/lrg/ LIBERTARIAN RIGHT GENERAL - 2 COOL 4 ROADS EDITION

This thread is for Discussion of Capitalism, Libertarianism, Paleolibertarianism, Anarcho-Capitalism, Minarchism, and the PHYSICAL REMOVAL of COMMUNIST FAGS from our board of peace. Reminder that this is the Libertarian RIGHT General. Aleppo Johnson-fags, Left-Libertarians, and other Shit-Libs need to fuck off. Voice your complaints to r/libertarian.

>Recommended Reading list
libertarianright.org/reading/

>Vanilla /lrg/ pastebin- CREATE IF YOU DONT SEE ONE IN THE CATALOG
pastebin.com/7K1EJYb8

>Bump for Life, Liberty, and Private Death Squads

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=NRd-yMT_5NE
youtube.com/watch?v=t8ejDTXUcxg
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

filling out a spekr quiz, post yours mates.

we're all asleep now m8

>europeans

Could Anarcho-Capitalism be described as a form of soft eugenics, rather than the hard eugenics of a NatSoc state?

There's no doubt that those with poor genetics are placed at a clear disadvantage in Ancapistan. Possession of a lower IQ means being less resourceful of their abilities, and being less able to make good long-term decisions unaided by a state. However, instead of being executed on the spot or eliminated from the gene pool artificially, they would suffer financial hardship and gradually become less prevalent as those with better genes gather more resources than them. Really in this manner AnCaps and NatSocs share the same product: purer, superior genes over time just not by the force of man imposed on others, but the force of man imposing on himself in absolute freedom. Thoughts?

Pretty sure Hoppe might addressed already, but I'm still working through his books.

...

p feisty

anarcho capitalism is the natural order so natural selection of genes should occur

almost pure, I didn't want to be fair to other nations in trade because I'm too racist.

Teach me, senpai.

Bump

checked
>road in captcha

...

So who build the roads in an Anarcho-Capitalism society?

That's exactly what it is. I couldn't have put it better myself. I don't think most ancaps see the passive eugenics of the free market as NatSocs see the forced extermination of "inferiors", since the former simply state that the market rewards goods and punishes bads, without ever hindering freedom, while the latter are more concerned is forcefully eliminating inferiores based on subjective evaluations of a specific government. What books of him are you reading?

It's likely that would be the case, charity would definitely exist in an ancapistan, which might give a helping hand to the lesser productive people. but theres no knowing how prevalent it would be. My impression however is that capitalists are pretty charitable.

Filthy commie, building roads is a NAP aggression.

just answer yes to the "is child slavery legitimate?" question and you'll be where i am.

Your mom

fuggin rekt.

Why does the libertarian right section of political compass memes always get the best laugh out of me?

Hi Bashar!

You know the one, portugalbro :)

The Libertarian Right is behind all the good memes, even nazi memes and anti-ancap strawman memes are made by us.

Fuggin noice bro

>Building roads is a NAP aggression
>Can't build roads to get to point A to point B in very short time because it violate somebody's NAP

Cuck

You're all neo-feudalists.

What are memes?

Am I supposed to read all that commie horseshit?

memes are a social construct

t b h

oops, meant to reply to

nobody will use roads except for heavy freight.
we will all fly from swimming pool to swimming pool

Here is a general rule of thumb for most philosophies and ideas
>if it takes you one hundred words to say something that should only require ten, what you are spouting is probably bullshit
>t. doesn't know what diseconomies of scales is

>the guy who won't read a long spool of text wants a society based around contract law.

Stay spooked classcuck.

b8

lol
>implying anyone can cooperate without property/prices/money
>implying any rational person would join an ancom society where people can freely do heroin everywhere and transaction costs in general are absurdly high

What about Hoppe wants to start physically removing people for being gay etc?

>Plow through 160 pages of dense Hans Herman Hoppe tongue twisters
>He calls Keynes's prose convoluted

Really ironic Tbh

>a Helicopter license costs half of my annual income
>a UH-1 is $500k
Free market, help.

he's reffering to a covenant community founded on protecting family and kin. you're taking him out of context. heres the quote.

Get a business loan and become an Pinochet style economist

Where are you in dude? Amazing that we have a Syrian reading Hoppe kek. Stay safe man

For those that need to be reminded.

far 103
ultraight aircraft,no liscense

buy a gyrocopter instead

He's free to exclude whoever he wants from his private property and/or covenant community. I imagine plenty of communities will accept gay people (if Hoppe is right, they'll do worse. Social darwinism and such).

How we are going to afford the flying machines to get to our jobs? Know how many businesses would be lost to no roads and have to revamp their parking space for flying machines?

youtube.com/watch?v=NRd-yMT_5NE
But does it sound this sexy?

businesses that require roads would happily pay to maintain them.

flying machines use tech just as simple as motorcycles.24 hp engine wood and fabric crossed the english channel over a hundred years ago.
turn them into reflecting pools similar to the one in washington DC

Hi Curt.

...

Ethics of private property. I kinda regret it desu since it was above my level even though I know my economics. Had to read an introduction to Austrian economics to help make sense of it.
Is his language in general always this pretentious or is it just the more technical stuff?

>One individual decides to start a farm on land that a Voluntaryist has claimed on his own

that man broke the NAP right there on his own volition, and thus is met with rightful justice

Nice try, but self-defense and protection of private property is part of the deal, even if it means being violent doing so. In essence by trespassing to farm on someone else's land without permission, that man already committed a violation and is subject to justice as determined by the owner and private courts. There is no contradiction, if the man just respected property rights and other people's property there would be no problems whatsoever and all remains in peace.

I suspect I'm replying to bait, but nonetheless I choose to have done so by my own decision without coercion.

Yes, I too had to look up the word "erroneous" when starting Democracy.

no,thats true.
but this is still kinda badass

youtube.com/watch?v=t8ejDTXUcxg

Dude, EEPP is endgame-tier when it comes to Hoppe. You should start with other, smaller books of his in order to get started. I started with Democracy—The God That Failed and let me tell you, apart from a few clarifications on his philosophical stances on epistemology (his defense of a priori) in the first chapter, the rest is economics, politics, history, society and culture. I'd recommend you to start with Democracy, since it covers everything. There's even a chapter on war which you might consider of special importance given what's happening in your country.

Brazilbro also made this post for his own progress.

Hi hans

So if a business have total control of the maintaining of the roads(only ones with the equipment to do so) decides to fuck you over, what now?

Find another one to do it. That's what great about freedom.

HERE COMES DAT MISES!

I know my economics man. It's not like I don't understand what I'm reading, it's just that it's hard to get through.
Tbh I never felt like reading democracy. The ideas on that book are heavily influenced by the work of Mancur Olsun whom I've read and I don't feel like reading the same stuff twice. In general all economists know that democracy is cancer, Hoppe isn't the first to point that out.

Yeah non native speakers tend to have this complex way of writing to make up for their lack of vocabulary.

round up the jews and nigger NOW!

I will control the concentration camp in africa

USA owns israel

jew women ugly

austrian school economics
IS economics
youtube yaron brook

Fuck it all!

think you got the wrong poster there jack

It's still a great read nonetheless. When it comes to his writing-style, I think it's perfectly fine. He combines technical language and prose quite well, and adds some wit here and there. Also, what's wrong with erroneous? It's a very used word here.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Apparently thinking abortion is murder and immigration should be restricted pegs me as a minarchist.

reading it now
I think all democrats should be removed to africa 1 way

...

T shirt worthy

why dont we go for extreme capitalism?

le pen is not far right
le pen is centric

marcon is far fringe left
as was obama, the worst president of all time

this is giving me an erection

Unfortunately states have built in brakes that make it virtually impossible to do anything. Remember we in Europe over here don't live in the land of the free, unfortunately. We live in the land of compulsory healthcare, gun grabbing and censorship.

Insurgency and separatism is the way to go.

This is actually so accurate it hurts.

This, the elites have their way to block free markets, because those would devoid them of power. For Christ's sake, Macron gets labeled a market liberal here because he doesn't support Le Pen's protectionism. You wouldn't believe how apeshit people go if you mention privatizing healthcare and infrastructure, yet they still blame the (in reality non existent) capitalist boogeyman for everything wrong in the world.

...

>pic related

vote for more capitalist leaders!
I have voted for them nonstop starting with ross perot through ron paul and rand now trump
you have to hold the beleif that democrats are retards, and thier ideas fail
look at obamacare
prices up supply down

...

I think only recently have we been able to throw off the stink of the hippies that invaded the movement in Rothbards time. More people I think are able to make the distinction.

I pointed out to my mom that obamacare made price go up and supply down
she looked at me like I was crazy
she is convinced republicans are stealing medical care from kids or some insane shit

I got enlightened !
Thank you, burger !
Now, be a good bürger-
have a fat, massive burger,
mein bürger.

im seriously so erect i feel like im sliding into a tight pussy doggystyle

get in here fegs

...

The propertarians are an interesting group. Doolittle has decent criticism of Hoppe's Argument from Argumentation. They also have a similar issue with the Austrian a priori argument approach to economics. Good stuff to see the type of counter argument you might run into if you are arguing on an economic basis.

sweet man, welcome to the covenant.

unfortunately there is no such thing here in Portugal. For example, just yesterday our centre-right party, the CDS (Social Democratic Centre) had one of their speakers, Adolfo Nunes, debating about Le Pen and Macron on a program along with a higher up of the Left Bloc, Mariana Mortágua. She rambled how both Macron and Le Pen didn't give enough "rights" to people and that Le Pen was fascism and all sorts of crazy bullshit. Then the CDS guy called her out on her bullshit by saying a lot of the Left Bloc's economic policy is similar or equal to the National Front, and that their party had sympathizers of Maduro and what-not, and she just denied it all and said "we're against fascism!". There is no right wing party in this country, no desire for autonomy and freedom. All parties don't want their competitors to take a hold of the state, but they themselves wish to use it for their advantage. It's a fucking shame. And our constitution is leftist garbage, which explicitly says in the preamble that Portugal ought to be a socialist country, and comes up with all sorts of bullshit rights and duties.

Im guna seriously blow a laod can barely hold on

...

...

What are this guys tenets?
How does he stack up against objectivism?
Natural order?
Geoism, objectivism, natural order, possibly propertarian are things I find tolerable.

I love Hoppe, but he's a victim of his education by Habermas and Rothbard. If he had attempted to write about private property as a means of commensurability in scientific language and not through apriorism then he could have won a nobel prize like Ostrom did for her work on commons etc. It's a pity really