McDonald's™ CEO says $15 an hour would cause them to use robots instead...

McDonald's™ CEO says $15 an hour would cause them to use robots instead. How will we ever have an economy if robots do everything?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_credit
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Identity
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Learn how to program.

we'll all be professional shitposters

GLOBAL COMMUNISM (ubi) :D

deport illegal aliens.
Ban or severely restrict H-1B visas.

Wait but why don't we just let McD go out of business since the food sucks in the first place, it's one of the most ebil gapitlist corporations in the world, and most of the people who eat there are the UBI crowd?

Why do we even care?

this is why niggers and white trash should be sterilized to ease their inevitable suffering

This, the non-programmer will hardly survive kn a new world of growing automation. Also, to my fellow National Socialists, we need to gain the world back before the automation revolution, or else we'll never get the world back again.

call his bluff

Also
>taxes

BUT THEIR FRIES!!!!!!! We got to get that recipe before they tank.

>Implying programming isn't the first thing that would be better done by computers.

>How will we ever have an economy if robots do everything?
they will never be able to do anything

Just Jew it out of them during the bankruptcy proceedings. That's valuable intellectual property.

Social Credit.

Programmers programming programs

Is this the new word for UBI? Was there something wrong with the old word, or is this the price of academic innovation?

Eventually that will be replaced by AI as well. Beyond that things cojld get scary, and I mean Terminator scary.

You have no idea how programming works then.
Programming is the last thing to be automated.

Well if that's what the (((CEO))) believes then we should just listen to what (((he))) says

it would be communism

>use robots
>costs plummet
>sales reduce too
>start using more expensive/healthier ingredients
>sales boom and nation gets a worthwhile fast food provider
Only "con" I see here is that worthless bottom feeders have to do more with their life than just dropping out of high school to work at McDonalds.

What if we had just kept normies and brown people away from computers instead of letting the Eternal Jew issue infinite credit for every slob on the planet to get a degree in CS?

mfw I chose a future proof career

It's already over you stupid goy

youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU

>Social Credit.
Dude. It's an idea from the 1920s. School yourself:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_credit

because being unemployed is better than earning $10/h

If we lose automation the Jews we may have to engineer a controlled Terminator dcenario to uproot the Jew, I am prepared to initiate such contingencies. We're very close to playing God here, we will need philosophical thought more than ever.

Communism is older than that friendo.

They already do in straya

Touchscreens to order

Works better than most burger flippers too

all these liberals complaining about the McDonalds wages lmao

all they have to do is stop eating there

>automate burger flipping
>cost of burgers plummets
>everyone is wealthier as a result
>other professions share their hours with the burger flippers
>everyone works less as a result
Where is the downside?

Automation for uniform mass produced food products is one thing. Automated checkstands or even cars are fairly simple. It was once thought that the automobile would destroy the economy, with so many jobs being centered around caring for the animals. Futurists have predicted 4 day work weeks 6 hour shifts and 10 weeks of vacation a year. No way automation will hurt jobs just change them. Programmers is a stupid suggestion since you only need one programmer for millions of McDonald's.

Remember when you went to the barber shop and a piece of candy was $0.03?

I do. Some people can't seem to figure out why, though. So let's just raise the minimum wage to pay for it!

You you basically be homeless in America with thst kind if money, or live in a dangerous non-White neighborhood.

Easy enough.

Income tax on the robots. Tax them as if they were human employees.

UBI, will be the only answer to prevent an entire economic/social collapse or 1929 on steroids.

Even the best economists on the right are starting to come to that conclusion. It so damn crazy it might actually work.

Although eliminating H-1B's and Green Cards might actually help, even making the hiring of illegals a Class-A felony with a minimum 8 year sentence would probably work.

Both ideas strain the GDP to the point where advancement would be at a snails pace til a majority of occupations were atomized.

In my last 20 visits to McDonalds, I have asked for no onions each time. 18/20 meals have had onions on the burger. This isn't all at the same McDonalds either. It is about time those worthless idiots get replaced with superior robots.

>le automation boogeyman

I wouldn't be too sure about that. If we enter a post-computational-scarcity world (think zetaflops on personal computers), self evolving code could take over fairly easily.

Inflation, banks creating money out of nowhere without it being back by goods or services.

>need one programmer for millions of McDonald's.
You should go back and read your futurist books more carefully to understand what they are predicting. I suggest "The Age of Spiritual Machines" by Ray Kurzweil. Written in 1984 and it will even tell you how sex dolls will sway the minds of men to join the singularity and how it will invariably falter and turn to grey goo and die out, and how that's a good thing.

If only we had only one computer program running in the world yesterday, maybe finally the entire globe could have been brought to its knees by a virus.

Kill ronald user

post your career, rate the automization chance
t. Psychotherapist

Mythbusters has an episode on that

The global deflationary collapse is inevitable as long as we let (((them))) continue to try to invent their way out of a ponzi scheme that they won't let go.

UBI isn't going to save it. Only make it worse while (((they))) continue to consolidate power. Don't be suck a fucking dupe.

I hate Mcdolan but he is correct.

naive retards on Sup Forums who think millions of new jobs will appear out of nowhere when actually this time its legit there wont be the jobs coming back because theres not going to be a magical new boom not everyone can be rocket scientists

i think we need to tax the robots and refunnel it back to the people without a job

>unironically linking to that joke of an analysis

We'll be in a world like WALL-E.

omg you mean they've been conditioning us to accept their planned future?

the only thing that creates unemployment is the minimum wage and welfare state

>thx reddit.

>not everyone can be rocket scientists
There are tons of unfilled jobs out there for people who lack intelligence. Welders are a prime example. Some of the dumbest people you will meet, but still a necessity.

Good, I'd rather have a robot handle my food than a nigger.

You would. It would just be a very different economy than the one you see around you now. UBI would ultimately fail. What would take its place is extreme self sufficiency and extreme local manufacturing.

Both labor's and factories' values would fall close to zero, only things that would have value would be raw materials. Mine owners and land owners would be the new aristocracy in the robot economy. Or at least those who could hold onto mines and land.

I suppose the only labor that would hold value would be related to robot repair and design. But you wouldn't need too many of those around. Maybe one person town or something like that.

>tax the robots
why? so tyrone can keep his ebt card? just let the system collapse and only the smart survive. once all the drag dies we can move on

It actually is better if you have a low time preference. Not to mention, the wage salary of your next job is dependent upon the one you worked at previously.
Also, you're picture is incorrect. Teens aren't the ones who would be impacted the most by a higher minimum wage, undesirable employees are (e.g. tattooed, pierced, problem dye, criminal record, felons, low IQ people, etc).

Call their bluff.

So if using a machine is cheaper why haven't they done it already? Because they want to pay you more then the machine?

Something stinks.

employment for the sake of employment doesnt mean anything you could earn 5 cents an hour and the cost of living is 2000 a month

as long as you have a trajectory of less good jobs and more robots coming in and outsourcing theres nothing you can do but you have to start recycling the money back from the rich

ya but theres also 3d printing with metal

also you dont seem to understand the concept of a economy becoming tighter and tougher rather you look at one place its still possible to make a living for a laymen and think everything is ok rather than looking at the world at large

when everbody without a job wants to be a welder there wont be any more positions for welders

Are you kidding? I'm sitting right next to an aftermarket exhaust with painstakingly beautiful welds. That's art, no question about it.

But what robot needs an aftermarket exhaust? They would already have the most perfect exhaust precomputed for them.

I heard the robots will be white so they don't fuck up orders.

>the cost of living is 2000 a month
If everything is automated then prices will come down

If they automate everything than EVERYONE should benefit from it. Get rid of the 40 hr work week. Have full benefits for those working 30-40 hours a week.

As I understand it, you won't be coding that much when working with AI, you'll be training it. Somewhat different skillset, probably closer to what a gamer has than a programmer.

Porgramms can learn the rules of, lets say c++, but they can't programm other programms without a template

>implying humans don't become the robots

Fuck you dumb people, starve and die you won't have my money.

Why would they? The Jews will still control the banks, which mathematically ensure that prices only ever go up.

Do you think you live in a world where everybody is being nice to you?

>i think we need to tax the robots and refunnel it back to the people without a job
The right people.

We tax the corporations using the machines, tax their company reveanue, but the machines should be owned by the government, a National Socialust government. The machines should not be privately own when associated with a corporation/company.

so everybody can keep their ebt cards

i dont hate everybody on welfare its not a crime to eat food

not true if everything is automated less workers means less working class moving into the middle class because nobody can make any money anymore

so youll have the super elite who can afford everything and then youll have the unemployed

>If everything is automated then prices will come down
t. 4chin armchair economist

>mfw when I work for an oilfield tool company and we have robotic welders

Do the robots get to vote? If not then you shouldn't be able to tax them.

>robots take up all the menial labour
>AI improvements mean that robots can also do jobs as complex as architecture
>78% unemployment rate by 2040
>everything so cheap that the state just gives out living wages
>suddenly half the world is on patreon or youtube trying to make it as the next big artist/vlogger/whatthefuckeverer to make even the smallest of wages as a status symbol
>birth rates plummet as women can't find an employed man
>suicide skyrockets
>humanity can only reclaim its dignity by venturing to the stars

Screencap this

(((They))) run the show our only hope is in the Chinese/Russo/Indio alliance to free the Earth of their menace.

(((They))) own/operate the West.
We can't save ourselves w/out external aid.

(((They))) own our religious leadership just like Rome 1700 years ago, plz Asia you're our only hope.

Robots > Humans. Get used to it.

what are you smoking, their fries suck

Learn to code is the "let them eat cake" of the 21st century.

Niggers can't get a simple McDonalds order right. The poor bastards, they're gonna go extinct once we stop helping them. If we had automayion in yhe 18th century slaves would have been obsolete to us, no niggers!

When the economy does become automated I've often toyed with the idea of sponsorship instead of employment and welfare. If the government were to make regulations forcing companies to sponsor X amount of citizens this could have two effects. One people would have to shape up to gain these corporate sponsorships instead of just showing up to work and half assing it and two since this is essentially corporate provided welfare, state provided welfare could potentially be eliminated as a result.

Too bad for you they're importing your saviors en masse to replace our demographics. I don't think this plan is working.

If there are no consumers and production costs are near zero why wouldn prices come down?

Burger boys just don't deserve $15 an hour. Is everybody too stupid to see that simple point?

If anything the government should fight high rents and provide affordable apartments.
That, and tell niggers they don't need to smoke, they don't need $1500 sneakers, and they should keep their fingers off drugs. Voila, affordable living for under $15 an hour.

>CEO says bad things will happen if people put his costs up
They always do this. Look at Nissan during brexit.

So in other words the government mandates the serfs to do something useful to the government by way of front companies?

Wow. Who thought of Communism before? That's brilliant!

Because there's no way to service the debt, you stooge.

>our only hope is in the Chinese/Russo/Indio
No

>(((They))) own our religious leadership just like Rome 1700 years ago, plz Asia you're our only hope.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Identity

It would do more than that. It would get rid of the use of money in a lot of cases. You wouldn't go to Mc Donald's for your burger, you'd tell your domestic robot to make you one from scratch.

You wouldn't have these huge factories churning out cars, TVs, whatever, you'd have a multipurpose village fabricator that would take your plans and fabricate whatever you wanted on demand. It would be mostly automated too, be like a super vending machine, unless you were trying to build something really weird.

You'd need money for the materials and some sort of surcharge for use of the robot, but since people aren't really making much money anymore, the prices would be low for what you had to pay.

t. Uses buzzwords but makes no real argument leaf

McDonald's is for niggers.
Thank you.

why not both

having the government own everything isnt a smart idea

rich people will keep buying stuff from rich people and their families

in capitalism theres nothing that says they have to give a shit about you and lower their prices so you can survive

they will just live in their gated communities while everyone else is left in the dirt because thats already where its going

Yes, the whole world would be a magical play ground where you have anything you want for free and there is no money.

I saw it on Star Trek!

I agree banks would be screwed

I'm lovin it™. For me it's the McChicken®

Ok what is stopping someone from selling cheap goods to poor people and getting rich?

So, in other words, banks would never allow such a thing to happen.

Let's try to pretend we're not in kindergarten anymore.

nah that's exactly what I predict as well. If we accelerate base needs to be completely automated we will end up leaving this planet much, much quicker than most people think.

>all these people saying that the costs of things will go down with automation

Oh, my sweet summer child...

What else is hard to automate by robot? Probably the fine arts. I suspect there will be AI musicians and painters but authentic art will command a premium.

A robot society could be quite a more artistic society, where the people making the most money are actually the street busker and the painter in his studio.

If we had a computer with infinite space and infinite processing power, we still couldn't feed it general ideas and get program code out. We have no way to teach it generalized ideas. We would have to get a sentient AI before being able to do so.

Lets say we don't feed a description, but rather a design, and ask for code. We've tried WYSIWYGs many many times and they ultimately fail in producing good viable and flexible programs. They aren't limited by processing power, but conceptual understanding.

Self evolving code doesn't exist (in the idea you put forth). We have "machine learning" programming (trial-and-error with functional language just to get a domain to map to a range). We have viruses that change their function signature to evade detection, but neither are a machine coming up with a new more complex program from a general or abstract idea.

Machine learning using neural nets barely works with regular languages, and requires an insanely large sample set (that's more convoluted than just defining the regex). The idea we could get it to work on context-free languages or context-sensitive languages is not within applicable reach. Machines that recognize and generate turning machines is just right out.