/lrg/ LIBERTARIAN RIGHT GENERAL - THE EXISTENCE OF COMMIES VIOLATES THE NAP

This thread is for Discussion of Capitalism, Libertarianism, Paleolibertarianism, Anarcho-Capitalism, Minarchism, and the PHYSICAL REMOVAL of COMMUNIST FAGS from our board of peace. Reminder that this is the Libertarian RIGHT General. Aleppo Johnson-fags, Left-Libertarians, and other Shit-Libs need to fuck off. Voice your complaints to r/libertarian.

>Recommended Reading list
libertarianright.org/reading/

>Vanilla /lrg/ pastebin- CREATE IF YOU DONT SEE ONE IN THE CATALOG
pastebin.com/7K1EJYb8

>Bump for Life, Liberty, and Private Death Squads

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/1CjndIiZyJo
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_3D_printed_weapons_and_parts
youtu.be/bq7iEkQzf8k
myredditvideos.com/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

How's it going my freedom loving pals?

For those of you who hate freedom, why are you such a little bitch? You should know any man enslaved to Libertinism, Marxism, or Degeneracy is not a free man.

>Left-Libertarian, and other Shit-Libs need to fuck off
But why?

We just have slight variances in our solutions to problems. Left libertarians would rather community policing before private policing for instance.

In for a libertarian Saturday evening, how are you guys?

No, fucking no. anti-propertarians, marxists, moral relativists, and egalitarians have a history of undermining our movement. I will not tolerate the cancer they espouse. Any time we left them in they overrun us with commie faggotry.

I'm doing well my dude. Whats going on Maltabro.

>loves liberty
>posts statist

fuck off

>loves liberty
>wants to police what image I post.

Fuck off. You like this image better?

been sick almost all week, missed these threads, did any statist provide a decent argument in this time? Or business as usual?

buisness as usual, most recent "debaters" have been dumber than usual. I'd rather talk to my libertarian bros instead.

Kill yourself boot licker

I'm not a Marxist and left libertarianism fails without moral objectivity too, we must all agree to a law. If I'm egalitarian it's because libertarianism without it tends to splinter and fragment societies. Do you believe the peasants lived like the daimyo?

The idea is that at this stage humans only need to be slightly better to recognise self improvement as a core value. After they are made to take responsibility for themselves, then many laws are simply not needed.

This is about functional minarchy. Our Lord Molymeme has decreed this is simply not possible in low light iq societies.

Define statist.

Eat shit, commie.

Someone who believes the state is a necessity or a necessary evil without any doubt. Someone who is not willing to explore how deep can we go in state removal before society crumbles.

And that includes assambleary societies, which are a parliamentary state in disguise.

digits confirm

Stay mad statist. PHYSICALLY REMOVE

Are you implying society might start to crumble with state removal?

...

...

No. Im saying "we should explore how much can we bend this iron before it breaks", but my belief is that it will never break.

Like, someone with an open mind about the state's necessity, someone willing to bend the iron even if he believes it can break, might not be what I'd consider a statist.

how you gonna defeat the army?

Is a sense of community statist?

...

The sense that you can force this sense onto others would be.

Us army is libertarian as fuck, oath keepers will be on our side on the day of the removal.

...

I just want to say "FUCK YOU" to all of the anarchobeeps who infiltrated the libertarian movement, because you can't get traction on your own merits, and proceeded to discredit and spoil the marketability of the movement to the public at large.

Seriously. I fucking hate you shits.

What? AnCaps? The Libertarian masterace?

f2u5c3k3y8o3u5
>d&c bait

Im not even going to give you a (((you)))

Mostly Ancaps. Yeah. They can just go ahead and kill themselves in penance. Too bad they don't have enough honor to understand why they should.

I am a bit more forgiving of paleos because they really just want to go Amish and be left alone.

Oh child. I don't want you.

>Mostly Ancaps
What is so bad about AnCaps?

This.

I'm a Paleo myself, I know lots of fags take on the position of ancap, but lots of them are leftists that completely reject Rothbards later works because it's too edgy and right wing for them. But as far as I know orthodox AnCaps are pretty cool.

Daily reminder that Sup Forums is a board of peace, that is why we have to physically remove the communists, socialists and all other left leaning scum.

They are coattail riders who discredit and ruin the Libertarian Party, by being utterly unmarketable to the general public. A la Gary Johnson.

They are everywhere and everything they say weakens the deployment of the party. I'm thinking they are simply a subversion tactic by the opposition.

Can I be a Libertarian without wanting to live in a 100% libertarian world? The idea makes a lot of sense to me and I think with the current political structure and society we live in, I always advocate for moving closer and closer to Libertarian values but I don't think a 100% libertarian world would work

...

I don't dislike them on their own. I despise that they infested the libertarian party.

Well he will tell you himself, he is not a Libertarian, he is a Republican. Maybe you're onto something.

...

How are ancaps discrediting and ruining the libertarian party, what is so unmarketable about anarcho capitalism that libertarians should discard?

Are you comparing ancaps to Gary "bake that fucking cake" Johnson?

"Weakening my party" is not an argument.

Yeah that's fine, you're not a "pure" Libertarian, but a libertarian still.

Brah, please. The Libertarian Party is becoming a fucking trainwreck on its own. They don't need to be infiltrated to look like retards.

AnCap is the logical conclusion of consistently applying Libertarian ethics. Thin Libertarianism.

What? AnCaps aren't running the libertarian party. They're a bunch of faggot ass left Libertarians larping as Rothbardians. Please don't let the LP spoil Anarcho capitalism for you. No real ancap likes those fags.

Hold the fuck on. Are you saying Gary favor Johnson is ancap? Fuck no. Us AnCaps are fighting against those open borders fags.

Pic related.

>Favor
I meant faggot

...

>trumpcucks and leftists get outdebated every thread
>have to start voicing their opinions as anti-ancap libertarians

>Tfw pro Trump and PaleoLibertarian Ancap.

Feels good to be master race.

The LP killed the libertarian movement back then in the 70's.

Georgism is the logical conclusion of libertarian ethics

No it's not. Georgism does not seek to prevent conflict over ownership. Rather it creates it.

It's not compatible with Property Rights in the Rothbardian sense.

What's the free-est gun?

Land is a scarce resource and therefore must be owned privately. Air is not scarce unless in special conditions (underwater, in space, in mine shafts...) so there is no real reason for it to be owned privately.

Georgism just doesn't make sense. Should food industries not be privately owned because food is a scarce resource? Applying consistently its implied logic to every sector of the economy would lead us to a soviet-style dictatorship.

It's just the typical "I am libertarian but" objection that arbitrarily rules out land from the laws of economics.

>Tfw have to drive to the gym
>Tfw I have to use government funded ROADS
>tfw taxation without representation
I don't know if I can even go to the gym anymore.

>What's the free-est gun?
Liberator.

...

Left libertarianism is a contradiction on itself, this place is only for intelligent discussion

So in ancapistan who owns space?

Wow, the magic of the free market at work.
:^) ain't freedumb great?
youtu.be/1CjndIiZyJo

go post this shit in an appropriate thread you stupid moron

>the liberator
Outdated. Another guy made a better one.

Here you have the blueprints. Don't blame me if it explodes in ur hands tho.

The jeb bush special Glock.

>literally a NERFgun-gun
Kek. Not bad.

Yeah it is. Fuck you.

Come back when you understand natural law.

I know mate, there is actually a lot.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_3D_printed_weapons_and_parts

Makes me want to try them all, but it's costly and I would get raped by the law.

Lel
Haven't seen that meme in a looong time

9mm, best recoil vs mag size vs stopping power

>.40
>best middle ground between 9mm and 45
>45 Stopping power
>less recoil than 45
>more ammo than 45
9mm babies btfo

What does natural law have to do with you dissing ancaps for destroying the LP without providing a single argument as to why or how they're destroying it?

It's like you're trying to hide how ignorant you are about anarcho capitalism by not confronting specific ideas and just focusing on ad homs. It's not working tho.

Uh, I think the people in the LP are the ones who don't understand natural law. Otherwise they wouldn't have voted for Gary.

Started reading Anarchy, State and Utopia and shit, Nozick is good. Really enjoying the book and learning something. Going to take some time to finish tough, I read every chapter 3/4 times.

.40 isn't a bad choice, at least we agree that the .45 is powerful but slow and recoils. These same advantages trickle down to the 9mm too at the slight loss of power from the .40

first hit wins right? recoil, mag size, and accuracy is king.

I couldn't push myself to read it. And then I read The Ethics of Liberty, in which HHH explains that Nozick became popular because he saw libertarianism as another "idea" to reflect upon and not actually be taken seriously, and so the elite and academia threw him a bone to keep the anarchofags like us satisfied.

Ay, fellow Maltese man. Of topic, who will you be voting for in the upcoming election?

I wish jeb! was President so his memes would be relevant forever. Truly unlimited meme material with Jeb!

What really pushed me to read it was his minarchist ideas, since I identify myself as minarchist more than ancap. Even if you think that I would recommend it to you, his argumentation is pretty good and can make you think different about some subjects.

Also, a bit unrelated, what's your opinion on the fact that commie parties here in Portugal also want the EU to end?

>first hit wins
Absolutely. But also, say you don't get that chance? Say you miss, or are shooting at a moving target. Life is more difficult than "yeah, I'll hit it" it's why I like the .40 compromise.

Hey there, libertarian too?

I'm not Maltese, just work and live here, I'm not really invested in Maltese politics, but I assume that there's no option I'd vote for.

>i wish American were a wasteland filled with 5'2 Mexican trolls and no jobs

Oh yeah, then there's that. Nvm we'll have to leave the memes behind. It's a shame tho.

I need some help committing to pure libertarianism lads, I really agree with free market = free people and capitalism as a system clearly works for making.strong economies, HOWEVER, I feel like placing all the power in corporations hands, even with consumer boycotts and the like we couldn't stop stuff like corporations destroying the environment and then paying people off to keep it hidden. I think some restrictions do need to be enforced on businesses, by a government like system. But maybe you guys can convince me otherwise?

I'm a world with no """public property""" there's no public parks to dump your nuclear waste in. The only areas they can destroy will have to be owned by them or a company Devoted to managing waste products. No one will allow a company to dump shit on their private property.

You've got it wrong bro. Corporations wouldn't even be that powerful if not for a regulated market.

In a freer market most businesses would operate at a smaller scale, no big Google's or Microsoft's fucking with the consumers.

Uhm, alright let's see if we can push you.

>couldn't stop stuff like corporations destroying the environment

Why do you believe that true property rights would not be able to address this? If you take a dump in your corridor I don't care, if you take a dump in your corridor and the smell reaches my house you're generating externalities that are lowering my property value, therefore damaging my property, and you should solve the situation or I should be able to get compensated in case you refuse to do it.

>I think some restrictions do need to be enforced on businesses

Please be precise in which restrictions you believe so we can address them just like I addressed the pollution/externalities one.

guys.

so what should be the appropriate role for the government ?

>Say you miss
thems the breaks. That's why the lower recoil and bigger mag is my card in the hat.

...

Hey man, look at it from the bright side. Had Cruz won we would have shitty zodiac killer and DAHNAGLD memes... We have the fucking shitposter in chief in command right now.
>Inb4 shills

Protecting private property and enforcing contracts.

disappearing quietly

youtu.be/bq7iEkQzf8k

Hail victory. Shills don't get that in a globalized world Nationalism is a step towards decentralization.

fuck commies my dudes

I read his book until Chapter 3, I think, but then let go after I started reading Rothbard.

Also, it's a shame that only commies want to get rid of the EU. I hope it just collapses on itself.

Thoughts on that guy t's new video?

I'm starting to get the feeling that nobody on this board knows anything about politics

This pham
Pic related is your future if you allow them to win. Give me death or give me liberty.