Europe now boasts the oldest civilization

The danube civilization predates the mesopotamian, as it turns out

knowledgenuts.com/2015/07/18/mesopotamia-may-not-be-the-cradle-of-civilization/
ancients-bg.com/the-danube-civilization-oldest-in-the-world/
m.disclose.tv/news/the_danube_valley_civilization_script_is_the_worlds_oldest_writing/138301

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=PE56dcgGVMs
youtube.com/watch?v=pDsJtB2F9i8
youtube.com/watch?v=7dxsVSzL4HE
youtube.com/watch?v=3HlPcaP9x5o
youtube.com/watch?v=80GgRWuXcO8
youtube.com/watch?v=IKy3fCvMz-8
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apkallu).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saptarishi
thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/02files/Mars_Images_24.html
enterprisemission.com/Path-sphinx.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

they weren't white, the danube civiilization was a matriarchal and old european, they looked like pic related. It wasnt until the Aryan Migrations that this civilization along with all of old europe was exterminated.

what is gobekli tepe

>b-but I heard 6 million died in the holocaust!
Normies swallow 6 gorillion because they never critically examine such a grisly topic, believing (((Hollywood))) and Allied history is 100% factual

>b-but what about the Nuremberg trials! Some Nazis admitted war crimes, so it must be true Hitler had a Final Solution to kill all the Jews!
Rudolph Hoess confessed 25 million were killed at Aushwitz, does that sound believable? Allies tortured German POWs. At Dachau Nazis had their testicles kicked in and crushed beyond repair

At Auschwitz, (((Soviets))) said 4 million died in gas chambers. Today, the death toll sits at 1.1 million (from ALL causes), though still grossly inflated going by Red Cross reports
>Auschwitz - Why The Gas Chambers Are A Myth:
youtube.com/watch?v=PE56dcgGVMs

>b-but it wasn't just Auschwitz!
At Majdanek, (((Soviets))) said 2 million were killed in gas chambers.
Now they say The Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth:
youtube.com/watch?v=pDsJtB2F9i8

>b-but the Reinhard death camps: Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec!
There is little to support the claim that tens of thousands, let alone 1.3 MILLION died
>1/3rd of the Holocaust (debunked):
youtube.com/watch?v=7dxsVSzL4HE

>b-but Nazis made lampshades out of tattooed Jewish inmates!
The lampshade myth comes from a propaganda film made to de-Nazify Germany by a US Psych Warfare unit
>Buchenwald: A Dumb Dumb Portrayal of Evil:
youtube.com/watch?v=3HlPcaP9x5o

>b-but I've seen Steven Spielberg's Survivors of the Shoah!
Watch the following
>The Last Days of the Big Lie
youtube.com/watch?v=80GgRWuXcO8

>o-ok, let's suppose you're right. Why does it matter?!
It matters because no one can criticize the Jews without being labeled an anti-semite. Denial is ILLEGAL in 20 countries
>The JQ:
youtube.com/watch?v=IKy3fCvMz-8

also, Seth Rich

That's not a depiction of an old European, it's a depiction of the first blue eyed human, but since neanderthals have had blue eyes for far longer it's pretty much null.

Here's the original btw, nice photoshop

Also they were white

">As Paabo explains it:
>"The team determined that Europeans who lived between 37,000 and 14,000 years ago were part of a single founding population that didn’t significantly interbreed with other populations. Since the drop in Neanderthal DNA couldn’t be explained by population mixing, the authors argue that the genetic material was forced out through natural selection.Further evidence bolstered this theory when the researchers found that Neanderthal DNA got culled more often near genes than in other parts of the genome.
>“The Neanderthal population, because of its small size, may have accumulated many slightly bad mutations,” said Pääbo. “It has taken tens of thousands of years to remove them from the modern human population, and it may still be going on.”
broadinstitute.org/news/8150"

Stay mad negroid

delete this

This should be common knowledge but in the last years it appears as a "revelation".

Same shit with the OOA theory. Even when I was a kid I did not believe I originated from negroes. And that's before my first third kind encounter with a gypsi.

>Europe now boasts the oldest civilization

Gobekli Tepe is older than the Danube civilisation.

Humans are BILLIONS of years old and are NOT NATIVE to Earth. Here is merely SOME evidence (though DEFINITELY not ALL of the evidence) suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago:

* A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago
* A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years
* Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old
* Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years
* Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years
* Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years
* An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years years (eoliths -chipped pebbles, thought to be the earliest known tools- at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old).
* A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years years
* Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy
* Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years
* Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years (end of part 1)

(start of part 2) Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years.
How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of:
* Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years
* An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years
* Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old
* More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago
* Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years
* Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years
* An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago
But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years.
There's still more.

(start of part 3) In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years.
In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints.
In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations.
But some other discoveries do.
In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today.
In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age.

(start of part 4) A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old.
In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old.
On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old.
Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries.
According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years.
In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago.

(start of part 5) What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species. (end)

YOU SAYIN WE WUZ CIVILZATIONS N SHIT?

YO DOZ COW THINGS LOOK REAL SOFISTICATED N SHIT

The red parts of this map used to be land. Daily reminder that sea levels around the world were 400 feet lower just before the end of the last Ice Age.

Near the end of the last Ice Age 12,800 years ago, a giant comet that had entered the Solar System from deep space thousands of years earlier, broke into multiple fragments. Some of these fragments struck Earth, causing a global cataclysm unseen since the extinction of the dinosaurs. At least eight of the fragments hit the North American ice cap, while further fragments hit the Northern European ice cap. The impacts, from comet fragments a mile wide approaching at more than 60,000 miles an hour, generated huge amounts of heat which instantly liquidised millions of square kilometres of ice, destabilising Earth's crust and causing the global flood that is remembered in myths all around the world.

A second series of impacts, equally devastating, causing further cataclysmic flooding, occurred 11,600 years ago, the exact date that Plato gives for the destruction and submergence of Atlantis. The evidence for all of this shows beyond reasonable doubt that a civilisation at least as technologically advanced as 19th-century England at the onset of the Industrial Revolution (if not more) that flourished during the last Ice Age was destroyed in the global cataclysms between 12,800 years ago and 11,600 years ago.

A distant memory and a warning to the future - for the comet that wrought such destruction in remote antiquity may not be done with us yet.

Gobekli tepe is located in Turkey

Turkey was once populated by white Europeans (called anatolia)

What are you smoking bro

Of course Serbs are oldest nation on earth

Doggerland is the oldest civilization

WE

No shit, Sherlock. Gobekli Tepe is just the Turkish name for that area. The Ancient Armenian name for Gobekli Tepe (used before the Turks got to present-day Turkey) was 'Portasar'.

I don't smoke.

Where are you getting your information cuz?

Is this a joke? Mesopotamia and harapa were 6k bc

And the least racist country in Europe, so progressive!

>American education

HOL UP

Well done lad.
This.
And this.

Daily reminder that only a tiny fraction of the stone pillars at Gobekli Tepe have been excavated. Daily reminder that there is an area near Gobekli Tepe called 'Karahan Tepe' that also has stone pillars and Karahan Tepe hasn't been excavated at all yet.

What the name of London mayor?
KEKE

WE

WE

this is what i call a rthread derailer faithful to his job
this fagot has been doing this for over a year in every thread about human sciences and prehistory

bump

WE

>knowledge nuts
>ancients bg
>disclose

I'll wait for the peer reviewed articles.

WUZ EMPERORS AND SHIIIT

Y u bully me like this

Makes sense how you're all retarded and inbred cattle fuckers I guess. Hope you all die again in ww3. Fighting over the same old patch of dirt..

Wait, so you be sayin WE WUZ?

The Apkallu were seven sages in Ancient Mesopotamian mythology (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apkallu). What's interesting is that Ancient Indian mythology also has seven sages (who are known as the 'Saptarishi' in the Sanskrit language):

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saptarishi

As if that wasn't enough, both the Apkallu and the Saptarishi were survivors of a global flood and bestowed knowledge of civilisation to the other survivors of that global flood. Furthermore, both the Apkallu and the Saptarishi were associated with fish. The Apkallu were half-human, half-fish beings (in some depictions, the Apkallu appear to be humans wearing fish-shaped costumes), whereas the Saptarishi were guided by Matsya (an avatar of Vishnu who took the form of a fish). Could the Saptarishi and the Apkallu be referring to the same seven sages?

>T-those sources don't count!

(((Peer-reviewed articles))) are usually circle-jerks and nothing more.

This is photo shopped.

Also the danube civlizations werent matriarchal at all, the Varna civilzations had a king and he was literally buried with a gold sheath for his cock

> it's a depiction of the first blue eyed human
You're a retard too. It's a depiction of some random ass hunter gatherer from Spain from 7,000 years ago, not the first blue eyed person by a mile

*PROTO-EURPOEANS AND SHIIIET

>now

This has been known for ages, what are you on about?

You should see how the archeological sites have been treated in the last 30 years though. On Croatian side, you had them destroyed in the war, and on Serbian side they've been building a nuclear waste dump on them. Total coincidence I'm sure.

As usual, those Nordic barbarians, destroying everything European just as soon as we have something good going on. The Danube, Rome, WW1/2. And those fucking savages dare to "WE WUZ" and say we are not European.

Oh heres the fake news britbong again

The blue eye mutation first occured near the black sea around turkey

also this guy

WAREN

WE

>matriarchal
it's just feminists meme user, there is no proof

looks like a virile spaniard to me

There's a book by Ellis Silver called 'Humans Are Not From Earth: A Scientific Evaluation Of The Evidence'. He says (among other things) that sunburn, our relatively high chance of experiencing back pain and pain during labour are types of evidence that Earth is not an optimal environment for human beings and that we come from elsewhere.
Also, this page contains what appears to be a photo of a so-called 'Inca city' on Mars:

thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/02files/Mars_Images_24.html

This page contains what appears to be a photo of a 'Sphinx' or a Sphinx-like structure on Mars:

enterprisemission.com/Path-sphinx.html

I am NOT saying that the Incans and the Ancient Egyptians colonised Mars. Even so, consider these similarities between Egypt and the Americas:

* Both had huge pyramids precisely aligned to the cardinal points.

* Both had temples with megalithic stones with extremely fine joints of less than a fiftieth of an inch.

* Both had head-dresses of similar style.

* Both employed a unique style of construction using L-shaped corners.

* Both used the same style of metal clamps to hold huge stones in place.

* Both cultures used the process of mummification to preserve and honour their dead.

Is it not reasonable to suggest that the civilisations present in Egypt and the Americas in antiquity are both the legacy of an even earlier civilisation that existed before recorded history as we know it began?

We wuz kings and civilized when you were still living in the caves

>The evidence for all of this shows beyond reasonable doubt that a civilisation at least as technologically advanced as 19th-century England at the onset of the Industrial Revolution (if not more) that flourished during the last Ice Age was destroyed in the global cataclysms between 12,800 years ago and 11,600 years ago.
Please show some of this evidence. Really interested to see it. Yes, I've read Plato's Timaeus. Where is the other evidence?

>The blue eye mutation first occured near the black sea around turkey
Wrong. The oldest blue eyed person we have is a hunter gatherer from Italy that's 14000 years old, we also have someone from Georgia carrying the mutation around the same time even though it's not expressed. The two people arent closely related to each other so it means the mutation is very old too. The whole "black sea" thing was a narrative the media shilled a few years back for some reason even though there was no conclusive proof and now we know it's flat out incorrect. The hunter gatherers from Ukraine actually had a very low frequency of blue eyes, in ancient times it peaks in Scandinavian and Northern Russia but again the oldest samples is from italy

Agree , Bulgaria was home of first Aryans hence Bulg-Aryan

This is well known fact from before. Dunnk why it got out now.


Also...


We WUZ KANGZ N SHIEEET.

>our relatively high chance of experiencing back pain and pain during labour are types of evidence that Earth is not an optimal environment for human beings and that we come from elsewhere.

Wrong deduction. Evolution does not always optimize every parameter, there are dead ends from which getting out is far to hard by genetic mutation alone. If the dead end is bareable then it will just stay that way, otherwise the species goes extinct. It's not a perfect system.