You literally can't refute this. islamic extremists do not represent the majority of islam...

you literally can't refute this. islamic extremists do not represent the majority of islam. in contrast bomb muslims in our holiest month. this has nothing to do with islam.

Other urls found in this thread:

middleeastmonitor.com/20170517-shia-cleric-iraq-christians-infidels-who-must-convert-or-be-killed/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petro-Islam
hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/85-/3853-sahih-bukhari-volume-004-book-052-hadith-number-041.html
youtube.com/watch?v=JkAZUvQAzkc#t=1h0m45s
youtube.com/watch?v=JkAZUvQAzkc#t=1h02m33s
youtube.com/watch?v=EMGri1fYef8
gatesofvienna.net/2013/08/how-muslims-did-not-invent-algebra/
youtube.com/watch?v=-t6xAseMITU&spfreload=10
aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2017/04/case-gender-equality-muslim-world-170424095756513.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

It has everything to do with Islam. The "innocent" are the ones that enable the radical.


There is not a single follower of Islam who does not condone the actions of ISIS, as they are inspired directly by the actions and words of Muhammad.

Are you a Leaf on holiday in the Netherlands?

>Muslims like to blow shit up so much that they almost always end up blowing even each other up!
>let's import some into our countries!

but they say the magic words ;alla ho ackbar when they do the bombings so who can say they're not islamic? seems like people who don't do bombings and murders are not islamic actually.

ISIS is killing the "untrue" muslims who aren't willing to slaughter in the name of Allah.

>haha retards associate with some stupid fairytale made by a warmongering pedo but they're still good people lol

Yes you can.
It's been happening just like that since Mohammad died. Muslims have slaughtered each other since that day, during Ramadan because they believe the ornery Muslims are wrong.
Sorry toothpaste, YOU can't argue with history. It happened long before isis was someone's wet dream.

it has everything to do with islam. different versions of islam fight each other

*sips absinthe

religion is cancer, if they were in a cooking class or interpretative dance school that was known for suicide bombings the "moderates" could just leave, but cant do that with muh spirituality

Muslims are cancer whether they're blowing you up or not.

Please, even obongo-leaf isn't that fucking retarded (well close).
>this has nothing to do with islam
Fuck goat fucker

Democrats are running through this place like roaches right now, ugh.

Of course not all muslims are bad but if those innocent muslims doesnt step up and take matters to cleanse those bad fruits in their group then every people will generalize.

That's why the muslims in MIndanao here ASKED military help from dutdut to cleanse those fucks off the map.

Being rotten spreads so you have remove the virus inorder for it not spread further.

>our holiest month
>flag
opkankere

No Orcposting in a goatfucker thread.
I'll fix that.

The muslims that are killed are muslims that are not muslim enough. Allah has two enemies in the islamic texts, the unbeliever and the unfaithful. This is also why they do honor killings and someone who leaves islam is to be killed aswell.

Go check out also sites like religionofpeace.com that documents many more of the cases than the western media reports because it does not rely simply on western sources.

It's simply bogus to say that a muslim that kills another muslim doesn't represent islam, because that's done all the time and is in the qu'ran and sunnah and the sharia which stems from it, to do.

In sharia law BEING in islam and then LEAVING it OR NOT FOLLOWING IT CORRECTLY is actually WORSE than not being a muslim but not yet distanced yourself from islam. Because the infidel who hasn't distanced himself from islam and allah still has a chance to embrace islam.

TL;DR who isis and other terrorist organizations, when they kill muslims it is because they are murtad status for not following sharia law. They are essentially excommunicated from the faith/treated as if they have left islam by not following it and the punishment for that/leaving islam is death.

A few important things, notice that they never talk about the christians that are killed they always talk about the muslims and how it is bad for the muslims.

Here's why, and this might blow your mind but it's very accurate. In islam the only ones considered INNOCENT are the practicing muslims that adhere to sharia law. So when they say they don't condone the killing of innocent this is deciet to you the infidel, because what they mean is that they do not condone any ADHERENT MUSLIMS that were killed. They have not condemned christians or others that have been killed, because doing so would be disobeying allah that says to kill or convert or dhimmi them to islam and install sharia law in their nations

can you stop making these threads every single day?

>can you stop making these threads every single day?
It's called dawah and taqiyya/kitman/idtirar, he's a muslim so he's defending his faith/trying to make muslims look good even when they do bad things, as he is instructed to do. In other words good luck with that my friend.

ditto. kanker op, op

lekker voor je, kankermoslimus

oh but a few catholics priests rape children and some others carried out the inquisition and suddenly EVERY CATHOLIC IS A PEDOPHILE BARBARIC BASTARD right?

fuck off, the only good mudslime is the dead mudslime

It has everything to do with Islam.

(cont) This is also why when you ask them will you condemn the killing of these christians, or these buddhists, or these hindu, or these whatever.. They will always say.. "ofcourse we do not condone the killing of INNOCENTS, this is forbidden in islam to kill innocents" Notice they do not mention that particular group only innocent. And yes that is forbidden in islam to kill innocents, but innocents IS DEFINED AS ADHERENT MUSLIMS ONLY! And noone else, so whenever a muslim say innocent think automatically and know that they mean only adherent muslims, that is the only thing innocent means in islam, a non muslim is guilty for not following allah's law, and a murtad one who has left the faith, is guilty of abandoning it, both carry the death penalty if they denounce islam and refuse to be a dhimmi. The dhimmi thing only works if muslims run the empire/nation in which they ask this of you, otherwise the only thing that can get you out of it is converting to islam.

fuck off muzzie

The dead were Shia, one of the sects that the majority of muslims seem to love shitting on. Shia and other muslims aren't even safe in Europe from the majority, there are gang wars and murders here all the fucking time. Islamic extremism isn't just limited to terrorism, you're also guilty of racism, religious bigotry, industrial scale rape, political fraud to subvert our laws and demographics, and all of this falls under "moderate islam" so it makes you even worse. Islam needs banning from the West, no exceptions.

this

Yeah the sunni do not consider shia adherent muslims, and the shia do not consider the sunni adherent muslims. So take a wild guess why they are at eachothers throats..

But they are both muslims in most other aspects so don't kid yourself with believing that the shia somehow are your best friend. Shia have killed christians and others many times aswell.

middleeastmonitor.com/20170517-shia-cleric-iraq-christians-infidels-who-must-convert-or-be-killed/

What is he reciting, same thing i told you they use the same script.. convert to islam, pay jizya (be dhimmi) or be killed. So don't be fooled by them being shia muslims just because the sunni and shia are at eachothers throats, the shia are very much muslims in most other respects than their disagreement with the sunnis about who is "adherent muslim".

if muslims were good people, they wouldn't build mosques and return to their shitholes once they get's less shitty.
Proof is in the pudding!

ITT
>GO TO WAR GOYIM

The crusaders also slaughtered a bunch of christians, I guess that means the crusaders weren't christian nor they did represent christianity

kys

What rhymes with exemplar

They might not represent the majority of islam but they are representing about 20% of them.
We are talking about 300.000.000 people here.

Where do wahhabi fit in with Shia/Sunni?
I've been hearing about all three but can only find Sunni/Shia info.

>Niggers kill other niggers too, so why don't you want to live around niggers

But they're always killing each other, what's new?

>killing the kafir in the name of allah
>not holy

Dude the muslims wants to kill the jews too and as they say "drive them into the sea" (higher % of jew hatred in the qu'ran and sunnah than in mein kampf eventhough it's smaller in volume) but they want to kill us aswell. Yes the jews detest the christians especially the orthodox jews either but when was the last time you saw a jew beheading a christian?

tl;dr both the jews and the muslims dislike us, but the jews don't want to go into our streets or behead us or force us to live under sharia weither we convert to islam or become a dhimmi (non muslim living in a muslim nation with very limited rights and easily can do or say something bad that offends islam will cause their execution, even leading a muslim away from islam can end you up dead), and the jews don't want us to force all nations of the world to adopt judaism either. Tell me i'm wrong about this?

>GO TO WAR GOYIM
In case you've been living under a rock they're kind of coming to our countries.

Is this the OP by any chance, because that seems to be what usually happens whenever you start to talk about what islam actually teaches or its history and the muslim gets in trouble then it's deflected with "ah must be a jew then".

This is because they know that many jews don't like us and we don't like the jews all that super much either, but atleast don't want to mass murder them so they use that as a gambit in any discussions about islam which is a bit annoying.

Judaism is bad imo and the jews not liking christians very much etc. is not a good thing, but Islam is definately just as bad if not more. And presents a much greater problem because they're 1.4 billion practicing muslims on the planet and about what.. 15-20 million jews? So even if you say they are both threats, which one is the biggest threat?

The fact that muslims and other groups are constantly killing each other (blacks in USA for exemple) just proves how dangerous they are and proves that we should never allow them to live among us

Different islamic sects celebrate the start of ramadan differently, you bigot. Who are you to judge their culture?

Wahhabi are a Fundamentalist Sunni sect.

Saudi Arabia is a Wahhabi kingdom with strict sharia.

the Islamic State Caliphate use free Saudi textbooks in their schools, Saudi Arabia fund wahhabi Imams to spread their version of Sunni Islam to Europe.

also see:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petro-Islam

>Where do wahhabi fit in with Shia/Sunni?
Wahabi is sunni, salafist is sunni, isis is sunni salafist an extremely hardcore version of islam or according to them the truest islam that follows basically to the letter the qu'ran and sunnah and are therefore extremely militant. Sunni is the most widespread muslim or essentially the arab islam, they follow the qur'an and sunnah.

Shia is more focused in iran and spread out in various places and essentially is the persian version of islam after they were converted. They have a very different take on it.

They both consider eachother essentially non adherent muslims so they get very easy at eachothers throats because of what the punishment for that is in islam.

Because ISIS is the only reason, why I hate Islam.

Suicide bombers are just the tip of what's wrong with Islam.

That's not really true as the Quran actually has the holy war against non-belivers as the secondary or lesser Jihad. The Quran has the war on temptation as the true Jihad of all Muslims. From an idealogical stand point the use of Jihad had been dead for centuries and it was mysteriously brought up in the region of Afghanistan during the 80's and used to unite the disparate tribes of Afghanistan and push the Soviets out of there. Gee I wonder who could have reminded them about Jihads, especially as usually Islamic militants put out fatwas against people..........

Europeans fought on Christmas in ww1 and 2

And easter*

How dare you as a white judge whether or not a person is a Muslim or not, regardless of his motivation and attire?
You racist cunts should really stop assuming on other's behalf. If the man says he is a Muslim, then hell yeah I will agree he is a Muslim. A bomb in hand or not.

this makes me even more afraid of bringing muslims in, they slaughter each other by the bombloads, god forbid when they enter the territory of their eternal enemies

Aren't the retards in ISIS the ones who follow the Quran the closest?

>Context is everything
Ramadan is like the holiest month for Muslims, according to the Quran you're supposed to have ceasefires with other Muslims and stuff. They are breaking core tenants of Islam to attack people which according to their own doctrine condemns them to hell forever in death

That is how Isis sees it. This does put them in the category of people like the WBC who actively call for the downfall of the US at the hands of God...

Wives should obey their husbands and adultery should be punished. Don't cuck by criticising muslims for that.

BTW I'm not muslim - fuck mohammed.

this user would be lashed, no matter if it's the girl on the picture or a boy looking at girl pictures

>That's not really true as the Quran actually has the holy war against non-belivers as the secondary or lesser Jihad. The Quran has the war on temptation as the true Jihad of all Muslims.

Quote me it, this is more bullshit as is expected ofcourse. About jihad being struggle from within-

You want to know what jihad is? Here you go here is 288 narrations of muhammad telling you what jihad is and that it carries the highest reward in jannah and then he goes on to explain what it is, which is warfare against the unbeliever/fighting for the cause of allah which ofcourse includes instituting sharia law in all nations of the world by conquest/killing or by migration or conversion. Which is the ultimate goal of islam.

hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/85-/3853-sahih-bukhari-volume-004-book-052-hadith-number-041.html

This is from sahih bukhari the hadiths from the sunnah 2nd in authority next to only the qu'ran. So there's no question of if muslims consider it valid or not. Go read it. In it you also find justification for jihad via piracy via a dream muhammad had of his warriors sailing the sea, this is what lead to the muslim raiders/pirates aswell as the barbary pirate wars with the US.

Once you click through that, the argument that jihad is a struggle to be a better person extremely difficult to make! Unless you mean being a better person is fighting for the cause of allah that is.

>our holiest month
>Dutch flag

I want to die.

>BTW I'm not muslim
sure thing muhammed

...

There's a 100% chance that ISIS is saying the same about the "Muslims" they killed.

Well in fairness I never said that the "true" jihad wasn't a hastily put together excuse by their profit. I mean if you'd just conquered as much as he had would you not want to try and control them before they break the fuck down and either start murdering everyone or each other?

Also the hadiths are open to interpretation, frequently commented on and debated by Imams across the world. My Quran reading is a bit rusty as I've been reading the Tao te Ching recently. That shit is like a concrete octopus.

when this timer stops...

...

Saved.
It is indeed representative of the attitude of "moderates"

Turks kill Muslim Kurds, I guess no one in turkey is Muslim.

...

ISIS doesn't consider them to be muslim.
They would attack us as well at the sight of the first political cartoon about their political ideology, Islam.

>Well in fairness I never said that the "true" jihad wasn't a hastily put together excuse by their profit. I mean if you'd just conquered as much as he had would you not want to try and control them before they break the fuck down and either start murdering everyone or each other?

Islam and jihaad actually only REALLY took offf with regards to conquests after muhammads death and them following the marching orders they were given. So, that's not really a good explanation. And the ones who lead those conquests knew muhammad well so they weren't confused about what he wanted them to do.

>Also the hadiths are open to interpretation, frequently commented on and debated by Imams across the world.

They're really not if you read them there's not really much to interpret differently they are very straight forward. The only reason why it took so long for us to realize what they taught was that a muslim must learn arabic after converting. And they kept their texts in arabic which others didn't really understand that well.

Also this is from where they derive the sharia law, it's essentially taking all the laws and directions out of the qu'ran and sunnah and turning them into a lawbook. If you want a modern lawbook of the sunni persuasion try to get a hold of the book called "reliance of the traveller" which is made by al ahzar university essentially the gold standard in sunni islamic jurisprudence of deliberating these things over many many hundreds of years, made for muslims by muslims.

And if you look at their conclusions things like honor killing is justified, it also says how people who of sound mind chooses to leave the faith is to be put to death and various other things and cites the various passages to confirm that this is the case.

Understand also though that massive amounts of the muslim world is illiterate so they rely on the imams and sheikhs to tell them, so many of them don't even realize how bad islam is.. But you can read it.

Where do you think some of those weapons trump greenlighted for the Saudis are gonna end up?

< ISIS member confirmed
< IS ginger
< IS spastic

>there are no absolute rulings in islam
It's essentially what you're saying, the "it's open to interpretation" i'll brush off you as naive since you don't know how simplistic and forward it actually is to read. It doesn't contain many metaphors or symbolism or things like that which is probably what you expect if you think it's like the bible, it's not like that.

youtube.com/watch?v=JkAZUvQAzkc#t=1h0m45s "moderate" muslims tell you there are no absolute rulings in islam (trying to hide from you what the rulings are like when you find sharia law unpleasant for instance) wrong.. ofcourse there is.. Scholarly consensus) Adherent muslims know what they follow..
Reliance of the traveller b7.0-b7.2"When the four necessary integrals of consensus exist, the ruling agreed upon is an authoritative part of sacred law that is obligatory to obey and not lawful to disobey, Nor can mujtahids (expert islamic scholar) of a succeeding era make the thing an object of new ijtihad (different ruling), because the ruling on it, verified by scholarly consensus, is an absolute legal ruling which does not admit of being contravened or annulled."
youtube.com/watch?v=JkAZUvQAzkc#t=1h02m33s Apostacy in islam (riddah) Whoever voluntarily leaves islam is killed.. "when a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed. Book o8.0-o8.1 reliance of the traveller.
Among things that entail apostacy from islam... "To deny any verse of the qur'an or any-thing which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does not belong to it.... to deny the obligatory character of something which by the consensus of muslims is part of Islam"

Check out the full 5 hour brief aswell, it's quite good to start out with.

When you read the islamic texts It's very clear that muslims didn't expect to be in the situation where they are in now, as in one of military weakness.. Now they actually have to defend or explain away their doctrine as peaceful, it's clear from reading the doctrine that it's extremely militant and unrelenting, so they expected to conquer the entire world submit it to islam by installing sharia and that is that, allahs law now rules the entire earth and all mankind, they did not expect to have to sit in a position of weakness and have to explain to non muslims why it is they want to kill them or forcefully convert them if they would not do so willingly.

Never said that, that's your point that you then debated.
>Understand also though that massive amounts of the muslim world is illiterate so they rely on the imams and sheikhs to tell them
As part of being a muslim, you have to be able to recite the Quran and understand it. It's often attributed that the profit's "miracle" (as compared with the other Abrahamic miracles) was his for the time extreme elegance of poetry and debate. Islam has in general increased literacy when it's not been of an extremist persuasion. Look at the numbers on your keyboard. Without the Islamic Golden Age we wouldn't have the mathematics that govern how your PC works. Literacy is a core part of their faith, unlike Christianity. Judaism also have a strong connection with literacy in general again due to the wrote learning required to be considered a man in those cultures

>couple of dozen Christians gets beheaded every now and again by extremist groups funded by _ E _ S?
>entire culture subverted into absolute degeneracy and self destruction (drugs+std+chems)
Whatcha doing Chaim??

to be fair, what religion did see the modern age coming? The lack of adaptation is not the religion but the organising force behind it. Organised religion is in general pretty shit and frequently subverts or ignores core tenants of faith. Look at the Vatican for example, Christ never spoke of taking up space in what would become Italy, and yet here they are....taking up space and covering up for priests...

My homo friend posted this earlier today:

youtube.com/watch?v=EMGri1fYef8


faggots waking up?

If Islam is the religion of peace why aren't Islamic extremists extremely peaceful?

without islam there wouldn't be islamic extremism

>Why aren't Christian Extremest extremely peaceful
>Without Christianity there wouldn't be christian extremism

That really gets the brain going amirightlads?

Are you shitting me? The second Surah starts warning against hypocrites who aren't really true Muslims almost immediately. Inner paranoia being fundamental in Islam, why wouldn't Muslims kill Muslims?
>Sup Forums unBTFO

>Islamist extremists
>Nothing to do with Islam

How stupid are you?

>islamic extremists do not represent the majority of islam.

so why do nobel prize winners keep telling us that hating on muslims will make ISIS bigger?

Kanker een eind op

Ah so you ARE a muslim apologetic.. just be honest about it.
>Without the Islamic Golden Age we wouldn't have the mathematics that govern how your PC works. Literacy is a core part of their faith, unlike Christianity.
Ah is that why 40% of the muslim world is illiterate in their own language? This is utter nonsense and the illiteracy was even higher during the ottomans which is the more recent one.
>muslims invented algebra
gatesofvienna.net/2013/08/how-muslims-did-not-invent-algebra/
No actually what islam did was cause a stifling of science and technology because they developed a notion that there were no laws of nature and there was no cause and effect there was only whatever allah decided it was. This destroyed scientific research and innovation so the only thing that came out of the islamic world after that was whatever they could get their hands on by conquest and have some dhimmis translate or construct/engineer for them. When the conquests started to wane the islamic empire started to gradually collapse. This stifling of science and innovation and technology has lasted nearly a 1000 years. and is part of the reason the muslim world is in the state that it is in.

>couple of dozen Christians gets beheaded every now and again by extremist groups
Are you nuts south africa? they've killed 1336 and injured 946 people in 25 different countries just in the month of april. May was a slower month only 358 killed and 485 injured, Ramadan bombathon started slow but it's currently up to 227 dead on this day 5 of ramadan.

>couple of dozens of christians
Watcha doing south africa, seems like you need to actually try to research what's going on in the world.

nobody cares you cuck. should have bombed them harder.

>algebra
Never said that. I said they invented the numbers that govern how your PC works. The actual numbers.
Where are you pulling the illiteracy numbers from, I've been googling and I can't find the numbers you have produced, I would like to know for future reference

>muslim apologist
No. I am not interested in debating the merits of Islam or its followers, I can't deny what has happened both positive and negative, but what I can say is that if you blow people up in the na,e of God, you cease to be a follower of any faith that believes in God. Near enough the only thing that religions share is in one way or another "don't be dicks to each other" and they all pretty much fail. Christians have done some fucked up shit to people in the past, the Jews have fucked up Palestine, Islam has been fucked up before the current iteration of extremism that dominated the culture these days, Shinto in Japan helped murder Christians during the "closure" of Japan under the Shogunate, even some Buddhists have fucked up muslims and others under the guise of religion.

TL:DR

Fundamentally if you kill others in the name of faith you undermine your faith. I am no apologist for anyone

the west has destroyed their countries for the last four decades. no wonder they're pissed. stop using (((their))) talking points

Also to add to this islam has a wonderful concept called jahiliyah, Islam calls all history that came before Mohammed, jahiliyah, ignorance which is offensive to Allah. It is to be annihilated. let bill warner explain it to you briefly in 3 minutes youtube.com/watch?v=-t6xAseMITU&spfreload=10

They spent several days burning down a buddhist library and many other such instances, in this way islam destroyed in some cases up to 90% of the knowledge and history in the conquered areas they came across. and preserved only a few things in comparison to what they came across. MASSIVE amounts of knowledge and things were lost as they expanded their massive empire for that reason. What you seem to be quoting or parroting is islamic revisionistic history to make islam appear as if it was awesome and somehow through it all sorts of things were invented and preserved and we couldn't do without it. Nothing could be further from what actually happened, it was the opposite! They actively destroyed history, artifacts, buildings and knowledge in many many cases!
> Look at the Vatican for example, Christ never spoke of taking up space in what would become Italy, and yet here they are....taking up space and covering up for priests...
I don't think the biblical christ would be super duper happy about the vatican currently either, but compared to the islamic empires history they're a toddler in a sandbox breaking a plastic shovel now and again.

>according to the Quran you're supposed to have ceasefires with other Muslims and stuff
>"the people we blew up werent true muslims"

problem solved

>the west built infrastructure in desert countries
>oil money has created a billion dollar economy for tribal savages
yeah the West is just TERRIBLE

Again you seem to be talking about extremists here, and not the mainstream of Islam. The main denominations aren't too concerned about the parts of the faith that are short-sighted or xenophobic in the extreme. Also if you want to talk history, Christianity does have a longer history of fucking people way the fuck up, from the reconquista of Iberia, to the disasterous early crusades, or the time that they sacked the Byzantines. Christians have from the perspective you have painted muslims, more blood on their hands.

I never questioned their logic. I pointed out that ISIS is crazy for not following the rules of their faith.

Whats the bombadan scorecard at right now?
That's the real question. Why OP has this many responses and we haven't focused on this incredibly important matter is the problem.

>Invading Afghanistan was peaceful and resulted in no loss of life or community or infrastructure
>Invading Iraq was peaceful and resulted in no loss of life or community or infrastructure

Yeah we totally haven't fucked up the middle east in the last 50 or so years. Totally. Desert Storm? More like 2 Scoops.

>celebrating your holy days by committing murder

Do any other religions do this?

>they invented the numbers

No they did not you moron

>innocent muslims

>all islam is the same
wow you're right, sunnis killing shias and shias killing sunnis just means that the aggressor isn't real islam!

Islam isn't supposed to either. Isis changed the goal posts to mean that anyone that's not them, isn't a "real" muslim

>I can't find it by googling
Look i'm trying to make this extremely easy for you because i don't know how it's not possible for you NOT to find it, so let me give you a muslim news outlet that states it.
aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2017/04/case-gender-equality-muslim-world-170424095756513.html
>These challenges are particularly pronounced in the Muslim world, where approximately 65 percent of women are illiterate, compared to 40 percent of men.
Illiterate means not able to read and write. And the number was even higher during the caliphates, so i don't know where you at all get the information from that you think muslims are literate because they are muslims.. Many of them don't even know what their own texts say!

There's so many presumptions you have about islam and christianity that are completely wrong and it really sounds like it's anti western and anti christian propaganda and pro muslim propaganda that you've been reading just judging by what you've been telling me. But i hope you study these things more thoroughly in the future.

>Fundamentally if you kill others in the name of faith you undermine your faith.
Not in islam, if you kill someone in islam you confirm your faith. It's a war religion the only notion of peace in it is well what peace means in islam is when sharia law governs all nations and all people on the planet, then there becomes peace then allahs law rules the planet. There is a ceasefire called a hudna which is only to last for maximum of 10 years. And then they have to start fighting for the cause of allah again which is to install sharia law in a nation by migration/conversion and install sharia law or conquest and impose it. And kill people who refuse to become dhimmi or to convert to islam.