Sup Forums will defend this

>Sup Forums will defend this

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=KS9EMvbBq_U
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Sup Forums is one person
nice meme

>what liberals think this means

reee democracy shouldn't work simply by popular vote

>what it actually means

democracy a shit, what is objectively best for people doesn't need to be the most popular

>bawwwwwwwwwww t-the candidates I want to win should win and not the one with most votes!!! it's not democracy if I don't get it my way!

the_donald is pathetic

Pretty sure he was trying to say "democracy is a horrible system anyways"

>the_donald
>smart

Pick one.

>r*ddit

I don't see a critique of democracy in that reddit post, it's just incoherent butthurt

Fuck democracy. Welcome to Sup Forums.

>libtard screenshots his own post
no surprise there.

>democracy a shit, what is objectively best for people doesn't need to be the most popular
you're assuming that what's best for people should always be chosen

It's as if any defective mutant and degenerate was enabled to breed. Stupid ideas and ideologies need to die, and they only die when they get tried and fail catastrophically.

What's the alternative? How do you ensure that someone capable assumes power in an autocratic system?

Modern Democracy is.
Politics is a profession and everyone is doing it in self interest. It is corrupt and inefficient.

The ancient democracy was more transparent positions of power were unpaid , so you didn't earn anything by sitting there doing nothing.

The only way to gain was to make a change that would actually benefit the citystate.

the belief that the popular idioticity
will somehow give us a better future is pretty interesting

replace

>impossible for Le Pen to win

with

>impossible for objective truth to win

Thats a pretty classic critique of dysfunctional democracies.

>you're assuming that what's best for people should always be chosen

Yes? Basic game theory

>It's as if any defective mutant and degenerate was enabled to breed. Stupid ideas and ideologies need to die, and they only die when they get tried and fail catastrophically.

Then failing catastrophically is the best choice.

>objective truth
>politics

I see, I'm arguing with a retard

>The ancient democracy was more transparent positions of power were unpaid , so you didn't earn anything by sitting there doing nothing.

Ancient democracies were essentially an extended large aristocracy where citizens were all veterans and land land owners of the city state.

the_donald is fucking cancer

it would only work on a bigger system,
the current one would not cause the extinction or inability to breed on the current democracy, it would do the opossite.
the more fucked up economy is the more people will breed.

He's implying that whats best for people isn't always popular you dumbass spaghetti nigger. This isn't implying that Marine Le Pen is the sum total of logos on earth, its just a poorly worded and often used criticism of democratic systems.

>defending reddit

Sup Forums is also cancer btw.

>tfw hate reddit but understand that we have to redpill Gen Z and normies somehow

Who else but the people should choose what's best for them? You think a redditor jacking off in his basement knows best what should be done with French people than an actual Frenchmen? You are delusional.

atleast it's a tolerable cancer

...

Protip: this board is well over 50% the_donald posters by now

Immigration killed this board

>posts anime

You pretty much prove your own point there, degenerate NEET closet cases like you should absolutely not have the right to vote.

>Who else but the people should choose what's best for them?

People with an IQ >80 who have some foresight? I mean especially when we are talking about something as large as a nation, people's experiences differ greatly. Some people have to live in the slums and experience the issues immigration and neoliberal or socialistics economic policies cause first hand, others are too young or too sheltered to understand the consequences of their actions.

Might want to read the works of the ancient greeks and learn about hubris my spaghetti nationalist friend. The mob is not inherently intelligent, although i guess that means something different for italians who kill each other over literally nothing.

>asuka is the best way to weed out newfags

The only anime I've ever watched is Cowboy Bebop, because most anime is garbage. But seriously you haven't experienced shitposting until you driven someone mad with smug anime faces.

Diversity ruins everything

>implyong anyone should have the right to vote

>777

Can't argue with those digits

HAHAHAAHAHA

you drumpfkins are admiting you need the jew tricks to win

AHAHAHAHAHHAHAA

OY VEY GOYIM

>you're assuming that what's best for people should always be chosen
>Yes? Basic game theory

Nigga what? In many game theory scenarios, the optimal strategy of a player is rarely achieved by choosing what's best for the player. Excepr in cooperative games of course

Have a one party state where they decide the next leader. China is doing great under this system, and they are third world. We just have to replace the hammer and sickle with a swastika or fasces.

Alrighty then, let's remove voting rights from people arbitrarily. But don't complain when people are going to riot because they don't agree with your system and they have no other way to show their disagreement.

PROTIP:
You're a faggot

>Excepr in cooperative games of course

I didn't know we lived in mad max where its everyone vs everyone?

>arbitrarily
>but people will riot

The amount of corruption this would lead to would be catastrophic. Any business who can pay off the members of that one party could essentially reign the nation.

How do you ensure that someone capable assumes power in a democratic system? seems far more difficult

PROTIP: remove your lips from Donald's baby dick.

>defend what some random nobody who you don't even share a webste with has said

>>>/reddit/

fixed

like any democracy where whoever pays off the media essentially controls the nation

a good analogy for what is happening in the West

Competition. If a party wants to stay in power they have to please the public somehow or the other party will. Also if the person in power is incapable they'll get voted out in a few years anyway.

Subtle

noice

kek

they have influence but they don't control it. the last say is still left to the politicians.

well played

...

an autocrat does what he thinks is best, a group that needs to be continually re elected will only do what the people who influence the voters tell them to do.

what if you had to earn your right to vote
what if you had to prove your vote has more meaning than someone else

I don't expect anything from them.
It's just assblasting

>an autocrat does what he thinks is best
for himself and his friends. they have no reason to cozy up to the public so they just pay the army to keep them on a leash. look at venezuela.

what about this?
youtube.com/watch?v=KS9EMvbBq_U

Why would Sup Forums defend The_Donald?

Yeah, great idea. Now we have jobs for all those Gender Studies degrees - they can decide who should vote based on privilege. Thanks! :^)