Good day, fellas. I need your help. I'm writing a comparative essay on pre-WW2 bolshevism and fascism. We all know who's right here, but sadly I can't just plain tell my teacher that Hitler was right and get away with it.
Now comes the question: How do I point out Hitler was right about e.g. the übermensch theory, but without coming across as a white supremacist?
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.org
endchan.xyz
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
pdf-archive.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
imgur.com
mega.nz
youtube.com
twitter.com
Why would you censor yourself? If you're right, you're right. It's not your job to argue against your positions.
archive.org
endchan.xyz
because the school council is 60-70% jews and I could get expelled for this
no jokes, I once got sent out of class (literature) because I put my hands up like the Hitler jugend
and holy shit my dude the second link
I'm very grateful
Yeah man, this is the only uncensored version out there. All the other ones were edited by Jews. You can't win with these people, better go out in a blaze of glory, make the news and get offered better positions.
Isn't Hungary very right way anyway?
not my school
also, while most people in the countryside either hate gypsies or are gypsies, there is an abundance of libtards in the capital city, and thus, in the school I go to as well.
You should spread awareness of it, maybe write a blog on minds.com?
what an idea
this is what I did so far, a crude draft
mind you, the essay is supposed to be 2 pages long
You should just present the facts as they are and leave your own opinion out of it. They can't fault you for doing research and it gives you plausible deniability.
Do list some of the genocides of the Poles by the Soviets which were blamed on the Nazis though, that'll really get their blood boiling as it implies that the holocaust is a soviet lie, which it is.
en.wikipedia.org
>commies always lie about everything
>b-but they told the truth about the holocaust goyim!
cool beans
can we be friends?
You could always take the opposite stance, present the facts that prove you wrong alongside obviously flawed arguments.
You need to give context as to why Fascism rose in response to Judeo-Bolshevism. Explain the nature of cause and reaction. That they are both '''evil''' but one had simply come as due to a sense of self preservation. In nature there are equal and opposite reactions and nothing is excluded from this principle. Pic related
...
literally my biggest redpill ever
...
Sure, thing bud, make a profile on minds.com and send me your username to [email protected] so we can chat over encrypted channels
...
If you're talking about fascism, not national socialism, talk about Franco, and Mosley, and Mussolini. Don't talk about Hitler because that's two different ideologies. Talk about Hideki Tojo, or Fumimaro Konoe, talk about glorification of the people and their struggle, about hyper militarisation.
I can recomend songs if you need some.
Yup, check Katyń massacre for example. It was discovered by Nazis, and they allowed an international investigation that proved soviets did it
I did
actually, this is less about facts and more about the generalized ideology. It doesn't have to be very polished, luckily, my teacher is easily impressable
Fucking Jew scum killing good Polish men, these jews must pay.
Added you, chat requires a separate decryption password.
It was bad, the death toll was comparatively low for WWII (20-30k) but it was targeted specifically at intellectual and military elite. It fucked us for decades
Yes, all I'm saying is that if the object of the essay is to talk in depth about 'fascism' you should point out that fascism itself is a fleshed out ideology which is seperate from national socialism.
so essentially if I write stuff like this it will be an A
And don't mention Jews... academia can't handle that... for now. Just mention everything they had a part in without naming the (((Jew))),
Like I said... stick to cause and effect... label them both 'evil' but give context for why Nazism rose in response to ((Bolshevism)). That there was no real greater good but that it was somewhat justifiable considering (((Communists))) were exterminating people long before Nazism ever began their genociding. And that Nazis were genociding people who were genociding the people they were elected to protect.
>youtube.com
Remember, the spartacists were backed by Bolsheviks. And the German civil war came immediately after WWI when Germany had suffered major inflation and chaos. It was do or die for the German people. Jewish Rabbis today don't even deny the fact that Jews had exploited the German people. But avoid naming the Jew at all costs.
Remeber, focus on
>Action: Rise of socialism-Bolshevism
>Reaction: Self-preservation-Fascism
I'm drunk as hell that's all you;re gonna get from me for now I'm going to bed.
Only deathcamps found were the ones liberated by Jewish commies.. and they denied access to the US to inspect.. what a (((Coincidence))).
paragraph 2:
>Contrary to the common misconception, fascism and national socialism are two, completely different things, although they share many key elements. Fascism is a radical, nationalistic ideology that originated from Italian dictator Benito Mussolini. The name was derived from the latin word “fasces”, which means “bundle of sticks”.
cont?
>The name was derived from the latin word “fasces”, which means “bundle of sticks”.
Just like "faggot", huh? ;^)
so much for jews crying about anti-semitism... it's like they askin for it
lol, yeah, you shuold omit that or give a more in-depth explanation with historical context
actually, yes. that's one of the main points a commie faggot I know usually uses
Worse than that, they built the destruction part of the camps:
youtube.com
But they're so terrible at getting anything done a closer look dispels the illusion.
Thanks for sharing these.
Here's the other major Gulag writer, Shalamov. Short stories based from his years locked up in the gulags, mobile spacing.
pdf-archive.com
im in a good mood, hungryburger, ill dump a couple good ones
...
.
just to be clear, are we still allowed to use "rekt"?
..
nein! mein fruend!
include this
youtube.com
This is what I composed so far:
>Comparison of the Fascist and Bolshevik ideologies
>Not long after the First World War ended, problems started surfacing throughout Europe. Problems such as starvation, exploitation of political power and massive hyperinflation. All these social and economic issues led to the creation of radical ideologies such as fascism and bolshevism.
>Contrary to the common misconception, fascism and national socialism are two, completely different things, although they share many key elements. Fascism is a radical, nationalistic ideology that originated from Italian dictator Benito Mussolini. The name was derived from the latin word “fasces”, which means “bundle of sticks”. Because of this, the main symbol of fascism was a bundle of sticks accompanied by an axe, which indicated power over life and death, and also strength in unity, since the symbol was used previously by socialist parties in Italy.
>One of Mussolini’s concerns was the lowering birth rates of whites in the late 1920s. He found that Caucasians reproduce at a significantly slower rate than e.g. Asians or Africans. He stated that fascism was born out of need, as the Mediterranean and Aryan races were slowly being suppressed. He was in fear of the extinction of these races, and thus, decided to take harsh action.
>To ensure his power, Mussolini organized a state police called the “blackshirts”, the name referring to the color of their clothing. Besides that, he frequently held speeches and political rallies, and gave himself the title of “the Duce”. With these precautions, he created a personality cult for himself, probably the first one at the time.
should I make a google doc so we can work together?
Jews always act the same way. They first kill of the elite in order to have a dumb mass they can control easily
The Talmud explains that the chosen people are superior in every single way to the goyim.
It also explains that all goyim are to be the Jews' slaves. Blacks, Arabs, Asians and Whites all equally squashed under their boot like the vermin they think we are in the greater plan lined up in that book.
General Patton realised towards the end of the war that they were fighting the wrong enemy and wanted to pursue conflict with the (((Soviet Union))) but was denied such honour and 'mysteriously died'.
Using more modern studies, you can say that according to global IQ statistics Asians are mentally superior to whites and therefore in many ways superior to whites, blacks and jews alike.
80% of your intelligence is based on genetics, the remaining 20% is the environment you grow up in (2 parents vs 1 parent, quality education vs diverse education, etc)
This has been proven time and time again in countless studies, even though nobody wants to talk about it.
In the end what Hitler wanted was self-determination for the Germans, free from the central banking system and revoking the Treaty of Versailles, hence the wars on Czechoslovakia and Poland. (((They))) wouldn't let him, and the zionists among (((them))) did everything they could to stop him, with WW2 as a result of (((their))) efforts.
Here is the reason UK needed the war:
GDP after WWI: Germany $18 billion, UK $17,xx billion
GDP at 1938: Germany $56 billion, UK $26 billion
UK and France were outpaced at an enormous rate, if this would have gone on there would be no doubt Germany would have ruled continental Europe simply because of its economic power.
Economic power equals military power, it took the whole world fighting Germany for 6 years to bring them down. And Germans were increasingly radicalised during that process, so it's no wonder you saw these kind of crimes after 41-43
>"our two peoples belong together racially"
this quote will definitely help show turbo normies that Hitler advocated for the European-Caucasian master race, and to put an end to the "only muh blond hair blue eyes are aryan!" and "b-but he considered every other race as untermensch and wanted to exterminate them!"
>global IQ statistics
those dont exist. notice that usa can test every single rural community, yet china can only test the best of the best in their biggest cities? red flag
>How do I point out Hitler was right about e.g. the übermensch theory, but without coming across as a white supremacist?
You can't. Even civic nationalists are called white supremacists and they worship black guy in a trump hat (fucking based!).
But who knows, maybe your teacher is one of the 1/100 that isn't a shithead and is willing to view it objectively. Just remember to provide plenty of sources.
...
.
It is still very likely that the IQ of Chinese, Koreans and Japanese is higher than ours.
The reason is that a direct correlation between IQ and proclivity to criminality has been shown again and again.
And the fact is, these 3 groups show up in crime statistics at about 1/4 to 1/2 the rate that whites do, depending on the type of crime.
Since jews are very prone to criminality and as a people they tend to over exaggerate their contributions heavily I would tend to attribute their success to their tendency to promote each other and basically gang bang non jews in secret back room dealings.
They are competing in the West as a collective against lots and lots of individual players. This fucks us.
last one before i go. Good luck friendo
>abundance of libtards in the capital city
Crush the goddamn urbanite!
In order to do that you need to dissect exactly what an übermensch in a sense where it can be applied to any group of people is and how this concept is superior to the communist alternative of reducing humanity to the lowest common denominator.
Tips:
Avoid using tainted terms like übermensch.
Avoid references to racial superiority.
Avoid LARPing Germanophilic references. The principles involved in a superior system are able to be applied universally.
okay guys
give me tips on this paragraph
>The national socialistic ideology, “Nazism”, had quite similar origins. In addition to his time served in prison, Adolf Hitler had many experiences – both personal and objective – that led him to creating his political ideology.
1. yes, it has a reference to him being fucked over by jews all the time
2. it kinda pictures him as a bad guy
bump
fuck I literally went away for like 5 minutes and now the thread is dying
Stefan Molyneux talks a lot about Communism, it should help you get ideas for arguments for and against it.
youtube.com
youtube.com
>The national socialistic ideology, “Nazism”, had quite similar origins. In addition to his time served in prison, Adolf Hitler had many experiences – both personal and objective – that led him to creating his political ideology. He agreed with Mussolini on the need for racial separation, however, he was specifically against one race secretly controlling all the banks, media, and even many governments. Essentially, he discovered that people’s races create significant differences in their intelligence levels and physical qualities, and that some specific races are can surpass others in certain aspects.
is this better or worse?
>Nazism
The term nazi was created to be a slur against national socialists.
>How do I point out Hitler was right about e.g. the übermensch theory
Well, the thing is was he actually right on that? And didn't you have your own fascist government too? Why not argue for things they were pro about? Or how about all the other fascist governments at the time? Hitler wasn't the leader of fascism by any means
The people checking this are jews aren't they? It's better to start of with small redpills and focus on the ideology instead of the feelings of nazis.
yes, I found that out too. Sadly, I have to mention this because I won't get points if I don't. my teacher is an asshole like that.
also, how do I explain the übermensch theory without sounding racist?
Hitler was wrong about the ubermensch. It was just propaganda.
You really think he was planning to replace every pollack with an Aryan? Obviously a people who got tricked into forever cucking themselves (Germans) can't be the ubermensch.
Sorry.
I know, but sadly this is not a radical news article. It is an essay, to be read by my teacher, who expects the übermensch theory to be mentioned at least. It was in the textbook (inb4 written by jews) so I have to mention it
A free market where the most intelligent people have the most power is propaganda now? Laughable.
Then say the truth, that it was propaganda designed to dazzle Germans into the belief that a race could be the ubermensch.
The problem is that Nietzche didn't really prescribe the ubermensch with a race, so Hitler was just sorta talking out his ass when he talked about the ubermensch.
If anyone followed the example of ubermensch, it was Hitler himself. Not his dogs (Germans).
It was originally envisioned by Neitzche as a way to escape Nihilism. He believed that in the future the strongest will guide humanity. Essentially they will replace God and the church as the new moral compass.
Ubermensch theory is simply the Pareto Distribution put in actionable terms:
youtube.com
That sounds like a great system actually, I just don't know how my post implied that was bad.
The greatest should rule. But the greatest race can still have retards in the tribe, and you don't want them in power.
There is no single best breed of human. There is a single best skin color though.
>Two sentences in
>A sentence fragment
You'll do fine, buddy.
there you go
I linked what Hitler actually wrote in the first post, you're spouting Jewish propaganda apparently without being aware of it:
endchan.xyz
>pre-WW2 bolshevism
stalin didnt ramp up the sewer system until the war really got going. And please remember that Solzhenitsyn didnt like Stalin or Hitler, or authoritarianism at all, and if you actually read his whole book you'll find out that he's real NOT /your guy/
but you're poltards so I know this is asking a lot.
Oh, and OP fly your nazi flag high. If your right why hide it? A Cowards dies a thousand deaths. Stop hiding under your sheets.
Still there. Merge the second and third sentences.
What are you even talking about.
I can see that youve never read Solzhenitsyn's book.
>Solzhenitsyn
kinda sounds like the name of a lizardman to me
It's a collection of books, I'm still working my way through. They're information. I don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Linking a series of books doesn't mean I agree with everything in them, it means I linked information.
The russian church under the tsar pre and post revolution was corrupt as fuck though. convenient that you leave this fact out. You cant blame the Jews for everything.
Op you might benefit HUGE from a wall of text I found some time ago about Marxism, Hitler and the current EU.
It was a major redpill for me.
thanks neighbor
this is shit writing.
>Another idea that highly contributed to Hitler’s thinking was the Übermensch theory. Many people misunderstand the meaning of this theory, most think it solely means that the Aryans are the only race who deserve living. However, this statement is far from the truth. The Übermensch theory was actually constructed by Friedrich Nieztsche to explain peoples’ purpose of living. It spoke of a higher being who would be capable of understanding the purpose of life. Sadly, Hitler and the Nazi Party completely misinterpreted the theory and used it as propaganda, replacing the higher being with the Aryan race, stating that they were plain “better” than anyone else.
>Alongside the highly misunderstood Übermensch theory, which was in fact proven wrong later, the Nazi ideology contained elements of social Darwinism, which essentially meant that throughout the process of natural selection, some races will prosper and evolve, while others will become extinct over time. Yet again, this theory was also exploited for propaganda purposes.
>[A bunch of shit about the communist shit]
> Even though Hitler and Lenin represented two completely opposing ideologies, they did in fact have some things in common. For example, both ideologies had forced labor camps, and both had a pretty strong personality cult in place.
Nononono, you are making a lot of claims here, you want to just report the facts as you have them. For example, the starvation, exploitation of political power and hyperinflation are a direct consequence of the abuse of political power. You're reversing these things now. It's better to just state these things happened and to say vague things that don't explicitly claim root causes, such as
"In the wake of starvation, the abuse of political power and massive hyperinflation, we've seen various ideologies arise attempting to address these problems. This report briefly compares the basic tenets of and principles behind these ideologies and their resultant outcomes"
See, now claims of "this happened because of that", no judgments, just stating the facts as you've found them.
Oh I forgot to tag you, but I've saved the pdf and added it to my to read pile. I'm also attempting to download mega.nz
This tells me you've not understood a word of what Hitler actually said and you should really watch:
youtube.com
National Socialism is about giving everyone a sense of duty towards their race, culture and country and then giving the most productive and intelligent of the dutiful the means to be the most productive. It's voluntarism based on a sense of higher purpose. You can't put a gun to someone's head and say BE GREAT AT THIS, it doesn't work and Hitler recognized that.
awesome! thanks. If you find me IRL I'll make you a pan of brownies.
>had many experiences – both personal and objective – that led him to
I'll tell you something kid, youre writing is shit. even for a high schooler.
God speed user.
"two completely different things?"
no stupid, you're not writing about objects, youre writing about ideologies.
you need a thesaurus stat. and honestly your writing is shit. And your coma placement is all wrong. shm. this essay is garbage tier. sorry. /not sorry
You don't.
You just recollect the "challenges" to which those systems responded.
You don't need to dwindle too much on the Jewish question nor do you need to adress the "untermenchen" theory because those kind of theories are always subjective, never objective.
A correct political theory in the end is just that, a theory, an interpretation of reality.
Nothing to do with facts *directly* but a response to those facts. Maybe I'm getting too positivist in here but that's how most capable people in these kind of areas take it.
You can present a Jewish "challenge" underlining how Jews were traditionally a marginalised outcast population which when out of the ghetto tended to support murderous leftie commie regimes, you can even present your own country as an example.
But you should avoid dwelling too much on those things, and focus on old school easily provable facts, and make a comparison.
Good luck, user.
you reading your essay
"not long after the first world ended problems started surfacing throughout europe, problems such as.."
MEN. WOMEN. PLEASE STAY IN YOUR CHILDRENS LIVES AND MAKE THEM READ BOOKS.
FOR FUCKS SAKE.
Haha be careful what you wish for, with 20 million migrants moving into Europe I might want to leave Hungary!
Not leave, I'm tired.
>The Bolsheviks, founded by Vladimir Lenin and Alexander Bogdanov,
Bogs are Bolshies ?
*chuckling*
listen kid, gtfo.