/lrg/ LIBERTARIAN RIGHT GENERAL - KILL EM ALL, LET THE MARKET SORT EM OUT!

This thread is for Discussion of Capitalism, Libertarianism, Paleolibertarianism, Anarcho-Capitalism, Minarchism, and the PHYSICAL REMOVAL of COMMUNIST FAGS from our board of peace. Reminder that this is the Libertarian RIGHT General. Aleppo Johnson-fags, Left-Libertarians, and other Shit-Libs need to fuck off. Voice your complaints to r/libertarian.

>Recommended Reading list
libertarianright.org/reading/
>Vanilla /lrg/ pastebin- CREATE IF YOU DONT SEE ONE IN THE CATALOG
pastebin.com/7K1EJYb8
>Bump for Life, Liberty, and Private Death Squads

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=v1jtKNs5q2o
mega.nz/:#F!1R0QATqZ!Eb1_M5KC9gkxK6w32R2ETw
sites.google.com/site/justindkeith/home/geolibertarian-faq
geolib.com/essays/sullivan.dan/royallib.html
youtube.com/watch?v=Ol6GA4dMZw4
twitter.com/AnonBabble

ideology for juvenile dipshits.

This is a special revolutionary edition, grab your guns folks. We're down to fucking waste these commies.

>Degeneracy
>Success
Yeah ok faggot. No one will come into your dildo shop and fuck you up.

"Degeneracy" sells, just look around you. No one want's to join your amish autistic covenant, people would rather party hard to Ke$ha and Miley Cyrus.
What makes Hoppean retards think unrestrained capitalism will bring about a conservative society?

Because of you give all your money to a slag you get nothing of value in return. You trade because you expect to be better off after that trade. People who spend their labor on degeneracy will find themselves starving.

I don't see the problem with degenerates draining their Bank accounts.

>What makes Hoppean retards think unrestrained capitalism will bring about a conservative society?
I don't care. I just don't like taxes.

Support right wing populism. Teach you young to despise socialism and degeneracy.

Utilitarian argument. Trying to justify your belief that a society will be more successful than other purely on economic reasons.

You know what, perhaps filling the country with immigrants, forbidding people to climb mountains, and selling only water and rice are economically sound decisions, but value is subjective, some people might value booming economy, others might value more the maintenance of cultural values, who are you to define what success is?

Not only that, but you're talking to libertarians, we don't give a fuck about other people's success. There's no jealousy here.

The only people who will get removed on the day of the rope are you kike-worshiping scumbags.

Greed kills nations.

...

Eat shit, niggerloving bootlicker.

What is a private death squad and how would it work in Ancapistan?

What's libertarian opinion on universal basic income?

Commie garbage.
The private death squads will cleanse this Earth of socialist tyrants. Have very little to do with ancapistan after that other than for special defense operations. The SS of the free market.

>you kike-worshiping scumbags.
here's an ancap making a video about the jewish question:
youtube.com/watch?v=v1jtKNs5q2o

Explain

On an economic point of view, it's a disaster. You should never have access to other people's production without having produced something first. People who don't serve society should not receive benefits. If we took all the money from everyone in the world and gave it to a retard, would we be better off, or worse? Leaving wealth in the hands of those who multiply it is always wiser for society.

In a social point of view, you don't have to leave your house and interact with others to make a living, you can isolate yourself from judgement from your neighbors, that can only bring degeneracy.

good, that's the spirit

>What makes Hoppean retards think unrestrained capitalism will bring about a conservative society?
Hey asshole, we don't care about what the fuck society is. I want to live as a conservative Christian and I don't give a shit about how the guys in Williamsburg dress, it is not of my concern, nor is it anyone's job to dictate what you wear, eat and celebrate.
Who the fuck cares if society as a whole is conservative, just live in a conservative neighborhood

kek

Seems more like a vigilante death squad than a private one. A noble undertaking, nonetheless.

Anyone got some Right-wing/Private Death Squad aesthetic images to post?

You get paid for your labor, your product. NEETS don't do shit so they don't get shit. No need for redistribution.

...

...

This

depends on what the source of the UBI is. If your taxing income, capital gains or anything else consumptive, productive or, recreational the UBI is just stealing. However if your UBI comes from taxing the unimproved value of land then you've got a morally justified position since all land belongs to the commons

somewhat relevant, it contains "Basic Economics" from Thomas Sowell and various econ/investing books

mega.nz/:#F!1R0QATqZ!Eb1_M5KC9gkxK6w32R2ETw

No welfare state brah. Try reading Hoppe before you spout bullshit.

Georgists get out

>geolibertarian

Taking money from producers and giving it to non-producers, i.e. socialism. It's garbage and it will raise people's time preferences, giving birth to an underclass of jovial parasites and reducing the comparative advantages of being employed instead of being a slob.

where do these come from ?

sites.google.com/site/justindkeith/home/geolibertarian-faq

enjoy

thx i'll look into it

>"Hitler pls stop me from fapping to traps!!"
Pathetic.

The aim of ancap isn't to shape society in your image, it's to give everyone the freedom to create their own

Tortured rationalizations

According to royal libertarians, land becomes private property when one mixes one's labor with it. And mixing what is yours with what is not yours in order to own the whole thing is considered great sport. But the notion is filled with problems. How much labor does it take to claim land, and how much land can one claim for that labor? And for how long can one make that claim?

According to classical liberals, land belonged to the user for as long as the land was being used, and no longer. But according to royal libertarians, land belongs to the first user, forever. So, do the oceans belong to the heirs of the first person to take a fish out or put a boat in? Does someone who plows the same field each year own only one field, while someone who plows a different field each year owns dozens of fields? Should the builder of the first transcontinental railroad own the continent? Shouldn't we at least have to pay a toll to cross the tracks? Are there no common rights to the earth at all? To royal libertarians there are not, but classical liberals recognized that unlimited ownership of land never flowed from use, but from the state:

Fun essay pointing out how the right side of the LP are actually state privileged half assed liberty hating shills
geolib.com/essays/sullivan.dan/royallib.html

>Royal libertarians
Are saying that we be Kings?

Also, rents due. Pay up.

Agorism isn't really that leftist, user. Agorism should be right besides Ancapball.

Also rate my blackmarket activity.

>pay rent

reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

>a Spaniard into tobacco black market
the stereotypes are true
also good job for keeping your shit untaxed,if you aren't LARPing

Ye be seeking state privilege yet call yourselves antistatest

Sweet man, I was gonna start growing cause I wanted some quality tobacco. How'd you find something like this? Internet? Only tax free trade I do is local.

The stereotype is the tobacco pack smuggler that goes to Andorra, Gibraltar or France for it, what I'm doing is buying it from national producers who merely shred it and send it to me via mail. It hasn't paid taxes to any government.

The good thing is that gov has made tobacco so expensive that I could find someone to resell them 1/2 of the stuff for the price I get every kilogram and smoke for free forever or even make a profit if I wanted to. Though I don't really feel like doing so, I'm just helping my family not to waste so much money and not giving my shekels to whatever moron is in charge of the country.
I find it in Craigslist-like type of websites. It isn't really that hard to find for me, though I don't know how it is over there.

>hasnt been taxed

what is indirect taxation?

>geo"libertarian"
>right wing
kill yourself, geofag

youtube.com/watch?v=Ol6GA4dMZw4

Based Jared Taylor BTFOing anti-white propagandists. This man is a national treasure, you burgers treat him right.

>tfw no Hoppean white ethnocentric covenant

>Muh white landlord privilege.
Left Libertarians everyone.

...

I know, user. It probably has been taxed when the producers bought the seeds, when they bought the machinery to shred the leaves, when I was charged for the delivery...

Still, it is better than anything else.

property in land is the fruit of no mans labor.. its all just state granted property

tell me why a libertarian would be okay with the state granting certain people privilege over others?

>putting Rand and Friedman next to Mises and Rothbard

That image is cancer. My problem with the "rate of taxation" is that it's anything above 0%

if youre a full on anarcho-whatever youre not actually libertarian

Taxation is theft, fuck the poor. Blaze it nigger.

>property in land is the fruit of no mans labor.. its all just state granted property
By that logic you can't own anything privately. Land is a raw material like anything else; the material is not the product of your own labor because you can't create material out of nothing. You can mold material according to your will; in the case of land, this involves turning a field into a crop field, and so forth.

Land is also a scarce resource like anything else. The task of ethics is to settle disputes and in the case of ownership, the only way to settle disputes is observe property rights. Fuck off with your geofaggotry you socialist.

You dont have a clue what your arguing against or for please re read and

Who is the guy between Rothbard an Hoppe? The one below Rand.

Ron Paul

> libertarian

> right

Pick one and only one. It's like saying "anarcho-capitalism", "fascist communism" or "authoritarian libertarianism".

define right-wing
because we are,but on our standarts

...

Hello gypsy-o

Freedom and natural law. You've been brainwashed by leftists to believe freedom means communism.