So I did a poll on Sup Forums recently and turns out this is actually mainly a libertarian board...

So I did a poll on Sup Forums recently and turns out this is actually mainly a libertarian board. There were also many fascists but for you libertarians, how do you think the country should be run? I mean if you guys had your way, we would not be the world's premier power. I understand the personal liberty thing, but security is also a huge concern. So basically, tell me about why we should be libertarians.

Other urls found in this thread:

strawpoll.me/13024067
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I'm a libertarian, yet I agree with the right leaning political views.

We live in a very dynamic world right now.

...

What I see libertarians as is being fiscally conservative but socially liberal. Which right leaning views do you hold sir?

The way countries should run is by being subjected exclusively to the ruling of the party you vote for.

Then the parties should agree between themselves to a third party arbitrator in case of conflict between laws.

You vote for democrat? You get your benefits, healthcare, but also taxes.

You vote republican? You get lower taxes, no benefits, good military.

You vote libertarian? You get the drill.

Now, if you liked this idea, change parties for insurances/covenants and you have anarcho capitalism.

make anime real

...

...

...

...

>we would not be the world's premier power

Of course we would.

We'd just be a lot richer.

...

Isnt Hoppe a monarchist?

How? We would not have been able to create a massive army or even nukes for that matter. We would not be able to project our interests onto other countries which is what we were able to do for the entire 20th century.

No, he just prefers monarchy over democracy

How would libertarianism work without a democracy?

You still have an army as a libertarian nation. Do you not understand this? You just only use it when you have to, to protect yourself..

Refer to my previous post in this thread.

You would chose insurance packages/private cities according to what you need.

We'd dominate the planet economically.

Every corporation on the planet would want to be based here.

Why are you operating under the assumption that we'd get rid of nukes? They basically the most cost effective way of ensuring no one can ever invade you.

I'm saying we wouldn't have created them

Well we have them now so it's kind of a moot point.

People just need to separate libertarianism from ancaps. I'm a libertarian and I think Anarcho-Capitalism is retarded (top tier memes tho).
Say it with me:
"Small state does not equal no state".

Freedom for the white man.

Everyone else needs rules and someone to enforce them.

Of course you agree with right leaning political views, Libertarian IS right leaning

Immigration ban, get rid of common core, and none of this transgender bathroom bullshit.

Thts me too, but it can still happen under authoritarianism.
What are the basic differences?

>I mean if you guys had your way, we would not be the world's premier power.
you are being intentionally obtuse about race
britain, france, and germany were world powers too, and they had a shitload of white people
america has the most white people of any country in recorded history. when we realize our destiny shit will get real

Ancap

In one you have a state and in the other you don't.

This isn't particularly complicated.

Libertarians are minarchists: minimal government function for things like defence of the realm. Ancap is no government: there's nothing govt provides that private enterprise and free markets can't do better.

I said nothing about race.

>>What are the basic differences?
It's pretty self explanatory, small state. One of the basic principles is that the state should not be a businessman as it always runs its business sub-optimally. For example, not state enforced monopolies (or participation in some cases) on shit like healthcare, energy, water, the press, education etc. The main focus of the state should be on defense and the justice system (army, police, law)

ahaha holy fuck this ideology is ridiculous.

No, you get left libertarians as well, your Gary Johnson types, and socialist libertarians. Then you get the right lib from Rothbard, to von mises and hoppe who are down at the bottom right corner of the political compass

>The main focus of the state should be on defense and the justice system (army, police, law)
Thats how our country started out but now look at us.

You did a poll on people who were on Sup Forums at that time and bothered to answer your poll.

>socialist
>libertarian

Pick one.

This is just another example of the left trying to co-opt a party.

Yup, that's why libertarians use the gadsden snek flag

strawpoll.me/13024067
here take it urself

Last one I have 4,700 anons voted. It's always been that kind of split

Left libs get coptered mate

The thing that makes libertarians and fascists different is that right wing libertarians don't believe in govt enforced social laws of any kind. The strong will supplant the weak naturally, and laws hinder that. No govt involvement in social issues, nor economic. The govt is needed to protect rights, nothing else.

I'm not a libertarian, but I am a Constitutionalist.

Fascists are libertarians who realize pure freedom leads to cultural degradation which eventually removes the freedom of decent individuals to live their moral lives.

You cannot separate personal morality from the state. They are ultimately both components of one civic virtue.

...

Fascists aren't libertarian. They're deluded progressives who think the state owns you.

Night watchmen state where government is only responsible for military, police, and the judicial system