Give me one good reason you're not an AnCap

Give me one good reason you're not an AnCap

>protip:
you can't

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=qNLrNFbcevM
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Because somalis would migrate here and outbreed my people. Also I can't afford an Abrams tanks

I am

i dont want child sex slaves being carted over gravel roads

>no government regulation
>buy a fuck ton of land
>no government regulation = free to tell niggers to fuck off
>only allow whites on your land
>gg

sounds pretty fucking good to me

That violates the NAP :)

Here's three:

> I'm over 15 (both physically and mentally);
> I have more than a highschool understanding of socio-economics;
> I'm neither retarded nor evil (read socio- or psychopathic).

not if they consent

...

I don't believe in freedom for people who disagree with me

Because everytime I debate an ancap on collectivism I win after they I receal the fact that their movement was created by a bunch of Jews and privatizing all industry and removing government just leads those Jews to having more power

I like roads.

>ancaps

You have no way to enforce the whole "allow and not allow" part.
Who are you going to "buy" the land from if nobody owns it?
How are you going to defend it?

Because I'm not retarded

>implying adolf hitler wasnt a ZOG agent who built a pawn movement directed for slaughtering countless europeans and slandering white nationalism

>Dude africa would be fixed by the free market lmao

How do you remove niggers from an Ancap nation

>With Government
>nazicucks: "The gubmint is controlled by joooooss!"
>Without government
>nazicucks: "the companies are controlled by jooooosssss"

Arguing with nazi's is impossible

>Who are you going to "buy" the land from if nobody owns it?
I own it now
>How are you going to defend it?
McNuke

>Claim land
>My land
>no """civil rights""" = I get to discriminate on my land

>Enforcement
Private police
>Buy
I'd claim it
>Who would defend your property?
Me and anyone I hire, with AR's and mini-nukes

>Da jooos
>>>/reddit/

Hurr anti-Semitism is a CRIME

Ill assume you are not an ancap and are just strawmaning to make them seem stupid, because that is the only way i see that reply have a basis in reality.
Either way, if any ancap has anything similar to this answer i suggest you do not ever mention it. It simply makes you look beyond stupid, i like arguing with ancaps, personally. However when i go into the argument i know one thing, its pure imagination and its an argument purely based on "well if x then how come y"
How would you hire people, how would you pay them? How would they be armed with ARs?
Whats stopping someone with more people from claiming your land instead?
If by private police you mean volunteers runnin around saving people in your god forsaken country, why would they let you shoot others? What if that militia that serves as police wants your land or doesnt like you?

>Private police
>Schlomo thinks that's a good idea

Whatever you say Mr Pinkerton.

>I'd claim it
You don't understand this.
Unclaimed land ok, but if someone owns the land you cannot just "claim it" without violating the NAP

>Whats stopping someone with more people from claiming your land instead?

How DARE you ask that you raging anti-semite. I ought to get the IDF to.invade your country you subhuman.

has there ever been a ancap society? Any examples at all? or is Ancap so retarded that's it's not even worth trying unlike communism?

Because Mill's Harm Principle isn't the only principle to build morality on.
I live in society, I have a stake in its morality and law. National Socialism beats AnCap flawlessly.

then you buy it

>tfw became ancap before it reached one of the biggest ideologies on Sup Forums

glad you're finally catching up sport

youtube.com/watch?v=qNLrNFbcevM

What happens when the NAP is violated?

What you mean you can't just take land from the Palestinians?

You're right, I'm not an ancap, just a minarchist. I was just memeing about the answer to the second question, though I was completely serious about the first. If no one owns a piece of land, doesn't that make it yours if you so desire to claim it?

Definitely, in such a country anything not claimed is yours.
However, the issue is, how are you going to know whats claimed? Are you gonna have a piece of paper that says: 500 x 500 owned by: me?

People talking about anarchism forget how many basic things in their lives depend on the government.

McNuke

Here is how it really goes

>Claim land
>Neighbor claims land next you
>You don't want niggers
>He does
>You each try to claim each others lands with violence for breaking the NAP of not agreeing on a nigger policy
>War

Too bad your McAbrams tank can't stop you from being a raging perma virgin

How about a fence surrounding my property with a sign every 10 or so yards that reads "PRIVATE PROPERTY NO TRESPASSING."

Because corporations will dominate not only the market but culture. They suck the soul from any society they touch. Homogenizing everything and turning all culture into a celebration of consumerism.

What if somebody doesnt give a fuck about your shitty sign and moves the fence during the night? Infact lets just be straight to it.
What is the course of action once the NAP is broken, how is the issue being resolved?

Just display the nuclear warhead in your backyard to show the enemy you have no fear

>What is the course of action once the NAP is broken, how is the issue being resolved?
An equal and opposite reaction a.k.a. McNuke

So wed have a whole country of people just chimping out over who hurt whose friend/family?
If ancaps wanna be niggers so bad there are plenty of places for that, even in america.

>So wed have a whole country of people just chimping out over who hurt whose friend/family?
You assume people are going out of their way to hurt people. I don't know how it works in Serbia, but that's not how it works in the US at least.

Is that an actual character or is it just ancap-tan?

also

Trust me friend, the second anyone can come into your country and do anything they please given the fact that they have enough numbers in ranks, shits gonna hit the fan real soon. Rapefuges commit crime now even if they have a law "preventing" them, imagine whatll happen later.

And i really would like to delve into what im going to say next but unfortunately i dont have the time, but ill say it anyway maybe someone can argue for or against it in my absence.

Establishing a hierarchy is something almost every, if not every, living creature does. People that can get more influential will, and people that can help each other become more influential wiill help each other. If right people come into contact with other right people, maybe you wont see it, but you will be under control. Whose paying the militia-police? The rich circle. Who owns hospitals? The rich circle.
Sure there might be institutions free from this rule, but a very few.

Humans lived in anarchy loooooooooooong time ago. Before we even knew of the concept of society we have lived with each other. Before we even knew the concept of government and gender roles, we had males of different ages doing different things aswell as females and we had some sort of distribution of "wealth" in this case food. The hunters didnt eat all of the food themselves, they shared with others. They basically got taxed. Mind i tell you this is back when the most people you could find on a piece of land was a few thousand. And what happend? Well over the years it seems like we evolved into having a government and into defining what society is and following its rules, we needed this because theres no longer a few of us close to each other. 1 city right now is like thousands of tribes.
Why go back in time?

...

Which is exactly why I'm not an ancap as I've said (). I can see where a government is necessary or expedient and I qualify it at defending the liberty of its citizens (last three words italicized). This can be through a police force, fire department, military, etc. I think anarchocapitalism is a good goal to strive for in human social evolution, but I understand that it cannot and will not exist in my lifetime, and possibly even outside my lifetime it will be impossible to implement because we don't live in a vacuum. Human nature has a way of fucking everything up. That being said, I'm not against a voluntary hierarchy. A good example of this is how I do not oppose the existence of a military but do oppose the existence of a draft. You can see what happens when a military does not have ranks and commands, you get the Spanish Republican Army. And to your last point, humans did what they needed to do to survive. As human civilization advanced, what you needed to do to survive changed and overall got easier. Libertarianism is simply the direction in which I want to see human civilization evolve towards.

based senpai

Hitler was trained by the British (zog hotspot) in 1912. Also, he was propped up by zionists in America with elaborate business and political interests, and by the Bank of England themselves!

I like roads and trains.