His dissection of leftists is one of the most insanely accurate things I've ever read...

His dissection of leftists is one of the most insanely accurate things I've ever read. He's the greatest thinker of modern times

Other urls found in this thread:

editions-hache.com/essais/pdf/kaczynski2.pdf
washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=YQ-Upb4Szms
gtx0.com/view.php?post=74039
youtube.com/watch?v=jYBcnwr5EEM
youtube.com/watch?v=OuRhEYTIFSU
youtube.com/watch?v=BMWEg-DdUDg
youtube.com/watch?v=RXGnsYrA1ZM
youtube.com/watch?v=qWWxEZ5QAQI
youtube.com/watch?v=wX7bHHg9ois
youtube.com/watch?v=x_fBYROA7Hk
youtube.com/watch?v=LD2ofP62KLU
youtube.com/watch?v=ri7euevDADg
youtube.com/watch?v=cSb3-Z42fb8
youtube.com/watch?v=x1_qkf23OiY
youtube.com/watch?v=3nwPLaYJ6kw
therightstuff.biz/2013/02/01/the-sickening-pretense-of-non-power/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

can you post please the most relevant few paragraphs?

10/10 serial killer

this, i really want to learn more about him, also was he jewish? i thought he might be from that last name

editions-hache.com/essais/pdf/kaczynski2.pdf

Read from Feelings of Inferiority

Who is this even?

Actually just read the whole thing, won't take you more than 30 min

Oh nvm im retarded

He is the famous Unabomber.

polish descent i think
goes like this:
>technology grants an ez life
>people focus on non-issues
and something he called oversocialization which i dont remember what it was

Ive thought the same thing, he had some pretty good ideas

>He's the greatest thinker of modern times.

and super great mathematician, too.

Him and Tim are unironically pillars of their political sides.

This was him, and you will follow.

While all of the essays are perfectly interesting they are far too generalizing.
Yes I realize the essays acknowledge this but with the amount conclusions being drawn there doesn't seem to be enough data to enforce those conclusions.
At least as far as the root causes go. The generally ideological profile of a leftist seemed fairly accurate.

Not the heroes we deserved but the ones we needed. One far left, the other far right, both freedom fighters in every sense of the word

Ted did nothing wrong

Also, don't forget about his critique on conservatives

Quote: "The conservatives are fools: They whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological
progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that you can't make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the economy of a society with out causing rapid changes in all other aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break down traditional values."

uncle ted was right. maybe not about wanton murder, but about everything else

>Actually just read the whole thing, won't take you more than 30 min
it's 35,000 words. it's almost half a novel. it will take you 3-4 hours to read. it can be read in one sitting, which is what i did, but it will take WAY more than 30 minutes. you clearly havent read the whole thing.

>one far left, the other far right

also, neither was authoritarian

>can you post please the most relevant few paragraphs?
next time i get some free time i will go through the entire thing and take out all the choice choice sections and post them all in a single thread

Yep

One was fighting the unis and modern industrial techno age

One the government

"The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone’s problems for them, satisfy everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs… His feelings of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization or a mass movement with which he identifies himself.
The moral code of our society is so demanding that no one can think, feel and act in a completely moral way ... Some people are so highly socialized that the attempt to think, feel and act morally imposes a severe burden on them...The over socialized person cannot even experience, without guilt, thoughts or feelings that are contrary to the accepted morality; he cannot think “unclean” thoughts…. the over socialized person is kept on a psychological leash and spends his life running on rails that society has laid down for him. In many over socialized people this results in a sense of constraint and powerlessness that can be a severe hardship."

Here's his manifesto, he got the NYT and Wapo to publish it. It's also what got him caught.
washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm

If you're interested in further reading, Alston Chase has a great book, Harvard and the Unabomber the Education of an American Terrorist. Chase is a philosopher and goes fairly deep into the philosophical basis of Ted's beliefs.

Lol, first time I read it I was 15 and I just finished reading it right now. It took me not even 2hrs

Okay, but why did he need to kill innocent people?

>"it only takes 30 minutes"
>**gets called out**
>"i mean it takes just under 2 hours!"

ok mr. speed-reading genius 2 hours is still WAY longer than 30 minutes.

He got really pissed off and frustrated. When the enemy is modern technological civilization how do you even attempt to fight it.

"True I would not fit into the present society in any case but that is not an intolerable situation. What makes a situation intolerable is the fact that in all probability, the values that I detest, will soon be achieved through science, an utterly complete and permanent victory throughout the whole world, with a total extrication of everything I value…. It's not merely the fact that I cannot fit into society that has induced me to rebel, as violently as I have, it is the fact that I can see society made possible by science inexorably imposing on-me"

So he ends up kind of blindly lashing out at people that supported the technological system or those that were most likely to advance technology. Also going through nearly weekly CIA level interrogations throughout your college career starting at age sixteen will fuck up anyone.

>Okay, but why did he need to kill innocent people?
to get attention for his manifesto. can't argue with his results, 2bh.

>Also going through nearly weekly CIA level interrogations throughout your college career starting at age sixteen will fuck up anyone.
it was for MKUltra to learn how to breakdown highly successful and intelligent people.

He targeted people involved in unis, computing, transport and similar. All part of the modern techno industrial age.

To him, they weren't innocent.

FEELINGS OF INFERIORITY

10. By “feelings of inferiority” we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strict sense but a whole spectrum of related traits; low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self- hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have some such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.

11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights activists, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities and about anything that is said concerning minorities. The terms “negro,” “oriental,” “handicapped” or “chick” for an African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation. “Broad” and “chick” were merely the feminine equivalents of “guy,” “dude” or “fellow.” The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal rights activists have gone so far as to reject the word “pet” and insist on its replacement by “animal companion.” Leftish anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the world “primitive” by “nonliterate.” They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)

12. Those who are most sensitive about “politically incorrect” terminology are not the average black ghetto- dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any “oppressed” group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual white males from middle- to upper-middle-class families.

13. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals) or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not mean to suggest that women, Indians, etc. ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology.)

14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.

15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.

16. Words like “self-confidence,” “self-reliance,” “initiative,” “enterprise,” “optimism,” etc., play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone’s problems for them, satisfy everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.

17. Art forms that appeal to modern leftish intellectuals tend to focus on sordidness, defeat and despair, or else they take an orgiastic tone, throwing off rational control as if there were no hope of accomplishing anything through rational calculation and all that was left was to immerse oneself in the sensations of the moment.

Ted did literally nothing wrong

...

18. Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative. It is true that one can ask serious questions about the foundations of scientific knowledge and about how, if at all, the concept of objective reality can be defined. But it is obvious that modern leftish philosophers are not simply cool-headed logicians systematically analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are deeply involved emotionally in their attack on truth and reality. They attack these concepts because of their own psychological needs. For one thing, their attack is an outlet for hostility, and, to the extent that it is successful, it satisfies the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., failed, inferior). The leftist’s feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is “inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he has not been brought up properly.

youtube.com/watch?v=YQ-Upb4Szms

here is a quick rundown

19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter, a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong, and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant behavior. [1] But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization or a mass movement with which he identifies himself.

20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist trait.

It goes on, but these posts are some of the most perfect description of the modern left ever recorded by the hand of man.

He was on his way to be an A-list maths professor.

I was posting in yesterday's Ted thread. Anyone wanting to know more about him should read the manifesto. It's not real long and well worth it.

He was a socialist and a radical environmentalist. He only criticized the modern left because they aren't far enough left for him.

Literal hippy trash

It took me like 4 hours

ted the lad being right as always

bullshit

He'd fit in perfectly in Sup Forums, see

His last name is Polish not nessicsarily Jewish, (Though there are alot of Jews in poland)

...

>tfw sam harris wanted to interview him for his podcast but the state won't let him

I love all of his book.
That analysis of liberals is truly great.

If I could talk to him I would. Apparently you can mail him and he actually responds, but I don't want to get put on a watch list.

Holy fuck how can someone be so wrong? Ted was redpill before it was called redpill. He loathed the leftists enough to kill them. Not figuratively, now. He literally sent bombs to leftists at university to kill them.

A socialist. LOL!

*yet another watchlist

>socialist

That's just blatantly wrong, he advocated pretty explicitly against reliance on the state

He's not talking about "liberals".

His ideology is called anarcho-primitivism, which is a more intellectually developed version of anarcho-capitalism.

No. Read the manifesto, he critiques the left for their fetishism of weakness and how they try to tear down anything strong and healthy (for instance, white culture). He's an environmentalist but NOT a,leftist/hippie.

let's figure out a way to get him internet in his cell so he can join in here on pol/

>millennial education

That is fake, right?

...

you're probably right lol, I bet everyone on this board is already on one for being here

what? the picture?

Based mail order clock maker

seems like it worked, maybe too well

Originally polish knights and nobles had surnames that end with -ski or -ska (female).
This doesn't mean that everyone with a Polish surname ending in -ski can trace their roots back to noble lineage, but it's possible.

>Though there are alot of Jews in poland
Before the WW2 - sure
According to the data from 2011 - about 8000 people.

>No, what worries me is that I might in a sense adapt to this environment and come to be comfortable here and not resent it anymore. And I am afraid that as the years go by that I may forget, I may begin to lose my memories of the mountains and the woods and that's what really worries me, that I might lose those memories, and lose that sense of contact with wild nature in general. But I am not afraid they are going to break my spirit.
Answer given when he was asked if he was afraid of losing his mind in prison.

Yes. I don't believe in such coincidences, and Noam seems pretty old in comparison.

I been watched and listed ; fucked and fisted; I don't care . tell me how to mail him. I ain't skeert.

>when he was asked if he was afraid of losing his mind in prison.
how the question implies ted is sane

Ted Kaczynski #04475–046
Federal ADX Supermax
5880 State Highway 67
Florence, Co. 81226

Oh, I have no idea if he said that or not. I think he's right though. In the manifesto he talks about how man has isolated himself from nature. I agree because I personally have always found a calmness to being in the woods. I live in a rural area and go on walks every now and then. It really does seem to help.

It would suck to be trapped in prison and isolated from the outside world. Ted has probably not been in nature since his arrest.

Don't fear being put on any watchlist. Government officials are just as frightened of a post-scarcity economy as the rest of us

Interesting read so far up to page 4
Its very insightful and very easy to read and digest
Recommended
Have anything esle like this?

I think the pics are real. I don't know who the old guy is.

...

He was and is sane. The folks saying "insane" break into two major categories:

1) Those who wanted to protect him from the death penalty.

2) The same kind of dipshit like "experts" who analyzed the manifesto before Ted was caught and indicated that it was someone who had never managed to complete their university education and was simultaneously envious of and hateful toward university folks for this reason. As I recall, they said the intelligence level reflected in the manifesto was not especially high.

Joke's on group #2. Ted probably has more brainpower than both of those experts combined...

Second chapter of "The road to Wigan pier" by George Orwell. He had swallowed ethereal leftist red pill. He one of the few deeply left wing thinkers able to analyze the real roots and motivations of the movement, and end up with deep disgust in it.

So why did he kill randomly. Why not target left leaders?

Shame CIA Psyops fucked his head when he was a kid. He coulda been a lot more than what he became.

More pics like this please

He was mainly after University folks and airlines folks as I recall. University is obvious; he knew decades before most that they are reprogramming camps. Not sure why the airlines people.

To make people afraid to travel

Cheers user
Its seems a lot of what he has said so far falls inline with many of my own ideas or thoughts, especially the part with that its not about helping others but its about there need for control or power due to depression low self esteem etc
Have anymore recommended books articles papers? Up to page 8 very engaging stuff

They were complicit with the advancement of technologies which destroy societies.

...

.

This is my biggest problem with this people. They're so rational and spot-on to all these problems, and then the next day they're killing a bunch of innocent bystanders.

Psychologizing a large group of people is fun, but limiting. In the interest of the former, though, maybe this will humor you.

>Conception 1
>The Socially-controlling, dogmatic Left is a mirror the socially-controlling dogmatic Right

Here's out faggoty friend Ryan Faulk on the matter:

>I contend that while being a cultural marxist is a default position you are born into, there are two factors that make someone a militant and bigoted cultural marxist (someone who uses the term “social justice” on a regular basis): 1. The group conformity factor 2. The religion factor Group Conformity .... To be a “racist” is similar to being a “heretic” in the middle ages.

gtx0.com/view.php?post=74039

You're right. It's eerie how accurate it was of what's going on today.

Anyone here ever written to him?

If you don't have this book, you should buy this book.

More on this
youtube.com/watch?v=jYBcnwr5EEM
youtube.com/watch?v=OuRhEYTIFSU
youtube.com/watch?v=BMWEg-DdUDg
More on the nexus Leftist Feminists using the Rightists to push their family court agenda:
youtube.com/watch?v=RXGnsYrA1ZM

youtube.com/watch?v=qWWxEZ5QAQI

I believe the old guy is brother who helped turn Ted in to feds.

The old guy is Ted's father

>Conception 1
>The Socially-controlling, dogmatic Left is a mirror the socially-controlling dogmatic Right

This is the "we suck but it's OK because you suck too" argument. Is it truly that hard to see that there is no left-right mirror here and cannot ever be? Why? Because the left is collectivist, it has a natural tendency to push its members into conformity. The right believes in the unique characteristics, potential, and achievements of the individual, and in rewarding them commensurately with those achievements. So if the right will sometimes push conformity too, it is not an integral part of their belief system.

Besides which, the left is alone in embracing so many contradictions and ignoring so many paradoxes to make their system work:

1) a. Gender is a social construct [and therefore not real]. b. Human rights [which are unquestionably a social construct] are sacrosanct and very real.

2) a. Women are as capable as men and should be treated equally. b. Rape law, custody law, separate competitions and record books not just for physical prowess but also for mental, e.g. female chess champion of the world.

3) a. All cultures and races are equal in every way. b2. Diversity is strength or b2. White people suck.

4) a. Black is beautiful. b. We need a separate beauty pageant for niggers to make sure a nigger gets to win.

It goes on and on. The right has nowhere near this level of self-contradiction in it.

The "activist" Left wants attention
youtube.com/watch?v=wX7bHHg9ois
They have little control of their own lives, want to control others' and like the endorphin release of their virtue signaling.

youtube.com/watch?v=x_fBYROA7Hk

More on Crusaderism Left and Right
youtube.com/watch?v=LD2ofP62KLU
youtube.com/watch?v=ri7euevDADg
youtube.com/watch?v=cSb3-Z42fb8
youtube.com/watch?v=x1_qkf23OiY
youtube.com/watch?v=3nwPLaYJ6kw

therightstuff.biz/2013/02/01/the-sickening-pretense-of-non-power/

Tim who?

5) a. There is no difference between men and women. b. Men can become women and women can become men.

Finally a decent thread