Who are the proper arbiters of death?

Who are the proper arbiters of death?
Which crimes are deserving of the dearh penalty?
>Rape
>Murder
ect.

blasphemy

No one should condone capital punishment. Don't give the state a license to take life.

perhaps not the states but the federal gov
>"Would you execute X if they killed 100 inocent people?"

Killing the perp doesn't bring back their victims. Toss him in a cell and throw away the key, but don't tell the government it's OK to kill people for committing a crime they define.

A life sentence is just the death penalty for squeamish liberals who pretend they haven't wronged the convict because he's still alive, when the end result is the same: condemning a person to die in prison.

Either execute the convict immediately or release them after a period of time when they are deemed to be rehabilitated by incarceration. There is no other internally consistent option.

What is war?

Driving under the speed limit in the left lane

Voluntary Mortal Kombat.

Bring back duels.

This.

The government already kills people, and generally does whatever it wants to. It doesn't ask the plebs for "license."

>Libel

Anyone who has been tasked with killing must carry out their duties if it is in defense of their land or king. The land includes the people lawfully living there.

>duels
Fuck that, coliseums.

Crime results from flawed thinking.
Flawed thinking results from a flawed mind.
Fix the mind and save the world.
Death is only an illusion.

>A life sentence is just the death penalty for squeamish liberals who pretend they haven't wronged the convict because he's still alive, when the end result is the same: condemning a person to die in prison.

You're missing the point. A life sentence has the potential to be overturned for the life of the convicted, spanning potential changes in government or government policy. You may not think this is important in cases like murder but once you tell the state that killing one of its citizens is an acceptable punishment for a crime that it defines you need to consider the possibility that they can and will extend this however they see fit.

The death penalty is bullshit for multiple reasons

1. It doesn't deter crime as states with the death penalty have a higher murder rate per capita than states without capital punishment.

2. It doesn't save money as inmates are allowed to periodically appeal the cases(A nessarry evil of our legal system if new evidence is actually legitimate) which drives up the cost of housing inmates. The average death row inmate costs millions of dollars for the state to deal with.

All in all the death penalty exists to make dopey politicians look tough on crime. If we truly want to punish people make them spend their life in prison, make them pontificate on how they fucked up and wasted their potential and then let them die of old age in prison.

Duels used to be more common back in the past when governments found it harder to cuck the male citizens.

>rape
get the fuck out of here. if you kill some one on purpose, then we the people kill you. the state acts as the people. you fuck someone up for life but dont kill them then you go to jail for life. all other non-asssult crime should just be fines and some jail time.

I agree
letting them rot a few decades in prison is a devastating punishment for the mind.
After all, death is inevitable anyways.

Any serious crime involving premeditation, i.e. premeditated murder, rape, etc.

That really didn't take long

Death is only acceptable as a means of disabling a violent criminal from perpetrating crimes when there is no viable alternative action.

For a state, after capture they are to be housed with states funds for a lifetime of imprisonment.

For a vigilante group which doesn't have the funds to house the countless numbers of violent criminals and is living under a criminal State then it can be used if there is no viable alternative, in order to ensure the protection of any potential future victims of said criminal.

God will deal with the guilty.

hnng

Treason and killing for pleasure/gain. Killing out of passion (for example when catching one's spouse cheating) shouldn't be punished by death.
2deep5me

Being a tranny or of like degeneracy
Being homosexual or of like degeneracy
Pedophiles
Commies
Socialists
Murder 1
Rape
Treason
Muslim
Being OP

...

No, simply on the grounds that the jury could be wrong. If you execute a single innocent man the state is now just as bad as the murderers they put to death.

Sadly, I think that would fall under "cruel and unusual punishment"

being a nigger or a muzzie should be an instant death penalty!

No, you're missing the point. The fact that you still think the common rabble can "tell" the government whether or not to do anything should disqualify you from discussion here.

degeneracy

The real solution is to fix point 2. Speed up the appeal process and kill the fuckers quicker.

>but once you tell the state that killing one of its citizens is an acceptable punishment for a crime that it defines you need to consider the possibility that they can and will extend this however they see fit.

Easily fixed:

Give the power to private companies.

Better? I doubt you'll think so.

>1. It doesn't deter crime as states with the death penalty have a higher murder rate per capita than states without capital punishment.

Who has ever said the death penalty is to deter crime? Does life imprisonment deter crime? Has punishment deterred crime throughout history? Maybe to some extent, but there will ALWAYS be people bent on committing crime.

It's not a means to deter crime: it's an ultimate punishment for barbaric crimes.

Your latter point is fallacious; correlation =/= causation.

>2. It doesn't save money as inmates are allowed to periodically appeal the cases(A nessarry evil of our legal system if new evidence is actually legitimate) which drives up the cost of housing inmates. The average death row inmate costs millions of dollars for the state to deal with.

Fix the appeal process, then.

rape deserves death penalty

Hell

Yeah it does. The mere fact there are trials after every big police shooting, even when there's a video invalidating the accusation, means the government still has to demonstrate some kind of popular approval of its murders.

>Self-fulfilling prophecy: the post

>Give the power to private companies.

Why would anyone want this? How is this supposed to be a solution to anything?

what do you consider as rape?
>drunk sex is rape

Drunk sex wouldn't be premeditated.

Say, if a bunch of guys stalk a woman, and rape her in a dark alley. Death penalty.

Send them to a russian prison. Sadly, I don't think that's a thing. Russia does prisons right man. Rape should be insta-kill. My man Draco understood on that part

What the fuck am I watching and did he go to jail?

>Who are the proper arbiters of death?

Bears

>Which crimes are deserving of the dearh penalty?

Feeding the bears