Why does Socialism work in Scandinavian countries only?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2016/07/is-socialism-only-for-really-really.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Dunno, ask all those raped women

because they are (or were) 100% white.

the ultimate red pill is realizing that any form of economic organization (capitalism, socialism, etc.) will work in a white country, and any form of economic organization will fail in a nigger or brown country.

IQ >>> all else

because WHITE PEOPLE!!!!!

That's the answer you're looking for, isn't it?

>Small population
>No diversity so everyone thinks the same
>Money

All three out the window when you bring rapefugees

This

Even a fucking shitty system like communism/socialism made the USSR a fucking superpower. That itself is proof that a decent country can be made with most systems as long as the people are quality

It doesn't, it used to a decade ago when the countries were still somewhat homogeneous

It doesn't. All Scandinavian countries are capitalist.

It doesn't. It's to early to tell. Socialism in those countries has existed for 60 or so years. It's an experiment doomed to fail.

Can confirm. I was an exchange student in 2003, have gone back many times since. The place is fucked now. Wife and I are you going to Iceland this year for vacation.

Would bang 8/10

True to an extent.
Still white capitalist country will be significantly more prosperous than white socialist one.

qt alert

Pretty soon it won't. There's your answer

doesnt seem to be working so well in sweden with all the debt theyre accumulating. norway has oil so its a bit of a special case (money tree essentially). no clue about the danes.

>socialism works

1. Homogenous population
2. Oil money to support it
3. ????
4. Socialism

""""""""""works""""""""""

Danes: No immigration.
Same with Norway.

Because they were industrial capitalists first.

This.
Socialism is when the state owns the means of production. Last time I checked Ikea and Saab were not owned by Captain Sweden.
Does Noway Nationalize its oil? Anyone know?

hahaha im imagining interrupting some civil debates about which economic or political system a 3rd world country should use and just shouting that it doesnt matter what niggers use theyll always fail. Think of those facial expressions

i think they all get money or have a collective fund

>scandinavia
>socialism
are you baiting or you're just brain dead?

If everyone actually works and doesn't just mooch off gibs while shitting out more babies than you can afford, it actually works fine.

It worked when they were 99% white and being a welfare leech meant no woman would touch you.

Now they've been flooded by niggers and Arabs who view working as a bad thing and raping/stealing as a good and honorable thing.

It doesn't. They're all capitalist.

fpbp

I mean they have socialized healthcare, but they are far from full socialism. There are plenty Scandinavian private companies.

I think it boils down to actual ethnic nationalism. Notice how each of these nations are all made up of people who share their own common ancestry, language, religion, and values. It works there because, historically, everyone believes in the welfare of their own kind.

Hitler believed in private property and free markets therefore national socialist Germany was capitalist by your logic.

It was. The actual socialists were killed in the Night of the Long Knives.

she legit convert islam, burns coal and has shitskin children

it use to work until they let in the nignogs, dindus and sandniggers.

Entirely untrue, shill fuckbag.

wtf

Is she a Kike? I can kinda see it.

Because it's homogenous and lightly populated...well, it used to be. Only a matter of time before their welfare system is overwhelmed by niggers and sandniggers flooding in. Then their Socialism won't look so great.

Danes still have immigration. It's just way stricter.

Riddle me this leaf.

How come East Germany was a shithole while West Germany prospered? Or take the Korean people, another group with a high average IQ. How come North Korea is terrible while South Korea is prosperous?

Institutions matter. They matter a lot.

It was moral capitalism. NatSoc socialism is socialist in the sense that the government takes care of the people if shit gets bad or if the private companies end up harming the nation. The were not socialist in the Marxist sense.

captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2016/07/is-socialism-only-for-really-really.html

>Sunday, July 03, 2016
Is Socialism Only for (Really Really) White People?
The latest news coming out of Venezuela surprises no one who has a basic understanding of economics, let alone common senses. However it did jump-start a question that had been lurking in my mind before, and I'm surprised I hadn't thought of earlier:

"Is socialism/communism only for white people?"

And by white people understand I mean REALLY REALLY white people, because if you think about it, the only place "socialism" has worked (sorta), is the Nordic countries.

Latino/Hispanic Venezuela, Ecuador, and Bolivia have all gone through large swings to the left and only have a shortage of toilet paper to show for it. Chinese communism (again, not white) only managed to kill more people during peacetime than any world war ever did. Its smaller oriental siblings of Vietnam and Cambodia certainly didn't make a good go of communism either. Ethiopia (again, not white) needed both Soviet money and easily-duped 1980's American kids' monies to not starve. Greece, hee hee, Greece. And even the Soviet Union, though pretty-darn white and even the original practitioner, was just not white enough to pull off communism successfully.

Apparently, it is only the Swedes, Finns, Norwegians, and Danes who can do socialism the justice the rest of the world can't.

But why?

First, we need to take out the obvious outlier of the group, Norway. Again, the left loooooves rushing to Norway as the perfect place to live. It sure is, especially since it has so much oil it sovereign wealth fund makes all of its citizens millionaires. And remember, oil is evil...unless it's under a state owned enterprise, then you never mention it.
...

Great article, too long to post. click link for more.

"Why did it work in the past" is a better question. Scandinavians have a bit of a collectivist culture in general and are generally hardworking and productive people. The problem is that the leftards attributed it to "muh marxist social philosophy" rather than the innate qualities of the Scandinavians and convinced them that taking on shitskins would boost their socialist power levels and the economy at the same time.

Now they have shitskin economic dead weight dragging down (and occasionally raping and murdering) what would otherwise be a healthy productive society.

ITT
>muh white people
you guys and your simplistic answers

it works because it's not full blown socialism, as in, they still have a capitalist society and they use the economic output of this capitalism to pay for the socialized institutions. It works as long as the cost of running the socialized institutions is smaller than the economic output of your mainly capitalist economy

without capitalism, it would fail

They're still capitalist, really. Scandinavians love trade. They just love universal healthcare and post secondary too.

its true

shes norwegian

This

It's Capitalist

It doesn't, it just takes longer for things to fail with a more educated and wealthy starting off point. The reason now euro leaders want immigration is they realize their socialism wont worth if the population is stable or decreasing.

Its a ponzi scheme that NEEDS new human cattle to feed the beast.

Same with the US and the socialist implementations here.

The Norwegian state owns the oil, the money goes into a pension fund. Norway is buying stocks in companies all over the world and we own approximately 1% of all stocks in the world.

Most of the money is basically being put away for the future.

We aren't socialist. We are social democrats. Our system is capitalist, we have private ownership, currency and free market economics. The "social" is a bit harder to explain, it's essentially the concept that the government should always side with the people and not with the wealthy. Thus, mainly, at the expense of the wealthy we're given many services "free". The reason why I'm not just saying "it means we get free healthcare and education" is that the philosophy spills into other stuff as well. It's a compromise between socialism and early 20th century capitalism essentially. At least in Finland.

Just because she's cute doesn't mean she's not autistic.

coz there are no negros and women that leech of the working man

because socialism is really a much better system and nordic countries have always been socialist .

but the issue is not socialism but marxism. marxism is a terrible form of socialism which should be uninstalled from the world. i would burn every single book and completely eradicate all the marxist ideology from the earth. then and only then we could focus on much more functional forms of socialism european kinds that actually help people.

i'd say a center right 45% socialist 55% capitalist free market would be ideal with a monarch at the top and religious leaders having some political power (some)

no scandinavian country is socialist.
socialism and a welfare state is not the same think at all

cuck

It DOESNT.

The inherent problem with Socialism is that it requires an ever expanding tax base. The reason EU politicians want so many refugees is a vain hope that they will support the next generation of pensioners.

Can't have a market economy that functions well enough to pay for Socialist institutions when you have too many low IQ shitskin welfare leeches.

Dearth of niggers

yeah it is dummy

welfare is socialism

there are many kinds of socialism. for ex nazism was socialism. peronism in argentina socialism. what you got now in china socialism. canada is also socialist . etc

>d-don't worry citizen, just taking some resources to plan for the future so that we don't have to do anything drastic!
>citizen! accept these foreign hordes or our socialism won't have a future!
lol

You must be 18+ to post here.

fpbp and checked

So you think institutions don't matter? You're dumb as a rock if you think they don't. Look at China. A complete and utter hellhole under Mao, and then massive GDP growth starting with Xiaoping to the present.

Now don't get me wrong. IQ matters a lot and no set of institutional remedies can fix sub-saharan African nations. But even high-IQ groups such as White and East Asians will not thrive if they are living under shitty institutions.

whites by nature feel shame for taking welfare, so it really only is used when its needed.

Sad

>it works because it's not full blown socialism

So you mean it was national socialism? Because national socialism still utilizes free markets and allows for private property.

>Canada
>socialist
You either are really uninformed or must be from the Prairies.

homogeneous
this

It's not working. The only reason it's lasted this long is oil money and the US paying for their defense for the last 70 years. But now they have to import Muslims to try to prop up their balance sheet but as we know that's even worse.

ontario is socialist asf

you can cherry pick 2 counterexamples and I can cherry pick more. Look at modern day china.

you need to quote a rigorous study:

>Gerring et al. (2005, p. 323) conclude from their review of the academic
literature until the mid-2000s that “the net effect of democracy on growth performance crossnationally
over the last five decades is negative or null.”

institutions dont mean shit if theyre filled with niggers

check your flag...

(OP)
1. Socialism only "works" to the degree it's being propped up by the profits of capitalism.
2. They had an ethnostate and all the undeniable benefits that come from a homogenous population.
3. They're aren't really socialist anymore.
A "decent country" cannot be made with communism.

You know Ontario is getting universal basic income right?

It doesn't. Their collapsing birth rates and cucked culture is the sign of a dying nation. Socialism made them into sterile perma-children.

and the population, we're only 5 million

Because Scandinavians are honest and upright and they don't abuse the system.

Because they are not socialist! They social programs and they limit them!

So your saying socialism works when you are ethnically homogeneous? If only there were a version of socialism that was nationalistic...

rich country, smaller population, doesn't have to spend too much money on military, and mostly white population (until recently)

God damn that bitch is fine.

(until recently)
are you jealous of not being a white country?

checked and truth. you can't upend the fundamentals of human action.

I'm not referring to democracy. I'm referring to economic institutions.

Learn to think you leftist (and by that I mean someone on the left side of the IQ bell curve).

Read points 10 thru 21 of the NS program, please.
National socialism detests capitalism only moderately less than bolshevism.
Anybody who's trying to teach you otherwise is subverting.

Ontario is the autistic rich kid of Canada. No wonder. I'd rather live up in the fucking territories than in Ontario.

>Ontario
>1 out of 10 provinces

t. triggered norgaygeian

the whole institutions argument has an enormous endogeniety problem and is thus very hard to prove causally.

It seems just as likely that a country can become prosperous and then have fair labour practices and ways to settle investor disputers and private property than it is the other way around.

He believed in personal property (houses, belongings, etc. as opposed to big factories and such) and private enterprise (you enjoy rewards of your own labor but these rewards and the labor you do aren't determined by a free market, which is volatile and more-often-than-not working contrary to the interests of the society)

i'm sure it works in other countries as well, but it makes sense to make a country communist if they lack a lot of resources.

IT'S NOT SOCIALISM

I would say it's a nice mix

I'll drink a Belgian beer for that one.

East Germany was still orders of magnitude more successful than any country in Africa.

This.

it doesn't, moron

Who is she?
Their economy are completely based on the free market, this means that they are not socialists.

that has to do with immigration of low-IQ third world countries, not socialism. Doesn't the US have a problem with illegal aliens killing and raping too?

Low testosterone levels.

It's a weird capitalist/socialist hybrid. The socialist half feeds off the capitalist half like a parasite, so that's how it 'works'. If it ever kills the host, it's dead too tho.