Egyptian vs Aztec empire

Egyptian vs Aztec empire.

Who would win?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=GCX-YHzPb3w
quora.com/Why-dont-more-surgeons-use-obsidian-scalpels
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Aztecs, the Jaguar warriors were very strong and intimidating. also Mesoamericans had a more advanced arsenal compared to the primitive Egyptians.

The west. Pyramids, while impressive to look at, did not contribute to the survival of their cultures. Dumb people built impressive structures. Smart people built nations.

Aztecs ate people

Egyptians had a cool, rich culture

In a fight? Aztecs would probably win

>pyramids
>2500 BC
Try again.
Those are older. Giants built them.
The nephilim.

Egyptians ruled for a long time, which period of time are we talking about?

I'd vote for Egyptians either way because they are more populous and they have more experience in war.

Aztecs actually had a pretty cool culture too

Thinking about it now , and DESU they're eerily similar
They had their own little pantheon of gods too

Shiiiet
At least the Jews didn't cuck the Aztecs

>have more experience in war

The Aztecs based their society around sacrifice and the waging of war.

ITT mestizos defending their shit indian ancestors

They weren't organized enough.
They had stone vs bronze age Egyptians with chariots.

Their entire greography shaped their war tactics.

Egyptians fought like most typical ancient armies in the thousands all at once on a battle field.

The Aztec raided with squads of two hundred at most through the jungles like flash lightining. Every tribe power were quick raiding scrimiges. They rarely formed standing armies until Cortez organized their enemies against them.

...

Is no one gonna point out that Aztecs never made it out of the stone age?

>Dumb people built impressive structures. Smart people built nations
stupidest claim I've seen in a while.

African tribes neither have impressive structures nor nations while mesapotamian people were the first to build powerful nations as well as impressive structures like the tower of Babel.

If you look at Europe, which became the hearth of civilization after Renaissance, you'll see that it's filled with magnificent structures.

Same with places that were under the rule of nations like the Roman Empire, the Ottoman Empire, Ancient greeks etc.

Depends on where they fight. If in shitty mesoamerican swamplands aztecs would win no doubt but on a wide open North African plain Egyptians with their calvalry would definitely have the advantage.

Aztecs didn't have metal weapons.

Where they fight changes a lot though. Egyptians probably couldn't do much in Aztec forests while Aztecs couldn't do much in a desert.

Egyptians were bronze age and had domesticated horses and other livestock. The Aztecs were still stone age and could only move on foot. The Egyptians would win.

only if you ignore the geographical factor
i could claim the mongols could wipe a roman legion in the steppes, but i could not claim the same in a place like rome, where you have to fight an infantry close combat

Egyptians had horses, Aztec's did not. If aztec's had horses maybe South America would be a much different place, but they didn't so Egypt stomps em

What era? Later era is basically just an appendage of Greece.

But in the earlier case, Egyptians would win. They had warships, chariots, military tactics, etc.

Aztecs never even invented metalworking. They were just barbarians who hit things with clubs.

Egyptians easy. Better tech. Aztecs didn't even have machines as simple as the wheel. Egyptians had chariots. Also, being isolated, people of the new world were vulnerable to the diseases of the old world. Bunch of Aztec people died after their first contact with the Europeans.

...

Aztec would kick their ass.

The Pyramids were cool and all; great on them.

But imagine if they used those resources and man hours to build an actual city of megalithic proportions that actually benefited the whole of society instead of stupid ass pyramids.

shit i never thought about it that way. They were just oversized tombs after all.

So what, it's not like the Aztec land was all jungle, there's plenty of area where the Egyptians could use their horses to their advantage.

>Aztecs are extinct,
>Former jew slaves rules the world
I think its apparent who won

>Egyptians
>Jewish

What about the eagle warrior?

>imagine if they used those resources and man hours to build an actual city of megalithic proportions
implying they haven't?
what are all those other temples, ruins and them?
do you even sacred geometry bro?

there's a theory that the pharoes were jews who larped as natives

aztec

>Aztecs didn't have metal weapons.
They had obsidian tho, which is sharp AS FUCK

youtube.com/watch?v=GCX-YHzPb3w

>Aztecs line up for battle with their stone axes and wooden shields
>Egyptians just steamroll them with chariots, horses, and metal weapons
Aztecs would get smashed. Seriously, Cortez defeated their entire nation with 200 guys.

quora.com/Why-dont-more-surgeons-use-obsidian-scalpels

>Cortez

Not ancient fuckhead

This, Egyptians for sure. They literally had bronze, hydraulic ballistas, but they could never get the seal on the piston made right. If they would have had access to rubber they could have started the industrial revolution, no joke.

Too be fair the Aztec's were getting wrecked by every disease that tore through Europe

Egyptians. Aztecs were despised by all of their client peoples to the point where a couple hundred cumskins could flip them and march on Tenochtitlan.

I would hope they be more advanced. The aztecs were defeated by the Spanish what 4000 years after the Egyptians peaked or something.

Egypt. They knew metalworking and possessed swords, armor, spears, chariots, etc.

Egyptians

Native Indians are retarded

Didn't Egyptians have horses? It's no contest if they did

No they didn't, you dumb ass. They couldn't even work metal and used obsidian/wooden blades, spears, and clubs.

Aztecs only had one city, and no beasts of burden. Not to mention their weapons were just clubs with little bits of sharp obsidian glass stuck in the sides.

Meanwhile, the Egyptians had an entire Kingdom, including horses and chariots. They had bronze swords and armor, not to mention amazing bowmen who were lethally effective shooting on the move from their chariot platforms.

It's not even close. The AEgyptians 6000 years ago could have beating the Ameriniggers 600 years ago.

Bronze age vs stone age.
Bronze age wins.

Have you never seen the bible movies, they did have horses

However horses in Mexico are useless as a weapon

It was called Thebes user

but how would they cross the ocean to fight each other?

The scale of the population of pre-plague eras is hard to comprehend. There are ancient Egyptian buildings designed to halve half a million people in them. These guys had tons of brainpower to work with. The past is filled with so much untapped human energy it's tragic.

Egyptians had camels and horses.
Oh, and bronze.

...

*have

Forgot to mention THE FUCKING WHEEL

Jesus Christ people. Blood drinking jungle savages would get stomped.

The only reason why they died so much from disease is that the europeans were super fucking filthy and had no hygiene, meanwhile the aztecs were a very clean people

...

>At least the Jews didn't cuck the Aztecs

They did

Cotez also allied with the other mexican tribes that had beef with the Aztecs.