Fascism/Nationalism/Religious fundamentalism comes from sexual frustration

The creators and most hardcore supporters of these ideologies are betas excluded from the extremely competitive sexual market of today, they end with a suplus of energy and frustration they divert by manifesting a zealous attitude toward tradition/religions in the hope inconsciously that moving back to a more traditionnal society where women are tightly managed by men will fix their condition and allow a fairer access to sex.

That's the reason why we see young western males turning sharply toward hardcore conservatism while young muslim from migrant background are embracing islamic fundementalism despite both having been raised in extremely liberal and "modern" societies.

Both populations are in a state of sexual misery resulting from the unchecked hypergamy from women of their generation which has been allowed by contraception and feminism, in consequence following th Pareto principle 80% of the females have sex with only 20% of the males they share, leaving the rest in the dust.

In consequence if overall you can say progressive/socialists/communist men are people with low self-esteem and low economical achievements, right-wing and religious authoritarians are on the other side sexually repressed men.

Prove me wrong.
Pro-tip: you can't.

Alphas tend to fall into egoism.
Betas buy into idealism.

Beta master race

Shut the fuck OP I have no problem getting laid and neither did those two

>Sup Forums right now

be identitaire member , have 3 gf`s - thats all

Even if that was the case, they're only trying to fix society, not to lash out in frustration. Unless you think a society full of sexually frustrated young males is a sustainable thing

Malcolm X was not a beta, yet he was a Nationalist and religious fundamentalist. Nationalism and religious fundamentalism comes from a desire to not want to live in a promiscuous society, yes. Right-wing authoritarians may be sexually frustrated, but to be a right-wing Nationalist or religious fundamentalist is not to be right-wing authoritarian. Don't throw the National Capitalists or anarcho-capitalists in with the Nat-Socs. That makes no sense.

Fascists are sexually frustrated, but you're conflating many groups as though they are all one.

>from the extremely competitive sexual market of today
What have you been smoking? Stick your dick out the window and some whore will throw herself at it.

Of course sexually frustrated males are a good thing just look at Muslims.
>highly aggressive
Expansionist into weaker groups
>abusive of women
Prevents feminism from taking hold
>Compensating
Building huge dick shaped monuments that reinforce their culture

Testosterone gives societies their productive energy.

Have you been consistently laid since your teenage years ?
When did you acquired your conservative worldviews ?
Did you have consistent access to sex during these times ?

I took a pic of Mussolini and Hitler to expose my point for a reason, both had absolutely miserable 20s they spent in homelesness, it's highly unlikely they had access to sex being of such low social value and not really attractive either (especially Mussolini who was an ugly bastard), of course later in their life they could have access to pretty much every women but their views were already engraved.

I too have been listening to Jordan Peterson all night long.

Nice projection. Not everything is about sex.

Virgin Trump supporter here.

You're totally right.

Except I'm sad because women don't want to move back to that kind of society. So I've given up. Since our women don't want us the muslims can have them.

Wrong, if sex was this easy there would not be a billion dollar industry for men to learn seduction techniques and crowded places like /r9k/.
Tinder for example is not "easier sex", it's "easier hypergamy", you can find online countless stories of men literally validating all girls the app is proposing them and still ending with 0 match and the others struggling to score the 1 or 2 opportunities they get.

I disagree in part with that, I share the pov that testosterone is what drives civilization.
But if men have a too difficult access to sex it's most likely that the majority of them will spend a fair amount of time trying to change their own situation by chasing girl which is wasted amount of energy for society (they could basically focus to be productive) or they will just lash out it (that's how you end with criminal bands and terrorists).

That's why I think islamic society are such shitholes too for example, past the inbreeding and the lower IQ thing there is a huge problem too which is polygamy: a large part of the young men living there know they will NEVER have access to a woman and reproduce, because on one side you have men with status/wealth accumulating the wives (mathematically "robbing" them from their opportunities) and on the other the society is too rigid to allow meaningful social mobility.
In consequence what do they do ? They turn toward violence instead of enhancing the society they live in (why would they do it since they know they will never have children ?).

We are being raided again

Sage

The creators and most hardcore supporters of these ideologies are betas excluded from the extremely competitive sexual market of today, they end with a surplus of energy and frustration they divert by manifesting a zealous attitude toward tradition/religions in the hope unconsciously that moving back to a more traditional society where women are tightly managed by men will fix their condition and allow a fairer access to sex.
Aside from your shit grammar, frenchman, your argument basically boils down to this:
>fascism/traditionalism what have you, is a symptom of betas being oppressed
So by following your logic further, that would make betas the alpha, as they subsequently acquire more power and wealth and thus are more likely to have children and pass on their seed, or at least propagate that opportunity for their countrymen.
You're a french faggot with shit ideas. Next.

I have access to women today.
You are right though, it's partly projection because I experienced miserable teenage years and early 20s when it came to sex, that doesn't lower the argument's value, most thinkers developped their systems based on their own life experience.

Foucault, one of the most famous post-modernist, wo spent his entire life criticizing psychatry for example was an absolute sexual deviant, frequenting gay clubs at a time when being homosexual was considered by society as pure mental illness which threw him in violent depression and suicidal mood.

>So by following your logic further, that would make betas the alpha, as they subsequently acquire more power and wealth and thus are more likely to have children and pass on their seed, or at least propagate that opportunity for their countrymen.

Beta/alpha are not definitive status, a beta can become an alpha and an alpha a beta, it's just social hierarchy, it's a simplification too, in reality it's not black and white either, it's a spectrum.
An hollywood sex symbol in his 30s is arguably hundred times more alpha than Chad the quaterback of your highschool.

Also my logic is that the comeback of traditionnalist ideologies in the modern world are a reaction to a sexual imbalance that began in the XIXth and raised its height during the so called "sexual liberation" in the 60s when women made a "coup" on sexuality.

I'm here since /new/, faggot, it's nu/pol/ trash like you who kill the board because they can't handle discussion when it makes them uncomfortable or when they can't spew "le epic meme".

I didn't call it projection because you partly based your argument on personal experiences, but because you have no convincing evidence for your theory and because your theory assumes that acces to sex defines wheter a person is authoritairian or libertairian, while at best it is only one of many factors.

you're french.

you have already lost this argument.