Name ONE (1) thing wrong with socialism if the polity implementing it excludes itself to a single tribe/ethnicity/nation

Name ONE (1) thing wrong with socialism if the polity implementing it excludes itself to a single tribe/ethnicity/nation

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/ome51
archive.is/7CUMq
archive.is/qMVAj
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Literally nothing. Nationalist Socialism is the true redpill.

damn that was a pretty quick /thread

Economic calculation is impossible when capital cannot be owned and traded.

Now, if each individual gets his own socialist state over himself then I'm all in for socialism.

/thread

When capital is publicly / state owned and cannot be traded and thus has no price tag, optimal levels of use of that capital cannot be figured out and as such capital will not be used at its most efficient rate, and depreciation will ensue (depreciation calculations are impossible)

Done.

I'll take some of that white socialism please.

When capital cannot be in private hands then there is no incentive for private individuals to save resources and thus generate their own capital stock.

Capital must be allocated in a way pleasing to those that direct it. In socialism, this is the state, rather than the consumer. As such, capital will respond to the whims of the most politically savvy rhetoricians of society rather than to the desires of consumers.

In socialism, people know that the direction of production can be changed by political powers rather than by a change in the desires of the populace. As such, any notion that production is allocated an unfair way (protip: this notion will always exist) will result in political upheaval which will have to be met with force.

Under socialism, the most powerful and well off individuals are not those best at catering to the previously unknown desires of man, but those who are best at convincing the masses that they are worthy of power. The development of an individual is thus directed away from being a member of society who caters to his fellow men and instead an individual has a higher incentive to please the powers that be through agenda promises and the masses through rhetoric - the population becomes corrupt and degenerate. An example of this was in East Germany. When they all started to flee to West Germany (prior to automated turrets being used to shoot those attempting to flee) they were all found to be useless at productive, west German manufacturing work.

"My brand of socialism is the real one. Never been tried"

>What is facist Spain, facsist Portugal and fascist Greece.

The state, just like any business, has its prime motive as expansion. The state has a monopoly on the use of force and as such will inevitably result in tyranny.

>the polity

Shoo...Back to leftypol you go faggot.

Seizing the means of production is moronic.
Social Credit is the way of the future my friends.

In a socialist state people are inculcated to feel that coercion of one's fellow man is beneficial. One also feels an attachment to the function of the state as the people vote for its actions and feel it to be part of their collective will. Society becomes more accepting of mass coercion and over time removes more and more private property for "the social good".

Finally: the people best able to rise political ranks are those with the highest verbal IQ. Those best able to rise the corporate ladder are those with the best knowledge to direct resources to their more desired locations.

Think about it. Verbal IQ.

I don't know why I even posted anything at all. Autistic NatSocs will worship 1930s Germany as if it is the end goal of society and requires no change to be truly perfect.

>"They pretend to pay us and we pretend to work."
Nothing will ever get done. There is no incentive to work. A country that does not produce value is destined to fail.

FPBP

this board fucking sucks

>t. retards who don't understand the difference between marxist socialism and national socialism
Why do I even bother?

>>t. retards who don't understand the difference between marxist socialism and national socialism
"As a National Socialist, how would you define the difference between a National Socialist and a Communist?"
archive.is/ome51

How National Socialism is Different from Marxist Socialism
archive.is/7CUMq

National Socialism and Communism
archive.is/qMVAj

Seriously how retarded can one be?
>People who claim to be National Socialists are advocating Marxism and class conflict.

Whites didn't become great on welfare. We became great because we worked for it.