Why isn't their a viable ideology that combines the nationalist aspects of Nazism with the Anti-State ideas of...

Why isn't their a viable ideology that combines the nationalist aspects of Nazism with the Anti-State ideas of classical liberalism?

This would be my preferred ideology.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=5DcA1TtaP_c
en.falundafa.org/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_military_brothels_in_World_War_II
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

how is that even possible

Implying there isn't

Hoppean Libertarianism?

Memes are best forced over on You best head there.
Thanks

Nationalism and Anti-Statism are oxymorons.

How isn't it? Not all libertarians are for the kike idea of completely open borders.

I think a lot of libertarians are offbase when they see the idea of the Nation the same way they see the State. The State and the Nation are two different things. So I'd disagree what libertarianism is incompatible with nationalism.

Americas founding fathers were pretty close to this ideology.

>Anti-State

Counter-State

>Nationalist
>Anti-State
These two concepts cannot coexist with each in any practical manner.

when you let civiliced men work thigns out under natural laws, you get exactly that

private ruling, nap, voluntary win/win co-op, scums out or ded, prosperity, safety, opportunities, traditionalism, bussiness and technological progress, lovely and respectful community

No. Pride in your home and people is not the same as a governing body of doom that lords over our every move.

It's called Paleo-libertarianism.

> Burger
> Doesn't know his own history

Rear Justin Raimondo's "Reclaiming the American Right". There's more to the American right than neoconservatism.

watch

and be amazed!

youtube.com/watch?v=5DcA1TtaP_c

Don't you start with this shit again pal!
See:

implying nationalism is only a statist thing in the first place

idiosyncrasy of the people of some place is unrelated to the state and could be understanded as nationalism

I don't believe in god and I still consider myself a christian nowadays

This is a hoot, lol

something something collectivism "common good" read Hayek

It's called American nationalism you shit. It's in American culture to want to be individualistic but there's also this feeling of superiority. The nazis failed, American nationalism won. Your thinking of the trap party which is a republican-libertarian hybrid

Also this is just nomenclature. Declaring yourself a neo-strasserist or coasian libertarian is just as bad as being a toadgender or spacequeer

>anarchism
Into the trash it goes. “All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.”

american culture is garbage

National (((Socialism))) is collectivist garbage. Combining nationalism with small government is what conservatism is supposed to be. Nationalist on defense and justice, libertarian on healthcare etc. The reason Sup Forums is made up of both natsoc and ancap is because both result in successful white societies.

coincidence of interests do happen in real life
common good is a hoax to hook up low iqs like you, retard

(((libertarianism)))

It's called minimal-corporatism/feodalism you uneducated moron

>common good is a hoax
yeah that's why collectivism is garbage libertarians aren't pushing that hoax afaik

>capitalism
>nationalism

> The Nazis failed, American nationalism won
You mean Soviet patriotism won?
Btw America doesn't even really have nationalism since there's no unifying force or core people who could homogeneously be considered a nation, if you consider yourself an American you can be patriotic, but not nationalistic.
There's nothing inherently wrong with collectivism. Hell, it's helping the Japanese and Chinese resist the SJW garbage and other cultural cancer.

NatSoc lolbertarianism can't exist. It's an oxymoron.

Because national socialism is authoritarian .

ok fine you're right

nat ancap

it's without the soc, isn't it implied?

private organizations are up to private trial and errors, nothing more nothing less

At the start, there is an Ad for the Northern Territory visible. Is this vid an aussie production?

Because national socialism and libertarianism are inherently incompatible with each other. National socialism requires a huge, overbearing state to indoctrinate and keep check on the general populace so they follow your preferred ideology. (i.e. secret police, laws out the ass and the national owning of ALL media outlets)

These are things that are OPPOSITE to what libertarianism is. The only reason why Nazi Germany came to be was because people were forced to live that way by the oppressive hand of the government.

The ends justifies the means doesn't it comrade

Yes, pretty much universally. That's what being a utilitarian/consequentialist is all about.

At it's core NatSoc is fascism which values the state above everything else.

To people who can't seem to understand, nationalism implies that you value your nation, its culture, ideas, etc. above other interest groups. As such, the nation needs to be above other entities like unions, businesses, etc. The nation is going to be physically manifested in the form of a corporation called a state/government with a bureaucracy and different functions. And since the nation is considered above or more important than other similar corporations or entities it's inherently authoritarian. It has to put business and corporate interests beneath itself and will have to pursue some policies which are in the interest of the nation and not individuals. This is perhaps the biggest reason nationalism is contradictory to libertarianism.

The state is the citizen's collective. That is, the pooled resources of private citizens. A libertarian should defend the citizen's collective with the same zeal as his own private property.

Open borders =! libertarianism as private property is essentially the exact opposite of open borders at a sovereign citizen level.

>why haven't anyone combined communism with the economic aspects of capitalism?

Fascism/NatSoc are the strong man
AnCap/Libertarianism is the good times
Commies/Liberals are the weak man
Communism/Economical Crisis/Cultural Suicide is the bad times

The Romans had this figured out long ago

Whenever people say "Ur a libertarian, why do you support the police"

This.

That excuse has been used throughout history to commit all kinds of savageries. People that believe the ends justifies the means are fundamentally immoral people.

>be doctor
>5 patients all need different organ transplant to live
>go find unsuspecting person and murder them
>harvest their organs and transplant them
>sacrificed 1 but saved 5
>ends justify the means :^)

Why can't you spell a simple word? It's there, not their.

Can a citizen opt out of the collective without being thrown in jail or shot?

>Anarcho-Totalitarianism
You AnCapshits seem hell bent to outstupid even the National Bolsheviks, aka the OxyMORONS. Keep it up.

Eat shit globalist.

American Nationalism is Libertarianism.

American Nationalism doesn't exist. Patriotism =/= Nationalism. America isn't a nation.

((((OP)))))

>nationalism
>personal choice
pick one
You can't have nationalism if everybody does whatever it wants, then you get degeneracy, which you now have. Enjoy your civic nationalism of cheating, interracial and pedophilia, because muh personal choice aka my body i do whatever i want, my money i do whatever i want, which normally translates into some sort of sexual degeneracy.

Libertarianism is not anarchism

That Swastika is facing the wrong way.

fag

...

Fuck off "melting pot" hippy.

American traditionalism is centered on liberty, there is no denying it.

doing that would sort of violate the NAP

Yes, because clearly socialism has worked out every other time it was tried?

Nice arguments bitchboy

... Yes?

Planned economy was the main problem

Do you know what a nation is or is defined as?
> a large aggregate of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory.
Due to its very nature and history there's pretty much nothing that ties all Americans together. Ireland is a nation, Britain/England is a nation, Denmark is a nation. America is not, it's a country, not a nation.

Family is also a form of Socialism, you agree to certain rules, to stay with your partner and take care of your children.

why would you take anything from the left

Uh huh, sure.

pic related is a world I'd live in.
Nat Soc fits Europe well because of the rich culture and history while Libertarian fits America more because it was founded upon principles of freedom.
One thing I disagree are the Africa colonies, we should just let them be. Nat Soc is about preserving and improving yourself and encouraging other races to do the same, not dominate them.

You guys really are a bunch of total retards. Laughing my arse off reading this fucking thread.

We're talking about economics not culture you dumb cunt.

America is all of that. Sure there's some niggers but they aren't the standard.

So socialism only works in extremely small groups.

I am stretching the definition of "works" here, we do have a 50% divorce rate after all.

Dude, wtf why would you punish Madagascar like that? What did they ever do to you?

>Nat Soc is about preserving and improving yourself and encouraging other races to do the same, not dominate them
It's about having pride in your race and the european race is above the negroids in Africa. They can't even create a society.

Fuck off Sharia blue

Family is as much economics as culture, as well as nationalism. If you want to go full capitalism with family then that would be gold-digging whores. If you want to go full Anarcho-Capitalism with family that would be cuck relationship where she digs for money and other cock, at this point she isn't even loyal any longer for money like gold-digging whore, she can do whatever she wants, so she accepts money from different partners and also whoring around for free.

But why not just leave them be tho?

Oh look! We're advocating for Buddhist-Anarcho-Capitalism, apparently.
Sage these retarded threads. OP is a moron.

The kind you see on TV, yes. But small town white America is beautiful.

Because it would be oxymoronic (that is to say, contradictory).

>guise i wanna be edgy like you, but i don't wanna feel like a traitor when i do it
The socialist ideals of uncle hitler don't mesh well with the ideals of the founding fathers.

Because one day the might fucking come over like they are doing now.

Socialism works very well when there is abundance.

Everywhere I have worked has had shared assets; when only a few people are working everyone will share no problem, but when a lot of people are working it become brutally competitive and people will cut corners or even hide things to ensure they get first access.

Socialism taught morality and physical exercise in school, without which you couldn't finish school. Capitalism teaches sexual education and how everybody is ok no matter the mental/physical illness, this teaches that everything can be sold to anybody.

So your just saying capitalism causes women to go slutty. People mostly date within their own classes and degeneracy in the western world came from cultural marxist jews not capitalist.

Anarcho-Facism is a thing last time I checked my memeballs. It's where it's a fascist society but everyone in it has agreed to live by that system and it's glorious leader and isn't being forced to and anyone who doesn't like it can fuck off to another community.

Actually you should do that just with prisoners who deserve it.

its called hoppean libertarianism.

absolutely dekiked and higher social and moral standards are only tolerated.

> I disagree are the Africa colonies, we should just let them be

the thing is, without international help / trades or exploitation, africa would probably be even worse than now, lots of countries there absolutly needs europe to survive

>Socialism works very well when there is abundance
And yet socialism is absolutely shit at producing that abundance.

And we're talking about real socialism here. The system as a whole. A workplace having shared assets isn't "socialism", it's just a capitalist company deciding to have shared assets.

Provide example of a socialist nation that has worked.

Socialism had no gays or prostitutes, while capitalism has plenty of it. What do you think prostitution is if not the most common capitalism there is, no moral obligation, no state obligation, no rules, just money for fuck, anybody goes. Prostitution is as pure ancap as it exists.

>Socialism taught morality and physical exercise in school, without which you couldn't finish school.
So now you're just stretching the definition of socialism to mean "everything that I like".

Falun gong
Principles are to be true, good and endure.
Believes races shouldn't mix and a virtuous nation is a strong nation.
Also says communism is evil.
en.falundafa.org/

There is: Nice Guy National Socialism

Healthy body in healthy mind is what Nazis & Partisans learned in school. This is not only for well-being of country, but also to lower the costs of public healthcare.

There are only 2 choices: NatSoc/Fascism or Zionism

Libcucks are controlled opposition ruled by Jews. Just another naive and facile ideology filled with cucks and good goys.

>Anti State Nationalism

Why not Libertarian Communism or Liberal Fascism?

>Healthy body in healthy mind is what Nazis & Partisans learned in school
Nazis weren't socialist you retard.

>i-it's okay if the germans do it, because they were based
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_military_brothels_in_World_War_II

You're talking about socialism as a social theory, it's not, United Arab Emirates has one of the most free markets in the world and bans homosexuality, prostitution and is technically a religious state.

What do you mean? Why should we ever fear them If they were left on their containment continent that does not naturally select them based on intelect? Take all niggers back to Africa and forget about them and eventually they would return to their tribes and mudhuts. All the 1% of high IQ blacks efforts would be for nothing... Or they would build dictatorships manipulating their retarded brothers. Still wouldn't be a threat for the other ethnostates