Libertarian-Fascism

Is it a feasible enough ideology to work? Also what would be a better name for it that would make it roll of the tongue better?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascist_(insult)
youtube.com/watch?v=RmtuCzKy83U
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>Libertarian-Fascism
That's literally like trying to be a Soviet Ancap.

>Also what would be a better name for it that would make it roll of the tongue better?
How about oxymoron?

It doesn't work. Fascist cucks depend on others for satisfaction and fulfilment and guidance. Libertarians are more about doing their own shit their own way.

Thought it was already called liberalism. *shrug*

If you see the phrase libertarian-fascism and don't immediately realize it's retarded and suggested by a retard, then you are retarded yourself

>Libertarian-Fascism

What policies?

It sounds like a self contradiction.
You'd either have to change the name or explain what you're talking about better.

i'm going to bed but this is a topic I like so I'll post real quick

first of all there's hoppean libertarianism which advocates for voluntary microstates, in which people have the right to physically remove those who would try to, through violence or bureaucracy, infringe on the freedoms of others

then there is "anarcho-fascism", which is just a term I use to describe a system in which fascism is used as a means to an anarchist utopia, much like how a temporary dictatorship of the prolectariat is used in Marxism to secure a communist utopia.

the most common critiques of this would be:
1: "Temporary" dictatorship is almost never temporary
2: How to find a good leader who would personify the anarchism/libertarianism that the people want
3: how libertarians/anarchists would feel about using force to secure freedom

"Fascism" is a meaningless word. Pic related.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascist_(insult)

After 1941 "fascist" was used in the Soviet Union to describe virtually any anti-Soviet activity or opinion. According to Marxism–Leninism, fascism was the "final phase of crisis of bourgeoisie", which "in fascism sought refuge" from "inherent contradictions of capitalism". As result of this approach, it was almost every Western capitalist country that was "fascist", with the Third Reich being just the "most reactionary" one.[2][3] As result, after 1941 "fascist" was used in Soviet Union to describe virtually any anti-Soviet activity: for example, the international investigation on Katyn massacre was described as "fascist libel".,[4] the Warsaw Uprising as "illegal and organised by fascists".[5] Communist Służba Bezpieczeństwa described trotskyism, titoism and imperialism as "variants of fascism".[6]

Not simultaneously without major concessions, but they both are capable of solving eachothers' problems which makes the concept worth considering as a philosophical framework.

The ideal society would be Libertarian, but if degeneracy/(((elite)))/invaders came to prey upon it, that society should have the ability & the will to quickly transition into fascism. Once the problem has been dealt with, there would be no real need for a fascist system, so there should be a mechanism for reversing this process.

"National-Libertarianism"

Fascist is only a meaningless word when used as a communist catch-all insult

it's important to remember the twenty years of Fascist Italy and the quasi-fascist Nazi Germany, because those were two of the most effective and influential governments in the world at the time
calling someone a fascist because of what they believe is meaningless yes, but it's instrumental to understanding an ideology

It doesn't just sound like a contradiction - it *IS* a contradiction.
You cannot violently and proactively control other people's lives and simultaneously be practicing libertarian ideology.

Fucking dipshits Jesus Christ.

filtered by tripcode

Even if no combination/merger can work, always remember we are still greatest allies and can co-exist once the meddling (((internationalists))) are helicopter'd

Totalitarian Anarchism pls

Beautifully put, and I'd join it the second a society like this existed and would take me (provided it managed to function as intended) but it's so far-fetched it's pretty much 100% larping. :-/

National-Libertarianism
>Libertarian whenever its possible,
>Nationalist whenever its necessary

Libertarian-Nationalism

This doesn't make any sense, they are complete opposites. One values control, they other values no control.

> Libertarian fascism
> Marina

Please. Get on my level.

> I am from the Italian Alps, so by Roman law, I get to call myself a Gallian

> The Swiss have the right idea wrt conscription

>Libertarian Fascism
>Another ideology that elected a nigger right off the bat

I'll pass

I think the most logical firs step to solidify the idea is to consider some possible mechanisms/methods of the switch.

>Democratic:
Voting emergency powers to the supreme chancellor
>Constitutionally outlined:
Allowing a specific council or perhaps the senate to unilaterally declare a state of emergency.

...

America was essentially that, E Pluribus Unum. There are fasces all over Washington DC. Lincoln's arms rest on two fasces in his monument.

...

Any state can mobilize into a fascist state, it's just a state of total war not anything else. Thing is your state will tend to suck up all the private property and resources during these times of fascism, since the military will need it to conquest the world. I don't really think a libertarian society would be a very strong fascist state AT ALL tbqh.

Standing between two fasces

Lincoln was very different from the founding fathers but still really cool. I don't get why anyone on Sup Forums wouldn't be a Unionist. Things are bad today, but imagine how much worse they'd be 150 years after le Nazi America lives and falls.

...

it's not just on Lincoln, they are everywhere, it was on your dime for like 40 years until fascism became the enemy

die, faggot

>Libertarian-Fascism
>Black-White
>X-Y

It's similar to the Roman system
Strong military dictatorship with a figurehead/leadership in times of crisis; decentralized yet still nationalistic during peace times

This draws a parallel between the law of civilization: where Hard Times (Communism) would lead to strong men (NatSoc) and ultimately give way to Good Times (Libertarianism). The problem is (((elites))) have been stepping in and artificially fucking it up in between Strong Men->Good Times and jumping the cycle

We also see parallels in Nazi-Germany itself. German citizens actually enjoyed a lot of libertarian leisures (encouraged to owning firearms, lack of degeneracy, strong smart stable knowledgeable society). Libertarianism cannot exist in our current demographics; NatSoc always strived to boot out (((anyone))) looking to subvert such a society; essentially we would need it before any sort of Libertarian utopia could be established

This often makes me wonder if Libertarianism wasn't Hitler's end game all along

Why?
Libertarians want everyone else to fuck off.
Nationalists want everyone else to fuck off.

Fusionism is close to that what you are describing.

Libertarians want small government, and fascists are the definition of big government. It's possible to have a blend with layer cake federalism, so that you leave people alone at a local level, but have a big strong federal government which projects its power outwardly, but you also need a large landmass and huge number of people to achieve it. It can only work in large countries, and we had it pretty good for a while in the US, but now the federal government is overstepping its very clear boundaries and people do not like it.

Black to black, white to white.
Be libertarian for rightists.
Be fascist against leftists.
The point is: don't treat them equally.

Yes, National Transhumanism is libertarian

...

I completely agree.
National Socialism was a reaction to Jewish-Liberal & Marxist domination of Germany.
The socialistic policies (nationalizing the banks, public works projects, etc) were driven by need not by desire. To regain control over their government and their money, not to steal profits from the private businesses.

Once the health, wealth, and future of the nation were secure, it is likely that the responsibilities thrust upon the NSDAP would naturally diminish as well.

youtube.com/watch?v=RmtuCzKy83U
>"for this struggle is not one for the present, but first and foremost one for the future."