Really gets the old noggin joggin

...

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_the_United_States
twitter.com/astroehlein/status/863059875978518528
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_Europe#Lists_of_incidents
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

where are the proofs?

This is why Muslim countries are more civilized

>Since 9/11
Just forget about the 24 hrs prior, start at 9/12.

>Since 9/11

Oh? Why do the statistics end on that particular date?

And what about the Hispanic, Asian, Black, Mixed?

In gun free zones

Between August 10th, 1946 and January 1st, 1947, more Japanese died from lightning strikes than nuclear bombing, just remember that the next time u think the USA is evil ;;;^)

>Breaking news! A group that's represented in 0.9% of the population kills less people than a group represented in 50%!
>So when you put the numbers next to each other, they're still far, far more likely to kill anyone, but don't let that bother you!

>since 9/11
>Since being blown to bits in a muslim terrorist attack you are 100% less likely to die in a muslim terrorist attack

Why do these statistics always start since 9/11? Why don't they also include other countries founded by europeans

Anyway, right-wing extremists never aim for conservative whites so it doesn't worry me. They're freedom fighters

How much you wanna bet that VT shootings are considered violence by a "white male".

>Adjusted for population size?

*crickets*

oh well in that case sure lets import millions of the cunts! thanks op!

>the chances of being struck by lightning is remote, so its fine to walk around a field in a storm holding a giant metal pole

>Islam
>Not right wing extremist
Why are liberals so unwoke

If you ignore more terrorist attacks, the number gets even higher! Evil white males!

And how likely is it to be killed by a nigger?

Always since 9/11

Also Muslims are like 2% of the US population.

I'm guessing there are far more than 7 times as many whites as Muslims.

Can i have the source on that? Sounds like I could have some keks with this.

Not remotely true, it is only true under leftist redefinition of any muslim terrorist as "mentally ill". Let alone the conspicuous "since 9/11".

San Bernardino + Orlando is already at 64.

Largest right-wing extreme attack clocks in a 9.

Either this is fake news, or there's a lot of right wing terrorists that aren't getting reported by the media that loves to focus on right wing terrorists.

Those two guys killed less people together than the Orlando shooter in one attack

American nukes never killed anyone*


*(since ww2)

Why do they always ignore the Orlando attack? Biggest mass killing since 9/11 in the US

9/11 was the Saudis anyway. That's not terrorism, that's an act of war. Literally admitted in public CIA documents.

And Trump is dancing with their King right now

Because he was actually a gay man pushed to do it because of bigots. Remember, any muslim terrorist is not a real muslim and therefore there are no muslim terrorists :^)

how can people die in a nuclear bomb blast if nuclear bombs don't exist.

HE WAS AN ANGRY GAY MAN OK SWEETIE?

>Since the Holocaust, Jews have not been targeted for violence or discrimated against in the Western world.

Hmmmm, I like this logic!

I can't take these levels of kike propaganda.

Since the increased scrutiny of muslim-looking travelers since 9/11, US citizens are 7 times less likely to be killed by a muslim than a domestic terrorist.

15 left wing
21 right wing
But I just woke up so if anyone wants to do the math be my guest.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_the_United_States

"Sources say"

Journalism
~1637 - September 11, 2001
R.I.P.

Why do people sit back and allow mentally ill to run their lives

>since 9/11
This trick again.

loved this

> 'it's because he was closeted gay'
> so he was struggling with his identity because of how muslims treat and see gays?
> 'RACIST BIGOT HOMOPHOBE'

Even if you ignore the the highly misleading choice of time frame...

they count San Bernadino as work place violence and Orlando as a mass shooting by a "repressed gay man" (he used grindr to find the place)

Include Muslim population in US and 9/11, let's see the results.

No one has been killed by nuclear weapons since World War 2, so maybe thing about that before being a nuclear disarmament bigot.

So rereading it all the only way this works out is if you count wikis definition of left wing and right wing extremism plus white supremacy, which works out to 7:1. They obviously aren't counting Muslim and black attacks.

>The U.S. National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) define terrorism the same as United States Code 22 USC ยง 2656f(d)(2). The Center also defines a terrorist act as a "premeditated; perpetrated by a sub-national or clandestine agent; politically motivated, potentially including religious, philosophical, or culturally symbolic motivations; violent; and perpetrated against a non-combatant target.

9/11 was done by a National group, Saudi Arabia. It wasn't terrorism.

Right-wing extremist=any white guy with a gun.

Tweet
twitter.com/astroehlein/status/863059875978518528

"If you don't count muslim terrorist attacks, you're more likely to be killed in a terrorist attack by someone who isn't a muslim"

*


(*sources say)

Wtf I hate God now

Every major Terror attack in Europe since 9/11 has been done in the name of Islam. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_Europe#Lists_of_incidents

And people will still defend it.

>some people actually believe this.

>(((HRW)))
>(((Ken Roth)))

Sssshhh or reddit will call you a shill

I get that this is a joke, but tehnically people did die from the effects and wounds of nuclear bombing after the bombs detonated.

Pretty sure it's not even true, every time I've seen a similar statistic that includes a citation, a minute's searching will reveal that they fudged the numbers some way (stop counting before Orlando, conflate all non-Islamist terrorist attacks with right-wing extremism etc.).

also more likely to be killed by Hillary Clinton

Don't know what article you are reading: even that wiki page is just a list of arab names.

can we get military records on both these guys we know Dylan's dad was involved with the Clintons

kek

X

Oh boy, this """study""" again!

>Since 9/11
>Conveniently leaves out San Berandino and Pulse Nightclub shootings

Really gets the ol' noggin' joggin'.

Huh? What about Breivik?

Some attacks are missing why? I don't see recent attacks in Sweden and Germany and chechen attcks in Russia.

Also done in relation to the Islamic invasion.

possible to get killed by drunk truck drivers more than drunk car drivers therefore you shouldn't care about drunk car drivers. Good logic

Literally fake news.

>counts angry letters as a hate crime
>counts mass muslim murders as hate crime
>study considers angry letters equivical to mas murders
this is how retarded OP is.
no wonder his noggin is joggin. id want to put a bullet in it too if my IQ was 65

It says "U.S. Citizens" killed by "Muslim Attackers".

Muslim Attackers have killed at least 11,000 U.S. Citizens since 9/11.

At the very, bare, tiny minimum.

If 11,000 U.S. Citizens have been killed by Right Wing Extremists I'd love to see some proof.

(((SOURCES SAY)))

Since February 2017, the New England Patriots have won zero Super Bowls.

That's sone gymstastics

holy shit you guys reddit really is cancer. i got shadowbanned for worldnews for posting "yeah okay i get it some kids died and shit but like can we just cool it with the islamophobia for a second? these poor people are persecuted every day they don't need this."

That's some gymnastics

You just have to count every murder by a white guy as right wing extremism.

Lol. OP believes that Santa Claus & Easter Bunny exist too

To be fair the japs deserved the bomb

where do you have that number from?

>people who make up 1% of your population are less likely to ______ than people who make up 50% of your population

really gets the propaganda poppin

Yeah, I figured as much. It's apparent in their wording. They frame you to accept the right wing perps as always having been extremists, while "killed by a muslim" implies self-defense, crimes of passion, etc. etc.

It reminds me of when some Reddit marxist made this claim about Europe, and proudly produced a list of "right wing terror attacks". Which consisted mostly of fisticuffs, and some cases were included because one of the perps was BELIEVED to have right wing extremist sympathies. So in other words, a guy who once said "niggers" on YouTube and gets into a fight somewhere down the road is used to inflate right wing terror numbers.

In this country they also convicted a bunch of right wing morons who threw molotov cocktails at a mosque as "terrorists". Yet funnily enough, that stringent definition is never applies to muslims who do the exact same shit. No, then they need to have bodycounts, international connections, and semi-professional gear. They won't call the scum that chases people out of neighbourhoods terrorists, for instance.

The left is fucked. They are our enemies. I mean, I don't agree with some of the shit a lot of Sup Forums has to say. But even when they want to outlaw it, they're not actively shilling for people who openly want to abolish everything the West stands for.

What about by (((Asians)))?

I thought Bush did 9/11. Can liberals from reddit ever get thier conspiracy theories straight?

"Yeah we know Muslims killed thousands in an utterly subhuman attack, but look, since then here are some white guys with guns and mental problems who stand out among all the black violence that happens daily because they are so rare. And please nobody mention the sheer size of the USA and the small percent of Muslims here, or our strong gun culture, compared to Europe."

Dylan looks kinda hot in that photo

N...no homo

"US citizens" vs actual US citizens?

Stupid redditor, Mossad did 911.

sage this shit

I'm guessing he's using Iraq and Afghanistan as contributors. US soldiers are citizens, and we were fighting Muslims.

Muslims are right wing extremists. Islamic countries are far right utopias.

Are you going to tell me Breivik would have been a hero even if there was no invasion?

Look at that.
Perfectly good moving target practice for our boys on border patrol.

They are all false flag (staged) fake attacks, carried out by governments.

Look at the "SWAT" officer behind Dylan Roof. Why do you think they put a 15 year old kid *dressed up like a police officer, behind the arrestee, in the photo?

>Human rights watch
>Human rights
>Defending Islam

>military are not us citizens
Hmm...

>since 9/11

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

How many more times likely are they to be killed by a left-wing extremist?

Just goes to show that anti Muslim terrorist policies and homeland security work

>implying Saudi Arabia pulled it off alone as the sole state actor
MOSSAD says hi

>Since the Holocaust, Jews have not been targeted for violence or discrimated against in the Western world.

That's unfortunate.

SWAT doesn't do prisoner escorts, that's a prison guard you dolt

>Why do you think they put a 15 year old kid *dressed up like a police officer, behind the arrestee, in the photo?
i don't know, why did they?