Sup Forums were vikings as cucked as modern Swedes? I'm watching the tv series Vikings...

Sup Forums were vikings as cucked as modern Swedes? I'm watching the tv series Vikings. Every women in the series cheats on her husband and has sex with dozens other men. Also,these viking women kill and abandon their own children. Is this historically accurate?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=89FuQofJmhw
youtube.com/watch?v=lywptXjdR70
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Do you honestly believe the Jews would let an accurate representation of a strong white society appear on TV?

Vikings were bitches who ran away from any organized armies and resistance. Fuckers only knew how to raid not how to fight. Too bad Charlemagne did not have more time to fuck up danes before they became plague on world.

That dan Carlin episode where he said the Vikings took the women and children to the battle with them and when a Viking ran from the front line he was slain by his own wyfe.

Fukkin barbaric. The old norsemen were anything but cucked. They were a nightmare.

What is Normandy? What is Danelaw?

The Vikings ruled Britain at one point and got land from both Germany, France and Italy, and formed Russian state, and also served as Byzantine emperor bodyguards.

Burger education I can understand, but you should just KYS.

Ruled parts of england not britain. Which is not that great feat. England was bunch of petty kingdoms fighting each other. Viking never conquered parts of germany (which did not exist at time). Normans are not same as vikings. By time Normans went out conquering sicily and other place. They did not have anything common with vikings and actually fought against them. Vikings were part of people forming early rus states. But integrated fastly into slavic population and were totally slavinized quite early. Anglo-Saxons and Russians slavs also served in same guard.

Those were earlier Germanic tribes.

>watch a bad tv series with horrible historical accuracy
>think it represents reality in any way

Swedes were decent people for a very short period of history, when they stopped being vikangz and established their Christian kingdom. Now they're reverting to cuck mode.

Yes, Viking sea pirates were the niggers of Europe. It's the ultimate expression of gibsmedat and for their ancestors it's the ultimate expression of wewuz for their desacendants. Vikings are the ISIS of the era.

>germany (which did not exist at time
I'll take what is the kingdom of Germany for 500, Alex.
>t. heard about Vikings once in high school

>what was the great heathen army

Those were Gallics (a subculture of celts and Germanics but not genetically Celtic and not genetically Germanic, they are genetically "Western European" at least that's their modern classification.)
>Normandy
The Vikings were given Normandy because they lost, they were given poor coastal land so they could defend the rivers and shores of France so the king didn't have to worry about it. They didn't conquer Normandy, they acquired it by losing a battle and being more servile than the Franks living there.
>Danelaw
The English were fighting eachother and the Danes just declared themselves rulers, they didn't even conquer. They even established Saxon leadership because Saxons were the only people who could fight other Saxons. The great heathen army and the great summer army never won a war, they lost half their battles even when they outnumbered the Saxons. Figures, spend your whole life fishing and hunting while others generation after generation ritually and habitually go out and fight eachother.
>Germany France and Italy
>"we will give you land and money if you fuck off and betray your brothers" Vikings :ok
>Varangian guard
Only 10k of them were Norsemen, the rest were Saxons. The Saxons were the ones who fought, the Norsemen just drank and got gibs.

Let's not forget they got btfo of Ireland despite outnumbering the Irish significantly in over half the battles between the Irish and the Norwegians.
They also got fucked up by Iberian peasants.
Also the Normans aren't Vikings, they had maybe 1/10 norse blood when they set out to conquer. They adventuring Franks who got out of France because they weren't bound to the king.

>getting your history from a tv show

If you want honest history then you go academic. Google Vikings in your uni library search engine and start there. television, pop history, pol, Wikipedia, etc just isn't going to cut it.

Long story short, Vikings put a great emphasis on lineage so female fidelity was extremely important. Women were not "empowered" and a lot of what you will on tv will be a feminist fantasy.

Swedes weren't even Vikings, they were traders more than raiders. No doubt they submitted to their more base and subhuman desires, but they weren't by any means as tough as the Danes, let alone the Northmen.

A tremendous failure

Which fought against disorganized petty english kingdoms not any real power of era. Oh they also robbed undefended Paris. Such battlefield glory.

You mean East Francia

>t. heard about Vikings from tv shows

To emphasis, Vikings had something called the odal. The odal was the farm that was always in your family. You had to prove this by citing your family's lineage. Bastards wouldn't count. Without the odal you were nothing in society, you couldn't partake in the Althing, you weren't a thane, etc. Romans, Celts and Anglo Saxons all had something similar.

Otherwise they'd all speak arabic

Rus formed also large part of Varangians alongside anglo-saxons. And no for any swedish revisionist at this point viking part of rus people was already almost fully integrated with slavs.

What should they have done?
Toppled Byzantium? Because that was the only empire in Europe at the time.

Yes goyi- I mean yes my fellow American. All tv shows are 100% accurate and you should never question anything you see on a tv show.

Swedes were, they were the primary colonizers of Ukraine/Russia.

>were vikings as cucked as modern Swedes?
No. They practiced honour killings. They would literally kill women if they cheated.

VIKANGS WERENT A FUCKING NATION YOU FUCKING BRAINDEAD FAGGOTS , IT WAS A SOCIAL CLASS WHO COULD OWN LAND AND WERE ROBBERS AND SEAMEN AND MERCENARIES


for fucks sake.
Poltards are dumb as fuck


Also swedecucks act like every vikang was the same, wheres the only famed ones were Vangarians who lived closer to slavs than scandis and we're a mix of scandi, Finn and a bit slav tribes , later fully interbreeding into slavs

The Swedes founded the Russian states, raided on the Caspian and black seas, warred with Byzantium and where made the personal guard of the emperor because he recognized their skill in battle.
Not really, you could argue that east Franica ceased to exist wit the election of Henry the Fowler.
>let me tell you about your countrys history
Kill yourself mr.56%
No comprende señor.

How they were primary colonizers of future russian principalities. If they were totally integrated to local slavic population in under 100years?

History Channel does not try to hide that the show is just loosely based in reality. It's not their fault that teens think everything they see on tv is real

>Vikings barely fought in Varangian guard

Source?

Source?

>Viking never conquered parts of germany
Denmark used to own 3 of the 16 states of Germany.

Because they left a cultural legacy, for example the time honed russian tradition came from the fact that the rus traded in thralls and where they left with a bunch of slaves when they converted to Christianity.

You have to prove that, archaeologically, first of all. Second of all my point was that Swedes were the Scandinavians that first settled, not Danes.

Anyhow, look up the book "Viking diaspora" for some recent research on the subject.

Any firm distinction between East Francia is later product rather than contemperaries view. But time were are talking here ("viking era") it was East Francia not Kingdom of Germany.

>England not Britain

Norse controlled parts of Scotland for 800 years.

>Viking ran from the front line he was slain by his own wyfe.
WHERE DO I FIND WOMEN LIKE THIS TO MARRY AND PUMP BABYS INTO
I NEED THIS SO MUCH

Fiction.

Not at all, the kingdom of Germany had it's own customs and traditional laws.

I come from some of those islands
Thanks for the blond hair mate, your culture got scotted though but it left a few things.

Vikings did get btfo by Alfred the great though

Stop watching jewish propaganda. The vikings were not a bunch of cuckolds.

>these viking women kill and abandon their own children
No, the children's life belonged to the father. It was looked down if he tried to kill them though.

PARTS OF

PICTLAND FOREVER FREE.

They adopted slavic language really fast as their main language also slavic paganism (before submitting to christianity). By 11th century they were already fully integrated with slavs. Love how swedish historians promote view of these fully swedish rus principalities that just disapeared overnight and became magically russian.

...

To be fair the vikings weren't strong. They were pretty much always BTFO whenever they faced organized enemy resistance. The Danes were so terrified of Charlemagne that they constructed defences that were last used in the mid 19th century.

...

>Love how Swedish historians promote
Oh for fucks sake, nobody does this.
We know that the northmen where far to few in numbers to be anything other than the absolute elite of the principalities and that their Norse names disappeared after three fucking generations.
You seem to have a really fucking huge horn in your side towards vikings and Scandinavians in general.

It was not gibs, because they conquered it. Spoils is the natural right of the winner.

Btw, the large majority of norse were never vikings. Calling a norse viking is like saying that englishmen from the XVI century were all pirates

Okey I embelished little. But Paradox forums are full of swedes who do that.

>We WUZ Russians

Kys

Sayin Vangarians were swedes is saying Americans are Germans because the come from Brits and Germanic Saxons settled there

Russians ethnogenesis comes from slavs+Finn's+vangarians
And it showed in history as they proved to be fierce warriors.
Slavs and vangarians were closer to one another than vangarians to other Vikangz and that's why they interbred, froming the Russians

Swedes claiming to have founded the RUS is the most pathetic attempt of historic revisionism and most try hard grappling at some phantom of historic pride is laughable

While Sweden ethogeneis were just local cucks who had sat on their isle. And it proved in history
And sure shows today , swedes breaking all records of lunatic cuckoldry

>To be fair the vikings weren't strong.
Compared to what? The danes today are not strong, we are 5 million people. We are pretty much germans though. If all of the sudden there was 80 million danes like there is 80 million germans we would be as strong as Germany.
>The Danes were so terrified of Charlemagne that they constructed defences that were last used in the mid 19th century.
And we are still here. Let's see who last the longest as a nation burger.

youtube.com/watch?v=89FuQofJmhw

Do you even know where the name Rus comes from mr anti-normanist?

Claiming that the Vikings didn't found Rus is in fact the single most pathetic attempt at historical revisionism ever pulled by an insecure nation.
>Russians ethnogenesis comes from slavs+Finn's+vangarians
>Slavs and vangarians were closer to one another than vangarians to other Vikangz and that's why they interbred, froming the Russians
Are you on drugs or something how does this disprove the Nestor chronicle?

...

>Swedes actually believe this
WE
>if you can't prove it didn't happen then it did happen
Wew, Karl.
>we would be strong like Germany if only we had more people
>we aren't cowards, were just playing the long game
Norway was the center of the Kalmar and you know it.
You aren't even real Scandinavians, you're just German bumpkins.

"Muh shield maidens" shit is based on sagas which are myths and bullshit for the most part.
As far as im aware they never found remains from the battle where women where used to any relevant extent.

Anglo-Scandinavian hybrid cross from Cumbria. Features Christian imagery, but also has depictions of:
- Loki bound with his wife Sigyn protecting him
- The god Heimdallr holding his horn
- The god Víðarr tearing the jaws of Fenrir
- Thor's failed attempt to catch Jörmungandr, the Midgard Serpent

>when uneducated Americans try to debate history
I was about to say something snarky but then I realised that there is a 50% chance that I'm talking to a non-white.

It's no wonder though. Charlemagne ruled a giant empire and had far more resources than the danes. His fame as a genocidal maniac didn't helped either

FPBP

You, my friend, are a retarded faggot.

That's pretty fucking rad, do you have rune stones and stuff as well?

...

Rurik was swedish.
A good part of the nobles of the first Rus' were norse too.

Russia only exist because the local finnic and slavic tribes noticed they were too dumb to rule themselves and invited the norse to rule over them.

>just German bumpkins.
>just

>t. heard about Vikings once in high school
>was busy writing an essay on why it's ok to have 18yo tranny niggers in class.

Ahahahahahahahahahaahanaahaaha

Rectally ravaged , Swen is rectally ravaged.
How does it feel to be so subuumans you have to claim that you in fact founded a nation that rekt you Everytime you liften your head?

Please bring forth any arguments in stead of asspaned pleas alas OMG srsly?

>Swedish WE WUZERY
>there's a 10% chance I'm talking to a subsaharan African in Sweden
In Sweden, SWEDEN.
I'm not a nigger, but I don't care if they are here. My nation was never about heritage, it was about adventure, conquest, frontiering, and progressing. You can't even protect your heritage, your ancestral homeland, the land of your fathers and their fathers and their 500 fathers. You're a cuck in your own land, I'm a conqueror in someone else's land. There's a reason Saxons never lose.

>Norway was the center of the Kalmar and you know it.

>only relevance is relative to the state of Germany
Yes, yes they are just German bumpkins.

You know Danish women all want the BNC. Not your tiny little, north German, poor fisherman, no one even remembers you as Vikings, not-even-Scandinavian-godmen weens.

I actually thing that swedish revisionism about them forming russia and magic 100% swedish rus principalities that magically turned russian and all swedish traces just vanished in communist plot. Is just their way of dealing with issue of Russians fucking up them so many times that they turned to cucks they are this day,

It's not we wuzism if they actualy did it.

>You can't even protect your heritage, your ancestral homeland, the land of your fathers and their fathers and their 500 fathers.
The same could be said about you

Swedish=/Vangarian, spastic
>Brazilian historians


Slavs already had their own culture and we're advanced enough that Rurik could come and actually rule over anything besides woodlands.

Vanagrians were mix of scandis ,Finn's and even slavs.
Swedes trying to take credit for it is just a pathetic attempt to make them feel better about shitty history.
>Russian are subhuman reee
>We wuz russians
Just kys


Interstengly you never hear a German talking like that, for we actually have a history

Who cares, there's not much to be proud about vikings.

sweden never were proper vikings. they were largely traders.

Danes were the conquerors, and the Norwegians the explorers. so when you think of vikings, it'd be one of those.

>Also the Normans aren't Vikings, they had maybe 1/10 norse blood when they set out to conquer.
They were pure vikings in the early 900s. They set out to conquer in the late 900s and the battle of hastings was obviously in 1066. When exactly are you proposing they went from 100% norse to 10% norse? You do realize 100 years is only like 3-4 generations?

I'm afraid not, at least as far as I know. I think physical evidence is limited to a few similar hybrid crosses, with pagan imagery, and so-called 'hogback' tombstones. There's a great deal of art/sculpture which shows 'influence', but whether that means there was large-scale settlement is not known. There are several-thousand towns and villages with names ending in 'thorp', 'by' and 'howe', so there must have been quite a few who made mainland Britain their home.
There was also a ship burial somewhere in Scotland, and there's been extensive archaeology in York (or Jórvík) as shown in the video I posted above

My fathers have been in this land for 10 generations, not 500.
The Swedes did literally none of those things. The Rus didn't establish an ethnically Swedish offshoot state. They settled, married the Slavs and Fenno-Karelians, and then established the states. The West Slavs were known for their combat prowess.

My argument, my argument is the already mentioned Nestor chronicle and the fact that the members of the varanigan the byzantines called Ros that escorted the east roman embassy to east francia where called Svear by the frankish chroniclers
What exatcly are your argument here other than screaming incoherently?
>I'm a conqueror in someone else's land. There's a reason Saxons never lose.
>what was the great heathen host
>who was Knut the great
>who was William the Conqueror
>What is the demographics of the united states
Shall I go on?

You watch television? That's fucking pathetic. I guess you're not even close to being redpilled if you still subject yourself to that corporate brain washing. Seriously. Let posting this thread be a wake-up call for you. Call your cable TV company and cancel the television portion of the service.

>I actually thing that swedish revisionism about them forming russia and magic 100% swedish rus principalities
Except nobody says that, every sane person agrees that the vikings where the ruling class of Rus for a couple of generations and then got assimilated.

This is an Anglo-Saxon brooch decorated 'in the Viking style'

>It's not we wuzism if they actualy did it
Did what ,nigger
>Holph uphhh
*Takes African cock out his mouth*
>SO YOU BE SÄYIN
*Scoops up dripping sperm at mouth edges*
>WË WÜZ RYSSEN N SHITTA?!Shiiiiiieeeeeeeet

Seriously monkey, keep out European history , you're making a joke out of yourself

4 generations of marrying Franks breeds out the Norse genes quickly.
50%
25%
12.5%
6.2%
4 generations
1066 wasn't even an achievement, they barely defeated an already exhausted, wounded and dying army which wasn't even the full weight of English soldiery.

Later part meant for Chief Tyresse Sanchez de Sholomonukovych obviously.

Varangians is a broad term.

The Rus themselves were swedish, or at least mostly swedish.

There is really nothing more pathetic than a "redpilled" individual who pays for and watches cable television. If a group of engineers and psychologists got together to design a mind-control system for corporations to manipulate and influence the population, it would look exactly like television. Let that sink in.

>You watch television? That's fucking pathetic. I guess you're not even close to being redpilled if you still subject yourself to that corporate brain washing. Seriously. Let posting this thread be a wake-up call for you. Call your cable TV company and cancel the television portion of the service.
This so much. Most important post in this entire thread desu.

...

>muh vikangz
I'm getting sick of this garbage idolism.
If you want to idolize Swedes, idolize Caroleans.

Except the Normans kept their own unique cultural blend alive for fucking centuries.

>replying to the Kraut instead of me
My god, what a loser.
>great heathen host
A failure?
>Cnut the great
Inheriting a kingdom?
>William the conquerer
You mean the man who was less Scandinavian than I am? I'm 10% Nordmann, William was somewhere between 6-8% Danish. And a bastard to boot.
>demographics of the United States
>you're newly made country is diverse
>pay no attention to my people who are old as dirt yet can't wait to give it all away
Like I said, America isn't about race or heritage, it's about conquest. The white man didn't go to Africa to pretend it was his ancestral homeland and he needs to maintain his culture there. He went because he was a conquerer.
You're still in Sweden, we see what your ancestors accomplished.

which more frankish than nordic influence.

Muh sports! Muh team! I needs muh entainments.

Strammen and irrlevant drifting off , nigger.

You claimed
>WE WuZ Russians
I btfoed you
Now you spout unrelated shit

Nestor Chronicles?
I have a PDF file on my desktop of in in it's original language ,old slavic

You can't argue with me with your bluepilled kike curriculum school level meme history , Machmud Al Sweedi


Sweden didn't found Russia period. It's a laughable and pathetic attempt at historic revisionism and even without knowledge of history completely illogical and easily disprovable

Vangarians had shit to do with today's swedes and alot to Do with today's Russians and with slavs at that time.period

T.Slavistics student

Danes and Norwegians were also primarily traders and explorers like the Swedish vikings, but were prevented from trading (as they were not Christian) and were attacked by the Carolingian empire which forced their hand. They raided and plundered largely in self-defense. Also, all sources we have today are Christian, which are obviously going to paint them in a negative light. None of the places that the Swedish vikings visited had a culture of writing to document their arrival at the time except the Abbasid caliphate whom they clearly traded with. The invitation of the Rus was of course documented long after it took place.

>You mean the man who was less Scandinavian than I am? I'm 10% Nordmann, William was somewhere between 6-8% Danish. And a bastard to boot.
The norse followed a patriarchal system. If a male swedish married a saxon woman, then the children would be considered swedish.

Through a rigid caste system which was undone by Scotsmen of all people.

I remeber when I decided to throw out my television. I was walking down the road a summerday a few years ago. I was thinking that the white man deserved to die out because we were the most horrible race on the earth. Never thought that before. Then I thought a bit more about it. What would happen if the white race died out? Well, the japanese or chinese would just take over, and they are just as "horrible" as whites. So I let that feeling of white guilt go. But where did that feeling come from? Stopped listening to radio and watch tv because of that day where I actually "felt" the white race deserve to die.

youtube.com/watch?v=lywptXjdR70

You should redpill Paradox and people on their forums on this issue. We wuz RUS thing is strong among swedes there.

After about a year of not watching television, your mind will start to auto-deprogram. You will come to hate television and pity those who are still enslaved by it.