K fags. Post yours

K fags. Post yours.

8values.github.io/index.html

Other urls found in this thread:

8values.github.io/results.html?e=88.4&d=65.4&g=71.5&s=64.6
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

no I'm for real, here's my other one.

Oh. You should kill yourself, then.

>Libertarian Communism

if it's not fascist capitalism, it's shit

sup senpai

...

Me

...

hello friends

...

I'm very similar to this, although I'm not sure why I can't download that picture as I'm on my phone.

Last time I checked I was more of a Social Moderate... All things must come to an end I guess.

Picture didnt post...

One person saying no cannot stop the collective. The collective is so overwhelming that it need not use violent authority. The individual has no wealth or land in the eyes of the collective and therefore said individual's wealth/land/power are never deemed legitimate. If an individual wants to leave the collective, he will have to be willing to accept the consequences of that. When that turns out to mean that he has absolutely no access to any wealth or to any of the benefits of society, he must willingly return to the collective.

But let's say a couple thousand individuals say no

...

>Neo liberal

Is this thing really working? I marked all the nationalist answers + free market ones.

And 300 million say yes? Then those couple thousand still, basically exist within a vaccuum, and potency/potential cannot exist within a vaccuum. If they are not legitimized, then obviously they are not legitimate.
Essentially, if the society in which you live does not legitimize your wealth or power, you have none (at least in a relative sense), and there is no need, therefore, to seize anything. When the couple of thousand have starved themselves long enough of all the offerings of the collective, they will likely return, by force of natural consequence alone.

...

What's good my guys?

...

As stereotypical as it may be, I am currently naked.

I can get Stalinist and Fascist-Capitalist if I cuck the program, so yes it is working.

>Libertarian Socialism
Wut, also I don't know how the fuck I'm a neocon but ok

First time I did it I got right wing populism and the second was moderate conservative

Its possible. Modern american libertarianism is honestly just different from traditional libertarianism.

Fuck off from pol

>having more than 5% communism
off yourselves, statists

Capitalist Fascism.

...

>libertarian communism
>"it's "libertarian" because you can take liberties with other people's shit"

kekm8

>Modern american libertarianism
...is extremely market-oriented.

Disappointed in myself. Progress should have 100% over Tradition.

...

...

Yeah, I can get behind that

rate me, Sup Forums

wp

Socialism is the best next step after capitalism brought a nation to a point of plentiful manufacture and wealth. We're rapidly automating almost every type of production now. Socialism will stimulate people to take risks, experiment, innovate, be creative. In short: everything computers and machines can't do.

The "socialism is always good/bad" vs "capitalism is always good/bad" debate is extremely simplistic. It's all about timing.

Right-Wing Populism

Really activates the almonds

Apparently being in favor of regulations to protect consumers makes you half commie.
Is there a way to throw only half of me out of a helicopter?

...

...

>Libertarian
>Socialism
Literal oxymoron.
How were you retards not retroactively aborted?

Same here.

Isn't this basically Alt-right?

Here you go.

I don't see why people persist on this being an oxymoron.

You might not, but plenty of people take corporate power seriously. This means you basically have a choice to either be trampled over by an organ that holds profit in the highest regard, or a government which, if properly held in check to keep it clean of corruption, is by the people for the people.

The free market isn't a free situation because once the financial hierarchy is established, you will nonetheless end up with a group of people dictating your lives because money is power.

If you aren't getting traditionalist, get off this fucking board

tradition is gay, religitard

wp?

...

...

interesting stuff.

...

>"If you move, I'll shoot you"
BANG
>"it's not my fault, his life wasn't legitimate"

Mine

I guess this is correct

Do you fags even own a child army?

in the end, this is meaningless since every politician is just in it to fill their own pockets

Hello balanced cucks

Isnt this just ancap lite?

Accurate.

weird. they changed it. before, it said pacifist and egalitarian for me instead of social and internationalist

...

...

I guess i'm not as "authoritarian" as you to be "capitalist" destu :I

Happy with this desu

...

...

pretty vanilla. i didn't do any strongly agree/disagree

If yours isn`t the same as mine, please kill yourself

hay

...

...

...

>ITT corporate cucks

...

...

>Socialism will stimulate people to take risks, experiment, innovate, be creative.

What's the point of taking risks and putting effort into something if the possible rewards are taken away from you.

i suppose it wrapped around to anarchism due to not being able to label such a totalitarian ideology...

i'd describe myself as a bureocratic collectivist but not communist at all. even though stalin and north korea were the closest to my ideal society they were tainted with the ideas of socialism. fascism is too liberal btw.

I for one can't wait to do it out of passion and philanthropy. There are many like that. Also, it's all about balance. I'm talking socialism after all - not communism. Good work will always pay off and make you richer than others. It's just safer to do it, because a situation of losing money is less dangerous. As a bonus, people will be less scared, less angry, less prone to do crime, less mental healthcare is required.

The only thing that's holding me back and keeps me working in a safe comfortzone is the risks involved with investing in in something new.

>Autocratic

Best results coming through

Am I doing this right ?

The most perfect ancap i've ever seen. I must shed a tear before this masterpiece.
Btw this is my result.

...

So you want to privatize profits but socialise losses which leads to people taking ridicilous risks with stupid ideas and the system runs out of money. If you really have a good business idea you can get investors to get you going. There's a reason why people don't want to invest in stupid/risky ideas.

>Who Bernie here?

>Libertarian Communism

...

8values.github.io/results.html?e=88.4&d=65.4&g=71.5&s=64.6

Economic Axis: Socialist

88.4%

Diplomatic Axis: Peaceful

34.6%
65.4%

Civil Axis: Liberal

71.5%
28.5%

Societal Axis: Progressive

35.4%
64.6%

Closest Match: Libertarian Communism

Hello comrade

Also rare

I guess I can do better by aging.

...

Look up Dom.
But Bernie is a fucking cuck.

Glad to see another!

huh