Sup Forums's thoughts on AnCap? Im neutral but open to opinions from either side

Sup Forums's thoughts on AnCap? Im neutral but open to opinions from either side

>pic unrelated

Other urls found in this thread:

ancap.com.au/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

it's a meme

What is there to prevent freely trading people from regulating their property? I.e creating government. Ancap doesn't make sense.

thats not government

...

>AnCap
>ANCAP: Car Safety Ratings | Car Safety | Crash Test Results
ancap.com.au/
The Australasian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) is Australasia's leading independent vehicle safety advocate

Autism. If you want your muh freedoms be a minarchist if you actually want to have a morally good racially pure society be a Nazi

>forcible wealth redistribution through socialism
>morally good

letting members of your own race and countrymen starve to death because you don't want a bit of your pay to leave, your greedy jew hands

>capitalism
>moral

>Giving food you worked for to your child. lmao children are statist I shouldn't have to feed my child

>conflating charity with forced wealth redistribution.

are you being intellectually dishonest or are you just retarded?

I've always thought a Voluntary government, similar to the Catholic or Protestant Church would be the best, essentially a Christian Theocracy that you could opt out of.

Giving up something for the good of society is bad. I bet you feel so much rage whenever you see a public transport bus go past.

>Communism doesn't work because people are naturally greedy
>But people would donate to charity to save millions of starving people

Capitalism is immoral and puts profits over lives and the moral/racial health of a nation. Think of the most backstabbing greedy you know a George sores kind of guy

That's capitlism if it was a person

I see a couple of straw men and an analogy, but no arguments.

Try again

Capitalism is immoral
Prove me wrong, show me how the mass production of drugs,pornography and putting money over peoples lives is moral

Thats not how it works, the burden of proof is on the one making the claim

So my claim is the mass production of drugs,pornography and putting money over peoples lives is immoral? And as evidence I show the world we live in now

Think Miley Cyrus all the whores and prostitutes destroying women lives the gansta rap turning whites into little more then thugs and turning women from housewives into sex objects and the destruction of the lower class though the use of drugs.

and forced wealth distribution is supposed to solve this?

Stop moving the goalposts is capitalism which pushes for drugs,pornography,sexual and women liberation's all the while putting peoples capital over their lives and pushing for mass immigration for more profits moral? Of course not, unless you can prove me wrong your welcome to try show me how miley cyrus and porn is good for a moral society.


Correct some wealth redistributionwith a nationalistic government. We're not talking communism here if you equate a little bit of your money going to the good of the state as massive wealth distribution and the destruction of the capitalistic method your retarded.

...

>your retarded

Not an argument. Try again

This an /apu/ thread nao.