In which world would you rather live and why?

In which world would you rather live and why?

A:
>White ethnostate
>Conservative (Stabil nuclear family, no promiscuity, "old" gender roles etc.)
>No degeneracy (No porn, gay support)
>Very authoritarian (heavy propaganda, no freedom of speech/enterprise, state is everywhere controls most things)

B:
>90% white
>High standart of living
>Technologically advanced
>Freedom of speech/enterprise
>Decadence (promiscuity, weak nuclear family)

B
I wouldn't want to live in 1984 even if it was a degenerate free white ethnostate (this is an idiotic term to begin with, as all of Europe is the ancestral homelands of Whites therefore are White ethnostates)

A ofc.
A has the future of B.
B has the future of Yugoslavia.

A

B is basically America in the 1950's and we all know how that turned out.

theres a strong nuclear family involved, it wouldn't be as bad as 1984

Well it turned out good for the boomers

B is the only correct answer.

You can't claim there's "no degeneracy" under a totalitarian government as totalitarianism is itself degenerate.

Gay guy here. Obviously B. That sounds primo.

A
The more I live and the more people I meet the more I realise the majority of people lack own values and morality and are easily manipulable with propaganda. Freedom is a meme and being used by certain groups of (((people))) to their own profit.

B

A totalitarian government is not needed to purge degeneracy though.

A, since every EU country has
>heavy propaganda, no freedom of speech, state is everywhere controls most things

A very clearly

You're probably correct, but OP's scenario described a totalitarian government so I answered accordingly.

Likely A, because B would turn into present conditions.

A
>is that even a question

So would A. Read "The Fate of Empires".

A, I have a huge boner for authoritarian states

A

This right here

So did I. If I had to sacrifice my will for the common good I'd do it without hesitating. Besides, modern ""democracy"" is basically a totalitarian regime of those who own the media, banks and corporations, we are neither really free nor our own rulers.

A, of course

ah yes the "I redefine words at my convenience" argument good job mr leaf

Personally, B.

An Authoritarian state should not be the absolute endgoal of trying to fix things, it should be used to pull us out of our hole until things such as the Judea can be dealt with. Afterward you can still keep some strong policy but an absolute authoritarian state is impractical long term and breeds more subtle problems that won't be dealt with.

After all, i suspect that most of us here, especially those who wish for a happening, wouldn't manage quite as well or with as much fervor if there were no problems to solve.

B

A

Because B was 30 years ago, and look where we are now

>modern ""democracy"" is basically a totalitarian regime of those who own the media, banks and corporations

It doesn't have to be. Technology has allowed us to break free of those who control the (((media))) and ultimately it will probably advance to the point that it allows other forms of control to be subverted as well.

3d printing and bitcoin are examples of tech that reduces central control over people.

I choose B

B but both suck in one or two points.
I want this:
>White ethnostate or 90%
>Conservative (Stabil nuclear family, no promiscuity, "old" gender roles etc.)
>High standart of living
>Technologically advanced
>Freedom of speech/enterprise
>Not to much degeneracy meaning sadistic crazy shit and no push to pedo crap like some radical lefties try, gay,bi is obviously ok

B for obvious reasons. Mainly because a small amount of diversity helps prevent fascist chimpouts. As long as the degeneracy isn't peer-pressured to high hell, you still have a choice to live within that society and not be a degenerate yourself.

These are someone else's worlds.
I wish to make my own.
However enslaving wh*tes and ar*bs are a must.

The better question should be, if the two go up against each other. Who will win?

A

A

I grew up in A and then B happened. A was so much more comfy.

B
you will spit and vomit on everything after 3 years of life under totalitarian government

A, of course.
>B gets subverted by Marxist professors who indoctrinate the youth into hating themselves and not wanting to have children, under the guise of (((free speech)))
>weak nuclear family and brainwashed youth means low birth rates, resulting in kike "intellectuals" demanding open borders and immigration to keep the economic bubble inflated
B is the US and Western Europe post WWII.

>A has the future of B
Wouldn't that mean that this society also becomes, in the end, decadent?

Are we humans just not made for comfortable lives? Would we eventually all just regress back and forth, maybe even fall and become the ashes of which a new civilization rises because of abundance of food, security and possibilities in where we can generate dopamine?

Is there any other way? If so, which one?

I live in B but with the very authoritharian aspect already.
A can only be an improvement.

C:
>90% white
>Conservative (Stabil nuclear family, no promiscuity, "old" gender roles etc.)
>Technologically advanced
>Freedom of speech/enterprise

A
A
A
A
A
A

A

Seems like the best route to take

everyone picking B should be shot point blank

either metro 2033 society or a fallout 4 kind of world.
the goal would be to find the island in the sky: bioshock infinite.

That's not how world war 2 worked my friend

B. If your sense of identity is so frail that you let yourself be defined by notions like ethnicity and morality (distaste for "degeneracy" is basically a meme at this point) you are a deluded fool.
Flawed premise though.

>B is the US and Western Europe post WWII
Now that I think about it, it actually comes pretty close to what I thought, except that there was no rampant decadence and even stabil birthrates...

A would then probably portray nazi Germany in the case that they successfully dedtroyed the soviet union.

Some people don't do well under peaceful circumstances.

Since there is a strong nuclear family in A I think it is fair to assume there are elements of theocracy. If there are not I would only want that added into A. Even without give me A any day.

A.

Anyone who says B needs to lurk much more.

I unironically think that this is as close to an utopia as it could come.

>We are neither free nor our own rulers
I think that it's always a question of degree. A completely "free" society would basically be mean that we live like animals. Collective organisation and discipline is needed for a civilization to function. But the individual should also have certain rights.

If I choose A will I still have my Japanese animes?

Considering how weird they partially are, I'm afraid no.

Even that may be pushing the limits, but considered as done in parts it might be possible.

>>High standart of living

Yes its called the verdas

For me B
For future generations aka my sons, A.

A obviousely, degeneracies in the intimate sphere that you state in B leads to degeneracy of whole society

Decadence is the work of the choas gods,. Our God king emperor will smite degeneracy

We already had B in the 50s and it degenerated into this, so A.

B.

If the demographics are stable, I don't mind 10% of minorities, as long as they're not all muslims.

A
>live long healthy life
>have plenty of children
>see them grow up and have their own
>enjoy

B
>aids
>niggers
>genders
>???

LOL
that's not an hard choice to make

Truly a difficult question then.

So is being a parent the ultimate purpose of life?

for normies, yes.

The freer the market the freer the people

Most of Sup Forumslocks will lie to themselves they would want A, but are themselves deeply a product of a society that is vastly more like B. This very second they probably have Asian trap porn tabs open right next to this one.

choice is basically
>A Sovjet Union
>B America in it's glory days

easy choice, comrade

The soviet union hates families. A is more like Nazi Germany.

And I forgot to add that I think B more or less resembles America today. America in it's glory days is almost like the best of both options combined.

A I guess. I HATE authoritarianism but no degeneracy, white ethnostate, and conservative is just about worth it.

Tired of all the ass grabbing and debauchery. It's annihilating our society. So with that, it doesn't matter what form society takes. It's done.

A

C:
>OP is gay