How much of Sup Forums is actually NatSoc/white nationalist?

How much of Sup Forums is actually NatSoc/white nationalist?

Other urls found in this thread:

aryanism.net/politics/white-nationalists/
renseradioarchives.com/dduke/
renseradioarchives.com/stormfront/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

No really anyone. Sup Forums is a trump-board not natsoc.

depends on your definition of white nationalist

I'm a white nationalist but I'm not even white l0l

Not me.

natsoc here,
also r8

>t. Stalin

You can't be a white nationalist and a national socialist at the same time.

aryanism.net/politics/white-nationalists/

50%. Lolbertarians are the other half.

Wrong. Theres been several straw polls with thousands of votes in that show this board is atleast half natsoc.

all of it :)

I would say about half are

>voting for it means they believe in it and know what it is!
How naive can you get? They don't know a fucking thing about Aryanism.

OUT

Full retard article. Completely disregards racial differences in intelligence.

About half, I think. I know I am.

I'm a mix between Nationalism and Libertarian, I worked with plenty of Natsocs/White Nationalists during events/rallies but thats about it.

You could say the same for libertarians

>Reddit JIDF detected
Every NatSoc General thread posted proves you wrong

>NatSoc/white nationalist
They are not the same thing

>white nationalist
I'm white, but why does it matter? A Nationalist is a nationalist, regardless of color. I'm a Nationalist, meaning that my wish for each nation to have their separate nation state and leave the others fucking alone

I'm against Black, Arab and Asian mass immigration into my European homeland. Does that make me a Nazi?

>national socialists on Sup Forums aren't REAL NatSocs

cuck

>>>>>>>>>>>/plebbit/

Stay there. Sup Forums is and always will be NatSoc

Me, full blown NS
however I support Trump because he gets us closer to that

all i know is im getting drunk as fucking shit tonight

I'm a filthy ((civic nationalist)) who wants stringent border control and for immigration to be limited to only the truly skilled.

White nationalism is ridiculous, you might LARP about the day of the rope but really, murdering or deporting legal citizens based on skin color is some evil shit.

Can't turn back the clock, gotta work with the reality we've got.

It all boils down to whether or not you want to gas the jews.

A significant amount, and it's not a meme.

Eh right after WW2 15 million (maybe more) Germans got deported from Eastern Europe, from places they've lived in for hundreds of years, which they actually developed. Most of the immigration to the West happened within living memory and you can make a good case that their influence is overwhelmingly negative. No matter how much money you put in, you're never gonna get blacks or hispanics (or in Europe, Pakis, Arabs and Turks) up to Western educational standards and we don't really have coal mines anymore.

I mean, hell if you're happy with Chinese driving up your property prices go for it but I don't want that civ-nat bullshit in Europe. Mussies eventually taking control of nukes is some scary shit.

Not only that, but I don't see how anyone could unironically support a fully authoritarian government. Who the fuck wants the government breathing down their neck 24/7?

Just don't dig. Stay like you are and you won't become like most of us. It's better that way.

with zyklon B
on their clothes, which is where it was found
> to prevent lice in their workcamps

and id have saltpeter solution put in their food so they couldnt get a hardon and it would lower heart attack rates
> but they would continue to work behind the

what it really boils down to is taking the jewish children, separating them from their parents, teaching them state sponsored propaganda and re-education to destroy their cultural heritage
> and burning all of the books and erasing all of the historical records regarding the Jewish Religion


Honestly I wouldnt gas the ones that needed to die for being subversive and sticking to their beliefs and heritage

> I would de-gas them.
> all the air is sucked out of the room

Yeah it's possible, but it ain't right. That was also done before modern media, you could get away with a LOT more back then. What I would argue for is breaking down ethnic conclaves within countries, spreading the people out, having programs and tests to convert them to the host nation's culture.

Not natsoc.

I'm a classical liberal imperialist.

In order to preserve freedom within the rest of the world must at the very least be an order of magnitude weaker than you combined. The only rights you have are those that you can protect. In a system of true liberty and justice the worst of us destroy themselves without state intervention. It's only when hey attack other that the government needs to get involved.

Light handed domestic policy.

Heavy handed foreign policy.

Well, i am more of a white libertarian.

o/

I'd say close to 1488%.

No one here actually believes in white nationalism or nat/soc. It's all satire.

>trump-board
reddit>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

change a few words and you got the leftist playbook

Radical Centrist just fucking around most of the time.

Correct. White nationalists and the false left use the same model of race.

i'm all for white people, but not so much into socialism

>white nationalist

This is why you retards will never be accepted in society. Nationalism does ascribe to race. Only country.

Doesn't*

Some.

Fuck you niggers

You people are fucking bad.....

And yet they still fucking hate each other.

Completely wrong. Maybe your gay civic nationalism does, but true nationalism is racial in nature. Nation does not equal a political entity known as a state, retard.

Half nigger here. I'm a white nationalist in so much that I want white culture to not only survive but dominate.

It's been a tough pill to swallow but I realized the only way for that to happen is to have as many white people as possible because like 90% of non whites vote for the opposite of what I want.

>socialism

Fuck that noise though

such a strawman holy fuck.
#2: i dont think anyone says that non-whites prefer to live with whites. they like our benefits, nothing else.
#4 is also never claimed by anyone that ive heard
#8 is again false. we appreciate what we have done with the lands we took but would prefer it doesnt happen again.
#10 i have never heard
#14 the term "anti-white" is only used to deflect unjust criticism
#17 hitler, for example, is seen as evil by people who dont hold wn ideals. with that in mind, this claim simply references the higher tendency of everyday minorities to commit small scale crime over whites
#20 no one claims that non-whites cant do good things. its just that in whole they dont fit in with white civilization
im not doing the rest, but this was clearly made without much thought.

Thats too far left

I get the point of the image, so let me attack it:
>Rule 2
Nonwhites like to live in white countries with welfare, but this is not "prefer to live with whites". I wouldn't say ALL of them prefer to live with white. Also there should be a distinction made between living in a white country and living in a white community.
>Rule 5
No, you're exaggerating a claim. The claim is "whites are the most attractive". And to prove this, people will use response rates between races from dating websites. While interracial is an overall rarity, the response rates (% yes and % no) are comparable. What's not comparable is the number of dating going on between races and across races.
>Rule 8
Most WN's probably won't do this, though they do feel sad for the Boers literally getting genocided in SA. Make no mistake, we think they're savages; but colonialism was obviously a mistake.
>Rule 10 & 11
Rule 10 might be wrong here, yeah. Whites DO have a tendencies for exploration and colonization. You can see it in our desired to colonize other planets.
>Rule 13
>tell people to never be fooled by the jews
and that's where the statement should stop
>Rule 14
Don't do this all of the time. Anti-white is a dogmatic phrase, and if engaging in dogmatic exchanges, then use it. Most exchanges in politics are dogmatic (because not many people seem to care about real arguments), but not ALL of them.
>Rule 16,17,19,20
Actually, benevolent and malevolent acts alone for races are nothing - what matters is stats & data. A summation of benevolent and malevolent acts per capita, and then a comparison: And doing this we can state that whites tend to be more benevolent (we use high-trust) than blacks, and less malevolent (low-trust) than blacks.
>Rule 25
There's a few thing with this: the first is that this is already a massive shift in the better direction for policy. Secondly, their children tend not to be behaved - see Muslims in Europe. Regression to the mean.

>We don't say to the rich 'Give to the poor', we say 'German people, help each other'. Rich or poor, each one must help thinking, there's someone even poorer than I am, and I want to help them as a fellow countryman. - Adolf Hitler

I'm a nationalist who happens to be white. Yes.

In the end Lolbertarians will always side with nat/soc rather than anyone else if cornered.

>ok then move it to the new bant board faggot

Natsoc is a philosophy, the specific forms of government and policies changes based on the specific people and circumstances.

I'm a Natsoc American, we should be a White ethnostate with autarky economic policies and a government that looks like imperial Rome.

I don't care if your not white, as long as your not a kike loving commie beta lefist sjw cuck.

not me

That's what everyone says until they have to live around niggers.

About 88%.

t. loddit

100%

Trumo is just a meme

>Rule 27
The Arabic Empires, the Ottomans (Turkey) in particular.
>Rule 28
They actually have occurred in history, and as you show IN THIS SAME RULE that it does not work out well for the indigenous people.
>Rule 29
I'm not seeing how the counter-argument in this rule "it didn't prevent colonialism or slavery" is actually addressing the original argument.
>Rule 30
This is not necessarily true - in places like Brazil, they have (somewhat) mixed. And it creates miserable shitholes like Brazil, Venezuela, and Peru.
There are also places where genocide of whites has occurred - Haiti, and CURRENTLY ONGOING, South Africa. No matter how just you think those genocides are, they're still genocides. And you can see with the level of hatred the nonwhites have for us in America that it's probably going to go the South Africa route. But even if it didn't, we don't want to become the next Venezuela, either.
>Rule 31
You couldn't really stuff an argument into this claim ("displays knowledge of genetics") but the expression of recessive genes (whites have quite a bit of these) would decrease if we were to all racemix. This is a valid statement.
>Rule 32
So who's doing the agitation? You can't make vague claims like that. When you look at the elites, both liberal and conservative, they seem to universally oppose white nationalism. And I also don't see what the elites gain from a divided society.
>Rule 35, 36, 37
When mad, use the "strawman" fallacy. Oh wait, that's you.
>Rule 38
You should ask them if using "black" in "black lives matter" is not a meaningful category. It is anti-white, and this attack on our identity has to be stopped.
>Rule 39, 40
When mad, use the "strawman" fallacy. Oh wait, that's you.

ethnic nationalism is a nightmare.

I believe in hybridization eugenics using sperm. That is a much more peaceful way to elevate the human race.

That doesn't work, everything is downstream from genetics. I mean, how much did the USA spend on the blacks since the 60s? And before you talk about muh slavery, we have the same problem with the Turks here. Fuck, the Turkish politicians here are all in favor of bringing in more Muslims to bolster their own power base. Or look at London...

Depends on what irony level you are currently operating on

I think nazis are pretty gay. Irrelevant and misinformed about what national socialism actually is. You'll find them making pro-neocon free market talking points for instance. They have no fucking clue, they're just edgy idiots.

White nationalist.. sort of? I think mass migration is a killer of nations, I think we have cultural heritage that is not just transferrable like the civic nationalists claim.

I think it's pretty obvious when thousands of years of European history hasn't brought everyone together. The EU project is falling apart. We can't make Norwegians, Swedes and the Danish unite enough to form a union, despite having been one country at various times, we're heavily related in heritage and language.. yet we all consider each other distinct and could not see a union working out.

Of course the ridiculous thing is that lefties here will in one second agree that you can't make danes and swedes co-exist in one country, and then in the next second proclaim that subsaharan africans will become 100% swedish within a generation. It makes no fucking sense.

Because democracy got us here in the first place. If everyone was a strong and intelligent man and women I would have no problem.

Fuck off nethers You are drunk and NO idea what you are saying

The socialism is just a name, same as democratic in the Democratic party.

Right dude! Im getting tired, time for a nap?

Maybe about 5% of posters.

Most of the actual extreme natsocs moved to 8/pol/

WTF I'm a libtard?

I am a Nationalist.
And I am a Socialist.

But I am not necessarily NatSoc.
Perhaps closer to Fascist or Monarchist. But most definitely traditionalist.

You're a fucking faggot
Go fuck yourself

I'm definitely White nationalist.

Kill all spics, Arabs, Blacks, Indians, and Southeast Asians.

East Asians can live, but they have to go back to their own countries for the most part.

...

>Too far left
>National Totalitarian
What the fuck?

Hell yeah dude

>79.9% Markets over caring for your own people
That's what you get for being a free-market capitalist memebertarian Jew

Achievable solutions take priority over idealistic outcomes. The majority is nowhere near close to being able to accept what you propose. The US didn't break apart black neighbourhoods, they left them in the ghettos where ghetto culture was ingrained and through familiarity overrode American culture.

Drastically reducing future immigration can be done, but you're not going to be removing those already here any time soon (and actually skilled migration is a benefit, but this only applies to a small percentage of current migrants). I still think breaking apart enclaves needs to happen for cultural conversion to work.

I'm a communist tbqh.

Why are you so offended?

>not realizing the nazis founded israel
>not knowing nazis were a psy op to discredit nationalism and further the white genocide agenda while also giving jews a persecution complex
>still thinking hitler actually existed
>oy vey real socialism has never actually been tried

You have a lot to learn, even if you are actual jidf because youre being played and you dont even realize it

Skilled immigration is a meme. H1-B1 massively depresses wages. As for people not being ready, the population reliably polled for restricting immigration in most of Western Europe. If a Politician wanted it, it could happen. Plus, considering the EU is coming apart and the debt bubble keeps getting bigger, who knows what can happen if it all falls apart?

Even in Germany, with the government massively supressing any dissenting opinion we have fire attacks on refugee centers.

...

>caring for your own people
I can care for my people with my own money and I should have the right to decide who my people are. I oppose government forced "caring" for anyone. That doesn't mean I oppose caring for people.

>needing to care for your own people
Only cucks need the goverment to care for their needs.

>unironically being a liberaltarian
>"m-muh wallet above all else!"
>"let the Jew corporations ravage our country, at least it's not the government doing so!"

Let's be honest, stable social programs with rules and regulations will always trump 'well maybe I'll help one person today, just lower the taxes!!'

>I don't like anybody or anything being over me
Fuck off.
Without strong governments and hardlined stances again foreign invasion, traditions fade.
Without strong governments, the Empire was never possible.
Without strong governments, some of the greatest wonders of the world would have never been possible.
People like you are the harbingers of the decline of Western culture. Probably mudskin T_D faggots or trailer trash.

At current levels, yep it's a meme. Properly trimmed to just legitimately useful people, and it's a very strong policy.

Restricting immigrating, yes. But live HD footage of black masked government men hauling families with children off to deportation camps just could not happen without a drastic change in the political climate. Also, for all its benefits, such a thing would be evil.

Stem the flow, then work worth the ones we have.

WN here, but economically more libertarian.

NatSoc is a beast from a different era.

I'm a white nationalist

I got redpilled by these podcasts and never went back:

renseradioarchives.com/dduke/

renseradioarchives.com/stormfront/

I'm completely white. Did a gene test and everything. But I wouldn't call myself a white nationalist even. I'm more of a cultural supremacist. White culture should dominate here. The fact that I'm saying this is that it's in danger. I consider myself a moderate in politics. Still hate mudsharks and mudslimes, even more than negros.

The climate is changing already and will be changing more rapidly. It is no more evil than letting in millions of savages to literally plunder what our parents and grandparents, and their grandparents and parents and so on worked for and letting them commit violence against our people.

Also, who said anything about camps. Their aid will be cut and they will be told to leave, or else.

Again, you are Australian, your government is probably better about this than the European and American ones and you are a bit out of the way so you mostly have to worry about Chinese buying all the real estate.

white

NatSo is a meme pushed by stormfront long ago, now people just meme it unironically
They want to feel part of something

Ethnonationalism = good
NatSoc = larp as Nazis

> doesn't understand that a merit based society is the best way to keep kikes at bay
> thinks inefficient and wasteful 'safety nets' do anything other than enable harmful behavior
You've got a long way to go.

It's a combination of a merit based society and a strong government.

How are you supposed to have a merit-based society for example with a country like the US which is 60% (and shrinking) white and a plethora of cultures and racial hate?

That's where the strong government would ideally step in. Or would have a while ago.

Although of course, that is not the only useful function.