NEW YORK (May 2, 2017) – For the month of April 2017, “The Rachel Maddow Show” was the #1 show across cable news among regularly scheduled shows in the key A25-54 demo (“The O’Reilly Factor” now off the air) and again finished as the #1 cable news show in A25-54 for the 9pm time period, beating both FOX News and CNN for the 2nd month in a row, according to Nielsen. Maddow also topped “Tucker Carlson Tonight” at 8pm, “The Five” at 9pm and “Hannity” at 10pm in A25-54 for the month. “The Rachel Maddow Show” averaged 2.4 million total viewers and 562,000 viewers A25-54, posting more year-over-year growth than its competition in total viewers (+98% vs. CNN’s +20% and FOX News’ +16%) and in A25-54 (+89% vs. CNN’s +28% and FOX News’ +30%). Year to-date, “The Rachel Maddow Show” is the fastest growing primetime show in cable news.
Rachel Maddow, literally #1
Based homos. Toothjobs and confusion cucks btfo
>#1 cable news show in A25-54
>in A25-54
lol nice exception there
She was still beaten OVERALL by every late night Fox show you cuck.
shes based
Why are you getting so triggered? It clearly says the demographic in which she's destroying the competition.
When did 25-54 become a key demographic? I thought it was always expressed as everyone vs. the key 18-35 demographic. Next thing you know they'll be reporting the ratings among the key affluent dyke demographic and Maddow will be #1 every day for the rest of time.
Fake news.
>Nielsen ratings are now fake news
So collecting data from cable boxes is now fake?
This is why nobody believes your meme anymore.
>cries when people respond to his thread
buck up
>It clearly says the demographic in which she's destroying the competition.
So in other words, the demo w/no jobs, insane college debt and gendermoprhic psychiatric issues?
I'm sure is winning w/that group...
>It clearly says the demographic in which she's destroying the competition.
most cable watchers are boomers dumbass
I'm merely pointing out how sad it is that they're triggered so easily when there was no attempt to hide anything. He's just defensive.
>he literally believes this
Nobody cares about UK demographics.
>cable
cabe news
she's as ugly as her fanbase
>Fake news.
i'm almost certain that this is now part of the shariablue plot to destroy Sup Forums by making even obvious data sources untrusted. just call everything fake news and watch everything devolve into sourcing anonymous youtube videos as sources
Obviously. Who the fuck actually watches TV?
like being the #1 turd eater, only old dying people watch tv
Almost everyone still watches some amount of TV, so trying to dismiss this based on your own incorrect assumptions of TV viewership is irrelevant.
>nobody cares about UK demographics
Preach. Their idea of any substantive change in the right wing scenery is electing some dumb Tory bitch and a meme UKIP candidate whose only Parliament member dropped out because "their job was complete" kek
This. They claim Hillary won the popular vote. But you don't have to win the popular vote in TV ratings
It's like watching A live news version of that Chinese train wreck where they buried it in place with bodies and live victims still inside.
The funny thing is, while she might cherry pic stories that favor Democrat positions she doesn't just make shit up or lie like the fat angry retards on the right. She tells the truth, she's articulate, and educated a lot more than you can say for the likes of Rush, Reilly, or Jones.
>still talking about the election when it's been over for 5 months
this is like my college roommate whose only successes were in high school so he wouldn't shut the fuck up about "the good old days"
My bad. I didn't realize that this was a political board and Maddow did political commentary.
>I'm watching Tucker right now
Yet Trump was the one who pulled out electoral college maps yesterday, reminded the reporter that red was him, and told him that he should be printing those on the front page.
That doesn't disprove what I've said at all
Sup Forums in charge of reading comprehension, folks
>That doesn't disprove what I've said at all
What did you say? That you voted for someone who was physically incapable of holding office?
No, I didn't. Your reading comprehension is shining through once again.
John D. Gartner, a practicing psychotherapist who taught psychiatric residents at Johns Hopkins University Medical School, minces as few words as the president in his professional assessment of Trump.
>"Donald Trump is dangerously mentally ill and temperamentally incapable of being president," says Gartner, author of "In Search of Bill Clinton: A Psychological Biography." Trump, Gartner says, has "malignant narcissism," which is different from narcissistic personality disorder and which is incurable.
>Gartner acknowledges that he has not personally examined Trump, but says it's obvious from Trump's behavior that he meets the diagnostic criteria for the disorder, which include anti-social behavior, sadism, aggressiveness, paranoia and grandiosity. Trump's personality disorder (which includes hypomania) is also displayed through a lack of impulse control and empathy, and "a feeling that people ... don't recognize their greatness.
>"We've seen enough public behavior by Donald Trump now that we can make this diagnosis indisputably," says Gartner. His comments run afoul of the so-called Goldwater Rule, the informal term for part of the ethics code of the American Psychiatric Association saying it is wrong to provide a professional opinion of a public figure without examining that person and gaining consent to discuss the evaluation. But Gartner says the Trump case warrants breaking that ethical code.
usnews.com
>inb4 psychology is a jewish plot
Not only can you not read, but looks like you did too. Didn't vote for anyone btw, so nice try.
this woman makes me cringe more than WALEED ALI
itsnot because more people are watching her. its because less people are watchingfox. its not like fox viewers switched.
I would personally throw this Mr. Maddow into the oven.
...
>#moldylocks
It's probably because people only watch with the hopes she'll fly off the lid and start fisting her fart box while her submissive gf licks the taint, I swear to god this is in the minds of all her viewers
>John D. Gartner, a practicing psychotherapist
He's a liberal hack. Took me 2 seconds to find out.
You write that Clinton, "simply has more God-given talent than any politician we've ever seen."
The Goldwater rule is the informal name given to Section 7.3 in the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) code of ethics, which states it is unethical for psychiatrists to give a professional opinion about public figures they have not examined in person, and from whom they have not obtained consent to discuss their mental health in public statements. It is named after presidential candidate Barry Goldwater.
Source : en.wikipedia.org
you may also want to check out this articale written by the President of the APA.
psychiatry.org
So your little play there, about using some specialist. Yeah. He's bunked because its considered unethical to diagnose someone without sitting down and actually, you know, trying to help them.
But its not a new tactic for the left, so whatever.
...
I feel like news opinion shows like O'Reilly and Maddow are the exact same thing as comedy talk shows like Colbert except there's no audience to laugh whenever the host makes a funny face at something they disagree with. Am I wrong?
But 25-54 has all the money.
Maddow isn't an opinion show, it's an actual news show. They do reporting and interviews.
O'Reilly was the one with literal opinion segments.
Even Steve Bannon watches Maddow. She takes people apart beautifully
oh führer! you make me laugh like noone else
its fucking called the rachel maddow show so obviously it has her opinions. all news shows do this dipshit
....have you never actually watched it? She reports news. Period.
Maddow is really good.
When the president is not a liberal you can count on her telling you like it is.
But when it's a liberal, you better watch something else.
Australians should GTFO.
>They claim Hillary won the popular vote
She did. It just didn't matter because the presidency isn't a popular vote.
It's not a big exception. It means only old fucks at 50+ are watching Fox. That's a death sentence for the network since in the next twenty years their audience will start dying. 25-54 are the group that will be committed, decided voters in the next twenty years.
Except that's wrong, cable companies have been jacking up internet prices and throwing on caps in a desperate ploy to get them crawling back to cable TV, and it still fails.
She makes up news. Fake news
Nobody is going to be watching that shit in 20 years. Once everything exists online they will fall into the meme dream
>Liberalism, not even once.
>averaged 2.4 million total viewers and 562,000 viewers A25-54
So, shit numbers are the top? Proof the cable dinosaur is sliding into extinction.
Prove it.
>Maddow is a really good liar.
Fixed.
Would you look at that. Lots of threads bashing conservatives and anyone who likes them and now a thread about how great Rachel Maddow is.
Interesting.
A sign of the times. Conservatism is dead.
Of course. That's what it is.
In all seriousness though, you should know by now that Sup Forums is simply contrary. I'm honestly surprised that it's taken this long to become as anti-Trump as it has. I'm guessing by June you'll see a much stronger opposition to him.