When did you understand that anarchy is the ultimate political redpill?

With power comes corruption. You will never have a government that cares for the people. Now left wing anarchism is crap because they are just lazy fuckers because they just don't want to work. But what if you have capitalist anarchy? Everyone is free to open their business, no taxes and most importantly freedom. Now for the police part you just make right wing militias and restore the peace. They will work even better than the police right now because they will be free to kill the criminals.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-capitalism
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

who's gonna make the right wing militias?

we

your founding fathers wanted that exact thing

>capitalist
>anarchy

choose one

>what is ancap?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-capitalism

industrial feudalism? one of the primary functions of the state is the management of private property affairs and the protection of private property. any "anarchist" society would eventually require entities with state-like functions including a legal system and an entity with a monopoly on violence, effectively operating as some sort of minimal state. i find this outcome much more likely but if that doesn't come then we have the other situation where corporations and private land begin to resemble something we'd see in our predecessor society.

>industrial feudalism?
no why would it be feudalism. it will be a free market. everyone's free to sell and buy.
>management of private property affairs
in the past there was no such management and there were no problems
>begin to resemble something we'd see in our predecessor society
>implying it would be a bad thing

That machine gun makes it look edgy and 'cool.'

Go smoke your dope and stop bothering us Antifa fag.

>Antifa
I am actually a fascist but nice try jew

Power that comes with monopoly on violence can only be abused.
Everybody needs to be able to protect themselves and their property.

...

Save pic related
Then
Sage
Sage
Sage

It isn't though... moron.

...

...

...

>everything I don't like is bait
how's first grade?

...

So if anyone "stronger" than you takes your property and you can't fight back, basically it's his property now?

...

Closing in on a decade ago.

Governments don't believe in private property, and the only "functions" unique to the state are that the state pretends only the state is legitimate in using aggressive violence in forcing people to do whatever it is state goons want.

Yes, that is actually how the world works.

>>no why would it be feudalism. it will be a free market. everyone's free to sell and buy.
why does feudalism preclude free markets? i don't claim that it does and that's something not essential to the common conception of a feudal society.

>in the past there was no such management and there were no problems

and hence in the future there will necessarily be no need for legal and, if need be, violent enforcement of private property rights? i'm not convinced

it is true in the past there were no legal systems to manage the transfer of land or enforce any binding contracts between the seller and buyer of land, but you'd have to go very far, pre-agricultural times where the notion of private property didn't exist, and beyond relevancy.


>implying it would be a bad thing
yea it probably wouldn't anymore now when we don't mind that we've shed off any veneer of reverence for classic liberal freedoms from right-libertarian ideologies, but keeping the right to rent people and private property, which without the other rights would turn into a society with a bunch of indentured servants and subjects of the corporate empires.

Person A owns property. He is killed by Person B who is now squatting on Person A's land.

Who's going to take care of this? Well maybe the community will deputize some other person to dispense justice. Or maybe there will be a private security firm that has the consent of the community to enact violence. And when society becomes sufficiently large where the threat of unlawful violence occurring daily is enough to establish one or more private security firms?

Person B goes to hell.
Problem had, problem given closure.

the ideology that inevitably results in the commodification of the social order and the effacement of social bonds and genuine human interaction with superficial transaction and consumerism is one of the most repulsive, vulgar, and crass ideologies that anyone could imagine.

/thread