Mark Zuckerberg "We Should Explore Ideas Like Universal Basic Income"

youtube.com/watch?v=AYjDIFrY9rc

He's going to run in 2020, isn't he?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=sGssbaktT1I
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

i fucking swear if cuckerberg runs and wins i will end my life

Great. I'll be voting for him.

He's going to a run a touchy feely, everything should be free ticket like sanders and crash an burn.

>says the man making billions off of the system that he's complaining about.

Capitalism isn't the enemy. Lack of values and poor work ethic is the enemy.

>If Trump wins I'm moving to Canada

Fuck off you child.

If he does win America will become a bigger Orwellian country than Britain

Sup Forums will cease to exist

>literally shaking

Don't worry user, Alex Jones will beat him in 2020.

lMAO "universal basic income" is that code word for socialism

Well, all according to Marx, communism will have chance only in high-advanced capitalist countries.

Zuckerberg is not honest in anything he says publicly. You are a retard if you take anything he says at face value. It is 100% designed for optimizing his worth and personal value. He is a proper psychopath with limited or no empathy.

Also I totally support his fake shit though. It's hilarious that people believe his B.S. He talks truthfully about AI and stuff but the social progressive shit is 100% him pandering

nobody will beat Kanye 2020

How can anyone unironically like this awkward faggot? He has no charisma at all, he's a robotic kike shitlord why the fuck does anyone care what he says?

Majority of people are too stupid and too low IQ to notice he has no empathy/human connection.

>He has no charisma at all, he's a robotic kike shitlord why the fuck does anyone care what he says?
Because he says something which sounds right.

>born into family rich enough to go to harvard
>windfall to the tune of a few billion
>thinks he knows what the best economic strategy is

the arrogance of this guy is off the charts

never forget

>idk they "trust me". dumb fucks.
yes, it's real.

>Because he says something which sounds right.
Proofs?

Thats like winding up a music box, chopping both of your hands off and trying to keep it going

>voting for cuck cucker(((berg)))
Stupid red dit fag detected, you may kys now.

we should explore how facebook gets paid and end it

Oh, this fucking JEW!!!!

yes and it's the same shit that has caused global growth in western countries to slow to 1.5% annually.

trump's goal is to get it to 3%

It's not off the charts. He is much more intelligent than the average human and has enormous capital.

He is great at pandering on popular subjects. Although anyone with nuanced perception will tell that it is all over the place and not consistent.

Basically he is just pandering to improve the PR of facebook and his net worth or power. Trump is playing a character too btw.

>Proofs?
OP-post

For you, I shill for Zuck.

>tries to bribe voters
>Trump has him arrested for bribery with newly appointed FEC

We should explore ideas like gassing the kikes.

His "show emotion and connect" algorithms are improving. He looks more natural lately instead of smiling randomly.

We should explore ideas like making college free, giving everyone free food, and giving everyone a free mansion. Also move off oil into solar and make the sky and waters clean.

Basically zucker is cynical and just promoting bernie / trump style pie in the sky bs. Although he does it with an asperger's flair.

"Look guys, I know it's not fair I'm rich"
"You gotta get lucky"
"Das not fair"
"Gibs will change this"
I'm not buying it.

Sounds great.
Let's start with his.

>we don't do nearly enough
Give your shit away to the poor, asshole. Don't make the poor give their shit away to the poor.

Satanic communist kikes are the worst. This guy isn't even a good liar.

UBI is a HORRIBLE idea. It will just enslave you even more.

>cashless system
>get a card the government puts X amount on
>government can program it so you cannot buy certain items with the card as punishment for wrongthink

The way he scans for audience reaction is Terminator like though.

We should explore ideas like a new Congressional commission to investigate the anti-American activities of the tax-free foundations.

Universal Basic Income is a fantastic idea for businesses and investments
It would force lots of wealthfare bloat out the window and in the end might even save moneh over the horrendously overabused wealthfare system we have now.

You know its bad when the prospect of handing people free money may be cheaper than providing wealthfare benefits

Google already has a network with all credit / debit companies. About 70% of all non -cash transactions are already in a giant google database and linked to each american.

Those systems already exist. They aren't waiting for UBI.

Everybody is hopping on the Basic income train.

okay charles murray

I'd just do the good'ol assassination.

jews are horribly ignoble. on any matter, big or small, they know whats best for you.

If he runs, he's going to win. Something like 80% of adults use Facebook, 50% everyday. They know people better than anybody and they can make AB-tests manipulating feeds, ads, etc. so that they will know exactly what people think and wants. Sometimes better than themselves.

He will win 100%.

To understand why zuckerberg does it, it's pretty simple. He just wishes to maximize facebook value.

It's the same reason he didn't mind letting Xi Jinping name his first kid if he wanted.

The worst thing is low IQ monkeys actually taking his words seriously instead of the goal behind why he says them. I can absolutely guarantee you that zuckerberg doesn't give a single fuck about UBI.

Of course he doesn't. He just knows its the next big temporary solution to maintaining power and being in the in-club.

...

>Net worth US$63.3 billion (May 2017)[3]

He can finance twenty presidential campaigns with cash.

This guy talks and acts like a complete pussy theres no way he'll win

>He's going to run in 2020, isn't he?
Until word gets out in the mainstream that facebook was originally used for college hookup fuck fests.

Hes right in many ways you know
Welfare is right now being used as a way to not work, and its abused to hell and back by selfish people who ruin their childrens lives in the process
It rewards them for being lazy and stupid and needs to go
And while UBI might have a similar effect, at least it doesnt encourage people NOT to work. If you do work UBI becomes spending money, which is used to stimulate commerce

>hey guys, poison A is better than poison B!
>don't forget we haven't tried Real Communism yet!

>5 seconds in
>"wealth inequality"
Oh fuck off already. Rich as fuck hypocritical data thieving jew bastard

More like
>heres poison A, it makes -X and -Y happen
>well heres medicine B, it makes +Z happen, but its side effect is -X
>-2 is worse than 0, so medicine B is objectively superior to poison A

Or is this too complex for you?

Of the many people I want chained up in my basement, Zuckerberg is the guy I really want to eviscerate and use his intestines to make animal balloons.

>hey guys I'm too rich
>this isn't fair to poor people!
>how can we make the poor people like it more?

>He is much more intelligent than the average human

How many times will I say this. Being ruthless and having no morals doesn't make you intelligent. It gives you an advantage, but it doesn't make you intelligent. Jews don't care about being hated because they're a protected group so no one can call them out. Faceberg is literally myspace with more (((funding))). Or did you think it was just coincidence that the goy idea didn't take off in quite the same way as the (((same idea))) that, for no apparent reason, was massively praised in all manner of (((media)))?

Oh yeah. That's totally how communism works.

I hope you centrally plan my economy for me.

He was like "If I had to provide for a family instead of learning to code..." which translates to "My family was rich and sent me to a rich ass school and I could do all sorts of rich ass things so we should give everyone $17,500 to do nothing."

Universal Basic Income is such an obviously horrible idea.

Just regular fucking welfare encourages people to fuck around all the time and not work, not give anything back to society, not look for work, not innovate.

This tard thinks if you pay people to do nothing they will suddenly usher in the next great renaissance of technology instead of just getting high.

Nice fallacy
I also see, like communists, you cant do basic math either

When did pols posters get dumber?

He is more intelligent. The no empathy thing can be construed as a mental defect but has advantages. He can't really help it.

So the DNC will have Cuckleburg and the Rock. What happened to them not wanting inexperienced people again? Oh wait it doesn't matter what they do the DNC has a fair shot at being in jail before 2020 if the God Emperor keeps his promises

Wait, which is better, -Y or +Z???

Universal basic income ONLY WITH the complete end of all forms of welfare:

SNAP/food stamps, Medicaid/Medicare, social security/disability, TANF cash assistance, and the Mac daddy of them all the Earned Income Tax Credit.

If you REPLACED all of those with a universal basic income you would likely save a boatload of money overall, eliminate huge amounts of government bureaucracy/employees, and provide a huge boost to the economy.


The problem is that it's a pipe dream because the left can't take an inch without reaching for a mile, they want those welfare programs PLUS universal basic income.

>Let's explore something that won't even be feesible to inplimented for at least 30 years let alone make works
I hate that jew

What happened to option C? My professional work often includes statistical modeling. You know why the models don't work? Because fucktards don't get the feature space right.

Mark Zuckerberg will need congress approval first.

What about universal basic privacy, you kike? If he runs, Trump needs to push the privacy issue hard.

Some lawyer user should write up a thing that says he gives all of his stuff away to charity. And go in front of a crowd and see if he will willingly do it. Or if he just wants to give away other peoples money.

I would vote for Zuckerburg even if he wanted my left nut if he could get us UBI. I've travelled along the West (Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, California, Washington, Nevada, Oregon), and wherever the minimum wage goes up, there is widespread poverty because the lower class gets replaced with robots.

We're 5 years off from losing 7 million jobs to automation, and that's by CNN's generous globalist perspective. In reality, we'll probably be losing close to 12m jobs, since once the 7 million plebs are out of work, their managers are gone, too.

We're going to need that UBI before we reach 40% unemployment. I live in Arizona, if there aren't enough jobs here, we're going to have a horde of shitskins breaking into peoples' houses to escape the Summer sunshine and crippling poverty.

zuck analyzed the election cycle and realized you can just say lots of promisey things and get people to like you.

He is just riding a quasi-bernie sanders wave albiet more techy. He doesn't believe it. While your post implies he is a hypocrit. The truth is he is just saying what the crowd wants to hear.

yeah but he's a kike though, it's to be expected. The fake shit was Hilary, you can just tell she straight up hates niggers and kikes and yet she still spread her legs as wide as possible, that shit was hilarious

god I hope he actually runs only to get Jeb!'d
something poetic about his wealth being redistributed

Those are variables which are meant to only give meaning to positive and negative values

As one is negative and the other is positive you can conclude that no matter what the true value of those numbers are that the positive one is always going to be greater than the negative one, this is true for all numbers >0 to -infinity for the negative (so all possible negative numbers) and likewise from 0 to infinity (all possible positive numbers)
So in all cases +Z > -Y

This isnt a statistical model. Its just a small example of using logic to show one option, even though it is still not that good an option, is better than another worse option.

If the Republicans don't pass some solid legislation and the Russia fantasy stays around it will hurt Trump in 2020. I'm afraid it will be Fuckerberg VS The Rock. I think I read that The Rock wants to run as a Republican.

I'm convinced this man is either a robot or a soulless demon.

I just told you I work with models, and you saw fit to remind me that your high school half-math is not a statistical model?

Jesus Christ.

you first mark!
even out the money in your corp?

Welcome to Jews, user.

You first.

Give everyone on earth $9 of your own money and then you can start talking about redistributing mine.

Clinton/Zuckerberg 2020

And your previous statement asked about a hypothetical option C then complained I didnt set my bounds correctly. Which implies you treated what I wrote as such a model.
If you truley didnt need reminded then you would have not replied as such in the first place.

>Jesus Christ.

I've put a lot of thought into it, and I came to the conclusion that the best method would be to eliminate all other forms of welfare, but also to eliminate minimum wage. That way if companies want to hire people for low wages, they can do so, allowing them to not HAVE TO adopt automation to be competitive. It also allows start ups to be profitable out of the gate.

The thing is, it'd take someone from the outside to ever push such legislation through. Republicans hate the idea of paying people to not burn cities to the ground because they're jobless and homeless, and Democrats hate the idea of not having welfare for minorities, women, and anyone who isn't a straight, white, male. The Republicans at least make life worse for everyone equally, the Democrats just want to make being a straight, white, male insanely challenging while making lives for everyone else better.

Libertarians fuck off

>He's going to run in 2020, isn't he?
If he does then RIP in pieces America.

It is a model. I'm familiar with logic and analysis as well. You are not correctly modeling reality correctly by claiming that for all cases there do not exist any other options.

You're falling for the typical Jewish mind control. Educate yourself on psychological warfare.

youtube.com/watch?v=sGssbaktT1I

>explore ideas
This is why I hate liberals. They have nothing concrete, nothing certain, nothing definite. Just "ideas" and "feelings" and "reactions" and "what ifs". If you actually ask them to take their "idea" to its conclusion, and ask "What is your end goal, what is your objective?" they will look at you with a blank look of confusion and unfamiliarity. Because that's not what they do. They don't actually deal with the consequences of implementing their half-baked fantasies. They just "explore ideas" and let everyone else fix the problems that arise out of the incoherent plan.

Oh looks a communist jew. This is new

>20 trillion in debt because of entitlements and military
>hey, let's give everyone even more free money! oh, me? nah. i'll keep my money in off-shore accounts, and i'll live in my fortress island in Hawaii while you underclass plebs fight among yourselves :)

Same algorithm-based logic was used to plan Hillary's entire campaign. Facebook was trying to implicitly back her too. You really think it will be any better for mark zuckerberg? Especially since any sign of facebook backing him will be transparent as fuck and raise red flags with any voter who doesnt appreciate being openly manipulated

Check out the RAND Corporation's Delphi Method. It was in great effect during the Occupy Wall St. thing.

If they're re-engaging the Pavlovian trigger word "occupy" like it seems they might be, this might become relevant.

Because for this specific case it doesnt need to host all other options, such an open ended problem that musf consider a near infinite amount of knowable and unknowable options is not exactly a useful way to model something.
Though you make a point of my post being simple. It was meant to be simple, but for something as complex as the benefits and drawbacks of welfare versus UBI then it would probably have well over a few thousand variables that are relevant to juggle.

Having only A,B,X,Y, and Z for my model is a matter of only scope. As options C-W are irrelevant to prove the point.

>why the fuck does anyone care what he says

He's literally the 6th richest person in the world.

NatSoc = Aryan Universal Basic Care Package, Comes With Fee-Fees Included.

>something as complex as the benefits and drawbacks of welfare versus UBI then it would probably have well over a few thousand variables that are relevant to juggle.
That's correct. Generalization for reduction of the feature space is an important thing, but failure to mount a cogent argument for why to do so is indicative of the Jewish form of tricking nerds in to believing in baseless lies and in-the-box thinking.

Obviously, he already did a tour around the US to "listen to and meet the people" as a bullshit pr stunt.

It's code word for 'this is the way we can give people the bare minimum that they won't overthrow us and we can stop paying people a fair wage and then eventually we can just stop paying them if we need to and they can starve to death because they have no skills and are entirely dependent on daddy government'. They'll eventually frame your acceptance of UBI as a contract with the government and in order to continue to receive your goybucks you will have to consent to whatever crazy shit they want, neural implants (for your convenience, goy), whatever they want.

bahahaha, the US system is fucking hilarious.

the rock would be an awesome pres tho

You know, you raise some good points, especially if people are unable to think about variables that are not apparent or are not explicitly laid out.

That is a problem with many people now in that they work strictly within a certain frame of mind without thinking about the interconnectivity of things. This can lead to more problems than what they had before a solution was even attempted.

You know, this argument is actually pretty constructive.

If it comes to that, I'll buy a kayak and try to see if I can make it to that island where you stop the boats.

And what's the other option, user? Not doing anything will lead to complete societal collapse in the West. When poor people are out of jobs, the economy will fucking crumble. You cannot run a country where only the top 30% of people have income. Who is going to buy all of the consumer goods? Rich people don't eat McDonalds, don't shop at Wal-Marts, don't use Uber to get places, don't patronize family restaurants, and don't buy video games or music.

Automation = poor people mostly out of jobs (you cannot make every poor person a janitor, or a plumber, or an engineer, or an electrician) = no underclass to consume products = crashed economy = poor people revolting and a collapse of modern society.

You have 5 years to find enough jobs for 12 million people that
a) Don't require going to college to get (remember, poor people don't have money for college)
b) Can't be replaced by automation
c) Provide enough money for them to be able to afford housing, transportation, and spare cash to continue consuming
d) Aren't Government subsidized, a la a Communist system