UN population replacement

What the absolute fuck is this?

un.org/esa/population/publications/migration/migration.htm

Other urls found in this thread:

bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-05-24/american-prosperity-depends-on-a-nonwhite-future
m.youtube.com/watch?v=p3XuSo03N7s
youtube.com/watch?v=mArV4QryF48
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peasants'_Revolt
news.berkeley.edu/2014/01/06/suburban-sprawl-cancels-carbon-footprint-savings-of-dense-urban-cores/
armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/understanding-cycles/benchmarks-to-false-moves-the-constant-cycle-of-change/
youtube.com/watch?v=DFrJF-noN7A
youtube.com/watch?v=VJivXSErhB8
twitter.com/UNmigration/status/865474920951693312
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-latest-australia-india-tell-uk-relax-immigration-rules-free-trade-deal-eu-visa-restrictions-a7540036.html
archive.is/SGem6
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Bump.

...

...

SHUT
IT
DOWN

Kallergi Plan

>gee lets cure the symptoms instead of the cause

As I've said before, this is the second part of the
>muh overpopulation scam
and the second anyone fucking tells you about how we have to do our part to prevent overpopulation, you pull this out. They don't want less people, they just want less of us.

Isn't this ethnic cleansing by the UN's own definition?

People need to talk about this more, especially with this report out saying they are considering doing exactly what he said he wanted done.

The UN is infiltrated by the Muslim Brotherhood, the reason they come up with this bullshit is to establish a global caliphate.

UN is evil, must be stopped.

BUMP

Capitalism's reserve army.
And also (((them))).

The UN is a group of limp dick quasi-humanitarian bureaucrats and should be abolished like its predecessor. It fell so low that it houses Saudi Arabia at a women’s rights commission and human rights commission, a state known for numerous violations of both. They can't denounce the slaughter of children in Yemen, they couldn't do shit when the US slaughtered civilians in the millions in Iraq and Afghanistan, they reprimanded Assad for alleged war crimes while the alternative was a ISIS controlled country, displacing even more of its population, most of them fleeing into Europe, mixed with some snackbars to cause mayhem here. And then they have the balls to tell us that we're not humanitarian enough and that controlled immigration inspection - who is actually a refugee and who is a migrant exploiting the situation for his own monetary gains - is illegal. The organization itself is impotent, without any real power, just for show so that everyone believes they have a voice. The truth is that they don't, everything is agreed upon under the table and out of sight.

bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-05-24/american-prosperity-depends-on-a-nonwhite-future

Badabada bing bing bong
Wheewzers guvnor, it's a whole load of nothing.

this is truly sad if true in a couple or few years what's happening in europe is going to happen in japan damn that is a sad prospect to think about

>over population
>population replacement!

What is suicide/genocide?

>US slaughtered civilians in the millions in Iraq and Afghanistan
No, Muslims killed each other in the millions

This 100%. I used to love the UN because in my naive view they were the "good guys" representing progress and stability, until I actually learned about what it does and how they do it.

They are either a tool of some malevolent cabal trying to create a new world order, or just an ineffectual clusterfuck that proves why that new world order would never work well. Either way, the UN is an enemy of all the peoples of the world.

Are you concerned about Switzerland's future? You have lot of immigrants but on the other hand most of them are Western European. Still, they are not swiss.

>Free education and healthcare is communism!
>We need to cut support programs too!

Now we need migrants to support the economy. Otherwise aging population will fuck us over and we will face a shortage of workers.

>OH WHY ARENT YOU MAKING KIDS WHEN YOURE SATTLED WITH DEBT?
>It must be ((their)) doing!

Why is pol so fucking stupid?

You exist for the "too big to fail" corporate puppet masters now, goys!

>0,05€ withdrawn from your account, please improve

They shape policy though. Of course they can't go and force you to take Bosnians Tito-style. But they will "suggest" you take them, and because our politicians (and electorate) still think of the UN as something with integrity, they will gladly take that advice of the wise people in New York.

I AM FUCKING REEING WE ARE HEADING TOWARDS AN AGE OF AUTOMATION, WE NEED A POPULATION REDUCTION, NOT A POPULATION REPLACEMENT, AND FROM 3RD WORLD SHIT HOLES NO LESS

FUCK OFF AND DIE NWO

It's the muslim brotherhood's global outreach program. Read The Plan.

This is based on the assumption of economic growth as an inherent good. That assumption is held today by both parties and by the wealthy in the US; if you support capitalism then it is rationally consistent to support this.

The concept of international law is a bullshit veneer to cover over the obvious reality that all countries will behave to benefit their own interests.... and that the most powerful group will get its way.

>UN

you don't need to be able to defend yourself goyim

The prospects of automation are few. Many of the most important industries cannot be automated in the foreseeable future. Population models are based on the required workforce to produce economic growth trends. In the US today housing prices are skyrocketing because we lack the necessary manpower to build new houses fast enough; this factors bigly into the economy overall. The problem is that le alt right supports deregulated neoliberal capitalism but at the same time doesn't understand what that requires.

quality post deserves a (You)

Is there a name for the prophecy (((they))) believe where whites will bring about (((their))) destruction?

This makes rational sense towards the migrations. Countries look out for their own interest. Low fertility and morality rates totally fuck a country up.

It's a study from 2001. It's not official policy, it's not even considered by the UN.

Doesn't change the fact that some interest groups are actively working on it.

Unfortunately I can't find the names of the original authors, they hide behind their UN office as publisher of the study.

Easiest way to grow the economy is;

>Grow population

>Increase productivity

Mass migration necessarily increases the population. Increased labour pools, ethnically dispersed, makes for higher productivity (competition encouraging harder work for less wages and diversity undermining unionization).

An increase in GDP doesn't need to be accompanied by an increase in economic equality. In fact, the higher the population (the deeper the labour pool) the less power organized labour has and the more power the owners of industry or property have (not to mention people earning from gatekeeping and descended wealth like landlords) a vested interest in steadily increasing populations.

As people become wealthy, they reproduce at lower rates. Concentrating more on quality over quantity (quantity being necessary for poor people who have no state system to rely on in their old age). This is why rich countries breed less and poor countries breed more.

So, for those at the top of the pyramid, it's necessary to keep punching up those population numbers.

Now, I'm not really into the Climate Change/Denial debate. But I do notice a number of their plans involve corralling people into mega cities and leaving "Green" areas depopulated. And that you can "offset" your carbon imprint with a "sin tax" - a modern day "indulgence", allowing people of great wealth to maintain their lifestyles and remain separated from the plebs in the mega cities.

Anyone want to point out where I might be going wrong with this idea?

The US actually has the most stable population control system as it is now.

i like how "low fertility" countries are all ones that arent home to shit skins

First week on Sup Forums?

Just let it happen goy we know what's best

You're totally right. People imagine world politics to be a conflict of nations but in reality we have a small (getting smaller) group of super-wealthy elites defining policy based on their interests. And if you're poor it doesn't matter what race you are; they are trying to either depopulate you or subject you to postmodern serfdom. Hitler really had the right idea by making his own currency and usurping the authority of international finance. I also believe he only did the Jew thing because it is easier to control the untermenschen by giving in to their hatred and fears. Anyway I want to start an esoteric nazism general but I'm too lazy.

thats why we're going to get there first

You're woke af, famalam. This needs to be added to the redpilled repository ASAP.

What they don't seem to realise (or maybe they do) is that shitskins don't migrate for work, they migrate for benefits and free healthcare. Only white people work, which is why white countries have all the wealth.

The world's elite families defining national and international policy so that their interests continue to be served.

Nope, you pretty much nailed it.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=p3XuSo03N7s

By 2050 we'll all be living in mega cities without private property. Living outside the city will be illegal except for the mega-rich. Micro-chipping, mass surveillance (even more than we have now), one child policies - basically communist China is coming to the west.

This seems more apparent by the day

This sounds dystopian af.
You should write a book, user.

Holy fuck. We are up against the world. Why do our elites want us dead...

Oy veyim stop reading goyim.

Niggers can't read and lowskill work is disappearing fast

...

Boomers will be dead by then and it's not their problem - It's not a coincidence that Teresa May, Macron, Merkel, etc etc are childless.

Amen

>living outside the city will be illegal
I would think this was dystopian but then I remember that the Chinese government is doing just that to the nomadic and agrarian people outside of the cities.

Because pic related.

youtube.com/watch?v=mArV4QryF48

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peasants'_Revolt

>The Peasants' Revolt, also called Wat Tyler's Rebellion or the Great Rising, was a major uprising across large parts of England in 1381. The revolt had various causes, including the socio-economic and political tensions generated by the Black Death in the 1340s, the high taxes resulting from the conflict with France during the Hundred Years' War, and instability within the local leadership of London. The final trigger for the revolt was the intervention of a royal official, John Bampton, in Essex on 30 May 1381. His attempts to collect unpaid poll taxes in Brentwood ended in a violent confrontation, which rapidly spread across the south-east of the country. A wide spectrum of rural society, including many local artisans and village officials, rose up in protest, burning court records and opening the local gaols. The rebels sought a reduction in taxation, an end to the system of unfree labour known as serfdom and the removal of the King's senior officials and law courts.

contd

Higher population = technological advancement = the masses having the means to not be enslaved to the debt based financial system = elites are no longer as elite, which they find unacceptable. They don't want us being anything other than poor, subservient, and non-threatening.

contd

>In 1348 a plague known as the Black Death crossed from mainland Europe into England, rapidly killing an estimated 50 per cent of the population.[7] After an initial period of economic shock, England began to adapt to the changed economic situation.[8] The death rate among the peasantry meant that suddenly land was relatively plentiful and manpower in much shorter supply.[9] Labourers could charge more for their work and, in the consequent competition for labour, wages were driven sharply upwards.

>Over the next few decades, economic opportunities increased for the English peasantry.[19] Some labourers took up specialist jobs that would have previously been barred to them, and others moved from employer to employer, or became servants in richer households.[20] These changes were keenly felt across the south-east of England, where the London market created a wide range of opportunities for farmers and artisans.[21] Local lords had the right to prevent serfs from leaving their manors, but when serfs found themselves blocked in the manorial courts, many simply left to work illegally on manors elsewhere.[22] Wages continued to rise, and between the 1340s and the 1380s the purchasing power of rural labourers increased by around 40 percent.[23] As the wealth of the lower classes increased, Parliament brought in fresh laws in 1363 to prevent them from consuming expensive goods formerly only affordable by the elite. These sumptuary laws proved unenforceable, but the wider labour laws continued to be firmly applied.

Now...Does anyone remember World War 1 and World War 2? 100 Million people, mainly in Europe...Wiped out.

What did the twenty years after World War 2 look like? Pic related.

Mid 20th Century Serfs living way above their station.

Maybe I'm just drunk right now, but it feels like what's happening.

I'll see if I can dig it up (we should dig into this as a collective on Sup Forums actually - try to find some white papers) but there was an article some years ago in U.K. Wired detailing proposals to cease zoning residential areas and cease providing infrastructure support and the like to regional zones to force people to move back to the cities "for the environment".

So are you saying the plague was intentionally brought into Europe to cull the population?

What else were they supposed to be? As we grew more and more comfortable with life the need to rear children to guarantee you are looked after in your old age disappeared. Without conflict we had no reason to fear our lives our livelihoods, so we shifted our focus on to smaller details.

The more comfortable we became, the more time we found to complain. The more secure we became, the deeper we looked for these complaints.

It is hard to put into words but im sure you can see what im saying. Like a neet without a job or social life fixates on things like anime and calling people niggers on the internet, a society without threat of existence fixates on picking itself apart just to complain about something

>the prospects of automation are few

There are plenty of studies which show the opposite

It makes sense in the US the same has been happening although I don't know how officially it is being promoted. All of the economic activity has been focused on Metropolis areas with the Middle of the country and other peripheral zones dying slow deaths.

No. Quite the opposite.

The plague wiped out 50% of the labour force of the U.K.

This is back in a period where offshoring manufacturing or mass importing replacement populations wasn't feasible.

What happened was that there wasn't enough serfs to go around. Suddenly Lords were poaching other Lords serfs by offering them money, and then other Lords would offer them more money. Then serfs started migrating around the country, going where wages and conditions were best.

Sumptuary laws were introduced. These laws were to prohibit serfs from owning clothes and transport or seeking education and services previously only affordable by the elites. They couldn't bare to see their serfs not only having the ability to walk out on them if they didn't get what they were worth, but also being able to dress and behave like them.

So they basically just came in and told them;

1. You're going to pay taxes massively out the ass. Especially because we're going to war with France (it's not important if no Frenchmen ever called you Serfnigger, serfnigger).

2. You will be banned from leaving your area or doing shit like buying private property or sending your kids to school

There was a great big rebellion and lots of violence and finally the kings put them back in their place.

After the two World Wars, the western world was in a similar position. You had high wages, strong unions, economic egalitarianism to a degree...a generally much higher standard of living.

In the mid 60's, Europe and the U.S. threw open their borders to the third world.

90% (at least) white nations are now sinking gradually towards minority white countries, as the standards of living plummet (while wealth increases and solidifies among the topper echelons of the population).

Pic related. productivity vs wage growth.

Look at the point where it splits - Late 60's.

The U.S. introduced their massive immigration reforms in 1965. The U.K. solidified theirs in 1968.

I'm too drunk and tired to look now, but there's stuff like this;

news.berkeley.edu/2014/01/06/suburban-sprawl-cancels-carbon-footprint-savings-of-dense-urban-cores/

Reports demonstrating that suburbia cancels out the benefits of environmentally friendly cities.

>Mid 20th Century Serfs living way above their station.
>Maybe I'm just drunk right now, but it feels like what's happening.

Well you're correct, but then again I'm also drunk

We used to be taught this in school, and they still teach it to children.

The doctrine is this: We need migrants to replace us because we give birth to so few children. We need migrants to replace us because people live longer, and we don't have enough workers to sustain the increasing population of elders. Global warming will cause the lands of Africa and the Middle east to become unsustainable, and we need to prepare ourselves for a huge influx of climate refugees. The western world have got it's wealth from the industrial revolution which caused huge amounts of pollution. Today we have environmental regulations that makes it more difficult for development countries to become industrialized, that is why we must pay for the industrial development of the third world. African countries lend huge amounts of money from us, that they struggle to pay back. Now they pay more interest to us than they receive in aid ... and it goes on.

They'll get Asian minorities like Vietnamese just like we do. It's not that bad.

That's basically all what geography lessons at my school were about.
>Poor poor motumbo in random 3rd world shithole can't grow yams wat can we doo to heeelp him

pic related

>Need migrants to pay for our retirement
Who will pay for the migrants retirement? Need ever more migrants for this Ponzi scheme

>Climate change refugees
So move millions of people from low carbon third world economies into high carbon first world economies? They will use more fossil fuels, waste more resources, emit more greenhouse gases than if they stay in the undeveloped countries.

>Just as the British Empire rapidly collapsed following World War I handing that title of Financial Capital of the World to the USA, we will see the same take place as that title moves to China. One of the critical factors that will kill the US economy will be taxes and overregulation – both the socialist’s dreams come true. What broke the back of China and Russia in 1989, was this same failure of Marxist philosophies that call for total central planning by government. It is merely the West’s turn to now collapse because of the same philosophy of Karl Marx.

armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/understanding-cycles/benchmarks-to-false-moves-the-constant-cycle-of-change/

communism will cull the population

Let me guess. You read Things Fall Apart in school?

It's an educated guess. Numbers are higher in reality. It also didn't take the ramifications of unequal male to female ratio into account. They fucked up big time

Well you're not going wrong anywhere.
This is what's currently happening as we speak.
The rich will just wall themselves off from the rest of us and live in a kind of insulated utopia while the rest of us will be left to live in a kind of semi-anarchic state, with gangs, religious extremism, under the blunt of deteriorating enviroment. Middle classes will mostly dissapear in thw West. We might see them in the East more though. Even a formal kind of democracy we'll be abandoned.

The migrants that are coming to the West will not a find a decent life or whatever they're looking for. They'll get more extremized. More terrorist attacks.

I'm telling you folks they are preparing to flush us all down the drain collectively.

how old are you? australian education is starting to sound very leftist

Surprisingly we didn't.
But in german lessons we did read a book called "Tauben im Gras", written by (((Ranicki))). A german-guilt inducing, race-mixing glorifying piece of shit.

I always thought it was aging and not ageing.

>m.youtube

Get out

Cheers, drunken user. Good postings.

>I'm also drunk
It's not even in the evening.

I regret buying a house in the Netherlands right after trump won.
What was i thinking???

I am a hard worker this country does not deserve me.
Im being forced to pay the destruction of my own country.

The few `friends` i have can easily be devided in 2 groups.
- Those who have personal pleasure as the highest goal imaginable. Totally obvlivious to politics. (biggest group)

- Higher educated -self righthious leftist-liberals. Propagating pro-obama and 'anti-fascist` posts once in a while. Most of them have a non-western GF and/or speak fluently english, having done internship outside the country.
Obviously they are living with one foot in the netherlands and with one foot in a safe country already, as soon as the country is in trouble, they'll be the first to leave - blaming either "holocaust denying fascist"- reactionaries or high taxes in the process as the reason why they have to leave the country.

Likewise i see only two pathes for hard working normal folks like me in the netherlands.
Either migrate. Or a full-fledged assault on leftist-liberal idiologies. With holocaust revisionism at the absolute core of it. In which case we have to team up or even convert to Islam.

That's the choises we have for the west. European-Islamic. Or Islamic. Convert, or flee.
I am not going to fight and work to uphol the leftist-liberal state that saught to destroy everything i stand for.
It's just no option.

As former Chief of the CIA Bin Ladin unit, Michael Scheuer, recently said about Western Europe- Any country that lets in so many (muslim) immigrants deserves to be overthrown.

there's multiple groups who benefit from it so they work together

>mudslimes want to go to europe and make a caliphate
>kikes want to kill whites and make a golem race
>as mudslimes flood europe whites will start to hate mudslimes and then help israel get their greater israel
>mudslime dictators can ship off all their people to europe instead of actually improving their own countries/being overthrown
imagine my shock! mudslimes and kikes are allied against christcucks and they're winning as white women are the fifth column

youtube.com/watch?v=DFrJF-noN7A

I saw something about this on TV last night. Fargo.

A character talked about avoiding cities. That the masses of poor were coming to the west, and that the wealthy would have to get themselves some big boats and pull of up the gangplanks behind them.

It's coming. Quicker than I thought as a kid too.

Gonna be exciting times.

youtube.com/watch?v=VJivXSErhB8

If it's any consolation, our only hope down here is that the Chinks conquer us before liberalism turns us into an African-Arabic-SEA Islamic dumping ground.

The Muslim migration is a red herring; a prelude to the true genocidal replacement.
They send the Muslims to pass discrimination laws, then they send in the Africans to complete the replacement.

>WE NEED T DEPOPULATE BECAUSE WE'RE DESTROYING THE PLANET

>WE NEED MORE IMMIGRATION BECAUSE OUR POPULATION IS DECLINING

Which one is it, leftards?

where will you go?

this shit should be binned seeing as creating a race of hapa mongrels is Sup Forums's wettest dream you are the biggest tools of the jews ever

I got permabanned for no reason now I can't fucking start new threads.

I wouldn't worry about it goy

It's what happens when you let The Jews run your society.

U.N--> theirs an over population problem!!!!

U.N-->Theirs an de-population problem!!!

If any of you fancy feeling SERIOUSLY FUCKING TRIGGERED, take a good long hard look at this: twitter.com/UNmigration/status/865474920951693312

You have been warned.

I want information on that scene.

If immigrants are so good for the economy, why don't poor countries want them? They not only don't want them, they literally try to blackmail us into taking them.

independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-latest-australia-india-tell-uk-relax-immigration-rules-free-trade-deal-eu-visa-restrictions-a7540036.html

Declining population isn't a problem at all. There is literally not a single thing wrong with it and many reasons why it would be desirable. Autogenocide is.

Please remember to archive activist sites with a reputation for shilling and clickbait. Thank you.

archive.is/SGem6

How about encourage people to breed instead of promoting degeneracy? And since when has genocide ever been a viable solution for minor economic issues?

FUCKFUCKFUCKFUCK. The JewN has it planned?

>housing prices are skyrocketing because
of immigration. With a declining population, you don't need to build new houses. And capitalism does not require population replacement and never has.

You could achieve that by encouraging people to have more babies. But instead homosexulaity and transgenderism, literally amputating your reproductive organs, and all kinds of anti-fertility, anti-family values degeneracy is being pushed on children as viable lifestyle choices. If low fertility is such a disaster, this is where you should start. Not replacing all the faggots and mentally ill trannies with brown people. But of course, that is precisely the plan. You just fell for the we need exponential population growth for the economy meme. Because that's what the anti-chrisyian, anti-white jews want you to think.