Muh Ancestry

As the politicians in America seem fixated on race, I would like to clear some things up. Also, I have been seeing a lot of Mediterranean retards throwing around fake/misinterpreted statistics.
Throughout this for brevity let "E" represent "European American(s)," "B" represent "African American(s)," "H" represent "Hispanic American(s)," "EA" represent European Ancestry/Genetic Makeup," "BA" represent "African Ancestry/Genetic Makeup," and "NA" represent "Native/Amerindian Ancestry/Genetic Makeup." All ethnic groups "E," "B," and "H" are self-reported.

America is only a post-racial country if you ignore all self-identified White Americans. According to this study ( cell.com/ajhg/abstract/S0002-9297(14)00476-5 ) only 3.5% of E have any BA whatsoever. With all E having an average BA of .19% this means that E which do have some BA have an average BA of 5.4%. Only 2.7% of E have any NA, and with an average over all E of .18% NA; this means that those E having NA have about 6.7% NA.
However, B have on average 24% EA, and .8% NA. H are the most "post-racial" of any ethnic group, with 65.1% EA, 18.0% NA, and 6.2% BA.
Although I wasn't able to find info on what percentage of E have NA but no BA, we can get the number of "pureblood" E within a range from 93.8% to 96.5%. It is likely near the top of this range, as the 93.8% figure requires that the groups E with NA and E with BA be completely mutually exclusive.
I write this post on Sup Forums not because it is entirely politics related, but because I feel it has a tangential connection and because of the interest I believe people on this board will have for this info. Sorry for sperging out. Pic related is percentages always of E, not of total population.

Other urls found in this thread:

occamsrazormag.wordpress.com/2013/03/23/racial-admixture-in-usa-and-why-mulattoes-identify-as-black/
theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?145330-White-American-23andme-results
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

British ancestry is vastly underreported.

Who is this directed towards?

Also interesting how North Dakota has the most Scandinavian ancestry, I always thought it was Minesota

Yeah I think a lot of them claim German ancestry, probably because it's more recent

Hispanic is not a race

Stupid chart

Not all hispanics share the same blood

some are not mestizos and some are mestizos

This is pretty autistic.
You're pretty autistic.
Quit being autistic.

america has always been a mixed country, that's why i've never really been concerned about racial demographics. never understood why people are concerned about whites being the minority, if you did blood tests you'd find out a lot of whites are mixed people too, they just lucked out and not looked like it.

Basically the entire northern Midwest is nothing but cucked vikings and injuns.
East coast is English, Italian, German.
South is blacks and scots-irish.
South west is mexicans, blacks, a odd assortment of whites.
West coast A lot of Asians, and Mexicans, with some blacks and whites.
Hawaii, Polynesians, a assload of Asians.
Alaska, injuns and whites.

So should I move to South Dakota?

Reading comprehension, bud. All ethnicities in this post (H, E, B) are self-reported. People self-report as Hispanic.

>self-reported

Prior to our DNA tests, my father would tell the story of our mullato ancestress, and my father would tell the story of our Native-American roots.

They wouldn't check the negro box, but if some nosy census taker pissed them off, they might say something other than whitey.

After our DNA tests, we're mixed. Mostly UK with a smattering of western Europe. Yep, mutts.

Wow did you not read the post. A lot of White American's aren't mixed. Only 3.5% of White Americans have any African ancestry at all.

*mother on the native american

She needed to explain her poker straight hair.

This study didn't touch Asian ancestry.

All of the europeans who keep insisting that White Americans are all racial mutts? The very vast majority only have European ancestry. There is a meme that was popular in the 60s or so for white people to claim some degree of Native American ancestry (presumably to attempt to get away with making redskin jokes), but it held no truth and only aided the perception that White Americans likely had non-white blood.

>never understood why people are concerned about whites being the minority

Hmm, could it be the numerous other countries that suffered the same fate and collapsed into dindu totalitarian anarchy?

i think you'd be surprised man, go do a DNA test, i doubt you are 100% european, probably have a few bits of black and native in you. practically everyone who has ancestry from before ellis island does.

texas is minority white and doing just fine, in fact they've got the strongest economy in the US.

The British Ancestry data isn't reported; all actual ancestry data is the result of genetic testing. Only broad ethnic groups are self-reported. Part of the point of this study was to see how well self-reportedrace matched up with actual ancestry. And it does quite well, especially in differentiating between Whites and majority-African-ancestry/Black-identifying Americans.

>never understood why people are concerned about whites being the minority
Because you'll become us

>texas is minority white and doing just fine, in fact they've got the strongest economy in the US.

Wow, now imagine how much better they'd be full white.

>i think you'd be surprised man
He is literally posting genetic studies you absolute moron

>i think you'd be surprised man, go do a DNA test, i doubt you are 100% european, probably have a few bits of black and native in you. practically everyone who has ancestry from before ellis island does.

No, that is very improbable. occamsrazormag.wordpress.com/2013/03/23/racial-admixture-in-usa-and-why-mulattoes-identify-as-black/

Thanks, I tried to post saying pretty much this but with more reeeees and for some reason it isn't showing up.

i doubt that, culturally speaking americans are very much against socialism plus our guns laws are better. not to mention there would be lesser overall black admixture.

they've never been full white, always had a lot of minorities, and yet everyone seems to want to move there while nobody wants to live in the whitest states like west virginia and kentucky.

To be fair, most of Europe is a lot whiter than the USA, as is confirmed by the linked study which compares average BA of E and percentage of E with any BA to their European counterparts, funnily enough they excluded Spain, England, Malta, France, and Portugal from the European data because they were not representative of Europe as a whole (too much BA).

There are towns in MS that fly the Swedish flag officially. I think they moved up the MS to the northern Midwest.

Already replied to a diff guy with the same info, but you may be interested to know the graphs display actual genetic information, not claimed ancestry.

MS is Mississippi. MN is Minnesota

Are you a nigger or a spic, or a member of another degenerate group?

Yes I know that. Mississippi is also a river that goes to Minnesota and the Great Lakes.

>H are the most "post-racial" of any ethnic group, with 65.1% EA, 18.0% NA, and 6.2% BA.
Obviously this is not true and NA forms the major part of ancestry in hispanics.
So if the researchers in this study were so biased towars EA in the case of H, why not assume they did the same with american whites?
I have seen enough 23andme from burgers on here to know that no way the average of BA in whites is only 0,19% and NA 0,18%.

>Obviously this is not true
>No data
>Doesn't even live in the US so no first -hand experience either

You do realize that people from spain (in the US at least) self-identify as Hispanics; not saying that really brings up the European genetics of the group by too much, but it has to help somewhat.

>implying you can have first hand experience into knowing if someone is 5% black or not
Just telling you that by the genetic tests I've seen hispanics have more NA than EA and whites have more than 0,2% BA/NA.

Also there are like 100k spaniards living in the US out of a total of 57 milions of hispanics. That's nothing and can't sway the statistics.

If you have recent and objective evidence of any kind from a reliable source, please produce it. If not, please fuck off and take your feelings and woman-think elsewhere.

Why couldn't the Scandinavians have chosen warmer states instead of the coldest?

I guess the positive is that those states are furthest from the states with the most hispanics and negros, which is good for gene preservation.

Probably because Nordics are better adapted to cold climates and living in Southern states has mild negative health consequences for very pale people.

By "British" do you mean Norman French, Anglo-Saxon, Viking, Brythonic Celt, Gaelic Celt, or what?

Well I found pic related about the ancestry of hispanics. As you can see mexicans are like half and half, and you can expect central americans to be even more native, puerto ricans are more euro and others like dominicans I guess half white half black. So no way close to the 65% euro 18% native figure.

Also found this about 23&me results of white americans. Few are actually 100% european and the majority have more than 0,2% shitskin.
theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?145330-White-American-23andme-results

Sorry this study was about the US, so your data really isn't that relavent. Think of the Hispanic data you posted as being one of the parent populations that helps to make up the Hispanic American ethnic group.
And nice try with the forum post that uses the exact same data the study I linked uses. I like how you perused for a bit and then made up your mind: "Whelp, looks like most of these guys have african ancestry, not like I actually counted them, it just kind of 'looks' that way to me." Wow I guess you didn't do too well in science at school, if they even teach that in the land of the Moors.

the vast supermajority of whites in America have no non-white admixture mate. we'll go the way of whites in South Africa or Rhodesia if present trends continue.