Women deserve equal righ-

>Women deserve equal righ-

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=8lCKeDl0l9c
youtube.com/watch?v=R5X9lENC4jQ
youtube.com/watch?v=zb_WYGtZ7K4
youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw
youtube.com/watch?v=Sn-ZQ3eKAM4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

When did the X Games become America's Funniest Home Videos?

>help, I'm crashing in my slowmobile

so what?
they do.

oh my god

>the bitch who falls like 12 feet
Every time

women aren't supposed to be as athletic as men though

>they do... NOT.
There. Fixed it for you.

They already have them
You gonna try taking them away?

not really.
and they already have them.
why would we refuse to grant them equal rights?
what benefit do we get from that?

>women aren't supposed to be as athletic as men though
So that just validates what OP is trying to say. Women, because they are not equal to men, do not deserve the same rights men have.

Yes.
>what benefit do we get from that?
Everything.

Less women working and more cleaning my home and making dinner.

These aren't professionals right ?

But they want you to believe that. On the top of my head I can't come up with any female athlete that can even compete with a man on the same "level". Elite vs. elite.

They literally cannot compete in the same league if it requires physical power. Apparently not even if it's motor driven.

This is from a few years back right? Don't tell me they are still doing this.

very explanatory.

youtube.com/watch?v=8lCKeDl0l9c

fucking hilarious

my fucking sides

>X Games
They are.

if you can't force yourself to clean your house and need someone else to do it, you are beyond hope.
still, you can still have your own way in your family if you really want.
but taking rights away from women will damage couples that don't want to live in the same way as you do. what about them?

Those professional female dirt bikers couldn't even compete with me, an average joe who rides trails on weekends. That's a seriously shameful display, it looks like they all just got on a bike that day.

Professional women.

Dude the title is a joke calm down.

>implying
You're telling me you'd rather not come home to a clean home and a hot meal?

Holy fuck women suck.

This is literal a finals.

These are supposed to be pros, the best of the best.

Jesus christ. Women suck, why did we let these bitched vote.

...

This was difficult to watch

ROASTIE DETECTED ahahaha. Women are inferior, okay? It's just how nature intended our species to be.

So i take it they practice alot huh?

kek, i as an average joe who has never done this would be bad but nowhere near as bad as them , i laughed way too fucking hard at 0:41

i would rather. but some people need their views to work and earn money to help feed their children and establish them a future. or for other reasons. who are we to object?

Hello canadacuck here are a few pointers for you:
>women vote, overwhelmingly, for the left
>because they are incrediby emotional-- necessary and vital for child rearing
>but that means they vote with feelings, not facts
>which means giving women the vote is a one-way ticket to socialism
>which accelerates quickly since men die at war and women pretend to be useful at home
>as the birth rate declines
Hopefully this will help you to uncuck yourself but Im not holding my breath
Also women can't ride bikes apparently.

I assume you would have the balls to try? These females are traversing the course like they are afraid to break a nail.

A bunch of fags on an anonymous Mongolian basket weaving forum with no censorship. We can object to anything we want.

It's not just women.

Seriously. All tracks have females ride in the same class as children or veterans (people 55/60+) and they are still the slowest.

>women vote, overwhelmingly, for the left
they can vote for whichever side thy want. it is not our business. you go and vote for your own party, they vote for their party. where is the problem? if we go by your reasoning, we might as well remove every party you disagree with.

>because they are incrediby emotional-- necessary and vital for child rearing
so what? they still deserve equal rights. being emotional is not an excuse to remove their rights. we have a civilization that gives us the right to behave like we really are. why does this should be discouraged? it is a freedom that many other civilizations don't get to enjoy.

which means giving women the vote is a one-way ticket to socialism which accelerates quickly since men die at war and women pretend to be useful at home as the birth rate declines
again, they vote to whomever they want. it is none of your business.

nice way of avoiding the topic.
why should we take the rights of women from families that need them?

is this the special olympics

i can't believe they are professionals, it looks like they are still in training on how to drive at all
are you certain these are not in fact all volunteers?

saved

Here's the men's for comparison.

youtube.com/watch?v=R5X9lENC4jQ

>being emotional is not an excuse to remove their rights
Do you not read what you respond to? Being emotional is being entirely reactionary with no vision of the future. I'm not against women voting but seeing your virtue signaling faggotry makes me want to see your disgusting excuse for a country fail even more. kys faggot

>women deserve equal pa--

>women
>x-games

all they're good for is the xxx games

You faggot leaf stop crying and laugh at the content.

But canadacuck, you forgot to respond to the most important part
>they vote with feelings, not facts
Left, right, up, down, no matter which way you vote, if its done with an uninformed opinion, you're not taking an objective stance on politics. I'd happily say women should be allowed to vote if they took a moment to invest some time to learning the politics as opposed to falling prey to dead children propoganda.

This paired with the fact that they're the ones left to nurture and teach the child while the father fights or works and you have not just one useful idiot with a ballot, but a future useful idiot in the making-- groomed by their idiot mother.
And of course, men can be victims to this kind of thing as well, but it's not a fact of biology that makes them susceptible to it.

>Leaf

where is the virtue signaling here?

> I'm not against women voting
then why the fuck are we even arguing?

God damn thanks user I had a hearty kek

Women make good firefighters though.

youtube.com/watch?v=zb_WYGtZ7K4

...

it might very well be true. but the moment we start to prevent people from voting because they vote on "the wrong side" or because they are too "sensitive" is the moment we start to fall into the pit of fascism. our ancestors worked hard for what we got, and while i agree that there needs to be some change, banning voters is against everything most western civilizations stand for.

Nah, they don't.

youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw

kek

>they disagree with me so they should be shut down
oh, how jewish of you.

lol, dude, come on. all of the civilizations that women have ever gained the right to vote or participate politically in were extremely wealthy and in moral decline, and fell soon after. all of the strongest and most successful ones were severely patriarchal. In Ancient Greece (physics, metaphysics, logic, geometry,etc.), women weren't even allowed to leave the house. In Rome (aqueducts, roads, etc.) the essence of virtue was masculinity - virtue literally means manliness or virility in Latin. Even in 18th century Europe (modern mechanics, optics, etc.) they were kept in the house. Women gaining the right to vote is completely coincidental with the declining power of the West (even if it is not in itself the sole cause, but also in many ways the effect). The strongest societies are divided into two, man occupy the outside and women the inside sphere. history proves it.

>Freedom is the best
>Politics is none of your business

Fucking disgrace

Why are ((leafs)) always such faggots? What are they putting in your water?

There's no way this is someone who actually wanted to be a police officer. It must have been a citizen training with the force or something.

>the finals
didnt these idiots practice

Jesus fuck, this is bad. I closed out at 2 minutes, I just couldn't watch anymore.

...

voting is not a right, it is a privilege.
If a man or woman cannot understand the Burden of the Voter, the civic duty of the voter, then they should not be permitted to cast their vote.

it is not your "right" to get a say in how things work, it is a privilege, and that privilege should be closely guarded for those who understand what it means.

Like owning fully automatic firearms or tigers.
because in truth, voting is as dangerous as tigers.

Not all women.

>that cunty expression she makes after he pulls that off

sure, but how about now?
the very arabs and muslims we hate keep genders separate, while the west allows women to have some rights at least.
granted, that is not how west got to where it is now. but success should improve the life standard of people and it should bring satisfaction. success just for the sake of success is pointless. and women rights is a way for countries to capitalize on that success to bring some happiness to their citizens. personally, i would not want to live in a "successful" nation that regularly shits on its people. people should also benefit from success as well.

...

according to one of the comments, no
they supposedly are usually dricing some other motorbikes and the women's finals are the first and last round already
> All of these woman are Motocross drivers who had been given a chance to ride an Enduro course. So it's comparable to F1-only drivers being placed in ralley cars and dumped in the desert for some all terrain race. Besides. The video might say "Final" but with the X-Games only taking 4 days, this was the first AND last race of the womans enduro competition.
not sure if it's true, but they do get better towards the end
still fun to look at though

>woman_slicing_pineapple
>is of two women failing to open a coconut

what'd he mean by this?

You misunderstand. Read carefully, canadacuck.
>women vote with feelings, not facts
Obviously, there will be exceptions on both sides. It's not my fault that rigorous application of logic and reasoning leads people to the right. It's just nature that puts women on the left. And it can only be wrong if they are allowed to vote simpy because they have a vagina.
It's the same logic that applies to modern schooling. You can't artificially inject low IQ populations into the system and expect them to catch up with higher IQ populations. What happens is school standards are lowered to avoid racism claims.
You can't artificially inject overly sensitive individuals into the voting system. It doesn't bring them to be as logical and reasonable as the people who voted before the women were given the right. It lowers the intellectual standard for voting. This is why you get people who will only vote republican for religious reasons. It's why you get people who only vote democrat for gay rights. Women are a plague on democracy, and I kind of wish it weren't so. But facts is facts and we wuz oppressed bitches

i said somebody else's right to vote for their chosen political part is none of your concern. it concerns them and them alone. i don't get how the fuck you would take it as
>Politics is none of your business

neck yourself, retarded faggot.

What in the fuck what she even trying to accomplish by doing all that shit?

then why do feminists support Islam so much right now?

>/fit/ happy new year's

...

That looks like some crossfit bullshit...

it's not because they disagree it's because they have a negative effect on society. it's not an abstract question.

>go prone with what is probably a 9 fucking MM
>still manage to limpwrist it hard enough it fucking whaps you in the face and draws blood
lmfao, post this on /k/

yes, but the thing is, a single voter is not the sole decider of the outcome. they might not understand how politics work, but as someone who gets effected by politics, they should get to have a say in it.

okay, but let's assume that the government wanted to filter their voters so that the only voters that know what the fuck they are talking about gets to vote. how would they achieve that? is there a realistic way of determining who gets to vote and who does not?
how would the government prevent that system from getting corrupted and rigged to a specific party's favor? and even worse, how would we make sure that the government does not rig the system to benefit itself?

I had to look up a men's event just to see how it's done for comparison.

youtube.com/watch?v=Sn-ZQ3eKAM4

asian commentary makes it

This reminds me of the time I had to teach a female SGM (Sergeant Major) the fundamentals of Basic Rifle Marksmanship. I also had to fix her helmet, and zero her sights for her.

That's just one especially bad example, but after training Soldiers for almost 8 years I can confidently say that 95% of women are not built for combat and should not be wearing a uniform unless they're a French Maid.

The female edition of Cast Away.

This video is golden

if you are getting effected by your country's politics, then i think you should get to have a say in it.

okay, but let's assume that the government wanted to filter their voters so that the only voters that know what the fuck they are talking about gets to vote. how would they achieve that? is there a realistic way of determining who gets to vote and who does not?
>how would the government prevent that system from getting corrupted and rigged to a specific party's favor? and even worse, how would we make sure that the government does not rig the system to benefit itself?

that is copied and pasted, but another person made the same argument.

apart from them not being suited, it's also plain unattractive, I want a female woman, not one that tries her hardest to be a man.
I want someone who can do what I can't, not someone whose job I could do myself

Bait or nor you are a disgrace to your gender

>only landowners get to vote
Not that I have put any serious thought into this part of the discussion before, but if we take it back to this era, it's ensured that landowners will mostly educate themselves on politics. Why? They don't want their property to be devalued. That means they want to pick their neighbors. That means they take an objective look at violence in the nigger community instead of pretending they can mesh and assimilate to the rest of the population. They'll also need to ensure that whatever party they vote for won't be doing anything that would ruin their property value as collateral damage-- mass immigration for example.

If women stop working, the money earned by a man will be enough to support himself as less people working means more pay for those who do work. So, a family can be supported without a working wife if women can't work and the money men earn increases due to it.

Crossfit done by people who know what they're doing is pretty intense.

Just because Muslims do a thing does not necessarily make it wrong. They also eat bread. Should we not eat bread? Second, rights are nothing more than the fruits of responsibilities; imagine that you are on an island by yourself, you only have the 'right' to eat if you take upon the 'responsibility' of hunting. Thus, if we accord rights where there are no responsibilities, then we no longer respect what makes the system work. So that everyone has the 'right' not to be invaded, men must take upon the 'responsibility' of being willing to fight and sacrifice life and limb, for which they are much better suited than women. So that we actually have soldiers who care about dying for their land, we need women to take upon the 'responsibility' of motherhood, for which they are uniquely suited. Economic migrants make poor soldiers. I think that each family - that is not on public assistance - should get one vote. families are the basis of societies, and societies are really nothing more than giant families. The list goes on. Women who have children late in life (because they are busy with that quota career) have higher chances of having retarded children, etc. I'm not saying that we should prevent women from becoming doctors for instance, I just don't think we should encourage it and promote it as we do. we should promote the basis for all societies: the family.

HELP HELP I"VE FALLEN ON MY SCOOTER AND I CANT GET UP< ITS GOING @ FAST AHHH

but they could betray their own nation if they saw another nation to be more profitable. i like capitalism, but i think governments should have a few key differences from companies to secure their existence.

The problem is that women do not support nationalism. They vote for the left inviting in migrants from the middle east who are still very patriarchal. Women having more power is basically suicidal for a nation. The West is becoming ever weaker, and the middle east will take advantage of that weakness.
Inviting enough of this patriarchal society into the west they will eventually take over and women will lose their rights anyways.

You are doing exactly what women do. They virtue signal and respond with emotions. They don't look towards the future and the consequence of voting for mass social benefits and immigration of a society that looks down on females.

>The audience applauds when the dumb cunt climbs back up the hill she fell down

Jesus Christ.

I have a couple more webm like this

...

>you are beyond hope

Most successful men throughout history had this yet they were not beyond hope. Women waited hand and foot on them and they built the greatest nations on earth.