It is well established that Abstract Expressionism was funded by the CIA

It is well established that Abstract Expressionism was funded by the CIA.

Do you think/have proof that the Pop Art movement was also funded by the CIA?

Other urls found in this thread:

dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2254181/YouTube-wipes-billions-video-views-finding-faked-music-industry.html
youtube.com/watch?v=aeL9gagV_VA
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
youtube.com/watch?v=H-kBmh-mqUY
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Operation_Mockingbird#Defend_Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmentalization_(information_security)
mondomostre.it/en/mostre/italia/132/new-york-renaissance/press/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

The CIA is funded by the beast of the anti-christ, the Roman Catholic Vatican

...

lol I have a print of that exact painting hanging on the wall in my study

Fake views on youtube that helped boost people. I don't know who was behind it, but someone artificially boosted "music stars"
Who knows how many careers were launched with fake numbers.

dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2254181/YouTube-wipes-billions-video-views-finding-faked-music-industry.html

the entire point of the CIA creating the "Modern Art" movement was so shift the overton window enough on the subject of "Art and Entertainment" that pure propaganda could be marketed as "Art"

youtube.com/watch?v=aeL9gagV_VA

>Do you think/have proof that the Pop Art movement was also funded by the CIA?

Name something in the mainstream media that *ISN'T* funded/controlled by the CIA.

I think that would be a shorter list.

>will no one think of the doubles!

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

All good points.
I wonder if kpop and jpop becoming popular in the West but cpop failing to is related.

youtube.com/watch?v=H-kBmh-mqUY

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
">It funded student and cultural organizations and magazines as front organizations."


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Operation_Mockingbird#Defend_Wikipedia

>decrement '>' position 1

fixed that myself.

>angry analysts argue against agency aims they aren't allowed to actually know.

tl;dr

CIA shills don't "Need to know"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmentalization_(information_security)

So they don't.

>So they don't.

In fact, "Knowing" might compromise their ability to do their job.

The CIA LITERALLY uses mind control against every American that it can.

No Exceptions.

Why is that one guy with a trip samefagging?

Television is classical conditioning, perception management, emotional manipulation, subliminal advertising for specific perspectives and feelings, etc...

Every single second subtly constructed to subdue the subconscious to specific stimuli and situational perspective.

>Why is that one guy with a trip samefagging?

I'm correcting my previous posts by addendum.

>Why is that one guy with a trip samefagging?

Is your post an example of in-situ perception management?

right after 9/11, a huge pop-art/abstract expressionism exhibition started touring europe and the world. It was called, if I remember correctly, "New York.". It featured all the big names, and now I know it was a very effective propaganda tool, to gather sympathies around this "cultural center" that had been attacked, while exposing the public to a number of images portraying american flags and american products. Well played.

I must be onto something. Some CIA bot has gone nuts in this thread.

>post ending in 1191

>"Right after 9/11"

What sort of witchcraft is this?

>I must be onto something. Some CIA bot has gone nuts in this thread.

We are discussing why and how the CIA uses it's mind control shenanigans on the public.

Of course they mad.

Thanks for the pic, "Google"

I checked. It was called "New York Renaissance" and was organized by the Whitney Museum.

this was the Italian stop: mondomostre.it/en/mostre/italia/132/new-york-renaissance/press/