Violence in Latin America discussion

Violence in Brazil has increased substantially in the last 40 years. We had an murder rate in 1980 comparable with second world countries today, but we've gotten to an African level of violence.
Mexico also seems to have a trend like this since 2007

What happened, Sup Forums?

just fuck me in the ass

USA and politicians realized with pablo escobar that cocaine/other drugs give tons of money, therefore used the Reagan-style war on drugs as an excuse to expand their influence over drug lords leading to homicides and gang wars everywhere

It was all good and fun until Colombia and Brazil started exporting their niggers here. Please leave.

>bolivia
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

>Brazil

At least I'm not a nigger.

>bolivia
>not a nigger

I know shitheads like you want to blame it on the niggers

but a decrease of 1% of white population creating a 300% increase in violence?

Shit apes gonna shit ape

are you able to read?

Doesn't CIA generally use drug cartels?

Genocide and start from scratch

Not enough sopa

UMA DELÍCIA

What is this meme called?

sopa de macaco or smthing like dat

Regional concentration. You can easily have a diminishing black population while having more blacks and hispanics causing more crime and slum conditions. The highest crime areas in the US are concentrated with non-whites. Intelligent non-hispanic whites logically try to get away from those areas. Focus on regions.

id start with the liberal infestations going on there.

spicy meme, mmm
uma delicia

If Brazil have seen the same increase in single-motherhood as the west. The same lose in respect for authority and the general liberal bullshit that just worsen things..

Perhaps blacks are worse hit by these sorts of changes in society.

everybody uses drug cartels, every gang got a representative in law, politics and international trade

the regions that support the workers party are the most affected by violence and the homicide rate started going up as the country shifted towards liberalism independent of race.

I just want to know what relation does liberalism have with violence

mhmm...be veeery careful now...

they are peaceful wonderful people, just like us ;)

This is what I believe... We are seeing an increase in alum culture popularity, divorce rates, corruption, degeneracy, et cetera.

they were... What happened?
Do the Mexican violence genes only activate after 2007?

Comunism, socialism and global agenda.

Basically:
>cold war
>"coup d'etat" (the legislative moved away the president)
>the unique issue for military regime is hunt the armed groups
>do not exit a significant political debate
>they forget the academy
>gramscism everywhere
>military ruins economy
>they throws the towel
>just left remains as organized political power
>30 years doing what they want
Sorry about my very bad english.

Your English is fine, anonbro.

Central and some South American countries don't have stable enough governments. Many of the politicians would be slaughtered so they're forced to be bribed. Drug cartels as you already know are interconnected. The biggest death blow to them would be ending prohibition to force the the plethora of drugs into the domain of legitimacy, not unlike any other commodity corporations (oil, gold, food) are forced to do. Meanwhile, the concentration patterns are bound to make crime go up the more that intelligent people (of all races) get away from gang feeding grounds, causing more of the local youths turn to crime out of pressure, survival, and lack of fostering intelligence.

the war on drugs and the us aren't completely to blame, the region has some of the shittiest economic policies on the planet and is way overpopulated for what it can support thanks to modern agriculture and food science.
the ones that had/have a stable drug economy are actually some of the better parts, stable mind you. queue instability in the drug trade and stupid politicians screwing workers. communist attempts at a take over in central / south american played a big part in allowing these shitty people to come to power, if they took a hard line and played ball it was a lot of incentive to get them into power.

now, drug money, international aid, or illegal workers enfranchising classes that can't exist is also a big problem. there literally isn't room for these people to exist economically in their homelands but money comes in to support them artificially. naturally they become a crime class, there is nothing else for them to do.

it's kind of funny but per american politics mexicans are some of the purest Republicans on earth. shows how poorly it runs without a balance.

there have been instances of collusion proven and there are alarming similarities in their tradecraft but that knowledge could have disseminated down to them from numerous places foreign and domestic to the region. drugs have historically been used to finance and equip rebels/revolutions down there, especially coming from the left.
it's suspected that at this point they are used to launder black money but not supported logistically or through knowledge/intelligence.

Yeah, while the (((CIA))) has a shit load of blame in some areas like Guatemala and the full frontal assault and chemical dumping on locals and their farms in the name of the drug war, there's a point at which the blame game starts to run dry. It's easy to take advantage and prey on people who don't have their shit together in the first place. That's why dictators are often the only solution to getting stability, which comes with its own horrific consequences. The only way out is industrializing drugs to cut off the main source of funding of unintelligent violent people (who become wealthy solely because of drug money).

I don't know but you need open carry