Remember, if you want to abuse children without having your own kids taken away, be famous. Don't me like Mike, be like Jimmy, he gets to enjoy more child tears because he's famous, so he can get away with doing worse things than Mike, and gets to keep his kids.
Remember, if you want to abuse children without having your own kids taken away, be famous. Don't me like Mike...
Jaxon Cook
Other urls found in this thread:
onbeing.org
dictionary.com
youtube.com
amazon.co.uk
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
Logan Turner
Yup. Dear Jimmy gets to violate a child's trust on Halloween, and humiliate them in their moment of agony as the audience erupts in laughter.
His kid having a congenital problems is divine punishment.
Jason Reed
his wife is 39
and the tetra...something heart problem even has high age of the mother as a risk factor
I think you have expect something to be wrong with the child if the mother is that old. not really that "divine"
Ryan Martinez
>>metaphor
Meaning what goes around comes around, you monotone q-tip.
Austin Wright
>His kid having a congenital problems is divine punishment.
I'm more worried that now he has a handicapped child to abuse. He's all tearful on TV for political reasons, but I'm sure he has a list in his desk drawer of great "pranks" to get that kid crying so he has something to jerk off to. It shouldn't be about "punishing" Jimmy, it should be about protecting children from him.
Dominic Anderson
>Don't know the difference between pretend to take away kids candy and then giving to them and beating your kids.
You guys have the autism.
Wyatt Parker
who is the tiefag? jimmy......?
Levi Perez
The child doesn't know that until the "it's just a prank bro" is over. And then the child gets to feel like a fucking asshole, where it's saved for all eternity on the web.
>>A recent study by researchers at the University of Michigan revealed that “the same regions of the brain that become active in response to painful sensory experiences are activated during intense experiences of social rejection.” In other words, humiliation and isolation are experienced as intensely as physical pain.
onbeing.org
Quit advocating violence, guy.
Hunter Russell
I haven't seen Mike's videos. I'm not into child abuse so I don't want to watch them. But if he hits his kids, they should be taken away.
Jimmy gets hundreds of parents to intentionally cause their children emotional distress so they can have 15 seconds of fame on his show. And in 2013 (if I recall the year correctly) one family sent him their prepubescent children naked and crying, and Jimmy, and ABC - Parent company Disney - happily put that child pornography on national television.
If you want to see that child pornography, I believe it's still available on the Jimmy Kimmel YouTube channel. I don't know for sure, I don't want to check, cause unlike Kimmel/ABC/Disney, I don't like child pornography.
So yeah, children are no where near safe around Kimmel.
Henry Wood
Jimmy Kimmel didn't scream at and torture kids for YouTube views
Juan Cooper
Nope, he just got hundreds of parents to torture their own children and publicly shame them for eternity on television and the internet. You know, good wholesome entertainment for the whole family, especially pedophiles who want to jerk off to crying children, and - I'd like to point out again - crying naked children in 2013.
Kevin Howard
In theory those family gave the kids candy after the 15 sec clips. Also I feel like this isn't really a logical road a place like Sup Forums wants to go down.
James Kelly
Can I get a list of how much candy I ned to buy in advance to get off the hook - ethically speaking - for different kinds of abuse?
> feel like this isn't really a logical road a place like Sup Forums wants to go down.
Interesting comment. I'm not sure what you mean.
Eli Wright
>You get your reward after your fear, shame, and humiliation.
>Good goy, I mean goooood boy.
>Lesson XIX of How to Raise a Serial Killer
Nolan Phillips
Wait, did daddy lose the kids?
William Sullivan
Mike did, Jimmy didn't.
Angel Adams
Yes, He's Daddyozero now
Gabriel King
"Hey user, hold my camera for me. I'm going to make my daughter cry so I can get on TV."
Are those the words of a person who should get to keep their children?
Jose Parker
he doesn't beat the children, it's just the internet exaggerating
he's just a stupid person that did something stupid without realizing what he's doing to his own children.
Jacob White
Weaponized autism at it's finest.
Samuel Johnson
It's not about the candy, but to show the person that has been pranked that the prank was harmless. For example "I ate you candy. Just kidding here it is." Isn't really going to harm somebody.
>Interesting comment. I'm not sure what you mean.
We are saying that Jimmy Kimmy should be held responsible for what other people did. Now imagine if there was a thread that said hey you should kill x. Then come crazy /poltard/ actually did it. Does that mean Sup Forums is responsible for that guys actions?
Jeremiah Kelly
Expect for those videos where he hits his kids or gets his kids to slap each other.
Samuel Gray
They're gonna be homeless soon too, their house is being foreclosed on.
Ethan Lopez
Jimmy Kimmel is a real sick douche.
Jeremiah Russell
i dont buy the whole pushing him into the book shelf thing, i could see that being an accident
gotta admit i didn't know about the last one
Evan Baker
Uhh.. Yeah.. That won't hold up in court.
Henry Smith
Has daddyofive made a video/talked on the news since losing the kids? I'd love to see the land whale break down. You guys think one of them might an hero? Or at least get a divorce?
This is too delicious
Tyler Powell
well no, it didn't and he got his children taken away for being an idiot. whats your point?
Aiden Nguyen
The slapping thing was harsh..Fuck him and his inbred landcow wife...they got what they deserved.
Joshua Martinez
Come on, it is a bit of light humour, it really isn't that serious
Leo Martin
>For example "I ate you candy. Just kidding here it is." Isn't really going to harm somebody.
Please see this it's like if you find a person using tweezers to pull the limbs off ants one by one, laughing about it and saying how much fun it is and believing he's a wonderful person who should be rewarded for this behavior. Is he breaking the law at the moment? No. Is he definitely a psychopath who should be locked up to protect the rest of us? Yes.
>We are saying that Jimmy Kimmy should be held responsible for what other people did. Now imagine if there was a thread that said hey you should kill x. Then come crazy /poltard/ actually did it. Does that mean Sup Forums is responsible for that guys actions?
1. I think there's certain things I could say on here, that I won't even say as an example, that if I said them, the secret service would absolutely try to hold me responsible if something happened. So legally I don't think that's much of an argument.
2. There's a huge difference between one of a million anonymous comments saying "do something harmful" and a famous person on TV saying "Here's some instructions on doing something harmful. Film yourself doing it and send it to me and I'll reward you by putting that you filmed on TV. Go on and do it, I'm famous and I'm telling you to, and if you obey you'll get to be on TV."
Christopher Sullivan
I don't think they are sapient enough to commit suicide
Dylan Butler
>A harmless jokes is the same as someone torturing animals.
Who hurt you?
Elijah Garcia
Jimmies pranks are harmless, with good and fun attitude. What the other guy did was just disgusting. I think the youtube money played a big role in the escalating. The apology felt sincere and I hope they can learn from this and start over again as a family.
Nathaniel Bennett
If someone is willing to make their child cry in order to get on television, they are a dangerous person who could not be permitted within 50 yards of anyone under 18 years of age. Is that simpler for you? No analogies, just the facts. If someone says "Make your child cry and send it to me and I'll put you on TV" a fit parent calls the cops and reports the psycho who said that, they don't follow the instructions.
Bentley Perry
reddit please leave, it was pretty clear those videos were scripted.
Aaron Turner
I would let my parents beat me within an inch of my life for his money
Easton Murphy
Halloween 2013, someone sent Jimmy child pornography and he, ABC/Disney put it on the air. It's still on YouTube right now if you want to go look it up. I'm not going to link it, because I'm pretty sure linking child pornography is against the rules on Sup Forums, though apparently not at Disney/ABC. If you think that's "harmless, with good and fun attitude" please voluntarily put yourself on a sex offender registry.
William Price
And that's fine, because you're making that choice, you're consenting.
Nicholas Johnson
I'm still calling bullshit.
Henry Hall
I just watch the video. My question is what do you think was pornagraphic about it?
Jayden Gonzalez
Go look it up. A parent or parents filmed their kids in the tub - because in their sick mind that's a great time to film a prank video with the intent of it being broadcast on late night TV - and when they say they ate the candy, their prepubescent daughter stands up, fully nude for the camera. I've only watched it once, because I'm not a pedophile, so I didn't want to watch it a second time. But you go ahead and look it up yourself, if you'd like to see crying naked children.
The naked children.
Look user, if you didn't find it sexual, that's great that you're not a pedo. I didn't find it sexual either, but a pedophile does find it sexual, and I don't think we should put naked children on TV for pedophiles to enjoy, mainly because those children can't consent to it.
Austin Peterson
>Halloween 2013,
OF course, Jimmy is an evil pedophile. You won
Robert Collins
I live in a world where pedophiles are national celebrities, I don't feel like a winner.
Parker Kelly
>"It's ok, he planned in advance to shove his tiny son into the bookshelf and give him a bloody nose."
Jackson Miller
You live in a world where you are a moron.
Gavin Brooks
Should all copies of Nevermind be destroyed?
James Cruz
yes
because he did it better
youtube.com
Brayden Bennett
Nope.
If this kind of content is acceptable, then there's a lot of money to be made in a "non-sexual naked children channel." Pedophiles will pay big bucks to subscribe to that channel, just naked kids 24/7, nothing sexual though. And Jimmy Kimmel can advertise to his viewers that they need models.
Now, does what I just said sound creepy as all fuck? Does the very idea make your skin crawl? Well that's because it's very obviously barely veiled content for pedophiles. But a brief clip of the same thing intentionally put on late night TV...suddenly not creepy apparently? I'm not good enough at doublethink to see it differently.
Didn't later copies have the baby penis Photoshopped out? Specifically because they realized they accidentally distributed a ton of child porn.
In any case, the same logic would apply to that cover. Where specifically do we draw the line? What exactly is the specific standard for sexual vs non-sexual child nudity? We need to know exactly where the line is so we can get as close to it as possible and make tons of money making TNQCP - Technically Not Quite Child Porn. Cause that's the market you create if you draw the line near where you want it, instead of "children can't consent, so maybe don't take pictures/video of them naked" which seems like a nice safe line to draw in my opinion. I don't think there's any important social commentary that's going to become censored because we won't let them include naked children, free speech will be as safe as it is now, with most child porn already being illegal.
Ian Hughes
yes
Liam Perez
...
Elijah Thomas
Test
Charles Jackson
>Didn't later copies have the baby penis Photoshopped out? Specifically because they realized they accidentally distributed a ton of child porn.
You can literally buy it with the baby penis right now
Xavier Bailey
There is no need for arguments here. Moron makes moronic claims ...
Liam Roberts
And just so we're clear. This image here, by your definition, this isn't pornographic cause she's just standing and bathing, right? If someone took an identical image of a child and put it on national television, that's A-OK right? Just checking that your logic actually works. You'd be willing to have a child pose exactly like this, take a picture, and put the picture on national television with zero worries that you'd ever get in trouble for child porn, correct?
Mason Garcia
Huh, well that's kinda fucked up too.
Wow, what sound logic. You must be the whiz-kid of your primary school debate team. Way to go, slugger, good luck at the next debate.
Jeremiah Hill
A debate about if a naked child equals child pornography?
Juan Gonzalez
pornographic is sex or masturbation, that's called nudity you fucking retard.
Angel Howard
Hey, you go right ahead and defend your belief in a right to pictures and video of naked children. Go ahead, I'll just watch from over here.
Alright, so take lots of pictures of nude children and pos them on Sup Forums. I'm sure the mods will agree with you. I'm sure there's young children in your neighborhood, go ask their parents to take naked pictures, and once you specify that it will be non-sexual, just full nudity, and sure they'll allow it and think you're a swell guy. Who the fuck wouldn't let someone take pictures and video of their naked child as long as it super wasn't sexual?
Christopher Richardson
Are you one of those guys that gets all weirded out when you see little kids running around naked or are disturbed when someone changes diapers. Because I hate to tell you but you are probably a closet pedo. When I see naked kids it's like I'm looking at a bicycle or a fucking dog or something.
Caleb Wood
>Who the fuck wouldn't let someone take pictures and video of their naked child as long as it super wasn't sexual?
I dunno. It worked for Nirvana.
Matthew Ross
Eh, I'd leave Daddyo alone. The kids know about youtube, they got lots of toys and videogames, and the rhetoric has caused violence towards the whole family. The kids can't even go to school anymore.
Joshua Miller
here, just for you
Isaac Ramirez
>Are you one of those guys that gets all weirded out when you see little kids running around naked or are disturbed when someone changes diapers.
Nope, but if I saw some guy films all those kids, I sure would be concerned.
>you but you are probably a closet pedo
You're projecting so hard Cinemark is going to try and buy you so screen movies.
Go and prove your point, user. Go take those totally non-sexual full nude pictures and video of children and put them on YouTube. We can all celebrate how totally non-sexual it is, and how a pedophile would never be able to enjoy this, and how the person who intentionally took the video and distributed it is also definitely not a pedophile.
Not clicking that, but reported just in case.
Nicholas Perry
What's in the video?
William Long
LOL have a good day moron :D
Jaxon Morales
Just one a link? Why not get some photos and post those directly on the site. Go ahead, put your IP address where you mouth is. Prove your point that the mods are A-OK with pictures of naked children. Maybe a webm too, I'm sure you've got plenty, you know, for completely non-sexual purposed. You enjoy the "art" of naked children.
Jaxson Sanders
Who is the degenerate on the left?
Jackson Rodriguez
hows this?
Angel Baker
Hey, why you don't sue youtube for showing child pornographie? I gave you the link, just sue them!
Joseph Ross
Mike Martin. He abused his own kids, instead of getting hundreds of parents to abuse their kids on his behalf like Jimmy.
Drawings don't count, they aren't real so they have no consent to violate.
I'm not clicking it. I personally don't want to see naked children. Apparently that makes me the weird one though. But hey, you want to prove your point, go ahead, shut me down, post picture after picture in this thread of naked children to prove me wrong. I'll report all your naked child pictures, and then I will get banned for false reporting, because your naked child pictures are A-OK and not a rule violation. The argument will be over cause I'll be proved wrong. You're not worried you'll get banned for kiddie porn right? These are just naked kids, that's, according to you, not kiddie porn, so you're safe, right?
Joshua Thomas
Americans are fucking weird, they think everyone who is naked is being sexualized. I guess we better sue sears magazine for posting all those kids in their pajamas and underwear.
Austin Thompson
Jacob Cooper
Logan Garcia
More links? Hmmmmm, it seems maybe you are afraid that you're wrong, and that the mods would indeed block you, and not me, if you posted pictures of naked children directly on the site.
Connor Bennett
A clip from a movie where kids are running through the forest, and playing in the water nude at one point. Nothing explicit or particularly interesting.
Charles Parker
I linked to the Jimmy Kimmel child porn video, how I can go worse from here?
Henry Torres
I will never understand how your brain can twist things like that. It's not about "thinking things are sexualized." It's first and foremost about consent, children can't give it. And secondarily it's about the fact that actual pedophiles will find it sexual.
Look at this pic, Benny the Bull, the Chicago Bulls mascot. Do you and I find it sexual? No. Are there at least a few furries out there who do find it sexual? Oh yes!
Bentley Bennett
Who's the guy on the left? And before you scream newfag, know that i couldn't give two fucks about pedowood celeberties, let alone ones on jewtube.
Liam Gray
Post directly on Sup Forums. This is an imageboard. No links to 3rd party sites, post right from your hard drive to the Sup Forums servers.
Andrew Walker
...
Joshua Johnson
Guy on left is just pure evil tho.
Jeremiah Green
>he just got hundreds of parents to torture their own children
do you know how retarted you're being right now?
Tyler Diaz
Maybe catch up on the 1.5 hours of thread that happened after that comment with the evidence I amply provided.
David Reyes
The point is, I am not saying there is no child porn. The argument is, Jimmy Kimmels video is not child porn. And youtube and the law agree with me. You, moron, disagree. You are wrong, I am right.
Noah Ramirez
Some idiot who made "prank" videos about his kids. They offended reddit, and his kids were taking away and given back to a methed out bipolar woman who's even more of a mess than he is. Everyone from reddit patted themselves on the back as a job well done, and smugly took credit for this entire retarded fiasco.
Luke Scott
Where's the proof?
Carson Cooper
>You, moron, disagree.
I think you forgot at least one word needed to make that a complete sentence.
>You are wrong, I am right.
Oh, damn, no way to refute this, the logic is so sound. Damn, that is just pure mathematical proof of how wrong I was.
Why don't you start with a screenshot form the Kimmel video that you're so confident about. Pause it, right on the scene with the naked children, screenshot it, crop it, and post that picture right here on Sup Forums. Unless you're worried you're wrong.
Cameron Fisher
Thanks user
Kevin Roberts
>And youtube and the law agree with me.
Yeah, that's part of why I'm upset. It's exhausting trying to be a good person in a lawful evil society.
Ryan Adams
Does the law agree with you? Can you sue Jimmy or youtube for showing child pornographie? The answer is no. You are wrong, I am right!
Parker Perry
No, you are trying to be a moron and you succeed every day
Joshua Robinson
Well, it's America, I "can" sue anyone for anything. But the reason I would likely lose such a suit is because Jimmy/ABC/Disney has more expensive lawyers than I could afford. I'm sure in Deutschland you have a semi-functional justice system, but in the U.S. we don't.
>"Please prove your point with a simple demonstration."
>"No, you're a moron for wanting me to easily prove my point. I already said I'm right and you're wrong, what part of 'I'm right cause I said so' don't you understand moron?"
I guess I accept your concession of defeat.
Easton Sullivan
You know, the way you are begging us to post cp tells me my first assumption is right and that you are indeed a closet pedo.
Julian Perry
Oh hey, I found a picture of you making your """argument."""
Jordan Price
You would loose because you are wrong. You know it, thats why you won't try.
Evan Cox
I'm simply asking you to prove your point. I'm sure there are ways to find kiddie porn, but I don't know them. I'm fairly certain that asking for it on site where it's illegal is not the way to go about it. But you disagree with that, so go right ahead and prove me wrong. Or continue to whine at me while proving I'm right like you have been.
Austin Diaz
Go back to ruddit you fucking freaky newfag. You must have like 80 whole iq points to sit here and lecture people about your subjective reality. Anyone who is actually a good person knows that there is no good and evil, just is and isn't. Pick whatever you want but get off your soap box you fucking retard.
Chase Perez
1. That's not at all how the American legal system works, but that's a completely separate argument.
2. No one has the time or money to take everything unethical to court. Are you in pre-school or something? The world is a fucked up place kiddo, adults have to pick our battles.
Damn, you are taking cognitive dissonance to a whole new level.
Noah Murphy
You don't even know what that buzzword means. You are the one suffering from cognitive dissonance, because you see reality and can't accept it. The fact you are going off about good and evil tells me you are a fucking retard. When a lion eats a zebra is that evil? Nope, it's all subjective and morality is the last bastion of a retard who can't accept what is in front of him.