How would 140+iq individuals with apposing ideological viewpoints interact with one another?

How would 140+iq individuals with apposing ideological viewpoints interact with one another?

A pooping contest.

They'd whip out their dicks and see who have a bigger one

They don't debate each other?

Hell no, when you're that intelligent you don't see other's opinions as worthy of consideration. The dick size on the other hand...

>apposing

you'll never know

Chess

i looked it up, it's legitimate word. I'm just a uneduceted polack but it's your first language

civilly, calmly and using very technical language

how would that even be possible? no grown adult with an IQ above 110 falls for leftism lol

now if a jew debated the merits of goyim accepting communism.... well, here we are.

basically this

through minecraft

Everyone who goes to pol has an i.q of at least 150 so just go to any other thread and see for yourself.

I know its a word but its not the right word

tfw no Sup Forums minecraft

with blackberrys

They would shoot each others.
That's what Stalin did

all is fair in love and war and politics

they would each pick a method including helping/killing/take over/working together

the thing about iq it has nothing to do with morality so the lucky and smart one will win in the end.

>Burger believe in that

good for you, maybe it's what he wants to know

By killing each other.

This

wrong

it's not and you're a cuck with a small dick

Not true, i'm a cuck with a modaretely sized dick

wouldn't be hard to work out if he really did mean apposing, apposing political ideologies would share pretty much all characteristics and differ on one or two key points, abortion, same sex marriage etc, think republicans. how would people with 140+ iq deal with these inconcistencies? a fact based debate would solve any contention in this situation quickly for these smart people. the problem of politics arises when you have stupid people debating other stupid people who cant or wont concede a point because their ego is all they have, they don't have brains to fall back on, so they cant give an inch.
stupid polack

semantics isn't a burgers strong point so stop it okay

You respects others opinions and behave like a rational human being.

I'll tell you when I meet another one.

I wouldn't want take your shit-post title away from you anyway. It's all you have.

>apposing
probably by mostly agreeing with each other

How long have you been browsing this website?

since 2011

They would set aside their differences to laugh at people that can't spell opposing.

>wouldn't

couldn't*

>Apposing

i disagree, people can get militant over small differences pretty quickly. Think different flavours of gommunism/socialism. And high IQ people have huge egos, because they grew up being rarely wrong in comparsion to they peers

if they have such high IQ point they will very likely have the same opinions, so lets ask a better question
can god heat a burrito so hot he himself could not eat it?

You should know the answer to this by now then, I don't know what else to tell you.

realize that debate is pointless and immediately try to kill each other as efficiently as possible

I mean that's one way of looking at it. a liberal way to be sure, libbers intellectuals are the worst

...

I'm doing it for the lurkers.

I never understood the point of this question. How would God literally being unstoppable against himself prove that he's not omnipotent? That's kind of the definition of omnipotence, capable of doing anything. To argue that he can't do things that restrict his ability to do things just further proves that his power is literally unlimited.

>a fact based debate would solve any contention in this situation quickly

Complete nonsense, almost all differences in politics come down to emotion, not facts.

smart people take loads of LSD, don't you know?

They'll seek to publicly humiliate each other in the open, while simultaneously plotting to kill each other in secret.

you're right. this doesn't make any sense

the contest should be for spitting distance

In my experience dealing with other smart people (IQ 147), we agree to disagree. It when you start taking to dumb people that the dynamics change. The best way for smart people to deal with dumb people is to ignore them and laugh about it later.

Like civilized beings, with mutual respect.

>almost all differences in politics come down to emotion
what is the most rational system of government?

He's saying the means are different, but their ends are the same.

The answer is in the question.

I have a 141 IQ, and sometimes it gets frustrating when you lay out an idea, and people aren't even grasping the fringes that have to be understood to get to the core of the central point. They seem to get angry that they aren't understanding things and revert backwards into these awkward stances that make no sense instead of just asking questions and figuring shit out.

Tested in prison, lol.

Dick swinging contest confirmed

Something like this.

Do you know anything about biology or psychology? I hypothetical question about human thought.

we can usually get down to brass tacks; we have a different priority structure of issues, or a fundamental difference in faith.
ie, if an argument or procedure relies on the question "does morality exist", then we might agree to disagree, based on that core belief.
there are some things that are just subjective from person to person, even if most people that tilt one way or the other.
there is certainly some validity to the rationalist idea that "people who are wrong just dont know it", but it only lasts up until statistical fact, logical supposition etc. if there is actually a subjective belief in the mix, we'll disagree there, and usually be able to identify that quite quickly.
>my IQ is 144

>itt everyone is getting trolled

thats exactly what the constitution is

i have an iq of 200 and talking to someone with an iq of 140 is like talking to a drooling retard

As the Buddhists say, if you meet another enlightened man on the road you greet him by punching him square in the fucking mouth.

>Holding lightsaber retard style

Whoever made force unleashed needs to die

Cool, can I ask you a few questions?

You don't have an iq of 200.

yea

Honest logical dialect with a willingness to meet in the middle to achieve a supreme goal for the betterment of humanity.
Why do you ask?

They made me take sociology to get my degree. But I am not sure how much of it I retained. I do see weird patterns in peoples behavior though that not everyone seems to pick up on.

Physics prof. here. You'd be surprised how orthodox the high IQ are politically. Practically everyone in my department is in the 130-150 range and nobody dares challenge progressive dogma because the majority won't debate or even register any argument. They'll just go strait to the department chair and lodge a complain.

IQ is indicative of a lot of things: Low propensity for violence, longer time horizon, fewer offspring, etc. But one thing it seem to have no measurable impact on is political insularity.

>lodge a complain.

You're definitely not an English professor.

its a pointless question indeed, would god even be stupid enough to try? its a situation that is just something that does not lend itself to happen

>They'll just go strait to the department chair and lodge a complain.
seems a 'high IQ' make you a giant pussy. literally no different from running to mommy and daddy.

Can the subconscious perform algorithmic functions?

>he doesn't know that the classical form of dialogue is one of the best ways to debate
You don't argue. You talk and essentially bounce off of each other's viewpoints until a conclusion is met. It's extremely efficient.

>How would 140+iq individuals with apposing ideological viewpoints interact with one another?

move their heads out the way and hysterically slap at each other

Fairly accurate statement. Might be a correlation between higher IQ and latent adherence to social hierarchy.

Single combat.

Jesus fucking Christ we're not aliens.

I have a Physics Bachelors ... I agree with this guy.

Sooo, dick swinging contest confirmed?

Dont be fooled by the iq meme. I know someone who is a god school wise, definitely 140+ but has many contradicting and some retarded opinions. Canteven defend half of them either

>claims to have IQ of 200
>thinks people with IQ of 140 are "drooling retards".
>not understanding that perception is key and is unable to be a social chameleon so is instead autistic.
brainlet detected.

There isn't one.

>Honest logical dialect with a willingness to meet in the middle to achieve a supreme goal for the betterment of humanity.

HAHAHA

you really think 140+ types are completely without ego anymore? they don't want to look foolish or come off looking second best. just like every other mope.

lol bitch don't tell me what i possess

yeah

>we're not aliens.
le humble gee shucks humility

biggest fraud itt

>high IQ
>ideology

Choose 1 mah nigga

btw, what is the SD for burger iq tests?

then how do we manage large populations with no widespread family ties?

what is your address

Probably play video games together.

I think it's more of a difference between those with high IQ and utilize more linear thinking and those with a high IQ that utilize more abstract thinking. Those that are more linear thinking tend to just go with the flow because it's easier and they typically don't think of such things (like politics) with massive importance. Then you have those that think in a more abstract way and more than likely go against the grain (with even more force due to increased ability to argue a point) than the average person.

I can prove it. I took an IQ test yesterday and a different one through mensa the day before.

86th post best post

If you've ever been to the Mensa forums, it's basically people autistically shrieking at one another.

Actually, they look a lot like Sup Forums. Clear cut political factions with traditionalists battling it out with libertarians, Christians fighting with atheists, and progressives being the whipping boys of the board.

Clearly ure not one of them "apposing"

this guy gets it.

the answer was no

Cool, thanks I might be on to something
I brushed on this earlier you know

do you measure your intellect exclusively through spatial games on the internet?

people who care too much about IQ are the biggest pseuds. it's a useful indicator. that's all. not something writ in stone that you can now toss out with a proud "I can prove it!"

wrong