I fail to see how libertarianism is compatible with ethno-nationalism...

I fail to see how libertarianism is compatible with ethno-nationalism. Why try to take credit for the achievements of some imagined racial community when you can work towards improving yourself as an individual?

Other urls found in this thread:

jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html
riosmauricio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Hoppe_Democracy_The_God_That_Failed.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Because it isn't.

Libertarians can be at most Civic nationals ( which suck cock anyway ) but that's about it

>Why try to take credit for the achievements of some imagined racial community when you can work towards improving yourself as an individual?
Good

Move to an African country and be free as fuck.

>but I want what white Nationalism brings!
NO, you post-Commie jew. GTFO. You're disloyal.

lol @ a national SOCIALIST calling a libertarian a commie jew

>Civic nationals
No such thing.

Nation is derived from Nati = ethnos

You can't have a Nation without a collective ethnos and culture, or it tears itself apart.

And religion doesn't help or matter.

>lol @ a national SOCIALIST calling a libertarian a commie jew
Open boarders Jews who replace one side of the pyramid scheme for the other.

You're a plebeian and will die one.

I myself am not Civic national, I can't really debate you on this bud

>People are free to associate or discriminate against who ever they want but somehow White people won't segregate away from the niggers that constantly want to rob them.

It's not, but "the enemy of my enemy is my friend"

>when you can work towards improving yourself as an individual
You can't "work improving yourself as an individual" if you are beheaded by sharia mob.

this

people are free to be as discriminatory as much as they want

Open borders is an assault on private property. It's a very anti-libertarian notion that the state would forcibly integrate shitskins into our communities.

Read up nigger.

Explain civic nationalism please

>Capitalist fascism

>Open borders is an assault on private property. It's a very anti-libertarian notion
Not to Ron and Rand.

Libertarian Nationalism is like 5yrs old.

>Explain civic nationalism please
It's a meme that the (((Alt-Kike))) is using to destroy Sup Forums.

There is no such thing as a Nation without a people.

'taking credit for' needn't be part of ethnonationalism. This is all you need to be an ethnonationalist:

jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

And property owneres would consent to have whoever will work cheapest on their land working for them. And these people would naturalize and have a vote. And they would vote libertarians out of power and vote themselves welfare and probably socialize the property of those that brought them in for cheao labor.

Pure libertarianism is incompatible with democracy because it won't be tolerated in a democracy.

If only there were a way to prevent this... Oh yeah, borders.

We just need to wake up enough to meet interlopers with machine gun fire.

IMHO Greater Israel would be a good thing. We just need to disallow the refugees.

We need the will to follow international law to the letter where it facilitates this, and to disregard or change international law where it hinders closed borders.

Well, it depends. Civic nationalism could exist in places like America, but only with decent-tier races. I agree with your point for "motherlands" though, but most Americans are Euro-mutts anyway.

>>128320233

>vote
No.
>Pure libertarianism is incompatible with democracy
Yes

Any property owner that wants to continue to own property will protect their borders. Open borders is for literal retards, and as a state policy the goverment forces you to integrate nogs. thats not libertarianism, thats totalitarian globalist communism being put in place by the jews. Theres nothing anti-libertarian about protecting your propertry.

>Libertarian Nationalism is like 5yrs old.
No its not idiot. Paleolibertarianism has been around for 30 years, the ideas behind it have always existed, Ron Paul is one such paleolibertarian, even if he did pander to lefties during his campaign.

Libertarians, explain to me how Voluntary Taxation would work

It wouldn't. Instead, if you want services you have to pay for them.

>voluntary taxation
Taxation is compulsory by definition, so it is involuntary. "Voluntary taxation" has no meaning.

The only owners that will be able to protect their property would be state-sized owners. Then why should anyone fight for them? Also since we're in the midst of a fight there are no rules anyway.

Nah, I'll take democracy nationalism and a civil society. If there's to be fighting we'll do it as a collective. And If I can be called on to fight, then I demand borders be protected so that my value as labor is protected and the area around me isn't overun by communists from third world countries that don't share my values.

How can you "work yourself as individual" ignoring who are your partners?

A good criteria about your friends, co-worker and neighborhood is one of the most important step to improve yourself

The ethnic-moral criteria is based on familiar relations (genes + local inhabits) and are the less probable to raise conflicts. A libertarian community is only possible with morally strong education and low conflicts. This is well explained by legendary Hans-Hermann Hoppe in his "democracy":

riosmauricio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Hoppe_Democracy_The_God_That_Failed.pdf