Are you for universal suffrage?

Are you for universal suffrage?

If not, what are your requirements for voting?

Only whites

Reminder that the West only survived 50 years of women being able to vote

>this will be in future history books

White and owns land.

and only men
there's a reason nu males exist

>Need to be a net tax payer.
>Need to be able to function well enough to get a government-issued ID.

No. Only male land owners. That excludes most of the shitskins but doesnt exclude those that are actually productive.

White males

IQ above 100
owns land
passes test about government structure / functions
passes history test
only men, or only one vote per household

maybe vote shares where meeting more requirements = more votes

>Are you for universal suffrage?

Yes. It works, but slowly. Exactly the way that good government should work.

white trash is no better than non whites

>White
>Land Owner or Veteran (should be a package deal IMO)
>Married w/child
>Male
>No Atheist

No voting at all. Hereditary monarchy or bust.

Exactly. Add in an additional line about anyone on pension but was a net positive for x years before retiring maintains voting right for as long as they can maintain their drivers license.

Male land owners.

Attending philosophical classes with political thinkers of every background from Nietzsche to Marcus Aurelius to Aristotle to that faggot called Rousseau. For each exam you pass your vote is worth more. Seems better to me than what we currently have.
The leftist cunts may call suburban retards retards all they want except for brain dead drama stories they don't read much either.

>Please do my homework for me
Oy vey goyim why would you be against universal suffrage, the great diluter of the concentration and efficient exercise of power?

More to the point, voting only for Registered, landed citizens who are tax payers, mandatory voting (blank votes acceptable but must cast the vote). If Democracy is sacred then it should be enforced as a right by every eligible voter not only to legitimise the result but to reinforce the value of Democracy.

Otherwise it is a token exercise in (((public consultation))).

What about Traps? Can you lose your suffrage with your dick? Or are the genes more important? "Must have dick" or "Must have Y-chromosome"?

Property owning men

every citizen should be able to directly vote on all legislation.
the technology exists. It would pretty much end corruption and promote a well informed, and involved citizenship that would have complete control over their future.
A parliament could exist to bring forth legislation and help inform the public of the rational options via debate and discourse.

everyone gets 1 vote, then married couples with more than 3 children get an extra vote if they are net payers of tax

>more than 3 children
3 or more children

Women voted for Nixon over Kennedy

>electronic voting
Yes yes good goy let us rig the votes for you!

Citizens don't want to vote, because they are lazy fuckers. The only reason Australia has such a high participation rate is because it's mandatory.

Take Brexit for example, the youngest cohort 18-20s who are eligible to vote overwhemingly did not support Brexit yet voter turnout was 20% or so, then having realised what just happened proceeded to use (((alternative))) means to voice their opinions (social media).

Conclusion is quite simple. People are either too stupid or too lazy for direct voting to work.