At what age you realised that both capitalism and national socialism are cancer and christian distributism is the only...

At what age you realised that both capitalism and national socialism are cancer and christian distributism is the only answer?

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=gXKeiTTN7Wc
youtube.com/watch?v=bExYLukiTdU&t=793s
youtube.com/watch?v=qQeRu7BUEr8
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Enlighten me
What is Christian distribution?

It is the idea that political power does not come from a persons right to vote but from what property they own.

Look up G.K Chesterton he spoke about it alot.

Economic doctrine based on Catholic social teaching. It's opposed to both socialism and capitalism.

>GK Chesterton
I love his works, where does he talk about it?

What does it entail?

Family values, christian society, basicly everything that Sup Forums wants minus the retarded skin larping.

It is hard to find a piece of his specifically about it more rather bits a pieces from his many newspaper and magazine articles.

If you watch the series "the apostle of common sence" there is a bit about his thoughts on it in there

All ISM's are jew creations.

The fact most people don't know about distributism is becuase media types don't want you to know about it. It is in their intrests to keep politics as a left right dicotomy.

>National SocialISM
Kys
I mean how does it work?
Ok, thanks, I'm looking into reading "eugenics and other evils" next

The vatican's doing a great job of not giving any of its tax-free extreme riches to any poor people.

When I first read pic related

Distributism is retarded and would be extremely economically inefficient in practice, it doesn't even view economics as legitimate. Something like authoritarian state capitalism with fascist tendencies like what China's doing is far superior.

Give me a quick rundown

I heard Chesterton and Belloc were close

tbqh most of nowadays economic systems are as much inefficient, it's just that we use them because we got used to using them

Catholicism is the reason slavery ended & the serf came about. Serf life wasn't as bad as people make out.
Capitalism ruined the feudal system.
Capitalism is doomed to collapse & there are two alternatives:
Return to a guild system & localism
The Servile State: essentially state-sanctioned slavery.
He saw things such as the NHS in the Britain & the minimum wage as the start of the servile state.

If you're already a fan of Chesterton, read his Outline of Sanity. That's the book in which he most covers Distributism

>tfw he can't see the glaring contradictions and fallacies in Popularum Progressio

Distributsm isn't supposed to be efficient. The idea if I get it correctly is that a content peasentry is better than the souless materialistic world we live in.

>Expecting /lol/ to understand what Distributism means
LMAO
M
A
O

>The vatican's doing a great job of not giving any of its tax-free extreme riches to any poor people.
That's a pretty brazen lie, Moishe.

distributism is meme

How will you know when you should forbid merger of companies, so that they stay "medium" sized?

This 100%
Gross wealth begets decadence which in turn begets decay
Thanks, can't wait to look into it, sounds based.

Is your NHS really that old?

>/lol/
Hello phone poster

>Give me a quick rundown
Everyone owns the means of their own production.

In Socialism, the state owns the means.
In Capitalism, a few fat cats do - hence to Catholic criticism: "The problem with Capitalism is that there aren't enough Capitalists."

Basically, it's the medieval theory of economics (think pre-capitalistic guilds and shit), which is in part still used by the German Mittelstand today (which according to most is the secret to our success in economics). Sadly, germany fell for the Socialism meme, so the Mittelstand is dying out pretty quickly and we're basically shit broke now.

Another problem with this is that Distributism is extremely anti-semitic (well, it's Catholic, what do you expect) and thus nobody wants to explain it or talk about it.

It is meme because it counts on people being Christians and not lukewarm Christians at that.

Hello newfag.

...

I'm sold

Interesting concept. How would it be enforced to make people behave? In a generalized idea it seems like a more individualistic version of communism to me.

explain

Well it wasn't the NHS at that time. It was the national insurance act, which

>created a system of health insurance for industrial workers in Great Britain based on contributions from employers, the government, and the workers themselves. It was one of the foundations of the modern welfare state. It also provided unemployment insurance for designated cyclical industries.

>Polish
Of course

>How would it be enforced to make people behave?
By being Catholic.

>In a generalized idea it seems like a more individualistic version of communism to me.
Not at all. Private property is the basis of Distributism, it won't work without it.

The problem is, as you said, who's gonna watch out that (((nepotists))) and (((humanists))) crash the system? We'd have to go full monarchy for that - ie a state that doesn't interfere at all until someone tries to rig the game then literally kills the (((culprit))).

Politics is cancer no matter the label.

So is this what pic related, Fr. Coughlin was advocating for?
m.youtube.com/watch?v=gXKeiTTN7Wc

the vatican was taken over by the jews in 1958. look up the 1958 papal election, it's some spooky shit. the throne of st peter is empty atm

Enlightened monarchy when - would that such a thing could happen nowadays. Democracy is a lie and Republicanism is easily subverted by those who make the law and by private interest.

I just wish Catholicism stayed true to itself and hadn't been subverted by people like (((Pope Francis))). It lends credence to the views of sedevacantists.

My man lmao

Where can I find info on that? What happened? Can it be rectified?

It is important to remember that in the long run of things 50 years is not that long a time. The Vatican will either uncorrupt itself in time or will fall apart leading to something better.

Both are good outcomes!

Have you ever read "whither the church?"
It's a couple of letters written by nuns back in the 50s asking their superiors why they can no longer talk about judeo-Bolshevism and other things.
I got it along with a pamphlet by Fr.Coughlin, "who is dead, God or Democracy?"

E. Micheal Jones talks aout it quite a bit.
youtube.com/watch?v=bExYLukiTdU&t=793s

A great speaker and writer he is, his best work is Libido Dominandi, this interview on it is required listening for any Christian browser of Sup Forums.
youtube.com/watch?v=qQeRu7BUEr8

Sedes pls

I agree the Church was infiltrated, but it's been 50 years & already tradition is regrowing in the Church. The groups with the most vocations are FSSP, SSPX, ICKSP etc.

Our Lord said the gates of hell would never prevail, not that that we'd never face great tests

>1950s
Bro. That's nothing. It seems long because you're living in this era, but imagine reading a book where it says "The Vatican slowly lost power over the next 40 years and got a shitty Pope for 5 years afterwards".

Can someone give me quick roundown on christian
distributionism?

Afraid I haven't read it.

Such things are hard to get in my neck of the woods and if you do it can get you in trouble with the authorities.

The entire world and all it's conflicts are rooted in Masonic Jew's vs Roman Catholicism

quality goods better than cheap garbage

Property = power

3 acres and a cow

contentment comes through hard work rather than wealth

Ancap with morals

athiests need not apply

What? Tell me about it, what book was this? Is Francis the pope you're referring to?
I got it off of Amazon, lol

In it's simplest terms using a modern creation:
rather than supermarkets, having markets with individual grocers, butchers etc. And those independent workers being part of wider guilds than include all grocers, butchers etc

Means of production not in state hands or capitalist hands, but in the hands of those who actually use them

pic related A good, short, practical book explaining some steps a state could take to help get a modern economy on the path to distributism