Can you imagine the complete and utter sense of satisfaction this man must have?

Can you imagine the complete and utter sense of satisfaction this man must have?

In 1939, his country was greater than ever, his identity and culture put on a pedestal by every person alive in his nation. His people safe, fruitful and in complete harmony. The weather is beautiful, the beer is fresh and tasty, his uniform fits like a glove and is /fa/ as fuck.

Everything is perfect.


Then, the anglo...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=DZ6rfxoEFI4
ub.edu/graap/EHR.pdf
aryanism.net/politics/economics/
voxeu.org/article/macroeconomics-germany-forgotten-lesson-hjalmar-schacht
pridecomethbeforeafall.wordpress.com/2014/02/10/hitlers-economic-miracle/
youtu.be/pKnFN8P21-0
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

what would you sacrifice to walk in that mans shoes for a year?

THROUGHOUT BRITAINS HISTORY WE ALWAYS DECLARED WAR ON YUROPOORS THAT GOT TOO POWERFUL.

WE MAY OF LOST OUR EMPIRE DEFEATING GERMANY BUT WE WON THE PEACE
THIS IS AN ANGLO WORLD RULED BY BRITAIN AND THE USA.

I genuinely believe anglos deserve to be sunk into the atlantic ocean.

Your country sucks.
You were created as a buffer state after the defeat of Napoleon

youtube.com/watch?v=DZ6rfxoEFI4

To live in a better world than has ever been seen... ;..;

*sniff* truly brings a tear to the eye user. pic related

>WE MAY OF LOST OUR EMPIRE DEFEATING GERMANY
you couldve keep it. Hitler even offered the Brits help to pacify thier colonies.

We should've of sided with Imperial Germany in WW1.
But Nazi Germany had to be destroyed

Why?

Oh my sweet summer child, even in the moment of disaster, all your hatred is still directed at other Germanics instead of your true enemy.

If Imperial Germany had won WW1, no WW2 would of happened and the German Empire was much more respectable and honourable in comparison with the third reich

...

...

...

...

...

Well, maybe if such aggressive expansionist policies hadn't followed then all that could have been kept. Sure, the homogenous traditional culture is a nice idea, but the Nazi ideals had an element in common with marxism-leninism, in that it needed to be something pushed globally in order to succeed. Too many of you see Hitler as some infallible God, when he made some right decisions and some wrong ones. More space was necessary and would be taken by force. Of course people like to now re-write history and tell that Hitler would have stopped and it's all Britains fault. Bullshit. You can argue we shouldn't have stepped in and worked together, but saying Germany had no plans for expansion is bollocks.

What differs us Kraut is that we beleive in Democracy and Freedom. It runs in our veins. If we had sided with you the world would of fallen to tyrany.

...

wow they all look evil, except the rabbi.

Fuck beer it's bad for you

Sorry our leadership fell for Jewish tricks

AHAHA. Yes, like you sided with Stalinist Bolshevism - such freedom! much democracy! WOW! - instead which literally has as its goal global communist revolution and you handed half of Europe to them. And of course global financial capitalism.

We see the effects today.

>More space was necessary and would be taken by force
Just as the brits did. The only difference is, that the german "colonies" wouldve been eastern europe.

Why did we have to let ((them))) drag us into a pointless brother war why didn't we listen to Sir Oswald Mosley

kill 6 million jews

kek

>But Nazi Germany had to be destroyed

Nah

People are saying he wouldn't have pushed west, which is true. From the beginning he admitted his intentions, which was conquest in the east for resources and living space. He wanted to leave the French/British alone, in particular the British as he saw them like Germans.

No National Socialist denies Germany's desire to expand eastwards. Lebensraum was the German version of Manifest Destiny.

why pol never remembers the moment when russia ass fucked the nazis?

I actually feel bad for this guy and I'm not even a nazi supporter. Makes me sad to see that guy like that. Fuck

Hitler shouldn't have invaded Poland, where else would we get our chrap labour from?

Oh golly the miscreant know

I ask myself the same question. But it is possibly true that Ribbentrop made political mistakes and Hitler was too impatient.

At least you listened to Enoch Powell - for a while - but his cost him his career, reputation and possibly happiness.

Sadly the beourgoise citizens never truly oppose marxist subversion and neo-liberal seduction.

National Socialism and Bolshevism are both very similar ideologies
Both hate Freedom
Both hate democracy
Both have enemies bourgeoisie capitalists or the JOOOSS
Both now destroyed

It's not like he dreamed it up one day - there's a huge german diaspora that hasn't been united withhin the german reich in 1871 living in the sudetenland, siebenbürgen, the donauschwaben and many more.

Before or after they killed 20million of their men?

Fuck off, Argies!

We're not all faggots. Some of us realise that Churchill was a pawn of the Jews.

>inb4 I'm a German cuck

Ehh no - bolshevism was a jewish creation - they slaughtered tens of millions of ethnic russian christians in the soviet union - one of the reasons why nearly 1.5 million russians fought together with the wehrmacht agains the bolshevic demon.

Why do school shootings never happen where they're needed?

tyranny, really, anglo? are you serious?

or did you mistype and mean non-degeneracy?

Germany is more cucked kraut.

I'm not denying we did. I'm just pointing to this as the precursor for war. If hitler hadn't wanted to expand then he would have had a better chance of keeping your homogenous Nazi state going.

*Cheap

But it transformed into ethno nationalism under Stalin

I just find it ridiculous how Brits and French have the nerve to talk about Germany's expansion when they had fucking GLOBAL empires.

Ignorance is bliss

>guys we're so superior, let's just invade Russia without making an atomic bomb first, it will totally work

>National Socialism and Bolshevism are both very similar ideologies
LMAO
>Both hate Freedom
wrong
>Both hate democracy
You don't?
>Both have enemies bourgeoisie capitalists or the JOOOSS
So?
>Both now destroyed
1,4 billion Chinese who are on the way to become the dominant global power show otherwise. Same for Vietnam and some South American countries. And if you really believe marxism was dead in the west, I have no idea why you are on Sup Forums.

And even IF they were similar, which is complete nonsense of course, Communism is a worse ideology than National Socialism and it also killed dramatically more people. It also wanted and wants global revolution, not just Lebensraum. But I think we all know (((why))) you can even repeat these talking points straight from the mainstream media.

For the purpose of rallying people to fight, yes.
No one wanted to fight for Stalin or the Soviet government, but they would fight for their families and culture if it were played up on Stalin's part.

ill take farage over mutti merkel any day

>and the usa
not so fast

National bolshevism is the true red pill my friend

stupid little goyim with your identity politics again. you really are no better than the nignogs and and feminists with mah white/black heritage and mah patriarchy/degeneracy.
no. realpolitik germany died with this man. the last true hero of white folks; one with old fashioned prussian iron and blood mindset while still having both feet on the ground.

germans and overall caucasian germanics are not superhuman, just like niggers aren't. you're more intelligent than the latter and thus propser, but so far you've only won in wars waged against individual nations. still worthy of respect, certainly, but you've lost both world wars because you've bought into your own supposed halo of invincibility and when coercion failed turned to fighting all others at once. you can blame (((us))), you can blame the anglos, you can blame the entire fucking planet for engineering your downfall, but ultimately the failure was your own.

and all that, simply because you've failed to realize that letting the french and russians fight together would spell disaster. a piece of logic any 8th grade student with basic understanding og geography can deduce, and yet only Bismarck took to heart. you've betrayed your own heritage by betraying him, and basically jewed yourselves harder than we have could ever hoped to attempt, nevermind succeed.

you are the bane of your own fucking existence, and instead of realizing the merit of my words and going right wing WITHOUT making your autistic ubermensch would just likely respond with merchants. so have fun with that, I'll continue watching and sighing while your boat burns completely and sinks while mine is catching fire.

goodbye.

uhu. at least we still got acces to muh gunz

>greetings comrade, soviet reign supreme, let's encroach on Western Europe and on Romania's oil fields when we know the Germans rely on them and then act surprised when Germany attacks first

Still no, Dugin

卐 - MYTHS ABOUT NATSOC (Part 1)
>"National Socialism is just (((socialism)))"

Marxist (Left) socialism and National (Right) Socialism are "antipodal zeitgeists engaged in dialectic". That's a fancy way to say they're opposite ideologies designed to clash, like Yin and Yang.

NatSoc was fundamentally an ideology built around race, while Marxist socialism was entirely different: built around class. Hitler aimed to unite the right and left, including workers and their bosses, into a new German nation based on racial identity. Socialism, in contrast, was a class war between workers, bosses, and owners (Capitalists), aiming to build a workers state in which race and gender were insignificant. Socialists, especially Marxist socialists, were anti-religious atheists, whereas NatSoc went so far as to make Christianity the religion of the state.

The differences go on and on: Marxist socialism was internationalist, NatSoc was nationalist. Marxist socialism was egalitarian, whereas NatSoc believed that nature was unequal and required competition. Marxist socialism wanted to nationalize all private industry, while NatSoc privatized every major industry except the railroads (it considered these a military asset. In fact, Hitler once joked "they didn't need to nationalize property because they nationalized people". NatSoc drew on a range of pan-German theories, which wanted to blend Aryan workers and Aryan magnates into a super Aryan state, which would involve the eradication of class-focused socialism as a non-German.

Well hopefully when rope day comes to Europe we can fight side by side brother

14 88

No one denies what the British empire did. It's not as if we faced no revolt, no wars, no attacks against the empire. The point of this thread is just bashing us for being against the German expansion. Well, you know, you can't try and vastly expand then complain against people standing against you. You face the consequences of your actions.

((Gun free zones)))

look at his eyes though; the man's got his pupper; also, the great honor with which he served his people has tempered and calmed his demons; this is the image of a warrior as he should be; only mercenary pussies who get their legs blown off for Israel get (((PTSD)))

卐 - MYTHS ABOUT NATSOC (Part 2)
>"National Socialism is just (((socialism)))"

NatSoc redefined socialism as "Germanism/Volkism", which they saw as "producer-oriented capitalism", as opposed to "Jewish capitalism", aka, international finance, globalism, wall street, etc. In theory, NatSoc economics was a version of Keynesianism, tailored to the Völkisch nature of whichever people adopted it. Its not one dogmatic economic system,and Hitler often joked that the lack of a specific ideology was their strength. NatSoc could be more "free market" as Americans know it, or less. But NatSoc is always in favor of the Volk over economic identity, of "producer capitalism" over "finance capitalism".

Hitler tried to clarify the distinction in 1938:
>“’Socialist’ I define from the word ‘social’ meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency.
>Our adopted term ‘Socialist has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. ((((Marxism))) is anti-property; true socialism is not. ((((Marxism))) places no value on the individual, or individual effort, of efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.”

>Against the Mainstream: Nazi privatization in 1930's Germany (Germa Bel)
ub.edu/graap/EHR.pdf
aryanism.net/politics/economics/
voxeu.org/article/macroeconomics-germany-forgotten-lesson-hjalmar-schacht
pridecomethbeforeafall.wordpress.com/2014/02/10/hitlers-economic-miracle/
youtu.be/pKnFN8P21-0

>Then, the anglo...
Then, the slav. But I guess you're probably one of those "lol putin is BASED" faggots.

People aren't complaining about others resisting Germany's expansion, they're pointing out the hypocrisy. Britain stood tall on a pile of bodies and then shouted down to Germany as if they were the great evil in the world. It's ridiculous.

>an ((((((((((((((((((((((((American))))))))))))))))))))))))))

Then... The Hans...

Hitler made his own mistakes. Primarily underestimating the USSR and the US invasion. He should have withdrawn from France on the condition of peace/truce.

What's it like living under Jewish occupation?

>He should have withdrawn from France on the condition of peace/truce.
Very unlikely it would have worked. Your leadership wanted the war at all costs. He let your expedition corp retreat in Dunkirk after all, to get a peace contract, which Churchill denied.

>What remains are bourgeoisie capitalist Jooos.

Good job!

>Jews are good with money
huh

you are right..

I'm still right though.

Who could be behind this post...

>He should have withdrawn from France on the condition of peace/truce.
He fucking tried you cunt. Your government even threw Rudolf Hess in jail for the rest of his life for trying to make peace.

...

He probably feels just as content as you feel right now.
The body has a fucked up way of adjusting to experiences by making that experience the new base. Which is why getting a billion dollars does not make anybody more happy but growing that billion does.

HE'S STRANGLING THE DOG AND HE WILL TURN HIM INTO LITERAL SAUSAGES

belgians are fucking cucks, Nazi raped and pillaged belgium and now youre honoring them like a cuck haha

> ruled by britain

WE ARE THE PERSECUTED ONES

Ehrenburg, pathologic liar and a heartless monster. BTW He compares jews with a bomb in his novel "Julio Jurenito", and also says that jews are always saying "no" when every other nation in the world says "yes". That book was written before WWII.

Mayor Sadiq is a major dick

no shit sherlock, i hate it more than you do

...

Germans in past were fit because you couldn't finish school in Socialism if you weren't, was so everywhere in Socialism. Nowadays that's not the case any longer. Nowadays you don't even have to be mentally fit or even be legal.

That's fucked

Wtf is this shit. The last of the true men who fought in WW2 are dying off. Fucking hell why cant we go back to like the 1950s or 1960s.

Sage