Redpill me on natsoc

Redpill me on natsoc

Other urls found in this thread:

pastebin.com/adMtb1gX
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

The left-wingers are fucking subhuman scum, but the far-right is very much retarded as well, including Nazis. Some of the points are worth noting, such as eugenics and natural hierarchy, but their strict categorizations of "race" is absolute pseudoscientific retardation.

archive.is/E3RCx

Hitler is the most lied about person in history. Remember that whenever you read or hear anything about him or National Socialism.

one of the only forms of government that actually work, the other being monarchy

You should visit the /nsg/ threads
Here's the pastebin: pastebin.com/adMtb1gX

It's retarded.

No, no I get that different POPULATIONS are unequal. My mistake for not making myself clear in the first post.

I understand that biological inequality is real, but there is a difference in applying this concept to "race" and to differently located POPULATIONS.

I understand that populations (depending on genetic makeup and geographic location) are unequal, and that some are (primarily intellectually) superior to others.

For example:

>North Europeans vs. Central Africans
>East Asians vs. South Americans
etc.

But the concept of geographic genetic "population" is different from the traditional concept of "race".

What I especially criticize is the Nazi's interpretation and categorization of race - Aryans, Jews, Slavs, Negroids etc. It's all stupid, inaccurate categories that have no basis in reality that is dictated by genetics.

There is no strict category/race of "whites", "blacks", "Jews" etc. But there are genetic makeups determined by geography (I already included examples above).

Saying that all "blacks" are the same, or that all "Jews" are the same, or "Whites" or whatever - is absolute idiocy.

But saying for example that Scandinavians, or the inhabitants of coastal China, or the people of Benelux are superior to the Aborigines of Australia, or the people of Sub-Saharan Africa, or the Caribbeans - this I approve, because it is based on factual genetics.

Different populations evolve differently, and some possess higher adeptness at things we traditionally consider to be desirable and superior such as intelligence.

But the Nazi's concepts and categories of race completely deviate from this geographical genetic reality.

here are some images

What the hell is wrong with heetlor in this webm?

Is it those drugs i heard he took? This doesn't seem normal

It's obviously fast forwarded a lot you fucking tard

No matter what you believe about Natsoc Germany
>Was extremely prosperous under Hitler financially until the war start going south.
>Was the most advanced technological power in Europe which greatly aided its conquest.
>Had a fiercely loyal and nationalistic people who would not dilute their morals.
>Hitler was going to make Germany an actual utopia, just look at some of the renditions of his city planning ventures and enrichment programs for his citizens, things far ahead of their time.
>His only problem was that he started a genocide without considering how the rapidly globalizing world community would react. If this were any other time period in the past his genocide would have gone along unhindered for the most part but he just played it wrong.

It worked so well that other countries got jealous and started a world war that spanned for almost a decade.

Splengle said it was then German cowardess reverting to a child state based on some romantic visions.
It's a fucked up ideology. Marxism and National socialism are two sides of the same coin. Both stem the German philosophical tradition but are different circumstantially. Marxism was pre German empire and Marx thought nationalism was a bourgeois concept.
National socialism was the practical application of a proletariat revolution when the capitalist system broke down, circumstantial to the post WW1 of the Weimar Republic.
Marxist blamed the bourgeois hence the liquidiation of the kulaks in Stalinist Russia
The Nazis blamed the Jews hence the final solution.

Both hated capitalism

Stick to the good guys; Adam smith, JS Mill are a good start. The British political tradition less nihilistic.

How does chastity cause single motherhood???

Isnt it the other way around?

Weren't birth rates like 7 times higher when people didnt have 11 sexual partners before marriage?

Oh yeah, but there are 3 indisputable races (caucasians, niggers and mongoloids). Some say there are 5 (those but they separe abos and amerindians). The other separations are a "social construct"

I think he wanted to pee

go to the site of the nordic resistance movement and download their english book "new politics for a new time" it is modern natsoc. start here.

>strict categorizations of "race"
someone is salty for being ein untermensch

...

What do you guys think about Matthew Heimbach?
>the new face of natsoc is a pimple-faced neckbeard

Oh no you don't understand. I couldn't give a shit about Slavism or ethnic belonging. I look at the ideology from a detached, "objective" point of view, rationally. And I don't agree with it, regardless of whether I'm a Serb, a Frenchie or a fucking peasant in Zimbabwe.

What

No one cares

>>Was extremely prosperous under Hitler financially until the war start going south.
Nazi Germany ran on a Roman war economy. It was only financially successful because of the resources it pillaged from the countries it conquered. It would have collapsed once they could no longer win wars that were worth more than they cost to persue

hitler escaped nazi germany to antartica, and then went to the moon, where to this day the brain of hitler is inside an A.I. robot that's plotting to conquer the world by a nazi ufo invasion