/lrg/ LIBERTARIAN RIGHT GENERAL - WHAT MUST BE DONE

This thread is for Discussion of Capitalism, Libertarianism, Paleolibertarianism, Anarcho-Capitalism, Minarchism, and the PHYSICAL REMOVAL of COMMUNIST FAGS from our board of peace. Reminder that this is the Libertarian RIGHT General. Aleppo Johnson-fags, Left-Libertarians, and other Shit-Libs need to fuck off. Voice your complaints to r/libertarian.

>Recommended Reading list
libertarianright.org/reading/

>Vanilla /lrg/ pastebin- CREATE IF YOU DONT SEE ONE IN THE CATALOG
pastebin.com/7K1EJYb8

>Bump for Life, Liberty, and Private Death Squads

>Libertarian Fascism - Christopher Cantwell
youtube.com/watch?v=utnowkjjAGg&index=78&list=PLmzSnh6rTNwD5X_a_rrKB8Q0D1pts1C8D
>Fireside Chat on Becoming a Reactionary - Augustus Invictus
youtube.com/watch?v=HPQ9yh0gWoE
>Fireside Chat on Speech & Violence - Augustus Invictus
youtube.com/watch?v=jIlV8n3AdVo

Other urls found in this thread:

lewrockwell.com/2017/05/nick-giambruno/end-western-civilization/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Menger
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_von_Schmoller
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werturteilsstreit
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodenstreit
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Étienne_Bonnot_de_Condillac
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Brentano
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/François_Quesnay
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

NatSoc is the only real answer

just your friendly Natsoc dropping by, hey guys

:^)

Bump

Hello :^)

I like when we get along, fuck leftists. Hail Victory.

Friendly reminder that Monarchy + Free Market is best

>Rely on the government to provide for and protect you

No thanks.

Libertarians should just radicalize already and embrace unironic helicopter removal

>hurr Pinochet was an ancap

This last gasp of ancaps/libertarians trying to remain relevant is embarrassing.

He's an honorary AnCap for his brave defense of the free market.

...

Bump

...

>corrupted dictator
>libertarian
where did this meme even come from?

He is a libertarian fascist.

Authoritarian socialist here. 90% of humans are stupid and need to be lorded over with an iron fist. The other 10% deserve more freedom. This is all based on exams after secondary school.

>Libertarian general
>Posts a market fascism pic

>libertarian fascist
nice meme

Hopefully it will be recognized as more than a meme in the near future. I pray for a libertarian fascist future.

>"PHYSICAL REMOVAL of COMMUNIST FAGS from our board of peace"

lol, keep larping friend

>tumblr
the fuck are you doing here ?

>tfw level 8

is libertrian facism a meme or is it for real?

I'm for real about it. We need fascism to attain a libertarian society. No matter of agorism or "paradigm shift" will ever take us to the promised land.

We need an iron fist to overthrow democracy, free the markets, and liberate the people. We need a Pinochet.

I'm far beyond saving gents, from taxation is theft, to Purge Marxists in a span of 7 years.

...

Libertarianism with Roman Catholicism is the best combination

I agree morality must be preserved for a libertarian society to function.

In cold war chile at least, we killed Castro's close commie friend, replaced him with our fascist, economic reforms were led by a group of libertarians from Chicago, and commies were prosecuted. Chile is still one of south america's most stable and prosperous nations, with the highest gdp by quite a large margin

Yes, and the church helps take care of the poor, social issues and spirituality.

tfw you're 8/10 on the redpill scale

expectations have been exceeded

Enough with this libertarianism Fascism meme. Stop being a bootlicker to a government and start working on improving your own life and community. No need to have a fascist state has "transition" for libertarianism, private cities, seasteading and the eventual break-up of the EU and the world economy will guarantee it happens.

Hello. Mom and dad never loved me during my growth years, so in order to fill this void in my being I need to exert my internal problems onto other human beings by participating in slavery called "government".

I actually care about people so much I think they should be required by gun point to help fund roads! So they can get to work of course...

I care about roads so much, that I'm going to completely ignore the fact that a clandestine guild of dark occult, child raping, baby eating, blood drinking, satanic, psychopathic, elite group of men that run the world and its politics through blackmail, murder, gematria, and drugs. Besides, current system does such a great job of taking care of them anyway. I've never seen a pothole in my life.

Ancaps btfo!

...

...

...

I wish that it were true that privately owned cities would rise from the already totalitarian new world order, but they won't, and they will not. I still believe every ethical word of Rothbard, Hoppe, and Mises I've ever read. But at some point I have realized that we don't live in libertopia, people use aggression to get their way. If we don't do the same we will die or be replaced by leftists. It's about damn time someone used force for good. For protecting liberty in a world that wants us dead. We must do what is nessasary.

...

Based Portuguese know what's up. This ancaps need to leave our threads. Minarchist all the way!

Why do you think they won't? We're reaching the point where technology and P2P saves us from government control. When Bitcoin and the likes start gaining widespread influence after the state's (((fiat currency))) starts bursting it will be rendered defenseless. Unless they literally try to shut down the Internet, cryptocurrencies will be impossible to regulate or centralize. The states are pushing for eliminating physical cash, so we are enslaved to inflationary imaginary money. But now we have bitcoin to make digital scarcity a thing and prevent this from happening. Bitcoin will be the new gold.

And I wouldn't be so pessimistic in terms of private cities. South Korea, Honduras, and India are already tinkering with the idea. And on top we have the Seasteading Institute making the first libertarian Rapture in the French Polynesia and movements like Liberland gaining traction. I'd like to think the New World Order will collapse because they're getting more and more cocky and arrogant each day, to the point where they're not even trying to hide it anymore (UN population replacement plans, the EU showing its teeth to the UK after Brexit, police agencies covering up migrant crimes, George Soros's name already being name dropped various times in the past years, etc.). I like to think it will be some sort of Babel Tower: they'll reach for the heavens and collapse under their own stupidity. We can only hope technology and secession gets off the ground soon enough.

If not, then yes, we fire up the helicopters and stop playing nice with them.

lewrockwell.com/2017/05/nick-giambruno/end-western-civilization/

>Jean Jacques Rousseau
every time I hear or read his name I want to punch this Swiss faggot

>tfw was 9, am now 1

i went full ancom a few years ago, but now i've decided that, at least for now, minarchism is the only pragmatic way to proceed with destroying/preventing "statism." i voted trump and still support him. maybe someday there can be a stefan-style (retro stefan) insurance-security company, but i don't see that happening in the next 20 years.

liberfags, good luck sustaining a strong white country with little to no state.

first empire that crosses you will crush you

>we
>society
>we
such collectivista

>tumblr
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I hope you're right about the private cities. However I've seen little progress them.

>New World Order will collapse because they're getting more and more cocky and arrogant each day, to the point where they're not even trying to hide it anymore

Yes I agree, but it's very clear public knowledge of this is fueling nationalist moments, not libertarian movements they're secessionist now, But when the union is gone they will be expansionist empires as they always have been. Again I'm not in favor of these types of empires but they have use to us.

>If not, then yes, we fire up the helicopters and stop playing nice with them.
We should be firing up the choppers NOW!
We have been aggressed upon for to Long. The market is not fixing the issue. We're drifting farther into totalitarianism. If anyone is to be subjugated it should be them and not us.

...

who needs roads when you can go for a free helicopter ride?

Yes we, the libertarians are a tribe. We should protect each other.

rothbard and mises are the only good ones there
responding to bait anyway

you presume i owe you things. being a rugged individual requires you to stop telling me what to do.

How do we fire up the choppers? Isn't the average pleb too attached to his social security pension, his minimum wage laws and all sorts of "rights" that there'd be massive chaos if libertarians were to be elected and promised to remove them? I'm more inclined to say we should simply cull the herd and start afresh, but if it comes to the point where we must choose between nationalism and globalism, the former is comparatively better.

The Singularity needs to hurry the fuck up.

I have no intent of forcing you to do anything. You've got the wrong bloke.

...

it can only happening two ways
1) very gradually
2) very violently

ok then newfriend

wtf does pinochet have to do with me? Im from Argentina not Chile.

he was a cuck to U.S jews. Anti-communism was part of the cold war.
Free trade and extreme individualism benefit jews.
Extreme collectivism such as communism does too.
Too much individualism -> autism
Too much collectivism -> Borg-like hive mind behaviour

quick, keep the thread alive with moar bitter bickering!

this doesn't even go far enough on the "jew" question. austrian economics is literally the result of the anti-jew side of economists from prewar germany. if you connect the dots between even casual influences from rothbard backward to mises and further to menger, even just on wikipedia, you'll see it. the austrian school has always been opposed to kibbutz-think.

Can you expand more on that please?

this

how the fuck does an ancap society stop child laborers/slaves from being a thing

>i went full ancom a few years ago
wat

oops, typo. i meant ancap

it doesn't. In fact they want a return to that

Because people don't like this now so they wouldn't like is in an ancap society ether. Having things less centrally controlled doesn't mean that people start suddenly liking and doing horrible practices.

but who enforces these dislikes? liberty mutual?

The people who are voting with their money. If a company does this and people don't like it, they just make that company go out of business by supporting their competitor.

with no state to enforce an agreed upon moral/ethic code, people would just do whatever they feel like, cause 'muh freedom'. A plutocracy would sooner than later develop, where the only law is i do what he who pays me more wants me to do.

Libertarians need to worry less about intellectualism the non aggression principle not that it's not a great principle, but because it renders Libertarians impotent to the point that we call each other fascists when we try to make freedom happen now. Real liberators know we must use our physical strength to acheive freedom now. We must stop larping and join real serious secessionist and nationalist moments. Better ourselves, preserve our culture and make the libertarian future for ourselves. We must not simply cheer on the market we must be involved.

Like what currently goes on?

in the meantime there are slaves

see
that's just what the commies want

I do agree with this after seeing the events unfold in 2016-2017. We have to be more active and join in with potential allies more

yes, you think liberfags are somehow against the current status quo? lmao

jews laugh at you, your entire ideology was designed by them.

But if you allow that sort of thing, there will always be a small core of people who support it financially. If you choose to allow legal child prostitution, then guess what? There will be small groups of people who do it even if the majority finds these activities to be morally disgusting.

...

I know, Peron I was just posting it to trigger libertarians.

well said

this too

>in the meantime there are slaves
There aren't slaves in modern countries because they are not economically efficient in a post industrial revolution society.

yes but it will take a while. i'll leave recent history to people who know better the stories of keynes vs. hayek, rothbard vs. everybody, etc.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Menger
bohemian, opposed by en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_von_Schmoller
schmoller was the teacher of nigger-socialist w.e.b. dubois and others like him
at this time the reigning intellectual competitions are en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werturteilsstreit and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodenstreit

menger was influenced by:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Étienne_Bonnot_de_Condillac
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Brentano (scholastic)

condillac was a contemporary of adam smith, close friend of en.wikipedia.org/wiki/François_Quesnay who was a physiocrat, along with turgot. these are all pure european thinkers. the historical school was more than half american socialists, concerned with government policy, not with understanding the science of economics.

>muh Jews

This will never be a clever or insightful argument against anything.

Roads.

...

notice how anarchists and commies have always been allies.

why? because in theory communism ends in with the dissolution of the State.

> your entire ideology was designed by them.
t.never rode de Molinari

>There aren't slaves in modern countries because they are not economically efficient in a post industrial revolution society

And because the government explicitly outlawed slavery.

making slaves work for you for free is always cheaper than paying people. you're being historically and/or industrially relative.

i know jews are behind communism and libertarianism. Not a coincidence, either.

and let's not forget taxation is theft, therefore, you're a slave.

>confusing ancom and ancap
and this is why Argentinians will never be considered white

notice how commies think they're anarchists

why? because in theory if you engage in aggressive violence enough then you don't have to have the rest of a theory

Why do you think people would suddenly put up with child prostitution if control of society was decentralized? A free society is more directly controlled by the people and people hate child prostitution.

liberfag always push precious metal based economy.

who has always controlled GOLD? yep, jews

don't forget
>believes hyperinflation is just a normal government policy that will cause whites to outbreed everyone else

without government, how do you raid a pedo's basement dungeon? what replaces warrants?

All my arguments are directed specifically towards ancaps. If we're talking in the context of a night-watchman state there would still be laws against child prostitution.

but jews control fiat too

what's the solution oh the whitest man of south america ?

>minarchy still winning

No it isn't because you remove the economic incentives to work good and massive power from living things are never more efficient then mechanical equipment. Why is it not economically efficient to use horses anymore? That has the same answer that slavery has.

i dont give a shit about your an-whatever bullshit.

you are cucked and so are all anarchists.

if tried you wouldnt last 5 years, no organization at all. You would be crushed by the first semi-organized civilization that crosses you