I'll start

I'll start

>Plato's Republic
>Wealth of nations
>communist manifesto (to understand the enemy)
>the Bible (new and old testaments)
>Art of war
>The Prince
>1984
>Brave new world

contribute

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=V8Dn7X2BIbQ
youtube.com/watch?v=6phCHk4UEpw&list=PL6071CE85CCEFF440
mega.nz/#F!B4dB2SzQ!h_pMC30v2a_y31iD0dy0sg
youtube.com/playlist?list=PL22J3VaeABQAT-0aSPq-OKOpQlHyR4k5h
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Shit, I forgot the thread subject.

Required Sup Forums reading.

plato's republic is a collectivist nightmare

Sneaky SURVEY Thread

1 / 2

2 / 2

youtube.com/watch?v=V8Dn7X2BIbQ

^^ Only for intellectual American white nationalists ^^

the ultimate red pill on how women destroy civilization

HOLY SHIT SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU HAVE BEEN IN EVERY THREAD FOR THE LAST 2 DAYS SPAMMING THIS SHIT

Title or not, keep going Mr huehue. I haven't read a book in years and need to find some good reads

Thanks mate, this is a pretty solid reading list.

What's your favourite of all these books?

1984
BNW
Bible
St. Augustine Works
Pensees by Pascal

And a lot of history, read both personal accounts and overviews.

-Rome
-Crusades
-Various revolutions (french, american, russian, the various English rebellions etcetc)
-Greece
-Protestant Reformation
-WW2, Korea, etc

Brodie I'm reading 'Art of war' too rn. Have reserved 'Plato's Republic' and 'Beyond Good and Evil' on the local library. Have also ordered the Communist Manifesto to arrive soon this May. I have several bibles but don't read much religious texts, I plan on reading 'The History of Religious Ideas', '1984', 'Brave New World', 'Crime and Punishment' among others soon enough. Have a long to read list. A lot of interesting books

Genealogy of Morals
Beyond Good and Evil
Phenomenology Of Spirit (So you can completely debunk commies)
Common Sense
The Social Contract
Meditations
Politics by Aristotle
Summa Theologica

You shouldn't have bothered ordering the communist manifesto, it takes like an hour and a half to read.

>123670449
Data drying up?
what a shame
not

>communist manifesto
>reading propaganda for peasants

somebody post the pic with the required readings before you can understand Nietzsche properly. I think it mentioned Plato and Dostoevsky but I don't remember the titles.

So what do you read in order to understand gommunism?

>Phenomenology Of Spirit (So you can completely debunk commies)

What? Commies adhere to Hegel's writings, and it makes sense to do so.

Sorrows of Empire
Blowback
Confessions of an Economic Hitman

Starship Troopers to make up your mind about fascism

Fair point

this, I've read a bit over half now and whilst I agree with somethings I find that they have the wrong approach to many things.

Keynes shouldn't be there. Unlike Marx who should be well known for being full of shit, he will be just confusing.

Has anybody read "The gulag archipelago" and is it worth it?

So you believe in the historical dialectic?

I believe the most powerful means of defeating communists is to reject historical determinism all together

The actual econ book?

I don't know if I believe in it, what I'm saying is, Hegel will not help you "disprove" communism, you would know this if you had read Hegel, the concept of "disproving" is something that Hegel violently rejects.

And even if he didn't, the content of his writings will support communist revolutions.

Those are all fascist learning books except for 1984, the bible, and communist manfesto.

Hmmmm....

Yes it does, because you're completely rejecting an integral part of the epistemology which drove marx's conclusions.

>a troublesome inheritance

...

This is the biggest redpill, you will cry for a week.

I don't see how "Wealth of Nations" is a fascist leaning book.

old man and the sea

become a man

>>Art of war
This is a stupid meme. No one actually reads this shit, they just claim too to look deep. Go read it for yourselves, and report back if you find ANYTHING new and insightful. Most of it is "don't fight when you don't have enough men, if you have more men than the enemy you will surely win, if you have fewer men than victory can only be achieved by not fighting"

This is pretty obvious shit, if you need it spelled out for you in poorly written chinese poetry then your fucking retarded.

Pic unrelated

The creature from jeckyll island.

And if you really want to understand the enemy, read 50 Shades of Gray.

Amen, amen, Eastern Orthodox Bible is the translation to use for the New testament and a translation of the septuagint (OSB) is the one to use for the Old testament. Translated by the Orthodox community. No (((protestant))) theology present.

Plato's Republic is shit tier. Plato is basically taking Socrates' prestige and using incredibly leading questions for a stupid audience to present Plato's idea of a utopia. A shitty one at that.

We. Best novel I've ever read.

-Nicomachean Ethics by Aristotle

>Politics
>Summa

Patrician taste, Dad.

The art of war is a bit shitty to be honest. Very obvious observations.

yes, and?

democracy is the biggest bluepill in history

>Plato's idea of a utopia
It's a pretty solid one.

...

Coup d'État: A Practical Handbook

Nah it sucks dick.

Well if this thread is about fascism then I guess H. R. Morgan

I'm reading this at the moment and it is pretty incredible stuff. The stories involved are terrifying and heartbreaking, and it leaves you not only with a new hatred for communism, but a deep sadness for those people forced to live under it. At the time, Solzhenitsyn really thought that his writing this would result in his return to the gulags, or worse, so it's amazing to see his willing commitment to record these horrors regardless, I doubt many of us could do the same in similar situations.

Will really make you hate commies though.

Fukuyama: The end of history.

Why? Because he analyzes the rise and succes of western civilization. He invokes the greek notion of Thymos, which I think will please the average Sup Forums user: People want to be recognized by peers. Universal recognition does not work, and thus he provides good arguments against globalization.

Samuel Huntington: Clash of civilizations. The future battle and conflicts in the world will be caused by cultural disagreements. I.g. clash between christian and islamic civilizations

>Plato's utopia
>good
BRAZILIAN INTELLECTUAL HERE

kys

>no Mein Kampf
If you haven't read it yet, you're doing yourself a disservice.

>Audiobook
youtube.com/watch?v=6phCHk4UEpw&list=PL6071CE85CCEFF440

I heard about it from Peterson. He said in the Joe Rogan podcast he did that this was the best handbook you can use to debate your commie co-students and teachers.

Will try to pick it up later, didn't Solzhenitsyn win a nobel/pulitzer prize for this book thought?

Dune, Children of Dune, and Dune Messiah

Sure, not philosophy in and of itself but it has a lot of weight to it.

Maybe im biased as fuck cause i read it when i was 12 and internalized a fair amount of ideas from it. Ie


"I must not fear.
Fear is the mind-killer.
Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain."

Which has given me the courage to make more virtuous decisions in complicated situations.

did you know catcher in the rye is about freemasonry?

Elaborate please, I had to read it in middle school with english not being my first language. I didn't understand the deeper meaning of a depressed teen that only whined about the world.
*though

Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald

i forget all the details but basically the night he slept over at his teachers house it was his indoctrination into the society. Id do a few googles about it if you wanna know more. Its really interesting.

>The creature from jeckyll island.
This

Not that I am aware of, though it should be. It doesn't get enough promotion in the west because in one of his later books he apparently calls out the jews for their part in early soviet bolshevism. Which, while true, was not particularly (((popular))) and lefty's have latched onto this criticism as their only response to his revelation of the true horrors of there "utopia"

Are you guys able to read The Republic at a decent speed? I feel like I read this book super slow.

Not what you guys might call "redpilled", just a list of what I've read recently:

>War Without Garlands
>Black Rednecks & White Liberals
>The Law
>Manufacturing Consent
>The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial Of Human Nature
>Capitalism & Freedom
>Auschwitz, The Nazi's And The Final Solution
>The Social Contract
>The Communist Manifesto
>Ancient Worlds: An Epic History of East and West

Bump.

FINALLY someone who has actually read it!
what of The Prince? it's been over a decade since I last looked at it but I recall having a similar perspective

I listened to an audiobook of it in an afternoon, that's what I do with most of the suggestions I get from Sup Forums. I only buy a copy if I know I want to revisit certain parts/ give the book my full attention.

I did read it and not it wasn't that retarded.It was just forgettable

>The 48th laws of power
>Thus Spake Zarathustra (and everything else by Neetzschee)
>Democracy: The God That Failed
Also books about evolutionary psychology. We are tribal animals evolved in a natural biosocial environment that's hugely different from the civilization we constructed, and by understanding our past, modern human behaviour starts making a lot more sense.

Art of War is old as Dog but it contains true basic wisdoms. It's not enough for something to be common sense, the knowledge really has to be ingrained in your way of thinking. So if someone is a bit uncertain of some of that ''common sense'' about strategy, Art of War should drill down that strategic thinking pattern a bit more. It's definitely worth the read.

...

I read part of it years back and I remember it ebing about how to keep small city sates and their rulers happy and to manipulate the servents and lords and shit; I may have just been retard and not drawing enough context.

It also doesn't help that it was written long ago and the setting is somewhat alien to myself

It's a good read for a bright 12 year old. :D

Marcus Aurelius Meditations

...

bump

also, in case anyone has read it, is maps of meaning worth checking out?

Kybalion

Its good so far

Anything by Julius Evola

Pretty much the same stuff, though it's maybe a little bit more daring than art of war in that it tells the reader to do immoral yet conventionally obvious stuff. It's basically "be an authoritarian dick, think of power before people, ensure the people suffer-it will make them great" All of which is pretty fundamental to the human character. After all, society spends years weeding out selfish impulses in people and promoting "good" morals. The Prince on the other hand, tells you to listen to that bad selfish voice in your head.

The prince can be summarized in four words; "Nice governors finish last"

I am currently reading
>At the mountain of Madness
also I recently finished the Count of MonteCristo

Unrelated. Is the study od sociology the most blue pilled subject?

Brave New World and 1984 are the most over-referenced pieces of literature ever written and are literally babies first dystopian book.

>All those great books
>The fucking Bible

Take all of that learning you did with the rest and throw it right out the fucking window, religitard.

Sup Forums is not a Christian board, massive faggot.

mega.nz/#F!B4dB2SzQ!h_pMC30v2a_y31iD0dy0sg

Book archive

Animal Farm.

to understand the enemy, It would be better to read das capital, not that garbage that is the communist manifesto

>ctrl-f
>no Tao Te Ching

what the ever living fuck guys? the tao is the biggest red pill of them all.

>bible isn't worthwhile political reading for anyone

Nice try bateman

I read it. Some pretty solid advice in it. Of course warfare has changed a lot since it was written, but there is still some universal truths in it.

Also
>they just claim too to look deep

Is English your first language?

Honestly, I'm still on tier 1. Currently consuming the Jordan B Peterson lectures on youtube then will move on to Meditations by Marcus Aurelius.

I'm watching the 2017 lectures on YT:
youtube.com/playlist?list=PL22J3VaeABQAT-0aSPq-OKOpQlHyR4k5h

Books worthy of a read on top of it? JBP is sometimes hard to follow, probably better via text

Book of the Subgenius should be on the required reading list desu

Some of it is insightful, for example the greatest enemy to a general being a meddling sovereign and always giving a cornered enemy a way out

Instead of Peterson listen to Jonathan Bowden.

What? No. You're confused. Catcher in the Rye was an MKULTRA and Illuminati and deep state trigger to carry out assassinations.

>Lee Harvey Oswald - favorite book
>John Hinckley - was carrying it as he shot Reagan
>Mark David Chapman - after he killed Lennon, sat down and read the book

Salinger found out that they were doing this, that's why he went underground and never published anything publicly again. It was protest.

I'm tellin' you guys, America is in trouble. The Republic was subverted in the chaos of WW2.

I can explain more if you wish.

>someone who lived 2400 years ago had different values than my own
>those quads tho

You don't have to be religious to the study the bible.

Keep going user.

Fvcking Checked

I'm reading this at the moment, once I'm finished I'm going to move onto Prussianism and Socialism which was recommended to me in one of these threads

go on. in detail please

That's why it's in the first tier, limey.

> mfw I read too slowly to read anywhere near as many books as I would like to

Principia Discordia,
For the shitposters and memelords.