Lauren Southern to sit on my face.

All of them are worthless unless I just want to shout endlessly about identity politics

obviously Hannity watson and alex

i would do better alone. none of them are even natsoc. they just hold simple political views like plain conservatism which is the easiest shit to argue for. maybe alex jones talks about "globalists", but he still backs down on actual topics that might be slightly challenging to argue for. nobody in there would even go up against the actual enemy of whites (jews). idk who #1 is

Neither of them act like the average British person

>no shapiro
>no peterson
>no e Michael jones
>no david wood

Jesus fucking Christ OP

6. Because He's great with the kids
7. Can't Cuck the Tuck
9. Quick wits and analogies make easy work of the competition.

Tuck the Cucker
Molymeme Argument Supreme
Milo Machine gun wit

/thread

Easy. 5,6,7

4 7 8

bang 4 & 8 while 7 argues

Where's Gavin at?

Lahren, Southern and Milo.

These three will push me to reject the right and embrace the left because these three are so fucking annoying.

1,4,8

1 is all I need to debate lefties. 4 and 8 for fun and victory celebrations

Jordan Peterson as the MOAB

Tomi and Lauren as support for my nuts.

Faith as my waifu.

cuckshed

would take michael savage every time

Easy 2 3 and 7

Michael Savage
Tucker Carlson
Alex Jones

>assuming it takes 4 smart people to debate a single leftie
>wasting your time trying to provide facts and reasoning when they only care about feels

...

Gavin can't argue. Besides, he's too busy drinking his own piss

Alex, Tucker, and Stefan

It takes a smart person to be able to properly assess a debate and attack using feelings
Not that the left posses this sort of competency for the most part - they rely on social stigma, not dynamic emotional manipulation

>everyone picking tucker

the guy sucks trans dick at debating , he goes up againts retards and kids and he still doesnt get his message across he just repeats exactly what the guest say in a mocking voice and asks "is that what your saying??" and then when their guest is explaining he just sits there with that stupid ass look on his face

underrated

Pick 7, let him handle everything.

Choose 4 and 8 then have a three way with them.

2, 6, and 9

2 and 6 will get under the manchild's skin, forcing the lefty to lose composure, and 9 and myself will deliver a series of devastating and articulate, yet undeniable point, with each point dissecting his "argument", before we all strike the final blow, causing the opponent to lose his mind as well as bladder control.

Ben Shapiro with two picks sacrificed to make it okay to select a Jew

Rees-Mogg
look him up.
youtube.com/watch?v=eoTSo1uB22c

Tuck, Shapiro, & Meteor

Lauren Southern, Milo and molyneux

My alternative pick would be

Jordan peterson, Sargon of akkad and Gavin Mcinnes though.

Milo, Shapiro and Peter Hitchens

Jared Taylor is the only correct option.

Tomi, Lauren, and Tucker
Let's Tucker debate while I take the two ladies back to my house !

With a side of Jordan Peterson for the mentally ill tranny issues.

Pick Lauren and the other girl. Let Molyneux sort it out while I have a threesome.

Tucker and Milo I suppose. I'm surprised that Ben Shapiro is absent. I suppose in the final analysis they're all demagogues and wouldn't debate earnestly

Samuel Jared Taylor, William F. Buckley Jr. and John Enoch Powell.

Molyneax to handle the debate, Louren and Tomi for threesome.

Bottom row.

Holy shit kill yourself

okay

Alex Jones twice and Milo so I can put a bullet in his head while Alex holds him down

Now choose faggots

Hannity is all you really need, but I'll take the Tuckmeister and MadBones Jones also.

also

>No Peterson
>no Savage so I can watch an angry jew manlet scream at lefties

579

Any of the others are literally retarded

9 three times to nullify any arguments.

No Ann Coulter?

Some of TJ's opinions infuriate me but when I've seen him debate on his podcast his arguments are pretty logical. So him.

468 is the baywatch of politics
259 is enough to make most lefties feel like shit.
137 is just overkill lmao

Unironically Sargon is the least obnoxious of the 4

I pick three of Alex Jones, I want them all to speak at the exact same time as well.

I pick molyneaux, tucker, and one of the women to be decided at a later date when I know who they are and which one has the tighter pussy.

I have no idea who any of these faggots are.

The answer is clear

2 5 9

IMAGINE MY SHOCK WHEN GAY FROGS ARENT AN ARGUMENT

Jesus Christ this can't be real. Someone couldn't really think this motif was aesthetic or badass, right?

Who /fridgecore/ here?

6,7,1
or
6,7,9

literally who

>Implying Hannity, Jones and Tucker aren't shit at debating

Sargon is the superior option
He might be a bit left wing for me
But he at least can form good arguments
Also he's the only one that doesn't make me cringe

Half those choices are cancer the other half is basic


Peterson and Ron Paul

6,7,9

Alex Jones and Alex Jones and Alex Jones. Becuase I want to see what the hell the three of Alex Jones would come up with.

And I want to see Alex Jones fighting Alex Jones while fighting Alex Jones.

He is the only one I think could walk on a bus without saying I AM FREE THINKER/ATHIEST/whatever the hell they come up with today.

all of the above are faggot nu-male (((Trump))) supporters.

I'll bring with me Millennial Woes, David Duke and Richard Spencer.

armouredmedia.com/blog/where-are-skeptics

Reverse image search brought me here. I was never really one for "hating e-celebs", but now I understand the cancer. That article was self-aggrandizing, pseudo-intellectual, poorly written cancer. How do people take this faggot seriously? He used the word "reasonist" instead of rationalist, he cant speak in anything over than a simple sentence without making it a run-on and worst of all is the pompous air in which he presents himself. Jesus fucking Christ.