Before ENTRANCE to college in the 19th century you had to read and write ancient latin and greek

before ENTRANCE to college in the 19th century you had to read and write ancient latin and greek.

The entire population of Florence, Italy during the rennisance was 15,000. In american we produce 15,000 masters of fine arts every year.

Periclean Athens had a population of 40,000, only a third of which were citizens. Green bay, WI has a population of 100,000. Compare their achievements.


The real black pill my friends, is humanity is getting dumber every year. Try to read letters from the civil war written by tanners and blacksmiths, and you will be shocked at the vocabulary, grammar, and rich allusions to stories biblical and ancient. Nigs are dumb today, but the darker reality is whites are only a pale shadow of what they used to be.

Take atheism, for example. In the 19th century its purveyors were Marx, Shaw, Darwin, Nietzche, dangerous men with dangerous ideas. Now its just a bunch of fedoras and a few jew grifters earning bank off of them.

Other urls found in this thread:

graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/education/harvardexam.pdf
nytimes.com/2017/05/26/opinion/the-four-american-narratives.html
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289613000470
math.mit.edu/academics/grad/timeline/language.php
twitter.com/AnonBabble

graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/education/harvardexam.pdf

Here is the entrance exam to harvard, 1869

>Implying that getting into Harvard now is easier

Obama went to school for a solid 20 years to come up with such chestnuts as "Thats not who we are" and "the right side of history".

Abraham Lincoln had one year of formal schooling.

pic related

Whenever I read anything written by people with ivy educations, what always strikes me is how LITTLE they have read. Much less than being conversant in greek and latin, none of them have read any of the classics or the bible and yet seems confindent to talk about it even though its plain they don't even have a wikipedia level familiarity with the topic.

>Take atheism, for example. In the 19th century its purveyors were Marx, Shaw, Darwin, Nietzche, dangerous men with dangerous ideas. Now its just a bunch of fedoras and a few jew grifters earning bank off of them.
I think the thread tanked because of this last statement. It was interesting at first, but that line ruined any serious discussion.

Hell take the decline of revolution.
From the Jacquerie to Munster to Jacobins to Communism to modern Buttplug Liberalism; in each iteration the values sought by the revolutionaries become more mundane, the tools less spectactular (from the mass cannibalism, to mob disememberment of the aristocracy, to police basements... to what, some fag professor with a bike lock?)... every iteration is just exhausting the point further and further.

revolution my friends, has DECLINED

It is the internets,technology fault, too many distractions, you have lots of content little time, calculators no need to do everything on paper and so on..

>Try to read letters from the civil war written by tanners and blacksmiths, and you will be shocked at the vocabulary, grammar, and rich allusions to stories biblical and ancient.
You have any? I've read a few epic Civil War letters over the years, but every time I find out anything about the writer it turns out he's an attorney, or a senator's son, or some shit.

That makes me feel straight up fucking retarded.

So what is the answer user? How do we regain what you claim we've lost?

Develop a plague to wipe out the cities, an emp blast to turn off the lights.

>Marx, Shaw, Darwin, Nietzche
Only Darwin is a valid option here and he wasn't atheist.

Yeah, you think Hitchens, Gray, and Harris are improvements?

Give me a quick rundown on how to raise my future kids?

...

The problem is meme celebrities who aren't better than your average poster here.

its pretty stupid of you to think that Nietzsche and Darwin were anything close to the common man back then

its pretty stupid of you to think i was comparing nietzche and darwin to common men today.

I was comparing them to modern atheists. Which modern atheists have comparable quality of thought in terms of being both lucid and radical?

icycalm maybe

The Latin is the only difficult part, and that's because I've never studied Latin

Higher education was once grounded in the classics. It was the reason why the West conquered the world.

If you want to know what triggered me so much to write all this shit, its this article:
nytimes.com/2017/05/26/opinion/the-four-american-narratives.html

This asshole has a degree from the university of chicago. Its tuition is 71k. He has a column in the premier newspaper in the country. And he doesn't even fucking know Exodus has to do with the EXILE and they never get to the promised land in it. JOSHUA is the actual settlement of the promised land, and it mostly involves the exterimination of the natives. Much like in america.

Its like a double ignorance, he doesn't know a goddamn thing about the bible or athens or american history, and here is he babbling his ideas to be declared normative for my fellow citizens. What really, really bothers me about our ruling class is they keep talking to each other about things none of them have actually bothered to read, or think about in a steady and quiet way for extended periods of time.

*cost of attendence is 71k*

>Take atheism, for example.
In the US, sensible people are leaving Christianity in droves. Meanwhile, more and more reasonable people are becoming atheists, with reproduction numbers to sustain a secular nation.

my grandfather got his phd from Cornell and back then they had to translate their dissertation into German and Latin

unfortunately, most of them just become secular humanists which is more cucked than Christianity.

>Mathematical proofs required for admittance to Harvard

I'm hard.

>Nietzsche
>atheist
Well fuck me sideways and declare me gay, you don't actually believe this do you?

TL;DR

The math part didn't change, we had the same shit during the entry course before university began, except it wasn't required to pass an exam.

Why the hell would I need Latin or geography if I wanted to study CS? Subjects back then had so little depth, people probably had enough time to acquire more common knowledge. Now every single worthwhile subject has as much material as all of them added together in 1899.

Western education is a joke. All you have to do is repeat your teacher/professor's political opinions and you get an A. They don't test for knowledge. They test for compliance. The West has fallen.

You're right, Sup Forums can't really understand how deep degeneracy really is. America's top universities are nothing compared to what they were 100 years ago.

oh get real chinky, the only reason the good thinkers and poets of the orient haven't disappeared is because of westerners perserved them, and your more likely to find a person who can read Du Fu in america than in China.

As for japan, who gives a shit, you were a counterfeit china before and now you are a counterfeit america.

When you take a PhD in mathematics you still have to learn at least two languages; usually German and French are chosen.

t. Doing it

the idea was a society of citizens who could interface with their intellectual forebears and have a rich interior life, not a society of technics who could spend 12 hours designing space age dildos in an airless cube, before returning to their depressing concrete laid commie apartment block and masturbate to ghastly pornography.

As a german, I wouldn't expect you to understand.

I can do the math part full, the rest I won't even try, fucking hell would get 0 in latin, greek and would be able to answer like 2 history questions.

Stop masturbating to your delusional superiority. If want to connect to their roman ancestors, they can do that, in their free time, or take the damn course specifically made for that. No need to force it on people just trying to improve themselves in a subject they find interesting. But as a fucking communist I wouldn't expect you to understand the free will of people.

this is bullshit btw, math phd is analysis, topology, abst algebra then dissertation

>Periclean Athens had a population of 40,000, only a third of which were citizens. Green bay, WI has a population of 100,000. Compare their achievements.

All low hanging fruit have been picked. How many people in Periclean Athens could write in their own language, how many in Green Bay can write in multiple languages?

Maybe at your local community college.

It's all basic stuff, anybody going to a good school here in Switzerland would be able to solve pretty much everything.

>swiss education

...

guys this isn't just a question of picking and choosing; hard data on psychometrics also suggest we are becoming dumber at an alarming rate:

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289613000470

Abe was a cunt who overstepped the Constitution and attacked a sovereign nation though

People just want a job these days, not an education. College has become a vocational school for stemfags and a political circlejerk for humfags.

you get that compared 1860s man, you are dumber than a nigger right? Start another thread if you want to chimp out about libertarian idiocy.

No it's not. You have to translate a paper in a allotted amount of time.

math.mit.edu/academics/grad/timeline/language.php

>humans are getting dumber
>technology continues to advance at an exponential rate

Is this an ayyyylmao thread?

>implying they don't let in every nignog and their 10 children
right

do you learn latin and greek highschool?

>exponential rate
dude, the difference between 1900 and 1960 is the difference between an airplane and a space shuttle.
the difference between 1960 and today is a gay dating app.

Wat

more like, between a train and a spaceshuttle, really.

Not even, hot air balloon.

Excessive sexual activity really is what was the final nail in the coffin.
People and their subconscious have permanently been polluted by the sexual revolution and regular pornography usage. We are what repeatedly do, the only things we are now are advanced breeding animals and nothing else. Copulation and self-stimulation are the only thing many people live for, no matter whatever they tell themselves. They believe they genuinely want to do this, I mean it it's pleasurable, like all addictive behaviors, the addict will deny that they have a problem and are doing it on their own volition. My friends, nothing further could be from the truth! You are engaging in a conditioned behavior, a very powerful one at that, that was previously confined to one partner for a limited stretch of time, mostly for the purpose of procreation. This deep seated function is actually our core being, and if exploited and abused as it has been, you will be slave to these base thoughts and instincts. You don't control them, they control you!


Masturbation was demonized (see onanism) as was fornication and promiscuity. While people obviously engaged in these things at times, the sheer guilt, the lack of stimuli, and percieved ill health effects of 'self-abuse' and 'onanism', meant the frequency of these activities for most people was a very slim occurrence and certainly wasn't affecting our subconscious very much. Most people had one partner and initially sexual activity was very high but it declined of course owing to the Coolidge Effect. Back then, they aspired and planned for long-term goals and learned. They did not have a conditioned sexual release associated with feelings like frustration.

Take it from me, if you want to be like the greats of the past, you need to live like them and to do this, you need to abandon the sexual excesses our minds are currently rotting in.

The Amish are pretty based

>"The greatest intellectual geniuses in both ancient and modern times led continent lives, and there is yet to be recorded one individual who freely expended seminal fluid who ever amounted to anything. In most cases, individuals who have achieved have been forced by necessity to abstain from sexual indulgence, as Cervantes, who wrote Don Quixote while in prison, or Dante who wrote his Divine Comedy while in exile. Milton wrote "Paradise Lost" when blind and when he did not indulge in sex. Sir Isaac Newton, active in intellect until the age of 80, led a continent life from birth, and so did Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo, both of whom retained their creative genius [until] an advanced age.

>We tell you that at every emission of semen you are losing the food and the best portion of the (blood) corpuscles, inasmuch as every particle of semen which is ejected will be replaced by more taken from the blood. This is enough to convince you that when you are ejecting the semen which should stay in the body and become reabsorbed so as to go and form the oil for the joints, new muscles, the brain material, as well as every other part of the body, you are really destroying or throwing away your life.

>"`You eject the substance of the synovial fluid. You send forth, to gratify a moment's passion, the very material of which the brain is made. This is a fact which you will acknowledge when you consider that all this semen is the material of which all these substances are made and supplied, and when the semen is ejected you have selected the best part of the body to go out and become to you a useless inert mass, which can never be restored to you under any circumstances. It is lost and gone. Then, the semen being out of the body, the sexual penalty comes apace. The penalty for this loss of semen is so far reaching and so concealed from the body of people of the present day that we do not know the exact spot to look for it. But we tell you, when you see paralysis, palsy, apoplexy, rheumatism, brain softening, bent shoulders and haggard face; when you observe a young old man and the dried up young lady, in all of these cases, and in dozens of others, you may set it down that there have been sexual losses and a waste of the bodily substance from the sexual orgasm.

>"`You will see this penalty all around you, and there is no place where you may go but you will see the fruits of this sexual indulgence to excess. The penalty may be denied, and all these diseases may be attributed to every other cause under the sun, but you will be right in laying it at the proper place, and that is to the sexual drain which has sapped the blood corpuscles of the victim before you. We assure you nothing can be so very enervating as this sexual excess, and any sexual mating is an excess, providing it is not for the purpose of having children.

Germans are robots, living for nothing but to generate tax money to be spent on rapists from africa and the middle-east.

there are a myriad of depictions of jesus that look similar to that predating caesar borgia

you give atheists a poor image when you spread misinformation

msm, gmo, pesticides, herbicides, fluoride, feminist, vaccines, etc, the globalist worked hard in the last century to stop the evolution of civilization

We might be getting dumber, but we have much faster access to knowledge.
Our problem is we are losing our ability to think critically, and we are losing trust in authority figures. Your teacher used to be a retired Doctor. Now it's just a college grad who's maybe 5 years older than you.

This thread is making me feel dumb and I haven't seen a self improvement general on Sup Forums in a long time. What should I be doing to expand my mind?

Read the fucking bible

you will always be alienated from the west until you do

That's a terrible suggestion, I hope you're joking.

you are a moron

You're on a good track, but such an action, if done quickly, would leave us open to genuine takeover from a hostile nation -- A nation whose leaders' interests do not align with yours or the people's.

the plague wouldn't be released in our nation

you shouldn't kid yourself about what releasing a plague will do to humanity worldwide

The problem isn't that people are becoming dumber, quite the opposite. People are the most educated tvey ever have been in history.

The problem is in *what* people are becoming educated in. Hundreds of years ago, the only mass printed media would have been the classics and the Bible. Now, we have such an infinite amount if media to choose from, that people can actually pick and choose what they enjoy to consume and study.

Ask your average teen about their favorite band, a housewife about their favorite show, or a man about their favorite sports team, they will give you a near encyclopedic account of their history both past and modern.

People are spending 10,000 hours, the amount of time it generally takes to "master" something, on texting and videogames, where as ancient peoples spent that time doing things that to us now seem reserved for only the most educated, like re-reading the Bible and ancient classics.

In reality the "classics" have become obsolete as entertainment, and modern media is almost solely based on entertainment, so it's no wonder that people choose one over the other.

You are over estimating your own intelligence.

Straight up virgin nerds trying to rationalize being unfuckable.

They drug, molest, and otherwise disable those of us who have proclivities towards such thinking.

This is not coincidence.

I'm a chimp compared to 19th century man, a WORM compared to medieval man

You are not being fully honest in your responses, most of which I judge to be intentionally offensive and cryptic. The arrogance you've displayed in the entire thread has put me off, and I am abandoning you.

>tfw brainlet

blacks managed to turn the Bronx into a pile of rubble..

even though the Bronx is located in the center of one of the most advanced and wealthiest metropolises ever built by man.

That is an incredible achievement, and a testament to their total inferiority.

You'd be surprised how many smart people are still out and about. Trouble is competing against our current culture which caters to the lowest common denominator which is dropping steadily all the time due to low birth rates for whites and immigration and high birth rates for nigmudspics etc.

you haven't read a goddamn thing, tough break you don't have the nepotistic connections to be writing equally braindead articles for the nyt

Now I understand where the meme of studying came from.

Sorry but studying for the GED is not a PhD program. Your tutor just has you sucking his Pretty huge Dick.

>The student may bring a dictionary to use during the exam.
>The purpose of the requirement is not to require fluency in any of the languages, but to encourage students to develop the minimal skills needed to read the mathematical literature in a language other than English

To prove you're smart enough to understand more things than the minimum necessary to do a job.
The point of university is not to create workers, but thinkers.

Yo ain't gotten yo dick wet. And yo ain't no Da Vinci.

It is depressing to see how far things have fallen academically. There are very few academies left that teach children according to the trivium. It has been replaced with meaningless drivel like gender studies, pornography as art and film, etc... the classics are fading, along with intellect.

its true. theres some study showing reaction times have gotten significantly slower since like the 1800s. probably lots of defects from environmental disturbances. same pattern shows up in T levels too for example. were getting worse in every way.

I wholeheartedly agree OP, but I don't really have much more to add to the topic. You hit the nail on the head in a lot of your points.

>What really, really bothers me about our ruling class is they keep talking to each other about things none of them have actually bothered to read, or think about in a steady and quiet way for extended periods of time.

Our (((ruling class))) are utterly revolting. See pic related for an example

Ignoring the problems that tend to be unsolvable, like the complexity of technology and the efficiency-driven mindset of consumer-capitalist-democracy which communications technology enables making "circles" more responsible for new discoveries than individuals, and those circles less wide and free-flowing, the single biggest problem in terms of culture is the technocratic view the modern society has of the state and its citizens.

>Our common parlance has become compressed with the conception of education as some sort of manufacturing process. Our children are the ‘raw material’; we desiderate for their education ‘modern methods' which must be ‘efficient' but ‘cheap’ [...]
>In our adoption of the standpoint here indicated there is involved a primary blunder as to the nature and functions of education. For education has not to do with the manufacture of things, but with fostering the growth of things. And the conditions we should strive to bring about in our education system are not the conditions favourable to the rapid and cheap manufacture of ready-mades, but the conditions available to the growth of living organisms - the liberty and the light and the gladness of a ploughed field under the spring sunshine.
You aren't taught more than you need so that your teachers can pass you, and neither are they. Even those born into the "elite" don't receive any training to do anything other than remain so. They like society abandoned the Greco-Roman-Christian valuing of philosophy, and are just another decadent, superstitious, idolatrous class whose duty consists in schmoozing (aka "activism") rather than an individual-oriented "aristocratism".