Explain to me

How was it possible that these mongol subhumans were able to conquer half of the world?

Unlike you, they were good at war.

>flag
>Literally no relevance

Ignored, let the big boys talk paco

Exceptionally good hay-years before conquest allowing mongols to breed and upkeep more horses.

Piss off aqua beaner

sisu

They had shitload of horses

>subhumans

no u

because they were all horse masters. They out maneuver the lard asses

Funny because the russians have their genes and gave some of those genes to you germans. The mongols helped spread shit such as gunpower.

Suomi thread?

>flag
>literal 3-time destroyer of Europe
At least I still live in a homogeneous society, Hans.

Unlike Germans or wh*tes in general, they were capable of winning wars.

because they were subhumans
they were naturally talented when it came to warfare

*weren't

They were strong

spoken like a true Roman! Now pay us our yearly gold tributes and we leave you alone

Mounted archers.

Age of Mongol warfare (horse archers and light cavalry) ended when Ottomans defeated Turkmen armies that consisted of horse archers and light cavalry with gunpowder and rifles.

Back then God was on their side and helped them. But then they got carried away and God said "I'm out". After that they lost battles and are only a shell of what they were in the past.

Allied with the Catholics.

>conquer
?!?!
they had an empire of dirt and horse shit.

All these armchair historians pretending like they know. Really fucking hard to take over a mostly empty steppe from Raw Meat eating Savages.

6 million horses plus bows is kinda cheating tbqh
also once Genghis died their power level decreased a lot

>God
we're in 2017.

They breed like rats.

Every thread

wrong.
they usually brought their entire population to the battles.

> the american education meme everyone

>be able to masterfully ride a horse
>be able to masterfully use a bow

Imagine a guy in a car zipping around firing arrows at you from the drivers seat, while you are on foot with a spear.

They didn't have to be smart, just strong. A bunch of violent drunken animals.

They were outsmarted by the white man though and now they are contained to a small shitty irrelevant nation

>American education
Wew lad

Europeans used spurs which would injure an unarmoured horse while being useless when riding armoured horse (as the horse couldn't feel the spur). Mongolians on the other hand used whips which didn't harm the horse while doing its job even on armoured horses.

Mongolians used stirrups more and their stirrups were incredibly suited to their particular style of fighting.

There was a whole lot of them, plus everyone in their way either joined them or fought their neighbors to gtfo Mongolian way. This ensured their ranks always swelled while their opponents would typically be worn out from fighting with tribes and peoples who were fleeing the Mongolian horde.

They were excellent, natural born fighters constantly fighting against opponents who were weaker, outnumbered or both.

I don't have to imagine, that's happened to me

Horses, bows and arrows

The type of fights and terrains Europe had encouraged fighting in small areas. The warrior culture of the time also looked down on non melee combat.

That's why centuries later you had the battle of azincourt where the 10 K or so english defeated the 18 to 35 k French by butchering them with a rain of arrows.

The mongols were riding horses and were exceptionnaly good riders. On top of that they had a bow culture.

Effectively, they shot faster, better and further than Europeans of the time. They could do hit and run tactics without getting punished.

If you are really interested, you could read about how the Russian principalities and the hungarians struggled against the mongols.

Burger education much really hurt, I feel so sorry for you right now.

He had the power of a finnish autist

They also bred like rats

Also horse archers were really stronk against wh*te armies till 1400s

>Germancucks unironically calling others subhumans

Roach kun is correct. The weak point of most armies is their supply line. Mongols had no supply line, they moved their city to each battlefield.

Not really. Most of the children died before reaching adulthood, because of the harsh mustering.
That's actually one of the main reason - they only allowed the strong to live and breed.

>talented at warfare
>subhumans

Are you dumb?

>Not really. Most of the children died before reaching adulthood, because of the harsh mustering.
Nomads were usually stronger and healthier than city dwellers at those times. Because diseases were not as common as in steppes than in cities/villages and nomads always ate meat/carbs whereas average plebs ate bread mixed with shit.

They were good at archery and riding horses

Parthians were white in that time, probably whiter than roman army.

>Nomads were usually stronger and healthier than city dwellers at those times
Because the weak didn't survive. They were bullied to death by their peers.

Subhumans vs even subber humans

Because they had no sense of masculinity, honor, or mercy, and were cavalry archers in the age before gunpowder.

You can't really fight cavalry archers with anything other than cavalry archers, and that didn't happen to be something that many other cultures had.

As soon as gunpowder weapons were introduced, the slavs completely annihilated the steppe nomads.

:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
They were more or less same as modern day Persians. My little armchair geneticist.

Their leader was white.

They actually had a really small population compared to the Chinese and Muslims. They were able to mobilize a higher percentage of their men though, and their nomadic way of life gave them better fighting skills than sedentary people at the time.

>Asians are strong, that's why they were using bows instead of faggy axes and shiet like us

You are so educated as well as smart.

Non-white half.

Fun fact, the Mongols were Christian for a long time

Because Asian are the most intelligent of all races and therefore superior tactics and strategy. ;*

There were no organized armies like theirs at the time. They were the best mounted archers and other armies weren't able to deal with their speed and movements on the battlefield. Also their bows were much more powerful than what others were using at the time

The weak COULDN'T survive .
Some of them. Most of them were pagan.

No, parthians were scythian tribes that migrated to persia.
Parthians are not persians.

fuck off Mongolians

A thousand years under Arab or Turkish rule will make you not white dumbass. Are you going to claim Anatolia was always dark too, Mehmet?

And Central Asian Iranians were also brown.
Ever wondered why Southern Central Asians (Turkmens Uzbeks etc) look browner than other Central Asians?
Yes it was lol

Ok mr chinese diaspora.

Rad a history book, seriously. It helps.

A lot of them were pagan, but Genghis Khan's sons married daughters from the Christian tribes. The Mongols reintroduced Christianity into China. Then those faggot Ming dynasty fags ruined everything

>beeing this fucking dumb

SAD

Even mongol women were dangerous

>Then those faggot Ming dynasty fags ruined everything
Good
Christianity is cancer. I wouldn't want the Chiense to worship a fucking abrahamic cross.

Mongolian horse riding and archery was superior to european infantry tactics.

Besides they attacked towns not forts, so they simple marched west uninterrumped.

How they conquered Japan it's a different story.

is this another anti-european raid?

dont you dare insult texas

t. Chinese diaspora.

Too bad Mohamed. Christianity is the fastest growing religion in China. One day Christians will turn your demonic kabba rock into a golf course

being nomadic meant they could amass large amounts of troops, quickly travel large distances, attack unprepared enemies and disengage at will.

>Then those faggot Ming dynasty fags ruined everything
Only thing they ruined by that was the jewish plan for world domination. Now there is still hope left in the world thanks to China.

>t. nigger from Amerifatistan

>superior to european infantry tactics.
Does anyone in this thread actually know anything or are they are talking out of their asses?

turks are the most pathetic from all nommands, mongols used turkic tribes as cannon fodder and "serfs"

best were ancient indo-european nommads

central asian "iranians" migrated from eastern europe, they were white in the past.

uzbeks etc were brought by mongols.

okay lad. don't forget to nuke London Berlin and Paris too because they're the biggest muslim cities.

Mongolians have one of the highest IQ as other East Asians.
Amerishart education. Mongolians were quite sophisticated in their conquest, both in military and how they governed conquered lands.

Well either whites are good at war, which makes no sense since 90% of the time they just acted like Jews to get the land they colonized or they're subhuman savages that are good at war like the pashtuns, mongols and turks.

shitty mongolians could not even defeat east europe, they only had a few succesfull raids and then ran away.
Just look hungary, by the second invasion they where ready and mongols could only run around outside of castles burning a few villages.

gun powder ruined war and nuclear weapons even more so :(

>Jews hate Christians and Christianity
>Jews suppress Christianity wherever possible
>somehow, this means the Jews love Christianity

hmm... 666d chess

>silk road
>no india

Seems totally legit.

no, this idiots think that europe of 13 century was infantry army

this is why I never take anything at Sup Forums seriously

maybe not completely better but their tactics and speed provided a large advantage to the mongols

>mongol
>subhumans

W-what?

This meme is full denial, you know?

Go to liveleak and watch how Black people fight compared to other races.

Because they weren't subhumans.

Maybe because they aren't subhumans?

Jesus Christ. Read a book.

these guys were great. created some of the most interesting history.
>head west
>get muddled down with turks
>head back east
>turks take up mantle
>completely and utterly fail
remember kids, don't race mix. especially not with a turk.

>Ukrainian
You are half Mongolian m8, not exactly an unbiased source. And I'd say not exactly a shining example of Mongolian intellect.

This from a fucking Kraut

You got it wrong.

It's humans.

Then arabs and niggers.

>central asian "iranians" migrated from eastern europe, they were white in the past.
I don't see any evidence for this. It doesn't explain why southern central asians are darker than northern ones. Tajiks are also dark (most of them) although there are some wh*tes among them.
>Does anyone in this thread actually know anything or are they are talking out of their asses?
Welcome to pol.
This board is filled with retards.

Keep losing. Your country is good at that. Currently losing tho Achmed

Millions of folks around the world still bear Khan's genes. Mongols literally cucked the world.

Because half of the land they conquered was desolate wasteland or taiga that nobody lived in.