Why are high IQ individuals/areas/countries always the most left-wing?

Why are high IQ individuals/areas/countries always the most left-wing?

Other urls found in this thread:

dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2655144/Massachusetts-smartest-state-Mississippi-lowest-IQ-Maps-reveal-intelligence-levels-US-based-tweets.html
chrisevans3d.com/files/iq.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Because center left is likely the most reasonable political position.

I think that data is wrong.
This is the correct one.

Because the blue states haven't so much niggers and therefore vote left

Why are high IQ races always lighter skinned?

The south is full of SPICS and NIGGERS so of course the iQ is lower if you're polling EVERYONE, what you need is the iQ of the republican voters not the iQ of all the undesirables in their state.

because socialism as a system enables the largest amount of individuals to enter the education system.

>2004

Wealthier people tend to receive better education opportunities.

More blacks in the south

rural and suburban retards

black people and muslims have far higher IQs than whites

It's the side that the public sides with as it agrees with sjw's and preserves life and protects (((feelings))).
People generally don't want to go down a path which has greater rewards which are barely visible from their position, but will immediately settle with the least painful and morally challenging route with great enthusiasm.

Why is California so retarded?

Hollywood.

>Utah
>Idaho
>Wyoming
>Montana

meanwhile, Minnesota, Michigan, California and Illinois are above... makes think...

Achmed stop it pls

There seems to be some inconsistencies among the numbers, but the lower one explains the IQ score. Montana is of course ~90% white.

Because there is no sample group in any state large enough to accurately depict the average IQ of the entire state, when most people have never taken a legitimate IQ test in their lives.

It's because conservatives are RASR (rural and suburban retards)

Fuck off

1. this is prob bullshit data.
2. ecological fallacy. eg just because a 'smarter' state on average might lean blue does not mean that the smartest people in the state are leftists. this is even more apparent with wealth / income.

Nice fake graph.

because red states have the most niggers

It's real you left wing retard.

>metro area courts businesses
>businesses attract intelligent and educated individuals
>metro areas implement gibs
>niggers want free shit
>gibs attract niggers
>niggers vote leftist
>city becomes nightmare of white flight
>businesses move
>repeat

sources are here btw
dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2655144/Massachusetts-smartest-state-Mississippi-lowest-IQ-Maps-reveal-intelligence-levels-US-based-tweets.html

t. Shaquinta Muhammed

Even if it's real, the smartest state is Mass. which is blue as all fuck.

more ecological fallacy:
> deep south votes republican
> deep south has highest black populations in the country
> therefore blacks must like republicans

just as dumb proposition as the IQ one.

Second smartest is NH, a swing state and the third smartest is North Dakota, a solid red state.
All this shows is that the majority of smart states is Republican.

same as with DC, many people working in research / government, thus relying on government's tit. also minorities.

>based on tweets
I hate Brazil.

>based on tweets

What a joke

Because most right wing leaning states aren't dependent on their university pyramids for their economies.

The less you're accustomed to knowing how (and in what manner) they're expecting an answer, the less you'll register on intelligence tests (which are largely academia-based logic tests, not psych evals)

>113 iq
>high
Normalfag get out

...

...

niggers.

/thread.

>pretends to be smart
>doesn't realize how ridiculous and fake an average of 113 is

>conservatives higher iq than liberals
Only if you classify Democrat spics who hate abortions as conservative.

And academia pyramids are beginning their long descents into obsolescence.

I'm not making a point of the picture you thickheaded fucking kraut, but OP's claim regatding it. 113 iq is simply not 'high'. Let's not put words in each others mouths.

An average of 113 is high as fuck.

Wow. Only a handful of people realise the table is false. Everyone else must be librals.

>(((they))) destroy countries with leftism and feminism
>(((they))) want dumb work slaves and kill high iq people
>(((they))) implant the leftism into Europe with Holohoax after funding Hitler (Rothschild Bank)

how is kentucky so low? they dont even have niggers

how very odd...all those red states are choc-a-bloc full of cretinous sub-human IQ coons. correct for the surfeit of coons, and watch your IQ disparity magically disappear.

btw, faggot, the ONLY reason those states are so left-wing is because they don't have to live with/around coons. there is a direct correlation and proportional relationship linking the duration and proximity of one's exposure to coons and one's contempt for them...same with kikes.

Boston is the most segregated city in amerika. when the schools in brookline and newton start integrating 50/50 with mattapan, i'll believe their weepy SJW bullshit. niggerize your yeshivas and let's see what you say.

SEGREGATION FOREVER!

Typical Jewish propaganda.

It's fake you dumb faggot.

Niggers IQ makes the South's average IQ low.
The highest IQ nation on earth is Singapore which is a far-right capitalist country.

This, also checked. Besides John Kerry was the best choice in 2004.

>Tfw too smart to be wealthy

>chrisevans3d.com/files/iq.htm
>1 post by this ID
saged.

>the whitest states are also the smartest ones
Who would have known?

Your ability to parse and understand English is god awful

>New Jersey that high
>New York that high
>Maryland that high
No, especially to new jersey

'arse' hehe

...

>Why is California so retarded?
Half of Mexico is there

because they have less minorities.

Chegged

this

you're also included in it, which is also why its lower.

Yeah, I know this type of stuff is moronic.
Even the conservative/progressive dichotomy is moronic.
A lot of "progressives" are actually conservatives in that they want to conserve the status quo as they see it. They are the establishment, or at least, were the establishment. The up and coming aggressive new right (not alt) are far more progressive and out-the-box.
High intelligence is often associated with unusual and unorthodox opinions, which isn't surprising really.

The comic is more about poking fun at the inconsistency in leftist thinking. IQ is irrelevant, but only when it suits them. When it suits their particular outlook they quickly embrace it.
They typically deny accountability and human inequality, stressing environment over nurture/free will, however, when it comes to their opponents, they call them names like "stupid" and "scum".

For the liberal, it is all about convenience, whether they realise it or not.

Quads of truth

it's not complicated

smart people form good societies
people are born into good societies with good genetics and good education
population liberalizes over time as there is no conflict or existential threats while intelligence remains high

meanwhile

lower iq people form simple societies
life is still relatively difficult as a result
therefore hold conservative stances as a necessity (keeping a tradition of what works is part of survival, rather than politics of liberals, which are just flights of fancy)

that's not even accounting for niggers and how much that swings things

...

Because they have no niggers

That's what I've been led to believe.

Well, the obvious answer is obvious isn't it.

Left wing policies, no backward, short sighted right wing policies, are better policies and people who are smarter see that easily and readily whereas less intelligent people do not and vote for right wing candidates.

There are exceptions on both sides. There are insufferable left wing people and insufferable right wing people, and there are highly intelligent people in both camps.

There are also socio-economic factors. If you are born into wealth you are less likely to see the value in essential public services like healthcare, infrastructure and education because you've never been in a position where those things have benefited you personally. You are also more likely to be in favour of lower taxes for the reasons above, amongst others.

People who were not born into wealth but have nevertheless gone on to be financially successful generally have either benefited directly or indirectly from public services in a way that is tangible to them. Or conversely, they have witnessed the indignity of inadequate public services first hand and understand how hard life can truly be if you're not extraordinarily lucky.

Moreover, empathy and intelligence correlate strongly as do superficial prejudices and a lack thereof.