Is Trump a Traitor?

Any ideas on possible reasons to fire Comey NOW of all times?
Im starting to wonder if he really might be working for the Russians

Other urls found in this thread:

imgur.com/a/awg8v
imgur.com/a/zvZJE
youtu.be/HDtvYHOY_Uc?t=6m18s
thehill.com/policy/national-security/310495-intel-head-ic-agencies-refused-to-brief-committee-on-russian-hacking
thehill.com/homenews/news/310820-electors-wont-get-intelligence-briefing-report
robertmlee.org/critiques-of-the-dhsfbis-grizzly-steppe-report/
medium.com/@jeffreycarr/fbi-dhs-joint-analysis-report-a-fatally-flawed-effort-b6a98fafe2fa#.1it24ccrw
theintercept.com/2016/12/14/heres-the-public-evidence-russia-hacked-the-dnc-its-not-enough/
icitech.org/its-the-russians-or-is-it-cold-war-rhetoric-in-the-digital-age/
securityweek.com/us-govs-grizzly-steppe-report-fails-achieve-purpose-experts
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Pictures_hack#Doubts_about_accusations_against_North_Korea
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal#Wiretapping_of_the_Democratic_Party.27s_headquarters
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panetta_Review
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Intelligence_Commission
youtube.com/watch?v=ZbZt1zLQ11E
cnn.com/2017/01/04/politics/assange-wikileaks-hannity-intv/
cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/fbi-russia-hacking-dnc-crowdstrike/
youtube.com/watch?v=ST2XZ97sjIk
web.archive.org/save/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-admits-to-russian-hacking-even-as-he-attacks-us-intelligence-community/2017/01/11/40941a34-d817-11e6-b8b2-cb5164beba6b_story.html?utm_term=.7a5909980c30
e360.yale.edu/features/stopping-trump-the-battle-to-thwart-the-assault-on-climate-moves-to-the-courts
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Obama should have fired Comey.

Isnt is very suspicious that Trump fires Comey during an investigation?

You are sooooo right. He should have waited for 168 recommendations, instead of 2.
So if you fire the police chief during an investigation, do all murders go free?

Yes if the police chief is related to the murder suspects or victims

No it's not suspicious at all. The entire Trump is with Russia is complete bullshit.

To bite the hand that's keeping him down. To shake up the establishment and Washington pedos. You're seeing how stunned and angry they are.

No. Comey is a hack pushing for a bullshit narrative. That narrative is:

> Russian undermining democracy
> gibs us funding

This is not a criminal investigation at all.

As you can see the chain of evidence has been tampered and is completely illegitimate.

At this point all they have is innuendo and hearsay, and circumstantial evidence.

They have no case. Look pic related and tell me this shit wouldn't be laughed out of town if it ever went to a judge.

>6 months of ignoring anthony weiner and Clintons obvious criminal activities
>spends whole time trying to make up connections between Trump and Russia using tax payer dollars

Yeah he definately fired him because he was getting close to muh Russians!

The Ukraine government has denounced CrowdStrike as anti-russian bullshit. Fucking Ukraine.

You are out of your mind or a fucking shill if you think that Russia hasn't attempted to involve themselves in American and other nations' politics.

So what?

So what? You want a nation who actively seeks to undermine America, in control of American politics?

Ofc not. It makes perfect sense to fire a man over the pretext of having damaged Hillary's campaign. After all, its Trump we are talking about.

>lol

Trump admitted it was due to the Russian investigation.

>undermine america
Are you talking about mainstream Democrats or Jews? Both?

Care to explain how it's possible to fire the FBI director not during an investigation? Considering what the I stands for?

Don't be dense, the implication is that it was during an active investigation that Trump is indirectly involved

Spotted the fucking shill

You are a shill if you believe anything the CIA tells the public. An agency that has done nothing but manipulate politics, commit crimes and lie for 60 years straight.

Further more your an idiot if you think the US should just take the word of a private security firm hired by the DNC without any forensic investigation whatsoever.

try and prove any of this wrong.

pro-tip u cant hill shill

You honestly believe Russia DOESN'T try to sabotage our politics and blackmail American politiciians?

Holy fuck you are stupid. Regardless of the manipulation of CIA et al, it's painfully obvious that Russia does this. It's exactly what WE would do and have done.

Why did the DNC hire Crowdstrike to destory evidence of the hack on their servers.

That sounds like obstruction of justice. Guess we gonna need some arrest warrants for DNC staffers.

Are you a newfag or a shill. Sup Forums knows what the fuck is going on in the world you asshat. If Trump were with the Russians, you would hear about it here first. Now fuck off, Brock needs CPR.

He's not a traitor because we're not at war with Russia. Russia is not officially an enemy of the United States at this moment.

Sure, we should arrest all of them. Hillary was a crook and involved in a ton of shit.

>You honestly believe Russia DOESN'T try to sabotage our politics and blackmail American politiciians?

You have zero proof they did anything to the DNC. Its all a fucking fantasy.

plus there is plenty of evidence this is a fraudulent investigation.

...

Trumps a front man
a nothing
no power
no influence
makes no decisions
Just a front man who sold out, picks up his pay, craps on for the media. A cheap old showman

Time for a rundown:

CIA Lies on Russia
1. CIA declassified assessment contains no facts. These are only opinions according to their own definitions.
imgur.com/a/awg8v

2. FBI/DHS Report contains a glaring disclaimer about the accuracy of information discussed.
imgur.com/a/zvZJE

3. Adam Schiff, of the House Intel Committee, refused to acknowledge whether there is evidence Russians actually hacked the DNC on behalf of Wikileaks.
youtu.be/HDtvYHOY_Uc?t=6m18s

4. The CIA refused to defend their case in front of the House Intel Committee.
thehill.com/policy/national-security/310495-intel-head-ic-agencies-refused-to-brief-committee-on-russian-hacking

5. The CIA refused to disclose their Intel to the electors considering if the election was manipulated.
thehill.com/homenews/news/310820-electors-wont-get-intelligence-briefing-report

6. IT Security experts agree that the CIA assessment and the FBI/DHS JAR were flawed and uncharacteristically devoid of any facts on the nature of the security breaches at the DNC, something common to put in reports about hacking issues. They also noted the JAR as attempting attribution without valid reasoning.
robertmlee.org/critiques-of-the-dhsfbis-grizzly-steppe-report/
medium.com/@jeffreycarr/fbi-dhs-joint-analysis-report-a-fatally-flawed-effort-b6a98fafe2fa#.1it24ccrw
theintercept.com/2016/12/14/heres-the-public-evidence-russia-hacked-the-dnc-its-not-enough/
icitech.org/its-the-russians-or-is-it-cold-war-rhetoric-in-the-digital-age/
securityweek.com/us-govs-grizzly-steppe-report-fails-achieve-purpose-experts

7. The CIA has a long documented history of attempted to manipulate domestic politics, fabricating intelligence, breaking US law and lying to avoid oversight and justify operational goals.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Pictures_hack#Doubts_about_accusations_against_North_Korea
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal#Wiretapping_of_the_Democratic_Party.27s_headquarters
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panetta_Review
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Intelligence_Commission
youtube.com/watch?v=ZbZt1zLQ11E

8. Julian Assange and WikiLeaks have a perfect track record regarding accuracy in their journalism, and maintain the leaks were provided by a DNC insider. In fact, there is no mention of Julian Assange or Wikileaks in relation to Russia in any report.
cnn.com/2017/01/04/politics/assange-wikileaks-hannity-intv/

9. The CIA has a motive to propagate the Russian hacking narrative in order to expand their budget and powers under the supposed threat of Russian interference in the election. It is also an attempt to smear Wikileaks and other whistleblowers to protect their institution. This happens to coincide with the upcoming re-authorization of section 702 of FISA.

10. The DNC has a motive to propagate the Russian hacking narrative in order to cover up and distract the public from their election-rigging crimes and culpability for the Democrats losing 2016.

12. The DNC has refused to turn over their servers to the FBI for investigation. Instead all the information the FBI has received about the breach has come from a 3rd party security firm, called CrowdStrike, which is the same firm to falsely conclude that North Korea hacked Sony.
cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/fbi-russia-hacking-dnc-crowdstrike/

proof?

people still falling for the file name shtick.

Comey committed the cardinal sin of playing both sides of the criminal political class, on the one hand he was allowing the media to make ridiculous accusations about Trump being somehow involved with the Russians, on the other, he allowed Hillary Clinton to escape a firm prison sentence.

would have been more suspicious if it was right after he was sworn in, don't you think?

This nigger. Fuck off.

Electors aren't subject to security clearance so ofc they wouldn't get briefed on CI

...

The investigation had yet to become public at that point, and besides, this was pre-Flynn, post-victory. The optics would absolutely have been better if he did it sooner rather than later.

>The CIA has a long documented history of attempted to manipulate domestic politics, fabricating intelligence, breaking US law and lying to avoid oversight and justify operational goals.

Yes, and you forgot (or failed to mention) that the CIA has also did this to other nations, Democratic and otherwise. However, so has Russsia. That's my point. Trying to sabotage other nations and undermine their democracy is fucking textbook.

To pretend that Russia hasn't attempted to hack, sabotage, manipulate or blackmail American politicians is willful fucking ignorance.

>the optics
>getaloadofthisgoycam

The burden of proof falls to the one making wild claims.

You believe Putin invited Trump to Russia to have girls pee on him, so he could use that tape for blackmail. Putin also knew that Hillary would run for President, and also rig the election against a no name Bernie Sanders.

The only way your scenario is true is if Putin can travel through time. In which case Putin is God. Or the Democrats made it all up as an excuse to spy on Trump, and undermine Trump. What's more likely, the Democrats are corrupt assholes who don't like Trump, or Putin transcends time and space?

Dear cucks,
We can tell you don't understand Sup Forums by your retarded posts. Let me explain it to you.
?pop/ don't give a Fu{k about your feelings.

Oh then I guess it wasn't threat to democracy if they couldn't authorize them to see their "secret evidence" to SAVE THE PRESIDENCY.

lul.

They didn't show anythign , cuz they dont have anything.

He answers to the Bogdanoffs, you nanobrainlet.

that makes too clear of a case, Putin is obviously a time traveller.

Imagine if OP is correct and he really IS a russian puppet?

I think it's time to move on about Russia until some evidence comes up. I support an investigation, but haven't we been investigating for months now without any evidence yet much of the MSM and Democrats still accuse Trump of being compromised. Move on.

youtube.com/watch?v=ST2XZ97sjIk
>‘No evidence of Russian intrusion in US political system’ – Ron Paul

nice ad hominem. your logic still doesn't make any fucking sense.

>To pretend that Russia hasn't attempted to hack, sabotage, manipulate or blackmail American politicians is willful fucking ignorance.

Had nothing to do with this election.

This is all a propaganda platform for the IC to shakedown funds for a non-existent threat and an excuse to reauthorize 702 and plug whistleblowers.

congrats. your a parrot for McCarthyist propaganda

Putin transcending time desu.

imagine Trump is a reptillian.

thats how stupid this scenairio is?

You mean the investigation that's been going on since he took office, such that if he were to replace him ever an idiot like you could say WHOA HE WAS FIRED WHEN HE WAS DOING HIS INVESTIGASHUN.

You tell me when would be a good time to fire someone if you were in his shoes.

comey should not have only been fired, he should have been arrested. Trump is more than just a president, he is the savior of the whie race. Anyone who defy's him deserves death.

Wow.

imagine that the FBI has 1000's of to her agents that can just continue the investigation

its like shills think he committed obstruction

Trump was put into office in January. The investigation into Russia influence on the Trump campaign wasn't officially declared until March I believe. Could be wrong.

>a non-existent threat
Russia is a non-existent threat? lol

>Any ideas on possible reasons to fire Comey NOW of all times?

no

This isnt a real investigation anyways.

Where was the Grand Jury to subpoena evidence in a violation of Computer Fraud Abuse Act?
Where the warrant to subpoena the servers?
Where is the warrants to arrest the people that plugged the breach destroying the evidence?
No attempt at forensic investigation by ANY law enforcement agency?

Doesn't sound like they are trying to solve a crime at all. Sounds like advertising.

You are wrong. The Obama admin was spying on Trump with the help of the FBI since last summer.

Do you know what FISA is?

Yeah, it's where they find a bullshit reason to spy on you.

Watched Maddow today and she really put a bow on it.. Flynn and Manafort are dirty and ones gonna sing

Has nothing to do with this

Clearly you dont know what FISA is.

The FBI NEVER INVESTIGATED THE SERVERS AT ALL

cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/fbi-russia-hacking-dnc-crowdstrike/

How is this a legit investigation when the investigators do none of the things that investigators are supposed to do?

>checked

this

EVERYTHING TRUMP DOES IS THE BAD!
>This is your current narrative.
>If Trump does something that is not bad, it is to be spun as bad.
>Hence how Colbert had to quick "re-educate" his liberal audience who cheered for Comey being fired.
>They strayed from the narrative.

Maddow is a fucking liar.

and you can go back to

>>>/redit/

monitoring carter page you mean

trumps got a lot of ivans in his circle

Trump didn't have a good reason. That's why he had to ask for one from his flunkies.

>Im starting to wonder
Do you even try to fool us anymore?

>monitoring carter page you mean

you mean pretending that 98% of Russian are spies as an excuse to spy on domestic opponents with plausible deniability using 702

nice try shill

if he fired Comey when he wanted to fire him,
you would complain.
if he fired Comey when the deputy DA wanted to fire him,
you would complain.
You're just whiny little bitches who complain. /thread

something's up, that's for certain
comey's investigation into both shillary's emails and trump's connection with russia were both in the search of truth. there is no reason to not dig deeper into trump's shit just because he was our favorite to win - question everything, and all authority. have loyalty to causes, not people.

i think all the shills ran away


>high five

HAHAHAH. You have to be new here. This is not plebbit. go back now.

>comey's investigation into both shillary's emails and trump's connection with russia were both in the search of truth

bullshit

its McCarthyism

insinuate spies without any evidence as a justification to enlarge institutional power of the IC

He literally went on TV today and said he was going to fire him regardless of what the AG and DAG said.

>obama wrote the carter page dossier
>obama pushed carter page, flynn, and manafort out

Oh nope he didn't. Open your eyes sweetie they invaded republican offices today with ties to manafort. Manafort's gonna sing like a stuck pig

How would they catch spies without doing research?

Not saying that the CIA and government can be trusted, but foreign intel groups do infiltrate and cause problems. How would you propose that is handled?

Im sorry do you have any evidence of a Russian hack of the DNC?

Or any quid pro quo by Trump officials?

Nope. OK. move along.

even the president admitted he agrees the russians did it you fuckwit. Months ago. What is with the coincidence of the president's most ardent supporters knowing fuck all about what's been happening?

web.archive.org/save/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-admits-to-russian-hacking-even-as-he-attacks-us-intelligence-community/2017/01/11/40941a34-d817-11e6-b8b2-cb5164beba6b_story.html?utm_term=.7a5909980c30

I like how Ivan's post ID ends in RT

Is gook moot getting creative naming the putin shills?

e360.yale.edu/features/stopping-trump-the-battle-to-thwart-the-assault-on-climate-moves-to-the-courts


It's a diversion. 4-D chess my dude

Oh, I'm sure. THIS will be the one. Those last hundred times you said it was over for him were just test runs. Sure.

>How would you propose that is handled?

By getting a search warrant.

By actually investigating.

Not running their AI roulette and deciding that anyone with over 25% probability of being a spy should be investigated.

Oh wow. Youre so edgy. You seem to ignore the last 80 years of crimes against u.s. citizens that fbi have purpotrated, but Russia, "oh thats true." Go back please. You must go back!!

see

I bet you'd really like the names of the russian officials on US payroll who informed us about these cyber shenanigans, wouldn't you?

Perhaps even a hand written memo from Putin. Fucking pathetic.

Yeah he either directly admitted that there was Russia hacking or didn't disagree with it in that Comey interview he had today

>president admitted he agrees the russians did it you fuckwit

Not evidence

>Russian hack of the DNC

Why is that your fallback? It's obvious that the Russians have been involved in many attempts to sabotage Western nations' politics.

Say the Russians didn't hack the DNC, that it was an insider leak. That doesn't change the fact that there has been other attempts on American politics and politicians, Flynn being an example. Do you believe that Russian communication with Flynn was completely harmless?

spotted a CIA detainee rapist

>Is Trump a Traitor?
>PePe Man

HOW DO YOU DO, FELLOW ANONS!?

Physically remove yourself.

Please just go back!!!!

Not evidence


> Do you believe that Russian communication with Flynn was completely harmless?

NOT AGAINST THE LAW TO TALK TO RUSSIANS

shills GTFO

go back please. Stay at plebbit and never come back

...

The US DOES THE SAME , that being said , if Trump worked for the russians , then how come weapons are still going to """"rebels """"" in syria ? How come sanctions are still on ?

Haha we all know you're not one of us

Fair enough, the Patriot Act and mass surveillance is a pretty egregious overstep on personal freedom.

Read my post, buddy. I admit that the CIA et al have done horrible things to manipulate and sabotage our politics and foreign governments. It's exactly why you should accept the fact that Russia also does this.

I'm completely off Trump, but if your falling for the MSM bullshit now as opposed to before whats changed? There is no Russian connection comey was /theirguy/ he's out. You should be more concerned with who has been fired in the cabinet.