SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY...

SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY SOURCES SAY

Other urls found in this thread:

docquery.fec.gov/pdf/318/201607159020655318/201607159020655318.pdf#navpanes=0
youtube.com/watch?v=Pjo16QamjIc
congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/4310
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

can someone sue CNN for what theyre doing?
if so, they should.

Based Zyklon Ben

Where's the non-edited version?

TWO SCOOPS
W
O
S
C
O
O
P
S

My prof actually had a ben garrison comic on his slides but misinterpreted as an anti-trump comic.

Just replace CNN with Fox and Trump with Obama, and you have the last 8 years
>suck it

>ignores antifa
>ignores SJW movement
>ignores how much harder the media goes after Trumps image than Obama's
Spotted the retard. Probably voted for Hillary too. Loser

my asshole is a source

(((based)))

>Be you
kys

Yeeesss... Yessss... Let the hatred flow through you
>I'm here all day

Besides, Zyklon Ben only mentioned CNN and I'm only mentioning Fox. Butthurt much?

>unnamed sources
>intelligence officer that preferred not being identified
>incognito insiders
>rogue WH personnel

Not really. The 1st Amendment is pretty much sacrosanct and defends even the Jew's right to outright lie to the public. There are very limited exceptions, like incitement of riots and violence when it isn't a very wealthy Democrat-funding Jew calling for them, for example.

There was a law a few years back that made it illegal for the Government to use propaganda against their own people, but Obama removed that law. Coincidentally.

top kek

I think the media is right in saying back in the day anonymous sources were key and important to getting important news to the public. Key here being back in the day. I think today, in modern times where they are unable to remain unbiased they are abusing that function. These anonymous sources most likely do work in the WH but the thing is they could get the WH janitor to give an anonymous opinion and they will report it like someone with Mike Pence level authority gave them the information. That I guarantee you is where the corruption is coming from. They are legally doing nothing wrong but abusing a technicality to get whatever narrative they want out.

This is correct . Right wing corporate media and Fox Jews always tried to politically witch hunt Obama just for being a black president

Which comic was it?

I love Ben but does he actually think anyone is intimidated by Gavin?

>anonymous sources
>trust us, goy!

I'm going to enjoy watching this orange monkey fail. What excuse will cuckservatives come up with when they are still living like peasants in 4 years?

oh god i can't stop laughing. that picture is fucking perfect

Fortunately, all antifa cuckolds crumble when isolated and are prone to extreme anxiety and fear when their bullshit is called.

The idea that Gavin quakes them isn't wrong but it isn't exclusive.

>muh zources

>watching either

#sourcessay Trump sells 20% Uranium Mineral rights to Russians

GOD EMPEROR WINS

Hyper-radicalization of media is almost complete, can't wait to watch them crash and burn when Trump never gets impeached.

>AN ANONYMOUS SOURCE HAS SAID

...

Where the fuck is the memo? It's an unclassified memo which is in the public record now, and they claimed multiple copies exist. Why has no one gotten a copy of the memo?

>BEANS in the garbage

What did he mean by this?

This brit's right. Where's all the racemixers preaching about white identity in that cartoon?

ARE YOU FUCKING AWOOOOOO~ING ME!?!?!

Make one about Trump supporting white girl raping subhuman muslims with 300 billion dollars worth of weapons

you know it hasn't even been half a year right? you can't fix the country in months after it was being destroyed for decades

One news station against Obama and they didn't outright lie and make up a bunch of shit. Trump is having to deal with almost every tv station slamming him for false news that they're making up. Not only that, but every late night retard is making it their job to bring the president down, and every celebrity is attacking Trump. We also have the left wing idiots who have access to Facebook and Twitter repeating all of the false shit because they're too stupid to realize that everyone is making things up.

THIS THIS THIS

If the leakers don't give us their names so we can murder them then I refuse to acknowledge what they say

The press needs to just be shut down. Any facts can come directly from the president

worst Even Stevens character desu it's where he belongs

I liked trump, then that syria bombing thing happened and that other stuff, so i stopped like him. Now I kind of like him again. Not sure why.

>our anonymous psychic says

Was this thought up by a 12 year old?

Old Ben is losing his marbles.

>CNN makes shit up every day that is always proven false and or never backed with an evidence
WE SHOULD TRUST CNN AND SIMILAR OUTLETS, THEY NEVER LIE OR DO ANYTHING SHADY

>Wikileaks, credible whistle blower that releases huge amounts of actual information and evidence
IT'S ALL FABRICATED AND FAKE WIKILEAKS MADE IT ALL UP

"A person for familiar with this thinking"

Is the new one

The real joke is that even if you ignore all "sources" and just go by the official white house narrative you have to contend with how it keeps changing.

>"I was in the room, it never happened."
>"Yeah I did it but it's totally legal folks."

If you live in a Fox News/Breitbart/Infowars bubble it's as though this never happened.

"The sources are fake but the leaks are real" has unironically become the official stance of all Trump sympathizers and not one of them sees the problem with that reasoning.

>beans
>pizza
what did he mean by this?

Give an example and actually back it up with sources.

An example of what? The first is a quote from McMasters on Monday and the second is Trump on twitter on Tuesday. Wait, have you just already forgotten?

unfortunately this has been EVERY news story so far.

>BREAKING NEWS; SOURCES SAY: "(enter vague anti-Trump leak here)"


i swear they're just asking random homeless men around the whitehouse who normally panhandle from tourists and pay them for "leaks"

They can still be sued for libel and slander. The first amendment offers no real protection from that.

n-no i'm not baka!

Probably not but you could bomb their headquarters

>"The sources are fake but the leaks are real" has unironically become the official stance of all Trump sympathizers and not one of them sees the problem with that reasoning.

>user (((sources))) that prefer to stay unamed
>Leaks that we know where and who they come from, what and who they are talking about, and make the people involved wet themselves every single time.

hmmmmmmm

>gosh, i sure do hate people and things that convert people to the right!

ctr/shareblue fec documents

docquery.fec.gov/pdf/318/201607159020655318/201607159020655318.pdf#navpanes=0

BLARGIBALD BRUUUUMPF

fucking love ben

>any of the Russian connection allegations
>proven false

ayylmao

Where's the crime?
youtube.com/watch?v=Pjo16QamjIc

He literally just did

I have absolutely no idea what you're trying to say. I can't even tell if you're disagreeing with me.

Every aspect of the original Washington Post leak is now part of the official White House narrative. The laptop bombs, the classified source, what was said to whom and when they said it, everything. The story from the White House has switched completely from "none of it ever happened" to "all of it happened but so what" over the course of a single week on live television.

Still somehow people talk about the sources of that exact information like they can't be trusted. What would it take beyond every single thing they said being right? What possible other standard is there for a source of information?

>What would it take beyond every single thing they said being right?
If they stop being "unnamed" and come out and stand behind their claims, I will give what they say a second of thought. Until then I don't believe these people even actually exist and it's just the media taking random stabs hoping something will be correct/stick, which it did this one time out of the 1000 other times they have tried it for the last few years.

IT'S THE RUSSIANS PUTIN HELPED TRUMP WIN THE ELECTION

There's literally nothing they could say to convince Trumptards. There could be a documented evidence of Trump paying a Russian company to spread propaganda and you'd still say it's fine.
>But but but muh Hillary
I don't care. Throw them both in jail. Hillary is irrelevant.

It's clear that your hated of liberals, brown people, gays, and Muslims out weights your allengence to our country, countrymen, democracy and consistution. Just leave.

...

>a person familiar with his thinking says
>a person familiar with his thinking says
>a person familiar with his thinking says
>a person familiar with his thinking says

Jesus fucking Christ, the guts of these """journalists"""

Obama is a Muslim who was conceived by a Kenyan from a deceitful Jew.

What is a Consistution?

...

>there are people
>on Sup Forums
>right now
>who unironically
>and completely literally
>will defend donald j blumpfskin
>in having two scoops while everyone else gets one

We already know the identities of all the Russian Hackers

Leftist media has until June 1st to provide their evidence of a Russian hacking incident using proper evidence (diplomatic documents, communications records, audio and/or video recordings, metadata, etc.) or the story is a lie and they should lose their broadcast licenses and press credentials.

Really. That's the world your brain has settled on. All of the information is totally true by sheer coincidence.

Admittedly, that is the only possible explanation that allows Trump to be in the clear here. So you don't have a choice as long as your one and only goal is to believe Dear Leader can do no wrong.

...And allengence?

A source allegedly close to the intelligence community has told me that his/her/their trusted sources have instigated an evidence based invesitgation based upon reliable sources that a person (or persons) has or have based upon anonymous evidence concluded that his sources are accurate and verifiable upon the basis of accurate sources that an individual or individuals may, or may not have committed unfounded allegations of dependable lines of enquiry which may, or may not, implicate a person or persons implied to be, have being or have been about to do an investigation without evidence of being sources or otherwise.
Notwithstanding these alleged allegations which may or not be alleged to have been, or otherwise eitheir (or not) to be true or false.

Constitution Allegiance.

Going to be hilarious when Mueller says there is nothing and Trump wise cracks then do they spew that the investigator was a Russian plant. We all know it will happen.

The story you guys keep trying to pitch is that the sources are of course later proven wrong.

If we look at just this last week the sources for the Russia meeting have not only been proven absolutely right but the White House story has changed from "It's all false" to "every part of it is true but so what."

Mother fuckers, most of the claims in the fucking PISS DOSSIER have been corroborated at this point.

How fucking long can you keep clinging to this bullshit?

>when you spot the bike lock

Actually the message is the same you retard Trump said nothing classified was said and transcripts showed that. The media then back pedalled to say what was spoken with Russia "could lead" to a secret agent of israel as if that means jack all. Israel already called you guys idiots as well over it.

(((Three scoops)))

...

>Trump said nothing classified was said and transcripts showed that.
McMaster and trump both said that and when pressed on it they fell back on "well it wasn't classified anymore because the president said it. How could something be a secret if you are already sharing it? Checkmate atheists."

Also what fucking transcripts? There are no transcripts. There's just the leaks you don't believe. Or do believe. Depends on what time it is.

It honestly amazes me that people are willing to immediately assume "secrets" were shared or that "sources compromised" despite both of these things were elaborated as false and even Dem house leaders know they have nothing so say for everyone to calm down, but refuse to believe there could have been more to Seth Rich's death than "botched robbery" they have know way of knowing while the MSM is spamming all newsfeeds to keep people focused on outrage and there are organizations and willful participants flooding Sup Forums and Reddit to keep any discussion of it slid.

>mexican intellectuals
>mexican designers
>someone familiar with Comey's way of thinking

This motherfucker's comics are so cringeworthy.

Ben Garrison is such a fucking retard it is unreal. His drawings are the political equivalent of a 2 year old's finger paintings.

And they are painting trump as this Russian agent despite no evidence suggesting otherwise. So they can be sued as slander because that is tarnishing reputation 101. I don't like trump, don't hate him either I am in between.

>people familiar with people familiar thinking what the familiar people might be thinking Comey might be thinking say

Ben Garrison has become savage as fuck.
Hardly need to edit his comics anymore.

Gavin is the leader of 'Proud Boys' who are a bunch of hooligans that go to places that antifa show up and beat the piss out of them

all the sources are against Trump. doesn't that tell you anything?

That they're lying?

t. macrista

On 12/29/12, President Obama signed HR 4310, (at night, during the holidays, in the dark, so that no one would even know); the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act. Section 1078 (thomas.loc. gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.4310:) of the bill authorizes the use of propaganda inside the US, which had previously been banned since 1948 when the Smith-Mundt Act was passed. The media was also reclassified as “entertainment”.

He's the best cartoonist out there.

>Section 1078
I'd have to see this in action before I could come to a conclusion on it. it doesn't sound terribly controversial to me (you can ctrl+f 1078)

congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/4310

>that piece of pizza

>a person familiar with his thinking says
Fake news is fake news.

they just have days with new stories and days without it. Trump is what sells. if there is no story you make one up for the day, same as ever, but that doesnt mean that there aren't real stories on some other day

More like gay boys who are trying to get some quality man-on-man contact