URGENT QUESTION FOR BRITBONGS

Does Corbyn want full police state/monitored and controlled internet too or is it all May?

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/HOOKWORMS/status/871301061046304769
youtube.com/watch?v=VckCoZkCEu8
youtube.com/watch?v=ao2VlpxGFe4
youtube.com/watch?v=wPtSarBX4wk
unz.com/item/fake-jews-deceit-and-double-think-in-britains-hostile-elite/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Who exactly runs account related?
twitter.com/HOOKWORMS/status/871301061046304769

Corbyn does not want what theresa does.
Its run by a shitty bands manager i beleive.

youtube.com/watch?v=VckCoZkCEu8

May wants to stop terrorism and other such cunts.
Corbyn activity speaks about language policing and social justice. You can see what the SJWs have done in US and Canada ect.
Plus Corbyn would see stopping Islamists as racist

nice try proxyfag

Corbyn isn't a sellout to telecom like May is.

if May wins, say goodbye to Sup Forums in the UK.

>May wants to stop terrorism and other such cunts.

Why'd she fire all those cops and cover up Saudi terrorism funding, then? Maybe with those 20,000 cops you would've been able to be more pro-active about this shit.

Corbyn is definitely the better choice even though he's a total commie cuck. Jews don't like him as much.

its another "left-hard tries to downplay the severity by diluting the muslim issue" episode

This is all May, she is a complete authoritarian and many Brits on pol of are so cucked they happily vote for a fully controlled and regulated internet

I know Corbyn isn't exactly what we need right now but there is no way I will vote for May after this

>Maybe with those 20,000 cops you would've been able to be more pro-active about this shit.
*arrest more Twitter criminals

fucking hell

thats a band, one of their members follows me.

I have a bigger question

Why the FUCK are Brits so fucking gung ho about trying to turn themselves into a real life airstrip one?

holy cuck xD

May is a terrible conservative leader.

who /crazy4corbyn/ here

Corbyn has voted against the expansion of surveillance powers consistently in the decades he's been an MP

Ukip or bust. Honestly no other choice.

COrbyn just wants to ignore the problem. I do support his anti-interventionist stance though, but its all smoke and mirrors.

I love how Sup Forums being the hivemind it is, is now supporting a communist and rationalizing the descision because a typical neocon wants more power. I mean, they are both fucked choices but lets now excuse the commie amirite? Same disgusting shit as the Trumptards excusing Donald for sitting in his fat ass and doing sweet fuck all.

But at the same time you'd have everyone ignoring boomer attempt to shut down the internet number #42131 for the sake of not voting for the left.

>Donald is sitting in his fat ass and doing sweet fuck all.
It appears you're from an alternate dimension son

be a peach
bin free speech

Labor shills have been targeting this board for a couple of weeks.
The UK election is a bit fucked, neither candidate is going to give them immediate good times so this is a strategic vote, the low IQ part of Britain is going to struggle with it.
It's really quite simple.
The net legislation is shit and will do nothing to fight terrorism but Corbyn's PC shit is worse.
If he is beaten Labor moves to the right or is destroyed. You have a golden opportunity right now to move UK politics to the right by crushing Corbyn.
If UK politics DOES move to the right then at least NEXT time you might get what you want.
No voting for UKIP either, even though they are the best party.
CRUSH CORBYN GET RID OF PC BULLSHIT.

Labour have always been as bad. Look back at their history, biometric ID cards imposed. Were the details were kept on an unencrypted database. IMP, surveillance silos and more. Labour of fiscally socialist, other wise not so much. Corbyn is already on record as stating end-to-end encryption is a problem and that companies need to do far more to allow government agencies to read everything. Either way we are fucked.

I don't see the problem with anti-terrorist internet control, just don't be too cheeky on twitter and there's a very low chance that you'll be the one arrested.

>I don't see the problem with anti-terrorist internet control, just don't be too cheeky on twitter and there's a very low chance that you'll be the one arrested.

>Someone from the soviet bloc being ok with state control.

Its like you want to be fucked up the ass.......

I said they are both fucked. But since mummy pissed of the internet people, it's full-swing left from here and we'll apologize for the commie. It's the rationalization that pisses me off, not the drop in support.

Do you want more knife attacks being coordinated on the dark web? Would you accept it even if your daughter was the one stabbed? How is this going to hurt you, unless you're interested making hurtful comments against protected groups and radicalizing them and yourself?

>muh PC
Story related is what May supporters are voting for: youtube.com/watch?v=ao2VlpxGFe4

the english were a mistake

Yes. The West needs sacrifices and those woken to the perps have sense not to live near them. Nothing short of a massive string of terrorist attacks, a really big one or a great depression where people are literally starving is going to change the course of events.

Well then, thank G-d that May will get rid of the likes of you polluting our cyberspace.

Nothing of value was lost.

What May wants won't even stop the dark web moron. And durkas co-ordinate their shit in person anyway, or they act alone and don't need to.
Croatia was mistake.

Why would muzzies need cyberspace when they have countless Mosque safespaces, faggot?

Sorry, censoring speech on the internet is a slippery slope. Anyone who calls for internet censorship is a snake in the grass.

>durkas co-ordinate their shit in person anyway
they dont. they use open source software and encryption.
telegram is highly popular among terrorists.

He only wants to gas white people, don't worry about it.

You seem to know a bit too much about terrorism...

Radical mosques are already under 24/7 surveillance.

Hate speech is not free speech.

Besides, don't you people want to be like Poland? Ask someone with a Polish flag about their surveillance laws, ID/passport laws, CCTV coverage, hate speech laws, and so on. It's a lot more developed than in the UK, and look how great their country is.

Hey, I read an article about Swedish milfs addopting refugee "children" and fucking them. If I floated to Sweden on a tyre, got a tan, said I was a child and grew a beard, would I be eligible for a Nordic milf of my own?

URGENT QUESTION FOR CORBYN/MAY SHILLS

WE HAD A FUCKING GREAT DAY WITHOUT YOU YESTERDAY

FUCK YOU, I'M VOTING FOR NEITHER

>Radical mosques
All of England is under surveilance. The dude who blew up preteen sluts in training and roasties at that concert was under surveilance. Just for posting here, we are under surveilance. Big fucking woop.

I'm watching it but seeing as it's over an hour long this thread will probably slide before I can respond.

May is focusing on islam. Corbyn and the loony left will leave Islam alone, and come for the right online, as they see white far right as the real problem, not Islamic terror.

You think Dianne Abbott as home secretary will leave you alone?

Vote Ukip.

of course

>Does Corbyn want full police state/monitored and controlled internet too or is it all May?

Corbyn is for an open free internet, without government surrveilance.

If by milfs you mean 60 year old gray haired dried up cat ladies, then yes.

I think it would be detrimental for May to ban Sup Forums. Think of all the May apologists she would be stopping from making their shitty mummy memes. She would also have a lot of bored white nationalists about, which isn't a good idea either.

>England tries to shut down Sup Forums
>it's an American website

It's almost Freudian in nature. They are seeking a strong motherly figure. Fags

Sweet. Do I also get state sponsered loli concubine visits at my refo centre?

i think trump would if we leaned on him a bit lol i hope we dont though.

*Apart from hate speech and Islamophobic sites which government retain the rights to shut down in the name of tolerance.

Between those two its just May but its something that seems to happen to every home secretary regardless of party affiliation. Something they see there makes them massively authoritarian its weird.

I reckon the intelligence agencies foil a whole lot of shit we never hear about and it scares the shit out of the home secretary, either that or they exaggerate the threat to get more funding.

Bullshit Corbyn is just as bad as May.. Fuck off Labour shill.

You can always increase the speed

Thanks m9, this is what I was looking for

Well so far he said the punishment he got that was the worst was a result of a law introduced by Labor. I've not seen anything in this so far which is more likely to be introduced by the conservatives than Labor.

HAHAHA they are scared of our influence.

jesus, just think about that.

Fck this Brit cunt... She'll turn Britain into "V for Vendetta"

That would be so much fun

This is a joke right?

Please tell me this is a parody account?


>twitter.com/HOOKWORMS/status/871301061046304769


The fucking hell, I don't even remember the last wild white male attack in the UK.

Only one I can remember is Jo Cox last year

Well, most spectrums of science agree that hate speech and climate change are the driving forces behind radicalism.

>Jo Cox


Still political assassinations are not something that just sprung up overnight and caused by the internet. It is pretty simple people will try to kill you if you are a in the public lime light regardless. The problem is security. If you take down the internet completely and don't improve security then you are wasting resources.

someone has been VERY naughty. VERY VERY naughty.

youtube.com/watch?v=wPtSarBX4wk

>who is Tony Blair

its not about stopping terrorists- the idea is preposterous. its about controlling information.

No one wants that more then the Jews.


unz.com/item/fake-jews-deceit-and-double-think-in-britains-hostile-elite/

Except with rampant degeneracy and tons of mudshits flooding the country.

So nothing like V for Vendetta.

Fuck Hillary I mean Theressa.

The best vote is to not vote at all, they are both terrible so all we can do is show that with incredibly low voter turnout.

Seems May is not interested in just fucking over the UK, but everyone.

Corbyn doesn't

She has police state bullshit in her manifesto. >Huurdur the police have no officers because we took all their money, lets blame the internet and cuck it.
>YAY lets vote for her because she lies constantly about immigration, which in 7+ years she did fuck all about.
>MUH VPN GOT BANNED?!

Corbyn has one of the top UK lawyers ready to negotiate Brexit, May has the clowns Boris dickface and david davis.

Corbyn has fought and voted against europe throughout his career. He is and has been pro leaving. He tried to compromise during the referendum to please blairites who betrayed him anyway. Now he is unrestrained.

He wants Brexit to enable us to re-organise UK finances from the top down.

Corbyn is pro assad(in a non intervention way), anti israel, and hates the global financial ((((system)))))

He will change tax laws and force corporations to pay up. They will not leave, they never do, it's a crappy fallacy.

He's not lying about immigration, but will do it in a sensible way.

He's a socialist but a very red pilled one in all other ways.

He has integrity and doesn't bullshit, even when he looks like a dick because of it. It's refreshing.

The cherry on the cake of him winning will be seeing the Sun/Daily Mail/Metro/Times, and tv news all sperging out, spewing salt in delicious quantities.

>May wants to stop terrorism and other such cunts.

Does anyone actually believe this? She's just using this as an excuse to push her batshit policies.

She lies constantly, it's the same shit Tories say every election, and never enact. Yet every time people fall for it. To be fair most of their voters are old and getting senile.

Her proposed changes to the internet will do nothing, they will just give the gov greater control to ban dissent. Sup Forums's days will be numbered in the UK if May wins.
Good luck when VPNs get banned if they win.
The police need more officers, it's that simple. Corbyn will give them 20,000 more.

Corbyn will look at the situation and base his decisions on facts, and not to please the daily mail and sun. For that reason alone he's infinitely better.

>all these Corbyn shills

Only idiots believe it, May has always hated the idea of a free Internet, free from government. She is a control freak who wants the dictate what you should be able to see. Corbyn is no better despite the flood of Labour shills. Not just on this board but fucking everywhere at the moment.

>For that reason alone he's infinitely better.

Like when he refused to vote against Mays Snoopers Charter, even when Labours back-benchers where horrified at the whole thing, and industry said it was fucking dumb.
This Corbyn Labour shilling is getting fucking nauseating.

>Apples and oranges.

She has it in her fucking manifesto. It's a promise, not a possibility. At the very least voting for Corbyn will stop May getting a big majority, to do whatever she likes.
Voting ukip or anyone else is entirely pointless and if you support May you're a fucking cuck.

Huh. A genuine Corbyn shill. Labour's scraping the bottom of the barrel if this is where they look for votes.

She will find corbyn's porn folder

I will be voting for neither, this will be the first time that I do not vote at all. As while I hate May having Abbot anywhere near power is just as horrifying.

>muh right wing

The UK Tory part are big government corporatists. If Tories get smash hopefully UKIP take their place.

I just feel quite passionately that he is the far better choice. I wouldn't take money if I were offered it, for stating my opinions.
She'll be somewhere in the cabinet, possibly. Corbyn has had to make lemonade with a real lemon here. She's a price worth paying for a fresh start in government frankly.

Corbyn is pretty based. Hes rational about things like this, and understands terrorism far better than most.

I dont know why the fuck Diane Abbot is shadow home secretary though, its seriously fucked. I can only hope its some 4d chess game so he can get rid of her, but I doubt it.

Any Brit worth his salt will already have TOR installed for this reason, Mummy May can't touch us

Germany will agree with her.
Our goverment looked for a reason for years already to be able to spy on everyone on the internet.

>Mummy May can't touch us.
Yes she can, you are not beyond GCHQ , and it will end up being illegal in itself anyway, to "help" the regular police.

Politicians aren't your friend.

Tor has been iffy for a while now, and limited. There has been talk of them banning use of VPN, but they can't as too many industries depend on them. So what they will do is make a vague clause in the law stating that using anonymous methods to circumvent agencies could be illegal. I think I'd go off-shore VPS install my own VPN. I don't do anything apart from come here and look at weebshit. But I like my privacy.

It's just rediculous to vote for less freedom on the internet, in exchange for the same anti immigration and anti EU soundbites they shout every election, from very disingenuous politicians.